{"paper":{"title":"Response to 'Comment on \"Time delays in molecular photoionization\"': Extended Discussion & Technical Notes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.atom-ph","quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"physics.chem-ph","authors_text":"Eugene Frumker, Paul Hockett","submitted_at":"2016-12-01T21:39:19Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a comment on our article Time delays in molecular photoionization [1], Baykusheva & W\\\"orner reproduce canonical scattering theory, and assert that our results are inconsistent with this well-established theory [2]. We absolutely refute this assertion and the spirit of the comment, although we do agree with Baykusheva & W\\\"orner that the textbook theory is correct. In a short response, Response to Comment on \"Time delays in molecular photoionization\" [3], we have already provided a clear rebuttal of the comment, but gave no technical details. In this fuller response we extend those brief co"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1612.00481","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"}