{"as_of":"2026-08-09T10:13:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:2e8d21678625b5a51b2cc5ec1e72dc36ca4720018fac9877708f70cdfe0abf7d","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":14,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":14,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":14,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":14,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:05:38.312713Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-07-02T09:26:51.598505Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-02T09:26:51.598505Z","title":"Inconsistency in conference peer review: revisiting the 2014 neurips experiment","venue":null,"work_id":"0546aa35-531e-4fb4-ad51-1185abc17040","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.12708","last_updated":"2026-05-10T21:28:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T13:39:58.773778Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-18T15:22:12Z","title":"AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents","version":3},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-23T23:38:28.005028Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2406.12708"},"observation_digest":"sha256:68bb3489736fef837064df28a4bec27c6b1db4389fcc44b5449d4861f6ab9f07","observation_id":"85d54e9e-9833-4255-b64c-d40c885569ed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-23T23:38:37.243917Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T11:49:01.756223Z","title":"Corinna Cortes and Neil D Lawrence","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.01372","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:01:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T03:01:37.763836Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-02T06:59:10Z","title":"AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T11:49:01.756223Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.01372"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5400b4c7f8b1d7b87061a49b20420b7a54e6fb3d86b9f654ce634c791f9b802b","observation_id":"eacc1515-4c04-404b-8f86-dd730f5c796a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T11:49:01.756223Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:22:49.456740Z","title":"Cortes and N","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.08134","last_updated":"2026-06-09T00:39:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:16:33.521117Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-09T18:37:14Z","title":"Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem","version":4},"reference_index":8,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:22:49.456740Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.08134"},"observation_digest":"sha256:08d3f4e7d3352886a74a22e5ae6cc36589d225c560f53547c1e99ec8cc417156","observation_id":"c6e0a24d-f2fa-41e2-b70d-4c0bc9deac95","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:22:49.456740Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:13:13.569893Z","title":"Lawrence","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.19882","last_updated":"2025-07-07T02:00:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T12:23:41.491036Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-24T02:19:30Z","title":"Position: Machine Learning Conferences Should Establish a \"Refutations and Critiques\" Track","version":3},"reference_index":19,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:13:13.569893Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.19882"},"observation_digest":"sha256:122b47e00695ef0a1ef9e619a22e063814cf1b1e40976c49ce72ddcc754e8bf3","observation_id":"60375794-094c-4451-9263-44694ef74aa0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:13:13.569893Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-02T09:26:51.598505Z","title":"Inconsistency in conference peer review: revisiting the 2014 neurips experiment","venue":null,"work_id":"0546aa35-531e-4fb4-ad51-1185abc17040","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.27900","last_updated":"2026-04-30T14:10:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T23:13:15.994987Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-30T14:10:33Z","title":"Can We Volunteer Out of the Peer Review Crisis?","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-05-07T07:37:41.252670Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.27900"},"observation_digest":"sha256:07ae48741defcae53407a4ac53f9682b75e1c4abecccc537d18d5b235c349c6e","observation_id":"73ae0fe3-5c05-4d6f-a7ec-62514bcfc46f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-12T10:11:27.025524Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-02T09:26:51.598505Z","title":"Inconsistency in conference peer review: revisiting the 2014 neurips experiment","venue":null,"work_id":"0546aa35-531e-4fb4-ad51-1185abc17040","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.04716","last_updated":"2026-06-03T10:49:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:38:17.523421Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-03T10:49:16Z","title":"The State of Peer Review in Empirical Software Engineering: A Community Survey on Review Load, Quality, and GenAI Use","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T05:29:14.806050Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.04716"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf9ba4689613b77110758271596c656a1321aaafd3bdc3d5d9d50e1152f49cfa","observation_id":"4b4ae637-db12-4132-ab5e-8b785b70f439","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-02T09:26:51.599719Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-02T09:26:51.598505Z","title":"Inconsistency in conference peer review: revisiting the 2014 neurips experiment","venue":null,"work_id":"0546aa35-531e-4fb4-ad51-1185abc17040","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.24892","last_updated":"2026-05-29T02:05:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T05:25:08.483084Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-29T02:05:10Z","title":"ReviewGuard: Aligning LLM-Assisted Peer Review with Long-Term Scientific Impact","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T20:17:18.437581Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.24892"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c58293c66c5d24f77c63bc2bb87b47abba455b89304ed7bb4a273a1618e1043c","observation_id":"5e103de5-3f0c-414a-ad03-d6274eb1a32a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T20:22:37.152415Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-02T09:26:51.598505Z","title":"Inconsistency in conference peer review: revisiting the 2014 neurips experiment","venue":null,"work_id":"0546aa35-531e-4fb4-ad51-1185abc17040","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.28277","last_updated":"2026-06-26T17:19:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T03:02:18.160309Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-26T17:19:17Z","title":"Towards Automating Scientific Review with Google's Paper Assistant Tool","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T04:15:47.487244Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.28277"},"observation_digest":"sha256:72558d54c0eb9850173987e7fa20e246b423f655a1c55d7074c684ab9b3545c1","observation_id":"3dc09d89-04b9-43d4-8b1c-37f0755fcf9b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T17:05:50.914893Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T16:04:50.429639Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.09774 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.05401","last_updated":"2026-05-24T05:52:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T22:59:08.531199Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-24T05:52:10Z","title":"Catalyst Papers in Artificial Intelligence Research: A Landscape on ICLR from 2017 to 2025","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T16:04:50.429639Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.05401"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8e2ef2592f0290d2f63a2c8354674b843a1a7740cbb0f47c2e2bb7bcbe2986cb","observation_id":"d4382265-c318-4381-a0aa-5d712d6bf853","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T16:04:50.429639Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-30T10:56:35.059444Z","title":"Hui Chen, Miao Xiong, Yujie Lu, W ei Han, Ailin Deng, Yufei He, Jiaying Wu, Yibo Li, Yue Liu, and Bryan Hooi","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27191","last_updated":"2026-07-29T17:57:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T21:48:44.569440Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T17:57:19Z","title":"Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies","version":1},"reference_index":2025,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-30T10:56:35.059444Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27191"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e85ef4a0bbeb4a86900495ad43ededff09b59e24e3df765cf108ac316fd6f1dd","observation_id":"c3336dab-856f-41a5-a803-f442ce07a5aa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-30T10:56:35.059444Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T15:15:45.846382Z","title":"issue-attention cycle","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27209","last_updated":"2026-04-30T10:54:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:16:04.197566Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-30T10:54:54Z","title":"Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review","version":1},"reference_index":2021,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T15:15:45.846382Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27209"},"observation_digest":"sha256:37b430f7371115e9e71738ba843178eafb4cb6dc659cf4e2f2e4ca6d4436575b","observation_id":"2915af06-693b-4391-9ed0-ac2d77cdaca0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T15:15:45.846382Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T00:49:01.524244Z","title":"Cortes and N","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00299","last_updated":"2026-08-05T14:51:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T23:13:06.224607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-31T21:26:20Z","title":"ReVoicer: Conversational Voice Annotation for Human-Centered, LLM-Assisted Peer Review","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T00:49:01.524244Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00299"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b7a7e83807a4070af9604958df8dac82afd84aacf6b21aebe9b1e5a96e5688bf","observation_id":"bbdaf93a-f21c-4585-ab17-fbb1cacc0f43","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T00:49:01.524244Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T04:15:20.355276Z","title":"Cortes and N","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00299","last_updated":"2026-08-05T14:51:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T23:13:06.224607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-31T21:26:20Z","title":"ReVoicer: Conversational Voice Annotation for Human-Centered, LLM-Assisted Peer Review","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T04:15:20.355276Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00299"},"observation_digest":"sha256:93196740716cc674735b4cb6cbc8e4a7c2a672db20ad1f63644189e6c8c38022","observation_id":"bee9df1e-ab13-43cc-b9d2-7f9920b8041d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T04:15:20.355276Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2109.09774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:05:38.312713Z","title":"Lawrence","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.05438","last_updated":"2026-08-05T22:16:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:10:38.086428Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-05T22:16:41Z","title":"A Vision for the Future of an AI-Integrated Research Ecosystem","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:05:38.312713Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2109.09774","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.05438"},"observation_digest":"sha256:32bc1e7ed646f115aa227a18bb65bb9beb4ed1ead605b96e0cd5108c02eef6ba","observation_id":"6540a00a-e6de-44cb-99d2-4d1da50ab491","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:05:38.312713Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2109.09774/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2109.09774/integrity","json":"/paper/2109.09774/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2109.09774"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2109.09774","last_updated":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.DL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T11:49:38.497583Z","submitted_at":"2021-09-20T18:06:22Z","title":"Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 14 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2109.09774."}