{"as_of":"2026-08-10T15:29:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:1cff1af9d3c1193024b86e5e59c47e42ee1d1835f82be5848e1e04f3e3704f3b","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:28.440487Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:29.418827Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2004.02557","last_updated":"2020-04-23T13:20:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T07:48:06.307220Z","submitted_at":"2020-04-06T11:09:44Z","title":"Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2004.02557","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2004.02557","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:29.418827Z","title":"Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"cb160453-b12f-4852-84de-a8e756e49abc","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.18768","last_updated":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T00:31:46.219906Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","title":"ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:28.440487Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2004.02557","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.18768"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cfcf50fce0e2a9ee0c84470026238b7107db67ee4ad9e28af7c5003b631db603","observation_id":"4623cd54-b6e5-4c83-b06a-70c8af60cfbf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:54:29.450194Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2004.02557/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2004.02557/integrity","json":"/paper/2004.02557/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2004.02557"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2004.02557","last_updated":"2020-04-23T13:20:23Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T07:48:06.307220Z","submitted_at":"2020-04-06T11:09:44Z","title":"Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2004.02557."}