{"as_of":"2026-08-19T19:32:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:71bbdef38807ec1c2345f5eff65da1893a07ea1929466ad4813ccfb500f3215a","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":9,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":9,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":9,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":9,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:38:04.005383Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-22T13:41:36.160100Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:38:04.005383Z","title":"Gilpin, Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05266 (2021)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.20256","last_updated":"2025-04-28T21:01:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T13:35:46.891071Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-28T21:01:07Z","title":"Optimizing Hard Thresholding for Sparse Model Discovery","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:38:04.005383Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2504.20256"},"observation_digest":"sha256:817e20b11f64309712eaaad2bb0464bd94c872958bf71568159f9ecb505f7ea2","observation_id":"b10ae8a6-ee49-456f-b900-31e046dc3f3e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:38:04.005383Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","venue":null,"work_id":"1d65cd3c-0c8b-4ed6-9a88-286eb291eb21","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16786","last_updated":"2026-05-16T12:46:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T05:10:44.061004Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T15:28:47Z","title":"FlowMixer: A Depth-Agnostic Neural Architecture for Interpretable Spatiotemporal Forecasting","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-22T13:41:26.675038Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16786"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5744cbb737cb46a63e7c28eb2213091c0d23c202e721520068fa860391e5d0ee","observation_id":"97ccc323-0e49-4bce-b905-ad86823954b5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-22T13:41:36.164079Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T14:45:24.861046Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05266 (2021)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.17740","last_updated":"2026-06-16T09:56:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:40:32.415954Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-23T11:03:35Z","title":"A tensor network approach for chaotic time series prediction","version":2},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T14:45:24.861046Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.17740"},"observation_digest":"sha256:edabe900ef14664078da0451ca3147ca7c663a247e463e174a2f9ec825508c34","observation_id":"2f50e34e-a4cc-4886-afe6-442a511f09db","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T14:45:24.861046Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:07:48.944831Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven mod- elling","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.11739","last_updated":"2025-07-15T21:12:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:32:49.322470Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-15T21:12:09Z","title":"Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics with Conformal Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:07:48.944831Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.11739"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c02d8b08f3d62aab4f3e7158ef24760922cd2283040e24fbb2c482b87b190d94","observation_id":"991053cf-a667-4956-bdba-e7319f4f5e82","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:07:48.944831Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:16:02.535689Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.00903","last_updated":"2025-08-31T15:34:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:01:37.212456Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-31T15:34:02Z","title":"Learning with Mandelbrot and Julia","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:16:02.535689Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.00903"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d97a129b403aa491a0c6f0b89b98c56d07f6c81b5dad67dd20f2655e757be328","observation_id":"4ae16cca-d8fc-4c37-b1eb-4bcc7dbf3744","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T13:16:02.535689Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","venue":null,"work_id":"1d65cd3c-0c8b-4ed6-9a88-286eb291eb21","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.06609","last_updated":"2026-08-17T23:46:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T19:23:31.425064Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-10T01:40:35Z","title":"A Weak Penalty Neural ODE for Learning Chaotic Dynamics from Noisy Time Series","version":3},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:02.934722Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.06609"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3f61ad9edd2eb293b59fe03d15308622a294675d678f652beb24c890f995624b","observation_id":"6da89b23-3fc7-4cb9-a2b1-f0bea37f3a4a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-18T00:05:31.374798Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:18:18.862038Z","title":"Gilpin, Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05266 (2021)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.06609","last_updated":"2026-08-17T23:46:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T19:23:31.425064Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-10T01:40:35Z","title":"A Weak Penalty Neural ODE for Learning Chaotic Dynamics from Noisy Time Series","version":4},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:18:18.862038Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.06609"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d36aa7d88e07bff6d8cd5b18e7e6eb25586d55fa825496240e99d7dfe3680b70","observation_id":"47774e12-2403-4b96-b46f-20c62bcb17f6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T23:18:18.862038Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T15:50:00.751983Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.20141","last_updated":"2026-07-27T17:58:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T05:50:48.913906Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-22T03:09:56Z","title":"Fourier Weak SINDy: Spectral Test Function Selection for Robust Model Identification","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T15:50:00.751983Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.20141"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dbeddd223072a60a44149862d177fb923b2bd5bd32b71107f8436d55a1408223","observation_id":"187b51ee-05e7-4179-b31b-cfeba6649d0a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T15:50:00.751983Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2110.05266","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T15:24:51.720122Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.18490","last_updated":"2026-07-20T20:19:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T05:46:45.742069Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T20:19:19Z","title":"Attractor Geometry Determines the Identifiability Limits of System Discovery","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T15:24:51.720122Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.05266","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.18490"},"observation_digest":"sha256:98460caf5e8e6fbb86ea17c62d21a9190d68aef892ee25fb5a9c33062a8c8164","observation_id":"4e0d4e44-a9ab-44e5-998f-230eaa0b8359","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T15:24:51.720122Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2110.05266/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2110.05266/integrity","json":"/paper/2110.05266/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2110.05266"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.05266","last_updated":"2023-01-29T08:19:43Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:50:19.393339Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-11T13:39:41Z","title":"Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 9 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2110.05266."}