pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07392 · v1 · pith:OM54TAUEnew · submitted 2019-07-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Introduction to multi-messenger astronomy

Andrii Neronov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 20:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords multi-messenger astronomyphotonsneutrinoscosmic raysgravitational wavesobservational techniquesastronomical sourcesphysical processes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-messenger astronomy studies sources by combining signals from photons, neutrinos, cosmic rays and gravitational waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the field of multi-messenger astronomy as the coordinated use of four distinct particle types to observe the same astronomical objects. It surveys the detection methods for each messenger, catalogs the sources visible in one or more channels, and outlines the production and propagation physics that link them. A reader cares because single-messenger data often leaves source identity or emission mechanism ambiguous, while joint observations can resolve those ambiguities. The lectures treat the established techniques of each channel as settled background and focus on how they fit together.

Core claim

The new field of multi-messenger astronomy aims at the study of astronomical sources using different types of messenger particles: photons, neutrinos, cosmic rays and gravitational waves. These lectures provide an introductory overview of the observational techniques used for each type of astronomical messenger, of different types of astronomical sources observed through different messenger channels and of the main physical processes involved in production of the messenger particles and their propagation through the Universe.

What carries the argument

The four messenger particles—photons, neutrinos, cosmic rays, and gravitational waves—that each carry independent information from the same distant sources.

If this is right

  • A source invisible in photons may still be located and characterized through its neutrino or gravitational-wave emission.
  • Joint data sets constrain the acceleration sites and emission mechanisms that single-channel observations leave under-determined.
  • Propagation signatures, such as energy-dependent attenuation or deflection, become measurable across multiple channels simultaneously.
  • Catalogs of sources can be cross-matched to build a more complete census of high-energy objects in the local universe.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Coincident alerts between gravitational-wave and neutrino detectors could isolate rare events such as neutron-star mergers that are otherwise hidden.
  • The same framework may later incorporate additional messengers once their detection techniques reach comparable maturity.
  • Population studies that stack multi-messenger statistics could reveal source classes whose individual members remain too faint for single-channel detection.

Load-bearing premise

The standard techniques and physical models for each messenger are already mature enough to be treated as reliable background when combining them.

What would settle it

Detection of the same transient source in two messengers whose measured properties cannot be reconciled by known propagation effects would show the combined approach fails in practice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07392 by Andrii Neronov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Timeline of multi-messenger astronomy emission from stars. Universe known to the mankind the centuries and millennia was the Universe of individual stars and galaxies (collections of stars). Modern visible band astronomy builds upon Galileo’s invention, but employs telescopes with larger aperture (up to ∼ 10 m in diameter, e.g. the Very Large Telescope VLT in Chile2 ) and uses photodetectors different from… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top: all-sky visible band image based on the second data release of GAIA telescope [4]. Bottom left: the principle of photon detection by CCD, right: the giga-pixel CCD of GAIA telescope. apertures up to 40 m in size. The angular resolution of ground-based telescopes is limited by the distortions of the wavefront of optical light by the fluctuations of parameters of the atmosphere. This limitation is relax… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top: all-sky image at 408 MHz frequency [5]. Bottom the VLA radio telescopes. Right: layout of the next generation observatory SKA. 2.2. Radio astronomy The observational window on the Universe has started to extend in the course of 20th century with the invention of radio telescopes. Astronomical observations in the frequency ν ∼ 0.1 − 10 GHz frequency range have revealed new classes of astronomical objec… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: X-ray map of the sky produced by ROSAT all-sky survey [6]. Bottom left: grazing incidence optics principle of X-ray telescopes. Also shown is the principle of spectroscopic measurements with CCD in the focal surface. Bottom right right: mirror stack of the XMM￾Newton X-ray telescope. The focal surface detectors of X-ray telescopes are similar to those of the optical telescopes: both use CCDs. However,… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: mosaic of the inner Galaxy sky region (in Galactic coordinates, Galactic Plane goes through the middle of the image) observed by INTEGRAL telescope in the energy band above 20 keV. Most of the sources in the map are X-ray binary systems. Bottom left: coded mask telescope principle. Bottom right: INTEGRAL telescope based on the coded mask technique. The Universe observed by X￾ray telescopes includes bo… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top map of the sky produced from COMPTEL telescope observations [8]. Bottom left: Compton telescope principle. Bottom right: POLAR gamma-ray burst Compton telescope which operated on Chinese space station in 2017 [9] The photoelectric interaction cross￾section drops below the Compton scattering cross-section in most ma￾terials above the photon energy Eγ ∼ 100 keV. This further reduces the efficiency of tel… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: sky map in the energy range Eγ > 1 GeV observed by Fermi/LAT telescope. Bottom left: the principle of γ-ray detection by pair conversion telescope. Bottom right: Fermi Large Area Telescope: a pair conversion telescope currently operating in orbit. The sky observed in γ-rays with energies larger than the rest energy of proton, mp ' 1 GeV, is by definition, dominated by emission from sources which host … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top: significance map of the sky observed by HAWC telescope [16]. Bottom left: the principle of γ-ray detection by ground-based Cherenkov telescopes. Bottom 2nd panel: Layout of CTA IACT network. Bottom third panel: principle of operation of water Cherenkov detector. Bottom right: HAWC water water Cherenkov detector array. Several techniques are used for the measurement of the energies and arrival directio… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top: sky map produced based on the IceCube data collected in the HESE mode [17]. Bottom left: Layout of IceCube neutrino telescope. Middle: the principle of neutrino detection with water / ice Cherenkov detectors. Right: layout of Baikal GVD detector [18]. statistical study based on Monte-Carlo simulations of proton / nuclei and γ-ray induced showers has to be done. The statistical studies performed for co… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Interior of the Super￾Kamiokande neutrino detector [23]. The same principle of detection of Cherenkov signal from particles propagating in water is used for detection of much lower energy neutrinos (in the MeV range) by large underground reservoirs, like Super-Kamiokande detector24 shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: LIGO gravitational wave detector, https://www.gw-openscience.org The gravitational wave astronomy is the youngest field of the multi-messenger astron￾omy, which has been born only in 2015 with the discovery of the first astronomical source, a black hole merger [2]. The two black holes in the binaries are not surrounded by signif￾icant amount of matter which could gener￾ate electromagnetic emission in conv… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Spectrum of pulsed γ￾ray emission from Vela pulsar (the brightest GeV γ-ray point source on the sky). From Ref. [29]. The bright GeV γ-ray emission from the pulsars is pulsed at the period of rotation of the neutron stars (10−3 − 1 s). This implies that the γ-ray photons are produced close to the neutron star, in a region close to the surface of the neutron star. We adopt a first estimate R ∼ RNS ∼ 106 cm… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Multiwavelength image (left) and spectrum (right) of the Crab pulsar wind nebula. In the image (from [30]): blue colour is X-ray, green is in visible light and red is radio emission. In the spectrum (from [31]) black data points show time-averaged spectrum of the source. Blue and violet points show examples of spectra during GeV band flares. Electrons emitting synchrotron radiation loose energy on time sc… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The spectrum of Extra￾galactic Background Light (from [35]. Grey band shows the range of uncer￾tainties of currently existing measure￾ments. The most widespread example of Compton scatter￾ing in astronomy is the scattering of photons inside stars. The nuclear reactions which power stellar ac￾tivity proceed most efficiently deep in the stellar cores, where temperatures are significantly higher than at the … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of the cross-sections of inverse Compton scattering (ICS), triplet production (TPP) and γγ pair production (PP) as functions of the square of the centre-of-mass energy s. Also shown in the cross-section of double pair production (DPP). Solid lines show the cross-sections, dashed lines show cross-sections times the elasticity (average fractional energy loss of electron in single collision). From… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparison of the energy￾dependent mean free path of γ-rays with the distances to the known TeV γ-ray sources [35]. Otherwise, lower energy TeV γ-rays could efficiently produce pairs in interactions with the EBL photons of the energies  ' 1 eV. The density of the EBL is much lower and the mean free path of photons w.r.t. this process is respectively larger. Still it is shorter than the typical distance t… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: X-ray image of Coma galaxy cluster, from Ref. [40]. Density of the gas in the cluster about n ∼ 10−3 cm−3 . In such conditions the Bremsstrahlung cooling time tbrems ∼ 1010 n/10−3 cm−3 −1 [T /10 keV]1/2 yr is comparable to the age of the Universe, so that the hot gas residing in the clusters is about to cool down at the present epoch of evolution of the Universe. Gas cooling is expected to produce a ”cool… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Compillaiton of neutrino signal from SN 1987A, from [49]. The distance to the LMC is DLMC ' 50 kpc. Estimate the typical neutrino fluence from the process of proto-neutron star cooling gives the neutrino flux Fν ∼ 0.1Egrav 4πD2 LMC ∼ 3 × 104 erg cm2 (49) so that the total number of neutrinos which passed through each square centimeter was about Nν ∼ Fν/Eν ∼ 109 cm−2 . At the time of SN 1987A event the exi… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: X-ray and TeV gamma-ray images of a region of sky containing Vela (larger bubble, 5 degrees diameter), Vela Junior (smaller bubble on the left) and Puppis A (bubble on the right top) supernova remnants [53, 54, 55]. (image credit: https://www.mpi￾hd.mpg.de/hfm/HESS/pages/home/som/2006/05/) would be noticed) one finds that the 10 m size neutrino detectors could have found some ten(s) of neutrinos from SN19… view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Measurements of masses of the neutron stars [60]. Basic estimates of the properties of neutron stars derived from the consideration of the gravitational collapse already give order-of￾magnitude estimates for the mass, size and density of these objects, in the range MNS & 1.5M , RNS ∼ 10 km, ρNS ∼ 1015 g/cm3 . Several more parameters which were not discussed in the previous section are the spin and magneti… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Geometry of pul￾sar magnetosphere and possible locations of particle acceleration regions (”vacuum gaps”) in pul￾sar magnetosphere (figure fro Ref. [63]). Young neutron stars reveal themselves in a spectacular phenomenon of pulsars. Pulsars are astronomical sources of highly regular pulsed emission with periods in the range between 1 ms and ∼ 10 s powered by fast-rotating magnetised neutron stars. The mos… view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Masses of compact objects in X-ray binary systems. Objects of the masses above 3M are black holes. From Ref. [65]. Dissipation of liberated gravitational energy of matter falling into gravitational potential well of a black hole is one of the most efficient mechanisms of extraction of energy from matter. Indeed, the total energy potentially extractable from a particle of the mass m is its rest energy, E =… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Evolution of the X￾ray, infrared and radio fluxes at the moments of matter ejection into the jet of X-ray binary GRS 1915+105 (from Ref. [66]). of INTEGRAL shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Top: gravitational wave signal from a binary black hole merger GW150914 [2]. Bottom: gamma-ray and gravitational wave signal from the neutron star merger GW170817 [27]. Within the General Relativity description of relativistic gravity, the gravitational radiation is quadrupole, with luminosity LGW = 1 5 GN h ... I jk ... I jki (56) proportional to the third time derivative of the quadrupole moment of the … view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Broad band spectrum of a quasar 3C 273 [71]. Study of variability of emission from AGN reveals variability time scales down to days, hours and sometimes even minutes and seconds. This implies that the variable emission comes from a compact region of the size R ≤ ctvar ∼ 1 [tvar/10 min] AU. Such enormous energy output, equivalent to 1012 Suns, could not be produced by a compact stellar cluster confined to … view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Broad band ”multi-messenger” spectrum of M8 7 radio galaxy. Background shows the Fermi/LAT image of M87. Assuming the best possible efficiency of conversion of the energy of the rest energy of the ”fuel” which powers the AGN into radiation, ∼ 10%, we could find that the mass of the ”waste” which should be left by the AGN activity is M ≥ 10EAGN /c2 ∼ 107M . This mass should reside somewhere in the source, … view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Left: radio jet of the galaxy M87 on different distance scales [72]. Image credit: National Radio Astronomy Observatory. Right: high￾resolution image of the ”central engine” of M87 jet, powered by supermassive black hole. Figure from Ref. [73]. Most of the AGN (about 90%) are ”radio-quiet”, in the sense that they they are not strong radio wave emitters. Radio emission is con￾ventionally asso￾ciated with s… view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: X-ray image of the source Sgr A region hosting the supermassive black hole of the Milky Way galaxy [78]. Blue bubble-like structure around the source is Sgr A shell of the size ∼ 10 pc. Right: Stellar orbits around Sgr A* [79]. The center of the Milky Way is situated at the distance ' 8 kpc away from the Sun. In the visible band it obscured by the dust filling the Galactic Disk. However, stars in the Gala… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The new field of multi-messenger astronomy aims at the study of astronomical sources using different types of "messenger" particles: photons, neutrinos, cosmic rays and gravitational waves. These lectures provide an introductory overview of the observational techniques used for each type of astronomical messenger, of different types of astronomical sources observed through different messenger channels and of the main physical processes involved in production of the messenger particles and their propagation through the Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a set of lecture notes that introduce multi-messenger astronomy as the study of astronomical sources via four messengers (photons, neutrinos, cosmic rays, and gravitational waves). It supplies an expository overview of the observational techniques used for each messenger, the classes of sources detected in multiple channels, and the principal physical processes governing production and propagation of the messengers.

Significance. If the coverage is accurate and balanced, the notes could serve as a compact entry point for students and early-career researchers, collecting established background material from the literature into a single pedagogical resource. No new derivations, predictions, or data analyses are presented, so the significance is entirely educational rather than scientific.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract refers to gravitational waves as one of the “messenger particles”; a brief clarifying sentence in §1 would avoid any initial confusion for readers new to the terminology.
  2. Because the text is purely expository, the reference list should be checked to ensure that the most recent authoritative reviews for each messenger (post-2017) are cited where appropriate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive evaluation of the manuscript. The recommendation to accept is appreciated, and we are pleased that the notes are viewed as a potentially useful pedagogical resource.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: purely expository introduction with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

The paper is an introductory lecture-notes overview whose stated purpose is to summarize established observational techniques, sources, and physical processes for photons, neutrinos, cosmic rays, and gravitational waves. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or novel derivations appear in the abstract or described content. The central claim is a standard definition of multi-messenger astronomy plus background material assumed mature by the paper's own framing; this is self-contained exposition rather than any chain that reduces to its inputs by construction. No self-citations are load-bearing for any result, and the text advances no claims requiring external verification beyond the expository goal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; it draws on standard astrophysical and particle-physics background without introducing new fitted parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5576 in / 1028 out tokens · 17573 ms · 2026-05-24T20:26:25.546300+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · 47 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    IceCube Collaboration 2013 Science 342 1242856 (Preprint 1311.5238)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    Abbott B P et al. 2016 Physical Review Letters 116 061102 (Preprint 1602.03837)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    On-orbit performance of the Gaia CCDs at L2

    Crowley C, et al. 2016 A&A 595 A6 (Preprint 1609.04240)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Gaia Collaboration 2018 A&A 616 A1 (Preprint 1804.09365)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Haslam C G T, Salter C J, Stoffel H and Wilson W E 1982 A&A Supp. 47 1

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    Truemper J 1993 Science 260 1769–1771

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    Hitomi Collaboration 2018 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 70 9 (Preprint 1711.00240)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    2000 Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 143 145–179 (Preprint astro-ph/ 0002366)

    Sch¨ onfelder Vet al. 2000 Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 143 145–179 (Preprint astro-ph/ 0002366)

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    POLAR, a compact detector for Gamma Ray Bursts photon polarization measurements

    Produit N et al. 2005 Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 550 616–625 ( Preprint astro-ph/0504605)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    Johnson III W N, Harnden Jr F R and Haymes R C 1972 Ap.J.Lett. 172 L1

    work page 1972

  11. [11]

    The 511 keV emission from positron annihilation in the Galaxy

    Prantzos N et al. 2011 Reviews of Modern Physics 83 1001–1056 (Preprint 1009.4620)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    The all-sky distribution of 511 keV electron-positron annihilation emission

    Kn¨ odlseder Jet al. 2005 A&A 441 513–532 (Preprint astro-ph/0506026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Churazov E, Sunyaev R, Sazonov S, Revnivtsev M and Varshalovich D 2005 MNRAS 357 1377–1386 (Preprint astro-ph/0411351)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    Beacom J F and Y¨ uksel H 2006 Physical Review Letters 97 071102 (Preprint astro-ph/0512411)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission

    Atwood W B, Abdo A A et al. 2009 Ap.J. 697 1071–1102 (Preprint 0902.1089)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    The 2HWC HAWC Observatory Gamma Ray Catalog

    Abeysekara A U et al. 2017 Ap.J. 843 40 (Preprint 1702.02992)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    IceCube Collaboration 2017 arXiv e-prints arXiv:1710.01191 (Preprint 1710.01191)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Baikal-GVD Collaboration 2018 arXiv e-prints arXiv:1808.10353 (Preprint 1808.10353)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Diffuse Galactic gamma-ray emission with H.E.S.S

    H E S S Collaboration 2014 Phys.Rev. D 90 122007 (Preprint 1411.7568)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    A new population of very high energy gamma-ray sources in the Milky Way

    Aharonian F et al. 2005 Science 307 1938–1942 (Preprint astro-ph/0504380)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    2018 The Astrophysical Journal 853 L7

    Albert A et al. 2018 The Astrophysical Journal 853 L7

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Letter of Intent for KM3NeT 2.0

    Adri´ an-Mart´ ınez S,et al. 2016 Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics 43 084001 (Preprint 1601.07459)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    2003 Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 501 418 – 462 ISSN 0168-9002

    Fukuda S et al. 2003 Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 501 418 – 462 ISSN 0168-9002

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    Arnett W D, Bahcall J N, Kirshner R P and Woosley S E 1989 ARA&A 27 629–700

    work page 1989

  25. [25]

    Scholberg K 2012 Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 62 81–103 (Preprint 1205.6003)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Weber J 1960 Physical Review 117 306–313

    work page 1960

  27. [27]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    Abbott B P et al. 2017 Ap.J. 848 L12 (Preprint 1710.05833)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    195 L51–L53

    Hulse R A and Taylor J H 1975 Ap.J.Lett. 195 L51–L53

    work page 1975

  29. [29]

    Fermi LAT Observations of the Vela Pulsar

    Abdo A A et al. 2009 Ap.J. 696 1084–1093 (Preprint 0812.2960)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    Hester J J 2008 ARA&A 46 127–155

    work page 2008

  31. [32]

    Hester J J 2008 Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 46 127–155

    work page 2008

  32. [33]

    Gamma-ray flares from the Crab Nebula

    Abdo A A et al. 2011 Science 331 739 (Preprint 1011.3855)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  33. [34]

    Discovery of Powerful Gamma-Ray Flares from the Crab Nebula

    Tavani M et al. 2011 Science 331 736 (Preprint 1101.2311)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [35]

    Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation

    Durrer R and Neronov A 2013 A&ARv. 21 62 (Preprint 1303.7121)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [36]

    Franceschini A, Rodighiero G and Vaccari M 2008 A&A 487 837–852 (Preprint 0805.1841)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  36. [37]

    Attenuation of VHE gamma rays by the Milky Way interstellar radiation field

    Moskalenko I V, Porter T A and Strong A W 2006 Ap.J.Lett. 640 L155–L158 (Preprint astro-ph/0511149)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [38]

    Aharonian F A 2004 Very high energy cosmic gamma radiation : a crucial window on the extreme Universe (World Scientific Publishing Co)

    work page 2004

  38. [39]

    On the Propagation of Extragalactic High Energy Cosmic and Gamma-Rays

    Lee S 1998 Phys.Rev. D 58 043004 (Preprint astro-ph/9604098)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  39. [40]

    Briel U G, Henry J P, Lumb D H, Arnaud M, Neumann D, Aghanim N, Gastaud R, Mittaz J P D, Sasseen T P and Vestrand W T 2001 A&A 365 L60–L66 (Preprint astro-ph/0011323)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  40. [41]

    Boehringer H and Werner N 2009 arXiv e-prints arXiv:0907.4277 (Preprint 0907.4277)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  41. [42]

    Aloisio R, Berezinsky V, Blasi P, Gazizov A, Grigorieva S and Hnatyk B 2007 Astroparticle Physics 27 76–91 (Preprint astro-ph/0608219)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [43]

    16 748–750

    Greisen K 1966 Phys.Rev.Lett. 16 748–750

    work page 1966

  43. [44]

    Zatsepin G T and Kuz’min V A 1966 ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu 4 114

    work page 1966

  44. [45]

    First Observation of the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin Suppression

    Abbasi R U et al. 2008 Phys.Rev.Lett. 100 101101 (Preprint astro-ph/0703099)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [46]

    Fermi-LAT Observations of the Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission: Implications for Cosmic Rays and the Interstellar Medium

    Ackermann M et al. 2012 Ap.J. 750 3 (Preprint 1202.4039)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [47]

    Chandrasekhar S 1931 Ap.J. 74 81

    work page 1931

  47. [48]

    Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae

    Janka H T, Langanke K, Marek A, Mart´ ınez-Pinedo G and M¨ uller B 2007 Phys.Rep. 442 38–74 ( Preprint astro-ph/0612072)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  48. [49]

    M N 2007 CERN Courrier 30 January 2007

    work page 2007

  49. [50]

    1987 Phys

    Hirata K et al. 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(14) 1490–1493

    work page 1987

  50. [51]

    1987 Phys

    Bionta R M et al. 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(14) 1494–1496

    work page 1987

  51. [52]

    Alekseev E N, Alekseeva L N, Volchenko V I and Krivosheina I V 1987 Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 45 589

    work page 1987

  52. [53]

    Aschenbach B, Egger R and Tr¨ umper J 1995Nature 373 587–590

    work page

  53. [54]

    Detection of TeV gamma-ray Emission from the Shell-Type Supernova Remnant RX J0852.0-4622 with H.E.S.S

    Aharonian F et al. 2005 A&A 437 L7–L10 (Preprint astro-ph/0505380)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  54. [55]

    H E S S Collaboration 2015 A&A 575 A81 (Preprint 1412.6997)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [56]

    Janka H T 2012 Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 62 407–451 (Preprint 1206.2503)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [57]

    Pavlov G G, Sanwal D, Kızıltan B and Garmire G P 2001 The Astrophysical Journal 559 L131–L134

    work page 2001

  57. [58]

    Caraveo P A 2014 Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 52 211–250

    work page 2014

  58. [59]

    Joss P C and Rappaport S A 1984 Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 22 537–592

    work page 1984

  59. [60]

    Lattimer J M and Prakash M 2005 Physical Review Letters 94 111101 (Preprint astro-ph/0411280)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  60. [61]

    ¨Ozel F and Freire P 2016 ARA&A 54 401–440 (Preprint 1603.02698)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [62]

    121 161101 ( Preprint 1805

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration 2018 Phys.Rev.Lett. 121 161101 ( Preprint 1805. 11581)

    work page 2018

  62. [63]

    MAGIC collaboration 2008 Science 322 1221

    work page 2008

  63. [64]

    2015 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454 1358–1370

    Chernyakova M et al. 2015 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454 1358–1370

    work page 2015

  64. [65]

    Clark J S, Goodwin S P, Crowther P A, Kaper L, Fairbairn M, Langer N and Brocksopp C 2002 A&A 392 909–920 (Preprint astro-ph/0207334)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  65. [66]

    Mirabel I F 2003 Microquasars as Sources of High Energy Phenomena High Energy Processes and Phenomena in Astrophysics (IAU Symposium vol 214) ed Li X D, Trimble V and Wang Z R p 201 ( Preprint astro-ph/0211085)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  66. [67]

    Bodaghee A, Courvoisier T J L, Rodriguez J, Beckmann V, Produit N, Hannikainen D, Kuulkers E, Willis D R and Wendt G 2007 A&A 467 585–596 (Preprint astro-ph/0703043)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  67. [68]

    Remillard R A and McClintock J E 2006 Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 44 49–92

    work page 2006

  68. [69]

    Gallo E, Fender R, Kaiser C, Russell D, Morganti R, Oosterloo T and Heinz S 2005 Nature 436 819–821 (Preprint astro-ph/0508228)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  69. [70]

    2009 Science 326 1512–1516

    Abdo A et al. 2009 Science 326 1512–1516

    work page 2009

  70. [71]

    Courvoisier T J L 1998 Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 9 1–32 (Preprint astro-ph/9808147)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  71. [72]

    Kim J Y, Lu R S, Krichbaum T, Bremer M, Zensus J and Walker R 2016Galaxies 4 39 (Preprint 1609.07896)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [73]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama K, Alberdi A, Alef W, Asada K, Azulay R, Baczko A K, Ball D, Balokovi´ c M, Barrett J and et al 2019Ap.J.Lett. 875 L1

    work page

  73. [74]

    T¨ urler M, Chernyakova M, Courvoisier T J L, Lubi´ nski P, Neronov A, Produit N and Walter R 2010A&A 512 A49 (Preprint 1001.2110)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [75]

    Blandford R, Meier D and Readhead A 2018 ( Preprint 1812.06025)

    work page arXiv 2018

  75. [76]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama K, Alberdi A, Alef W, Asada K, Azulay R, Baczko A K, Ball D, Balokovi´ c M, Barrett J and et al 2019Ap.J.Lett. 875 L5

    work page

  76. [77]

    Genzel R, Eisenhauer F and Gillessen S 2010 Reviews of Modern Physics 82 3121–3195 (Preprint 1006.0064)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  77. [78]

    Chandra X-ray Spectroscopic Imaging of Sgr A* and the Central Parsec of the Galaxy

    Baganoff F K et al. 2003 Ap.J. 591 891–915 (Preprint astro-ph/0102151)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  78. [79]

    SINFONI in the Galactic Center: young stars and IR flares in the central light month

    Eisenhauer F et al. 2005 Ap.J. 628 246–259 (Preprint astro-ph/0502129)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005