{"as_of":"2026-08-17T17:20:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:e1f8a78e32bf15abd9c29176aea94c9d8b62e62958b9df748309c7bf273808be","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:35:17.466779Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-07-01T09:45:40.521546Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.13758","last_updated":"2022-12-12T04:47:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:18:08.295447Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-28T13:18:26Z","title":"Logical Fallacy Detection","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2202.13758","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:35:17.466779Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.13758","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.12466","last_updated":"2025-04-16T20:03:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:28:51.837701Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-16T20:03:47Z","title":"SLURG: Investigating the Feasibility of Generating Synthetic Online Fallacious Discourse","version":1},"reference_index":2022,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:35:17.466779Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.13758","citing_paper":"/paper/2504.12466"},"observation_digest":"sha256:298091075b0a73c1a38e1bd340dc146fca8b1d1b64c7027fcfb359c83e007107","observation_id":"738dde16-efe7-4cce-8157-d7ff8abf7274","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:35:17.466779Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.13758","last_updated":"2022-12-12T04:47:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:18:08.295447Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-28T13:18:26Z","title":"Logical Fallacy Detection","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2202.13758","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2202.13758","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T09:45:40.521546Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.13758 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":"c4923c8c-954c-4050-8333-f2e5ca1b42ec","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.31039","last_updated":"2026-06-30T02:17:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T03:26:12.058806Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-30T02:17:45Z","title":"Truth or Sophistry? LoFa: A Benchmark for LLM Robustness Against Logical Fallacies","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-07-01T06:11:50.941228Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.13758","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.31039"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1e2b885456bf954b347954286edf6baeca1b24d4a4b5045f5244ffec6a3be3be","observation_id":"caa11f0e-d49f-47a6-8a16-0d05e8862e3e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T09:45:40.522809Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2202.13758/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2202.13758/integrity","json":"/paper/2202.13758/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2202.13758"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.13758","last_updated":"2022-12-12T04:47:49Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:18:08.295447Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-28T13:18:26Z","title":"Logical Fallacy Detection"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2202.13758."}