pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.22234 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Improved measurements of the TeV-PeV extragalactic neutrino spectrum from joint analyses of IceCube tracks and cascades

R. Abbasi , M. Ackermann , J. Adams , S. K. Agarwalla , J. A. Aguilar , M. Ahlers , J.M. Alameddine , S. Ali
show 419 more authors
N. M. Amin K. Andeen C. Arg\"uelles Y. Ashida S. Athanasiadou S. N. Axani R. Babu X. Bai J. Baines-Holmes A. Balagopal V. S. W. Barwick S. Bash V. Basu R. Bay J. J. Beatty J. Becker Tjus P. Behrens J. Beise C. Bellenghi B. Benkel S. BenZvi D. Berley E. Bernardini D. Z. Besson E. Blaufuss L. Bloom S. Blot I. Bodo F. Bontempo J. Y. Book Motzkin C. Boscolo Meneguolo S. B\"oser O. Botner J. B\"ottcher J. Braun B. Brinson Z. Brisson-Tsavoussis R. T. Burley D. Butterfield M. A. Campana K. Carloni J. Carpio S. Chattopadhyay N. Chau Z. Chen D. Chirkin S. Choi B. A. Clark A. Coleman P. Coleman G. H. Collin D. A. Coloma Borja A. Connolly J. M. Conrad R. Corley D. F. Cowen C. De Clercq J. J. DeLaunay D. Delgado T. Delmeulle S. Deng P. Desiati K. D. de Vries G. de Wasseige T. DeYoung J. C. D\'iaz-V\'elez S. DiKerby M. Dittmer A. Domi L. Draper L. Dueser D. Durnford K. Dutta M. A. DuVernois T. Ehrhardt L. Eidenschink A. Eimer P. Eller E. Ellinger D. Els\"asser R. Engel H. Erpenbeck W. Esmail S. Eulig J. Evans P. A. Evenson K. L. Fan K. Fang K. Farrag A. R. Fazely A. Fedynitch N. Feigl C. Finley L. Fischer D. Fox A. Franckowiak S. Fukami P. F\"urst J. Gallagher E. Ganster A. Garcia M. Garcia G. Garg E. Genton L. Gerhardt A. Ghadimi C. Glaser T. Gl\"usenkamp J. G. Gonzalez S. Goswami A. Granados D. Grant S. J. Gray S. Griffin S. Griswold K. M. Groth D. Guevel C. G\"unther P. Gutjahr C. Ha C. Haack A. Hallgren L. Halve F. Halzen L. Hamacher M. Ha Minh M. Handt K. Hanson J. Hardin A. A. Harnisch P. Hatch A. Haungs J. H\"au{\ss}ler K. Helbing J. Hellrung B. Henke L. Hennig F. Henningsen L. Heuermann R. Hewett N. Heyer S. Hickford A. Hidvegi C. Hill G. C. Hill R. Hmaid K. D. Hoffman D. Hooper S. Hori K. Hoshina M. Hostert W. Hou T. Huber K. Hultqvist K. Hymon A. Ishihara W. Iwakiri M. Jacquart S. Jain O. Janik M. Jansson M. Jeong M. Jin N. Kamp D. Kang W. Kang X. Kang A. Kappes L. Kardum T. Karg M. Karl A. Karle A. Katil M. Kauer J. L. Kelley M. Khanal A. Khatee Zathul A. Kheirandish H. Kimku J. Kiryluk C. Klein S. R. Klein Y. Kobayashi A. Kochocki R. Koirala H. Kolanoski T. Kontrimas L. K\"opke C. Kopper D. J. Koskinen P. Koundal M. Kowalski T. Kozynets N. Krieger J. Krishnamoorthi T. Krishnan K. Kruiswijk E. Krupczak A. Kumar E. Kun N. Kurahashi N. Lad C. Lagunas Gualda L. Lallement Arnaud M. Lamoureux M. J. Larson F. Lauber J. P. Lazar K. Leonard DeHolton A. Leszczy\'nska J. Liao C. Lin Y. T. Liu M. Liubarska C. Love L. Lu F. Lucarelli W. Luszczak Y. Lyu J. Madsen E. Magnus Y. Makino E. Manao S. Mancina A. Mand I. C. Mari\c{s} S. Marka Z. Marka L. Marten I. Martinez-Soler R. Maruyama J. Mauro F. Mayhew F. McNally J. V. Mead K. Meagher S. Mechbal A. Medina M. Meier Y. Merckx L. Merten J. Mitchell L. Molchany T. Montaruli R. W. Moore Y. Morii A. Mosbrugger M. Moulai D. Mousadi E. Moyaux T. Mukherjee R. Naab M. Nakos U. Naumann J. Necker L. Neste M. Neumann H. Niederhausen M. U. Nisa K. Noda A. Noell A. Novikov A. Obertacke Pollmann V. O'Dell A. Olivas R. Orsoe J. Osborn E. O'Sullivan V. Palusova H. Pandya A. Parenti N. Park V. Parrish E. N. Paudel L. Paul C. P\'erez de los Heros T. Pernice J. Peterson M. Plum A. Pont\'en V. Poojyam Y. Popovych M. Prado Rodriguez B. Pries R. Procter-Murphy G. T. Przybylski L. Pyras C. Raab J. Rack-Helleis N. Rad M. Ravn K. Rawlins Z. Rechav A. Rehman I. Reistroffer E. Resconi S. Reusch C. D. Rho W. Rhode L. Ricca B. Riedel A. Rifaie E. J. Roberts S. Robertson M. Rongen A. Rosted C. Rott T. Ruhe L. Ruohan D. Ryckbosch J. Saffer D. Salazar-Gallegos P. Sampathkumar A. Sandrock G. Sanger-Johnson M. Santander S. Sarkar J. Savelberg M. Scarnera P. Schaile M. Schaufel H. Schieler S. Schindler L. Schlickmann B. Schl\"uter F. Schl\"uter N. Schmeisser T. Schmidt F. G. Schr\"oder L. Schumacher S. Schwirn S. Sclafani D. Seckel L. Seen M. Seikh S. Seunarine P. A. Sevle Myhr R. Shah S. Shefali N. Shimizu B. Skrzypek R. Snihur J. Soedingrekso A. S{\o}gaard D. Soldin P. Soldin G. Sommani C. Spannfellner G. M. Spiczak C. Spiering J. Stachurska M. Stamatikos T. Stanev T. Stezelberger T. St\"urwald T. Stuttard G. W. Sullivan I. Taboada S. Ter-Antonyan A. Terliuk A. Thakuri M. Thiesmeyer W. G. Thompson J. Thwaites S. Tilav K. Tollefson S. Toscano D. Tosi A. Trettin A. K. Upadhyay K. Upshaw A. Vaidyanathan N. Valtonen-Mattila J. Valverde J. Vandenbroucke T. Van Eeden N. van Eijndhoven L. Van Rootselaar J. van Santen J. Vara F. Varsi M. Venugopal M. Vereecken S. Vergara Carrasco S. Verpoest D. Veske A. Vijai J. Villarreal C. Walck A. Wang E. H. S. Warrick C. Weaver P. Weigel A. Weindl J. Weldert A. Y. Wen C. Wendt J. Werthebach M. Weyrauch N. Whitehorn C. H. Wiebusch D. R. Williams L. Witthaus M. Wolf G. Wrede X. W. Xu J. P. Yanez Y. Yao E. Yildizci S. Yoshida R. Young F. Yu S. Yu T. Yuan A. Zegarelli S. Zhang Z. Zhang P. Zhelnin P. Zilberman
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 01:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords astrophysical neutrinosIceCubeneutrino spectrumbroken power lawTeV-PeVmuon trackscascade eventsextragalactic flux
0
0 comments X

The pith

IceCube analyses of tracks and cascades reject a single power-law neutrino spectrum in favor of a broken power law at over 4 sigma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents two analyses using over 10 years of IceCube data to study neutrinos from 1 TeV to 10 PeV via muon tracks and cascade events. Both analyses find that the data disfavor a single power-law spectrum at greater than 4 sigma significance and instead support a broken power law. This measurement matters for understanding the origins of astrophysical neutrinos because the spectral shape encodes information about their production sites and mechanisms in a multi-messenger context. The work also reports the detection of an 11.4 PeV muon neutrino, the highest energy event observed so far.

Core claim

Both analyses consistently reject a neutrino spectrum following a single power-law with significance >4σ in favor of a broken power law. The methods implemented in the two analyses, the spectral constraints obtained, and the validation of the robustness of the results are described. Additionally, the detection of a muon neutrino in the MESE sample with an energy of 11.4 PeV is reported.

What carries the argument

Joint likelihood fits combining track and cascade event samples to determine the parameters of the astrophysical neutrino spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

Atmospheric background models and detector response functions for tracks versus cascades are assumed to be accurate without introducing correlated errors that could imitate a spectral break.

What would settle it

A reanalysis with independent atmospheric neutrino flux models that reduces the significance of the break below 4 sigma would challenge the central claim.

read the original abstract

The IceCube South Pole Neutrino Observatory has discovered the presence of a diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux at energies of TeV and beyond using neutrino induced muon tracks and cascade events from neutrino interactions. We present two analyses sensitive to neutrino events in the energy range \SI{1}{TeV} to \SI{10}{PeV}, using more than 10 years of IceCube data. Both analyses consistently reject a neutrino spectrum following a single power-law with significance $>4\,\sigma$ in favor of a broken power law. We describe the methods implemented in the two analyses, the spectral constraints obtained, and the validation of the robustness of the results. Additionally, we report the detection of a muon neutrino in the MESE sample with an energy of $11.4^{+2.46}_{-2.53} $\,\si{PeV}, the highest energy neutrino observed by IceCube to date. The results presented here show insights into the spectral shape of astrophysical neutrinos, which has important implications for inferring their production processes in a multi-messenger picture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents two analyses of more than 10 years of IceCube data on track and cascade neutrino events in the 1 TeV to 10 PeV range. Both analyses reject a single power-law spectrum at >4σ significance in favor of a broken power law and report the detection of a muon neutrino event at 11.4 PeV, the highest-energy neutrino observed by IceCube to date. The paper describes the methods, obtained spectral constraints, and robustness validation.

Significance. If the central result holds after full scrutiny of the likelihood fits and systematics, the >4σ preference for a broken power law would provide important constraints on the shape of the extragalactic neutrino spectrum and its implications for source populations and production mechanisms in multi-messenger astrophysics. The consistency across two independent analyses is a positive feature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of >4σ rejection of a single power law rests on the joint track+cascade likelihood fits; the abstract states that robustness is validated but supplies no quantitative information on the size or energy dependence of correlated systematics in atmospheric neutrino flux models, effective areas, or track-versus-cascade classification efficiencies that could induce an artificial spectral break.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive comment. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of >4σ rejection of a single power law rests on the joint track+cascade likelihood fits; the abstract states that robustness is validated but supplies no quantitative information on the size or energy dependence of correlated systematics in atmospheric neutrino flux models, effective areas, or track-versus-cascade classification efficiencies that could induce an artificial spectral break.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including brief quantitative information on the relevant systematics. The full manuscript contains dedicated robustness studies (including variations in atmospheric neutrino flux models, effective areas, and track/cascade classification efficiencies) that demonstrate these effects are too small and lack the energy dependence needed to produce an artificial spectral break at the reported significance. The >4σ preference for the broken power law persists under conservative systematic variations. We will revise the abstract to add a concise statement summarizing the size and impact of these correlated systematics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct statistical fit to observed neutrino events; no derivation reduces to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper reports results from two joint analyses of IceCube track and cascade data spanning >10 years, using likelihood fits to constrain the astrophysical neutrino spectrum between 1 TeV and 10 PeV. The central claim—that a single power-law spectrum is rejected at >4σ in favor of a broken power law—is obtained by direct comparison of model templates to the observed event distributions after subtracting atmospheric backgrounds. No equations or steps in the abstract (the only text provided) define a quantity in terms of itself, rename a fitted parameter as a prediction, or rely on self-citations for uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The analysis is therefore self-contained as an empirical measurement whose validity rests on the accuracy of the background models and detector responses rather than on any logical loop back to its own fitted outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement relies on standard assumptions about atmospheric neutrino backgrounds, ice optical properties, and detector simulation accuracy that are inherited from prior IceCube work rather than re-derived here.

free parameters (1)
  • spectral indices and break energy
    Parameters of the broken power-law model are fitted to the data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Atmospheric neutrino flux models and detector response matrices are sufficiently accurate for TeV-PeV energies.
    Invoked implicitly when performing the joint likelihood fit to tracks and cascades.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 8021 in / 1187 out tokens · 22701 ms · 2026-05-19T01:51:56.676496+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Little Red Dots as Hidden Neutrino Sources

    astro-ph.HE 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Little Red Dots can contribute ~30% of the diffuse neutrino background at TeV-sub-PeV energies through photomeson production in black hole envelopes, with modified flavor ratios at higher energies.

  2. Does the spectral break in the IceCube diffuse neutrino spectrum originate from AGN evolution?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AGN evolution produces the IceCube neutrino spectral break through superposition of contributions from active and post-active phases, with host galaxies acting as efficient cosmic-ray reservoirs.

  3. Sensitivity of the As-Built Askaryan Radio Array to Ultra-High Energy Neutrinos

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    With 2013-2023 exposure, the as-built ARA achieves world-leading UHE neutrino sensitivity above ~10^19 eV and predicts up to 13 trigger-level events under optimistic flux models, with secondaries contributing up to 30...

  4. Single-source-class interpretation of the diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux is interpreted as dominated by a single source class with dominant pγ production for target photon temperatures of 0.1-1 keV.