{"as_of":"2026-08-16T20:11:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:dd484e3d7c59158788ec64ffb790743940f3893f75fc31901ccc1ba11e6ffdb2","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:58:41.353769Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:58:41.836326Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1810.00738","last_updated":"2018-10-01T14:49:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T10:24:20.011977Z","submitted_at":"2018-10-01T14:49:22Z","title":"Contracting projected entangled pair states is average-case hard","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1810.00738","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1810.00738","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:58:41.836326Z","title":"Contracting projected entangled pair states is average-case hard","venue":"quant-ph","work_id":"7cdf1f26-97af-4872-9c4a-eb346bcdb7a4","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1908.08069","last_updated":"2019-11-11T14:29:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T13:06:50.278261Z","submitted_at":"2019-08-21T18:04:45Z","title":"Closing gaps of a quantum advantage with short-time Hamiltonian dynamics","version":2},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:58:41.353769Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1810.00738","citing_paper":"/paper/1908.08069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7852619a724d65a949385995b449c713ec65f678a2c4e669dfaee027af8be57f","observation_id":"33e5c4d6-dc93-46dd-ab91-a561511eff4e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T11:58:41.843130Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/1810.00738/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/1810.00738/integrity","json":"/paper/1810.00738/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/1810.00738"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"1810.00738","last_updated":"2018-10-01T14:49:22Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"quant-ph","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T10:24:20.011977Z","submitted_at":"2018-10-01T14:49:22Z","title":"Contracting projected entangled pair states is average-case hard"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:1810.00738."}