pith. sign in

arxiv: 2308.08615 · v4 · submitted 2023-08-16 · ⚛️ physics.comp-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-lat

Improvement of Heatbath Algorithm in LFT using Generative models

Ali Faraz , Ankur Singha , Dipankar Chakrabarti , Shinichi Nakajima , Vipul Arora This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 07:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.comp-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechhep-lat
keywords Heatbath algorithmgenerative modelslattice field theoryphi4 modelXY modelMonte Carlo samplingconditional distributionproposal generation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Generative models learn conditional local distributions to generate improved proposals for the Heatbath algorithm in phi4 and XY models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes using generative AI models to create proposals for each lattice site in the Heatbath algorithm applied to phi4 and XY models. These models learn a conditional distribution based on neighboring sites and action parameters, without needing samples from the target distribution. This addresses the challenge of low acceptance rates in rejection-based sampling for continuous variables. If successful, it offers a direct way to enhance sampling efficiency in lattice field theory simulations.

Core claim

The authors claim that generative models can learn to sample from conditional local distributions conditioned on neighboring sites and action parameter values, providing effective proposals that improve the Heatbath algorithm for the phi4 and XY models without requiring training samples from the target distribution.

What carries the argument

Generative models trained to approximate conditional local distributions for proposal generation at each site.

If this is right

  • Improved acceptance rates compared to standard Heatbath proposals for continuous field variables.
  • Efficient sampling without exact local density sampling.
  • Straightforward application to phi4 and XY models in lattice field theory.
  • Potential for use in other models with similar local update structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method might extend to more complex lattice theories if the local conditioning captures enough information.
  • Reduced computational cost in Monte Carlo simulations due to fewer rejections.
  • Could be combined with global update methods for further gains.

Load-bearing premise

Generative models can be trained to closely approximate the true conditional distributions using only neighbor and parameter information, resulting in meaningfully better proposals than conventional choices.

What would settle it

Numerical experiments showing that the acceptance rate with generative proposals is no higher than with standard proposals in the phi4 or XY model would falsify the improvement claim.

read the original abstract

The Heatbath Algorithm is commonly used for sampling in local lattice field theories, but performing exact updates or sampling from the local density is challenging when dealing with continuous variables. Heatbath methods rely on rejection-based sampling at each site, which can suffer from low acceptance rates if the proposal distribution is not optimally chosen a nontrivial task. In this work, we propose a novel, straightforward approach for generating proposals at each lattice site for the phi4 and XY models using generative AI models. This method learns a conditional local distribution, without requiring training samples from the target, conditioned on both neighboring sites and action parameter values.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a novel approach to improve the Heatbath algorithm for lattice field theories by using generative AI models to generate site proposals for the phi^4 and XY models. The method is described as learning a conditional local distribution conditioned on neighboring sites and action parameters, without requiring training samples from the target equilibrium distribution.

Significance. If the central claim were substantiated, the work could offer a data-free way to approximate exact local conditionals in continuous-variable LFT models, potentially raising acceptance rates above standard rejection or quadrature methods already used in Heatbath updates. The absence of any supporting equations, loss functions, or numerical benchmarks renders the significance speculative.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that generative models can be trained to approximate the exact univariate conditional p(φ_i | neighbors, β) without target samples is stated but unsupported by any loss function, architecture, or training procedure; for these models the exact conditional is a univariate integral that can be evaluated to arbitrary precision, so any approximation error directly lowers the Metropolis acceptance rate.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no acceptance-rate comparisons, training details, error analysis, or lattice-size results are supplied to demonstrate improvement over existing Heatbath rejection sampling for phi^4 or XY models, leaving the performance claim unverified.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the method 'learns a conditional local distribution... without requiring training samples from the target' is not accompanied by a description of the surrogate data or objective used, which is load-bearing because the exact conditional is known analytically for these actions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and the opportunity to respond. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the method.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that generative models can be trained to approximate the exact univariate conditional p(φ_i | neighbors, β) without target samples is stated but unsupported by any loss function, architecture, or training procedure; for these models the exact conditional is a univariate integral that can be evaluated to arbitrary precision, so any approximation error directly lowers the Metropolis acceptance rate.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the abstract provides no explicit loss function, architecture details, or training procedure. The manuscript describes the conceptual use of a generative model to learn the local conditional but does not supply the supporting equations or implementation specifics. We will revise to include the loss function (a standard generative modeling objective), the network architecture, and the training procedure on surrogate data drawn from the local action with fixed neighbors. We also acknowledge that approximation error reduces acceptance probability relative to exact integration and will add a discussion of this trade-off in the revision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no acceptance-rate comparisons, training details, error analysis, or lattice-size results are supplied to demonstrate improvement over existing Heatbath rejection sampling for phi^4 or XY models, leaving the performance claim unverified.

    Authors: The current manuscript presents the approach as a methodological proposal without numerical benchmarks. We agree that acceptance-rate comparisons, training details, error analysis, and lattice-size results are required to substantiate any performance improvement and will incorporate these elements in the revised version. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the method 'learns a conditional local distribution... without requiring training samples from the target' is not accompanied by a description of the surrogate data or objective used, which is load-bearing because the exact conditional is known analytically for these actions.

    Authors: We will revise the manuscript to explicitly describe the surrogate data generation process (sampling from the local action at fixed neighbor values and varying action parameters) and the training objective used to match the conditional distribution without reference to global equilibrium samples. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal uses external generative modeling on known action

full rationale

The manuscript proposes training generative models on the known local action form to produce proposals for Heatbath updates in phi4 and XY models, without target equilibrium samples. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citations, or ansatzes are shown that would make any claimed acceptance-rate gain equivalent to its inputs by construction. The method is presented as a forward application of standard conditional generative techniques, leaving the empirical verification of approximation quality as an independent question rather than a definitional reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in the abstract; the method relies on standard generative modeling assumptions not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5647 in / 1166 out tokens · 34047 ms · 2026-05-24T07:40:37.469200+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scalable Generative Sampling and Multilevel Estimation for Lattice Field Theories Near Criticality

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A hierarchical generative model for critical lattice scalar field theories achieves orders-of-magnitude lower autocorrelation times than HMC while enabling exact multilevel Monte Carlo.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Swendsen, R.H., Wang, J.-S.: Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86–88 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.58.86

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    Wolff, U.: Comparison between cluster Monte Carlo algorithms in the ising model. Phys. Lett. B 228(3), 379–382 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.105. 015313

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.105 1989

  3. [3]

    Wolff, U.: Critical slowing down. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl 17, 93–102 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-I

    work page doi:10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-i 1990

  4. [4]

    Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo 2(11), 2 (2011)

    Neal, R.M., et al.: Mcmc using hamiltonian dynamics. Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo 2(11), 2 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Rezende, D.J., Mohamed, S.: Variational inference with normalizing flows (2016) arXiv:1505.05770 [stat.ML] 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models (2020) arXiv:2006.11239 [cs.LG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Albergo, M.S., Kanwar, G., Racani` ere, S., Rezende, D.J., Urban, J.M., Boyda, D., Cranmer, K., Hackett, D.C., Shanahan, P.E.: Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories. Phys. Rev. D 104(11), 114507 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.104.114507 arXiv:2106.05934 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Albergo, M.S., Boyda, D., Cranmer, K., Hackett, D.C., Kanwar, G., Racani` ere, S., Rezende, D.J., Romero-L´ opez, F., Shanahan, P.E., Urban, J.M.: Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality. Phys. Rev. D 106(1), 014514 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514 arXiv:2202.11712 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.014514 2022

  9. [9]

    Hackett, D.C., Hsieh, C.-C., Albergo, M.S., Boyda, D., Chen, J.-W., Chen, K.-F., Cranmer, K., Kanwar, G., Shanahan, P.E.: Flow-based sampling for multimodal distributions in lattice field theory (2021) arXiv:2107.00734 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Nicoli, K.A., Anders, C.J., Funcke, L., Hartung, T., Jansen, K., Kessel, P., Nakajima, S., Stornati, P.: Estimation of thermodynamic observables in lattice field theories with deep generative models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 032001 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001 arXiv:2007.07115 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.032001 2021

  11. [11]

    Caselle, M., Cellini, E., Nada, A.: Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows (2023) arXiv:2307.01107 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Singha, A., Chakrabarti, D., Arora, V.: Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory. Phys. Rev. D 107(1), 014512 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512 arXiv:2207.00980 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.014512 2023

  13. [13]

    SciPost Phys

    Singha, A., Chakrabarti, D., Arora, V.: Generative learning for the problem of critical slowing down in lattice Gross-Neveu model. SciPost Phys. Core 5, 052 (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.4.052 arXiv:2111.00574 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.5.4.052 2022

  14. [14]

    Pawlowski, J.M., Urban, J.M.: Reducing autocorrelation times in lattice simula- tions with generative adversarial networks. Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech 1(4), 045011 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/abae73 arXiv:1811.03533 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73 2020

  15. [15]

    Kanwar, G., Albergo, M.S., Boyda, D., Cranmer, K., Hackett, D.C., Racani` ere, S., Rezende, D.J., Shanahan, P.E.: Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(12), 121601 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.125.121601 arXiv:2003.06413 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Eichhorn, T., Fuwa, G., Hoelbling, C., Varnhorst, L.: Parallel Tempered Meta- dynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling (2023) 10 arXiv:2307.04742 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    : Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions

    Abbott, R., et al. : Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions. Phys. Rev. D 106(7), 074506 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506 arXiv:2207.08945 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.074506 2022

  18. [18]

    PoS LA TTICE2022, 036 (2023) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0036 arXiv:2208.03832 [hep-lat]

    Abbott, R., et al.: Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models. PoS LA TTICE2022, 036 (2023) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0036 arXiv:2208.03832 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.430.0036 2023

  19. [19]

    Abbott, R., et al.: Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space- time dimension (2023) arXiv:2305.02402 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    JHEP 2024(5), 060 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ jhep05(2024)060 arXiv:2309.17082 [hep-lat]

    Wang, L., Aarts, G., Zhou, K.: Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory. JHEP 2024(5), 060 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ jhep05(2024)060 arXiv:2309.17082 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Singha, A., Chakrabarti, D., Arora, V.: Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model. Phys. Rev. D 108(7), 074518 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074518 arXiv:2306.00581 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.074518 2023

  22. [22]

    PoS LA TTICE2023, 022 (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Finkenrath, J.: Fine grinding localized updates via gauge equivariant flows in the 2D Schwinger model. PoS LA TTICE2023, 022 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 22323/1.453.0022 arXiv:2402.12176 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Zhu, Q., Aarts, G., Wang, W., Zhou, K., Wang, L.: Diffusion models for lattice gauge field simulations (2024) arXiv:2410.19602 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    PoS LA TTICE2024, 027 (2025) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.466.0027 arXiv:2412.19109 [hep-lat]

    Caselle, M., Cellini, E., Nada, A.: Stochastic normalizing flows for Effective String Theory. PoS LA TTICE2024, 027 (2025) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.466.0027 arXiv:2412.19109 [hep-lat]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.466.0027 2025

  25. [25]

    Albergo, M.S., Vanden-Eijnden, E.: NETS: A Non-Equilibrium Transport Sam- pler (2024) arXiv:2410.02711 [cs.LG]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Creutz, M.: Monte Carlo study of quantized su(2) gauge theory. Phys. Rev. D 21, 2308–2315 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.2308 1980

  27. [27]

    Kennedy, A.D., Pendleton, B.J.: Improved heatbath method for Monte Carlo calculations in lattice gauge theories. Phys. Lett. B 156(5), 393–399 (1985) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6 11

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6 1985