{"as_of":"2026-08-14T14:55:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:af15ca1725fce8550c71236b96c5e83e9e59f0f0b818afd6f65110880a234102","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:10:33.001376Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-17T22:30:44.831477Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2104.09061","last_updated":"2021-04-19T05:39:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T19:37:43.811807Z","submitted_at":"2021-04-19T05:39:24Z","title":"Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selection","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2104.09061","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2104.09061","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"Improving faithfulness in abstractive summarization with contrast candidate generation and selection","venue":null,"work_id":"60b6d137-cde2-444b-aa27-39954752213c","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2308.05374","last_updated":"2024-03-21T00:21:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T17:09:20.540788Z","submitted_at":"2023-08-10T06:43:44Z","title":"Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignment","version":2},"reference_index":77,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-17T22:30:44.520703Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2104.09061","citing_paper":"/paper/2308.05374"},"observation_digest":"sha256:361dd7a94fe01e8e04698cadf6722043a0882c4b49798eddc276f95f23fba70b","observation_id":"b32d646a-b87a-4cec-90de-9aa30812901b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-17T22:30:44.833676Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2104.09061","last_updated":"2021-04-19T05:39:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T19:37:43.811807Z","submitted_at":"2021-04-19T05:39:24Z","title":"Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selection","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2104.09061","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:10:33.001376Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09061 (2021)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.15661","last_updated":"2025-02-13T19:59:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:01:13.539153Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-23T22:09:58Z","title":"Improving Next Tokens via Second-to-Last Predictions with Generate and Refine","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:10:33.001376Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2104.09061","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.15661"},"observation_digest":"sha256:597f169866a7d4ad6448b7e225d6d5b41a174fac19be8bb6a2dd26e60e687222","observation_id":"09b5e219-207c-437a-930d-9ae5795656be","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:10:33.001376Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2104.09061/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2104.09061/integrity","json":"/paper/2104.09061/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2104.09061"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2104.09061","last_updated":"2021-04-19T05:39:24Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T19:37:43.811807Z","submitted_at":"2021-04-19T05:39:24Z","title":"Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selection"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2104.09061."}