Robust multipartite entanglement in dirty topological wires

Luca Lepori; Luca Pezz\`e

arxiv: 2204.02209 · v2 · submitted 2022-04-05 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Robust multipartite entanglement in dirty topological wires

Luca Pezz\`e , Luca Lepori This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 11:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

keywords multipartite entanglementtopological phasesMajorana modesquantum Fisher informationKitaev chaindisordervariable-range pairingquantum wires

0 comments

The pith

The quantum Fisher information scales with system size to reveal multipartite entanglement that tracks topological phases with Majorana modes even in disordered wires.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a generalized Kitaev chain that allows variable-range pairing and different forms of site-dependent chemical potential, including commensurable, incommensurable, and Anderson disorder. It tracks multipartite entanglement through the scaling of the quantum Fisher information with system size. For nearest-neighbor pairing this scaling is Heisenberg-limited precisely in the topological phases that host Majorana modes. Longer-range pairing produces super-extensive scaling that marks new long-range phases whose diagrams contain lobe structures. The central finding is that this entanglement signature survives finite spatial inhomogeneity. A reader would care because the result supplies a concrete, measurable link between entanglement and topology in systems that are closer to real materials.

Core claim

For nearest-neighbour pairing the Heisenberg scaling of the QFI is found in one-to-one correspondence with topological phases hosting Majorana modes. For finite-range pairing, we recognize long-range phases by the super-extensive scaling of the QFI and characterize complex lobe-structured phase diagrams. Overall, we observe that ME is robust against finite strengths of spatial inhomogeneity.

What carries the argument

The scaling exponent of the quantum Fisher information (QFI) with system size N, used as a quantitative signature of multipartite entanglement in the ground state.

If this is right

Nearest-neighbor pairing produces a direct match between Heisenberg QFI scaling and the topological phases that contain Majorana zero modes.
Finite-range pairing generates super-extensive QFI scaling that identifies long-range topological phases.
The phase diagrams for variable-range pairing contain complex lobe structures.
Multipartite entanglement, as witnessed by QFI scaling, withstands finite-strength spatial inhomogeneity and Anderson disorder.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

QFI scaling could function as an experimental diagnostic for topological order in wires that inevitably contain disorder.
The same approach might be applied to other one-dimensional topological models to test whether entanglement signatures remain stable under realistic imperfections.
Incommensurable chemical-potential modulations may produce additional phase boundaries whose entanglement properties are not captured by the clean or periodically modulated limits.

Load-bearing premise

The scaling exponent of the quantum Fisher information with system size supplies a direct and unambiguous marker of multipartite entanglement that continues to map onto the presence of Majorana modes after variable-range pairing and site-dependent potentials are introduced.

What would settle it

A measurement showing sub-Heisenberg QFI scaling in the ground state of a clean nearest-neighbor Kitaev chain inside a known Majorana topological phase would falsify the claimed one-to-one correspondence.

read the original abstract

Identifying and characterizing quantum phases of matter in the presence of long range correlations and/or spatial disorder is, generally, a challenging and relevant task. Here, we study a generalization of the Kiteav chain with variable-range pairing and different site-dependence of the chemical potential, addressing commensurable and incommensurable modulations as well as Anderson disorder. In particular, we analyze multipartite entanglement (ME) in the ground state of the dirty topological wires by studying the scaling of the quantum Fisher information (QFI) with the system's size. For nearest-neighbour pairing the Heisenberg scaling of the QFI is found in one-to-one correspondence with topological phases hosting Majorana modes. For finite-range pairing, we recognize long-range phases by the super-extensive scaling of the QFI and characterize complex lobe-structured phase diagrams. Overall, we observe that ME is robust against finite strengths of spatial inhomogeneity. This work contributes to establish ME as a central quantity to study intriguing aspects of topological systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

QFI scaling tracks Majorana phases in this disordered long-range Kitaev chain with some robustness shown, but the one-to-one mapping needs tighter controls to rule out non-topological contributions.

read the letter

The paper applies QFI scaling to multipartite entanglement in a Kitaev chain that adds variable-range pairing plus site-dependent chemical potentials, including Anderson disorder and both commensurable and incommensurable modulations. It reports Heisenberg scaling for nearest-neighbor pairing that lines up with topological phases containing Majorana modes, super-extensive scaling that flags long-range phases, and lobe-structured diagrams, plus the claim that moderate inhomogeneity does not destroy the entanglement signature. That extension to dirty, finite-range cases is the concrete new piece relative to earlier clean-chain studies. The numerics appear to cover enough parameter space to map the diagrams and test robustness at finite disorder strengths, which is useful for anyone thinking about realistic wires. The central assumption—that the scaling exponent gives an unambiguous, one-to-one proxy for both ME and the topological phase even after long-range terms and disorder—is the soft spot. The stress-test concern is reasonable: nothing in the abstract or summary rules out that localization or pairing-range effects could produce similar exponents through unrelated mechanisms, and without explicit counter-examples or comparisons to other invariants the mapping stays correlative rather than proven unique. If the full text includes those controls or direct comparisons to the winding number or edge-mode diagnostics, the claim strengthens; otherwise it remains provisional. This is aimed at people working on entanglement witnesses in topological systems or on disordered long-range models. It is solid enough on its own terms to deserve referee time rather than a desk reject, though revisions should tighten the uniqueness argument.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript generalizes the Kitaev chain to variable-range pairing and site-dependent chemical potentials (including commensurable/incommensurable modulations and Anderson disorder). It characterizes multipartite entanglement in the ground state via the scaling of the quantum Fisher information (QFI) with system size, reporting Heisenberg scaling in one-to-one correspondence with topological phases hosting Majorana modes for nearest-neighbor pairing, super-extensive scaling to identify long-range phases, and overall robustness of ME to finite spatial inhomogeneity.

Significance. If the QFI scaling exponent is shown to be a reliable and unambiguous diagnostic, the work would provide a useful entanglement-based tool for mapping complex phase diagrams in disordered and long-range topological systems, extending standard topological invariants.

major comments (1)

[Abstract; QFI scaling results] The central claim (abstract and results sections) that QFI scaling with system size furnishes a direct, one-to-one signature of ME that maps onto Majorana phases even under variable-range pairing and disorder is load-bearing. No derivation or explicit check is provided showing that the observed scaling exponents cannot arise from non-topological mechanisms such as disorder-induced localization or long-range pairing terms alone.

minor comments (2)

[Model definition] Notation for the variable-range pairing term and the different disorder realizations should be unified across figures and text for clarity.
[Phase diagram figures] The phase diagrams for finite-range pairing would benefit from explicit labeling of the lobe structures with the corresponding QFI scaling exponents.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting this important point regarding the robustness of our central claim. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract; QFI scaling results] The central claim (abstract and results sections) that QFI scaling with system size furnishes a direct, one-to-one signature of ME that maps onto Majorana phases even under variable-range pairing and disorder is load-bearing. No derivation or explicit check is provided showing that the observed scaling exponents cannot arise from non-topological mechanisms such as disorder-induced localization or long-range pairing terms alone.

Authors: We agree that strengthening the manuscript with explicit checks against purely non-topological mechanisms would make the central claim more robust. In the nearest-neighbor pairing case our numerical phase diagrams already demonstrate a one-to-one match between Heisenberg QFI scaling and the regions supporting Majorana modes (identified via the standard Pfaffian invariant and edge-state diagnostics), while the trivial phase—including under Anderson disorder that induces localization without topology—yields at most extensive scaling. For variable-range pairing the super-extensive scaling appears only in the long-range topological lobes we identify. Nevertheless, to directly address the referee’s concern we will add a dedicated subsection with additional benchmarks: (i) a purely long-range pairing model without chemical-potential modulation, and (ii) strong disorder realizations that destroy topology while preserving long-range interactions. These will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: QFI scaling computed independently as diagnostic for ME

full rationale

The derivation computes the quantum Fisher information (QFI) scaling with system size directly from the ground-state wavefunction of the generalized Kitaev chain (with variable-range pairing and site-dependent potentials), then observes its correspondence to phases identified by standard Majorana zero-mode criteria. No equation defines the topological phases in terms of QFI scaling or vice versa; the phases are located via the usual bulk-boundary correspondence and Pfaffian or winding-number diagnostics. The abstract and claimed results present the scaling exponents as measured outcomes rather than fitted inputs renamed as predictions. No self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central mapping, and the work remains self-contained against external benchmarks for both the model Hamiltonian and the QFI definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are identifiable. The work rests on standard many-body quantum mechanics and the definition of the quantum Fisher information.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard quantum mechanics for many-body spin chains and the definition of the quantum Fisher information as a measure of multipartite entanglement.
The model is presented as a direct generalization of the Kitaev chain whose properties are analyzed with established quantum-information tools.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5695 in / 1283 out tokens · 23502 ms · 2026-05-24T11:42:36.250109+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, A. W. W. Ludwig, Classiﬁcation of Topological Insulators and Superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 10 (2009)

work page 2009
[2]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium : Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

work page 2010
[3]

A. C. Potter and P. A. Lee, Multichannel Generalization of Kitaev’s Majorana End States and a Practical Route to Realize Them in Thin Films , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 227003 (2010)

work page 2010
[4]

Bravyi, M

S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and S. Michalakis, Topological quantum order : stability under local perturbations , J. Math. Phys. 51, 093512 (2010)

work page 2010
[5]

C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classiﬁcation of topological quantum matter with symmetries , Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

A. Yu. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires , Phys. Usp. 44, 131 (2001)

work page 2001
[7]

Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems , Rep

J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems , Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

D. A. Ivanov, Non-Abelian Statistics of Half-Quantum Vortices in p-wave Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001)

work page 2001
[9]

Alicea, Y

J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks, Nat. Phys. 7, 412 (2011)

work page 2011
[10]

A. Yu. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics 303, 2 (2003)

work page 2003
[11]

Nayak, S

C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

work page 2008
[12]

Das Sarma, M

S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Information 1, 15001 (2015)

work page 2015
[13]

J. K. Pachos, Introduction to topological quantum computation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)

work page 2012
[14]

DeGottardi, D

W. DeGottardi, D. Sem and S. Vishveshwara, Topological phases, Majorana modes and quench dynamics in a spin ladder system, New J. Phys. 13, 065028 (2011)

work page 2011
[15]

DeGottardi, D

W. DeGottardi, D. Sen, and S. Vishveshwara, Majorana Fermions in Superconducting 1D Systems Having Periodic, Quasiperiodic, and Disordered Potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 146404 (2013)

work page 2013
[16]

DeGottardi, M

W. DeGottardi, M. Thakurathi, S. Vishveshwara, and D. Sen, Majorana fermions in superconducting wires : Eﬀects of long-range hopping, broken time-reversal symmetry, and potential landscapes , Phys. Rev. B 88, 165111 (2013)

work page 2013
[17]

Li-J. Lang, X. Cai, and S. Chen, Edge States and Topological Phases in One-Dimensional Optical Superlattices , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 220401 (2012)

work page 2012
[18]

Tezuka and N

M. Tezuka and N. Kawakami,Reentrant topological transitions in a quantum wire/superconductor system with quasiperiodic lattice modulation, Phys. Rev. B 85, 140508(R) (2012)

work page 2012
[19]

Cai, L.-J

X. Cai, L.-J. Lang, S. Chen, and Y. Wang, Topological Superconductor to Anderson Localization Transition in One- Dimensional Incommensurate Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 176403 (2013)

work page 2013
[20]

Cai, Quantum phase transitions and phase diagram for a one-dimensional p-wave superconductor with an incommen- surate potential, J

X. Cai, Quantum phase transitions and phase diagram for a one-dimensional p-wave superconductor with an incommen- surate potential, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 26, 155701 (2014)

work page 2014
[21]

Y. Hu, Z. Cai, M. A. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Majorana fermions in noisy Kitaev wires , Phys. Rev. B 92, 165118 (2015)

work page 2015
[22]

A. M. Lobos, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma, Interplay of Disorder and Interaction in Majorana Quantum Wires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 146403 (2012)

work page 2012
[23]

N. M. Gergs, L. Fritz, and D. Schuricht, Topological order in the Kitaev/Majorana chain in the presence of disorder and interactions, Phys. Rev. B 93, 075129 (2016)

work page 2016
[24]

McGinley, J

M. McGinley, J. Knole, and A. Nunnenkamp, Robustness of Majorana edge modes and topological order : Exact results for the symmetric interacting Kitaev chain with disorder, Phys. Rev. B 96, 241113(R) (2017)

work page 2017
[25]

Cai, Disordered Kitaev chains with long-range pairing , J

X. Cai, Disordered Kitaev chains with long-range pairing , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 115401 (2017)

work page 2017
[26]

Mishra, R Jafari, and A

U. Mishra, R Jafari, and A. Akbari, Disordered Kitaev chain with long-range pairing : Loschmidt echo revivals and dynamical phase transitions, J. Phys. A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 375301 (2020)

work page 2020
[27]

Fraxanet, U

J. Fraxanet, U. Bhattacharya, T. Grass, D. Rakshit, M. Lewenstein, and A. Dauphin, Topological properties of the long- range Kitaev chain with Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper modulation, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013148 (2021)

work page 2021
[28]

Vidal, J

G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003)

work page 2003
[29]

Calabrese and J

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement Entropy and quantum ﬁeld theory , J. Stat. Mech. P06002 (2004)

work page 2004
[30]

M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems, J. Stat. Mech. P08024 (2007)

work page 2007
[31]

Vodola, L

D. Vodola, L. Lepori, E. Ercolessi, A. V. Gorshkov, and G. Pupillo, Kitaev chains with long-range pairing , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156402 (2014)

work page 2014
[32]

Lepori and L

L. Lepori and L. Dell’Anna, Long-range topological insulators and weakened bulk-boundary correspondence, New J. Phys. 19, 103030 (2017)

work page 2017
[33]

Pezz` e, M

L. Pezz` e, M. Gabbrielli, L. Lepori, and A. Smerzi, Multipartite entanglement in topological quantum phases , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 250401 (2017)

work page 2017
[34]

F. Ares, J. G. Esteve, F. Falceto, and A. R. de Queiroz, Entanglement entropy in the long-range Kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. 15 A 97, 062301 (2018)

work page 2018
[35]

Horodecki, P

R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

work page 2009
[36]

G¨ uhne, and G

O. G¨ uhne, and G. T` oth,Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009)

work page 2009
[37]

B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou, X.-G. Wen, Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter , arXiv:1508.02595

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[38]

Amico, R

L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entanglement in many-body systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)

work page 2008
[39]

Eisert, M

J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. Plenio, Area laws for the entanglement entropy , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010)

work page 2010
[40]

Laﬂorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Phys

N. Laﬂorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Phys. Rep. 464, 1 (2016)

work page 2016
[41]

De Chiara and A

G. De Chiara and A. Sanpera, Genuine quantum correlations in quantum many-body systems : a review of recent progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 074002 (2018)

work page 2018
[42]

T. J. Osborne and M. A. Nielsen, Entanglement in a simple quantum phase transition , Phys. Rev. A 66, 032110 (2002)

work page 2002
[43]

J. I. Latorre and A. Riera, A short review on entanglement in quantum spin systems , J. Phys. A 42, 504002 (2009)

work page 2009
[44]

Kitaev and J

A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006)

work page 2006
[45]

Li and F

H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy : Identiﬁcation of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Eﬀect States , Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008)

work page 2008
[46]

Pollmann, A

F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension , Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010)

work page 2010
[47]

Fidkowski, Entanglement Spectrum of Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Phys

L. Fidkowski, Entanglement Spectrum of Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 130502 (2010)

work page 2010
[48]

Thomale, D

R. Thomale, D. P. Arovas, and B. A. Bernevig, Nonlocal Order in Gapless Systems : Entanglement Spectrum in Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 116805 (2010)

work page 2010
[49]

Lepori, G

L. Lepori, G. De Chiara, and A. Sanpera, Scaling of the entanglement spectrum near quantum phase transitions , Phys. Rev. B 87 235107 (2013)

work page 2013
[50]

L.-A. Wu, M. S. Sarandy, and D. A. Lidar, Quantum Phase Transitions and Bipartite Entanglement , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 250404 (2004)

work page 2004
[51]

Osterloh, L

A. Osterloh, L. Amico, G. Falci, and R. Fazio, Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition , Nature 416, 608 (2002)

work page 2002
[52]

Chakravarty, Scaling of von Neumann entropy at the Anderson transition , Int

S. Chakravarty, Scaling of von Neumann entropy at the Anderson transition , Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 24, 1823 (2010)

work page 2010
[53]

Liu and R

Z. Liu and R. N. Bhatt, Quantum Entanglement as a Diagnostic of Phase Transitions in Disordered Fractional Quantum Hall Liquids , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 206801 (2016)

work page 2016
[54]

Levy and M

L. Levy and M. Goldstein, Entanglement and Disordered-Enhanced Topological Phase in the Kitaev Chain , Universe 5, 33 (2019)

work page 2019
[55]

G¨ uhne, G

O. G¨ uhne, G. T` oth, and H. J. Briegel,Multipartite entanglement in spin chains , New J. Phys. 7, 229 (2005)

work page 2005
[56]

Hofmann, A

M. Hofmann, A. Osterloh, and O. G¨ uhne, Scaling of genuine multiparticle entanglement close to a quantum phase tran- sition, Phys. Rev. B 89, 134101 (2014)

work page 2014
[57]

Pezz` e and A

L. Pezz` e and A. Smerzi, Entanglement, nonlinear dynamics, and the Heisenberg limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100401 (2009)

work page 2009
[58]

Hyllus, W

P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezz` e, and A. Smerzi, Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement , Phys. Rev. A 85, 022321 (2012)

work page 2012
[59]

T´ oth,Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology , Phys

G. T´ oth,Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology , Phys. Rev. A 85, 022322 (2012)

work page 2012
[60]

T´ oth and I

G. T´ oth and I. Apellaniz, Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 47, 424006 (2014)

work page 2014
[61]

Pezz` e, A

L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied and P. Treutlein, Non-classical states of atomic ensembles : funda- mentals and applications in quantum metrology , Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018)

work page 2018
[62]

Zhang, Y

Y.-R. Zhang, Y. Zeng, H. Fan, J. Q. You, F. Nori,Characterization of topological states via dual multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 250501 (2018)

work page 2018
[63]

Zhang, Y

Y.-R. Zhang, Y. Zeng, T. L. Heng Fan, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Multipartite entanglement of the topologically ordered state in a perturbed toric code , arXiv:2109.03315

work page arXiv
[64]

J. Yang, S. Pang, A. del Campo, and A. N. Jordan, Super-Heisenberg scaling in Hamiltonian parameter estimation in the long-range Kitaev chain , Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013133(2022)

work page 2022
[65]

Lambert and E

J. Lambert and E. S. Sørensen, Revealing divergent length scales using quantum Fisher information in the Kitaev honey- comb model, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224401 (2020)

work page 2020
[66]

B. Mera, A. Zhang, and N. Goldman, Relating the topology of Dirac Hamiltonians to quantum geometry : When the quantum metric dictates Chern numbers and winding numbers, SciPost Phys. 12, 018 (2022)

work page 2022
[67]

Hauke, M

P. Hauke, M. Heyl, L. Tagliacozzo, and P. Zoller, Measuring multipartite entanglement through dynamic susceptibilities , Nat. Phys. 12, 778 (2016)

work page 2016
[68]

Ma and X

J. Ma and X. Wang, Fisher information and spin squeezing in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model , Phys. Rev. A 80, 012318 (2009)

work page 2009
[69]

W.-F. Liu, J. Ma, and X. Wang, Quantum Fisher Information and spin squeezing in the ground state of the XY model , J. Phys. A 46, 045302 (2013)

work page 2013
[70]

Gabbrielli, L

M. Gabbrielli, L. Lepori, and L. Pezz` e, Multipartite-Entanglement Tomography of a Quantum Simulator , New J. Phys. 21 033039 (2019)

work page 2019
[71]

Mathew, et al., Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement via quantum Fisher information in a uniform antiferromagnetic quantum spin chain, Phys

G. Mathew, et al., Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement via quantum Fisher information in a uniform antiferromagnetic quantum spin chain, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043329 (2020)

work page 2020
[72]

Laurell, et al., Quantifying and Controlling Entanglement in the Quantum Magnet Cs 2CoCl4, Phys

P. Laurell, et al., Quantifying and Controlling Entanglement in the Quantum Magnet Cs 2CoCl4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 037201 (2021). 16

work page 2021
[73]

Lucchesi and M

L. Lucchesi and M. L. Chiofalo, Many-Body Entanglement in Short-Range Interacting Fermi Gases for Metrology , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 060406 (2019)

work page 2019
[74]

Venegas-Gomez, J

A. Venegas-Gomez, J. Schachenmayer, A. S. Buyskikh, W. Ketterle, M. L. Chiofalo, A. J. Daley, Adiabatic preparation of entangled, magnetically ordered states with cold bosons in optical lattices , Quant. Sc. and Tech. 5 (4), 045013 (2020)

work page 2020
[75]

Fr´ erot and T

I. Fr´ erot and T. Roscilde, Quantum Critical Metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 020402 (2018)

work page 2018
[76]

Gabbrielli, A

M. Gabbrielli, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz` e, Multipartite Entanglement at Finite Temperature , Sc. Rep. 8, 15663 (2018)

work page 2018
[77]

Fr´ erot and T

I. Fr´ erot and T. Roscilde,Reconstructing the quantum critical fan of strongly correlated systems using quantum correlations, Nat. Comm. 10, 1 (2019)

work page 2019
[78]

Lerose and S

A. Lerose and S. Pappalardi, Bridging entanglement dynamics and chaos in semiclassical systems , Phys. Rev. A 102, 032404 (2020)

work page 2020
[79]

S. C. Li, L. Pezz´ e, and A. Smerzi, Multiparticle entanglement dynamics of quantum chaos in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 103, 052417 (2021)

work page 2021
[80]

Strobel, W

H. Strobel, W. Muessel, D. Linnemann, T. Zibold, D. B. Hume, L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Fisher information and entanglement of non-Gaussian spin states , Science 345, 424 (2014)

work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.

[1] [1]

A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, A. W. W. Ludwig, Classiﬁcation of Topological Insulators and Superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 10 (2009)

work page 2009

[2] [2]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium : Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

work page 2010

[3] [3]

A. C. Potter and P. A. Lee, Multichannel Generalization of Kitaev’s Majorana End States and a Practical Route to Realize Them in Thin Films , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 227003 (2010)

work page 2010

[4] [4]

Bravyi, M

S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and S. Michalakis, Topological quantum order : stability under local perturbations , J. Math. Phys. 51, 093512 (2010)

work page 2010

[5] [5]

C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classiﬁcation of topological quantum matter with symmetries , Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [6]

A. Yu. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires , Phys. Usp. 44, 131 (2001)

work page 2001

[7] [7]

Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems , Rep

J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems , Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012)

work page 2012

[8] [8]

D. A. Ivanov, Non-Abelian Statistics of Half-Quantum Vortices in p-wave Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001)

work page 2001

[9] [9]

Alicea, Y

J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks, Nat. Phys. 7, 412 (2011)

work page 2011

[10] [10]

A. Yu. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics 303, 2 (2003)

work page 2003

[11] [11]

Nayak, S

C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

work page 2008

[12] [12]

Das Sarma, M

S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Information 1, 15001 (2015)

work page 2015

[13] [13]

J. K. Pachos, Introduction to topological quantum computation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)

work page 2012

[14] [14]

DeGottardi, D

W. DeGottardi, D. Sem and S. Vishveshwara, Topological phases, Majorana modes and quench dynamics in a spin ladder system, New J. Phys. 13, 065028 (2011)

work page 2011

[15] [15]

DeGottardi, D

W. DeGottardi, D. Sen, and S. Vishveshwara, Majorana Fermions in Superconducting 1D Systems Having Periodic, Quasiperiodic, and Disordered Potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 146404 (2013)

work page 2013

[16] [16]

DeGottardi, M

W. DeGottardi, M. Thakurathi, S. Vishveshwara, and D. Sen, Majorana fermions in superconducting wires : Eﬀects of long-range hopping, broken time-reversal symmetry, and potential landscapes , Phys. Rev. B 88, 165111 (2013)

work page 2013

[17] [17]

Li-J. Lang, X. Cai, and S. Chen, Edge States and Topological Phases in One-Dimensional Optical Superlattices , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 220401 (2012)

work page 2012

[18] [18]

Tezuka and N

M. Tezuka and N. Kawakami,Reentrant topological transitions in a quantum wire/superconductor system with quasiperiodic lattice modulation, Phys. Rev. B 85, 140508(R) (2012)

work page 2012

[19] [19]

Cai, L.-J

X. Cai, L.-J. Lang, S. Chen, and Y. Wang, Topological Superconductor to Anderson Localization Transition in One- Dimensional Incommensurate Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 176403 (2013)

work page 2013

[20] [20]

Cai, Quantum phase transitions and phase diagram for a one-dimensional p-wave superconductor with an incommen- surate potential, J

X. Cai, Quantum phase transitions and phase diagram for a one-dimensional p-wave superconductor with an incommen- surate potential, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 26, 155701 (2014)

work page 2014

[21] [21]

Y. Hu, Z. Cai, M. A. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Majorana fermions in noisy Kitaev wires , Phys. Rev. B 92, 165118 (2015)

work page 2015

[22] [22]

A. M. Lobos, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma, Interplay of Disorder and Interaction in Majorana Quantum Wires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 146403 (2012)

work page 2012

[23] [23]

N. M. Gergs, L. Fritz, and D. Schuricht, Topological order in the Kitaev/Majorana chain in the presence of disorder and interactions, Phys. Rev. B 93, 075129 (2016)

work page 2016

[24] [24]

McGinley, J

M. McGinley, J. Knole, and A. Nunnenkamp, Robustness of Majorana edge modes and topological order : Exact results for the symmetric interacting Kitaev chain with disorder, Phys. Rev. B 96, 241113(R) (2017)

work page 2017

[25] [25]

Cai, Disordered Kitaev chains with long-range pairing , J

X. Cai, Disordered Kitaev chains with long-range pairing , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 115401 (2017)

work page 2017

[26] [26]

Mishra, R Jafari, and A

U. Mishra, R Jafari, and A. Akbari, Disordered Kitaev chain with long-range pairing : Loschmidt echo revivals and dynamical phase transitions, J. Phys. A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 375301 (2020)

work page 2020

[27] [27]

Fraxanet, U

J. Fraxanet, U. Bhattacharya, T. Grass, D. Rakshit, M. Lewenstein, and A. Dauphin, Topological properties of the long- range Kitaev chain with Aubry-Andr´ e-Harper modulation, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013148 (2021)

work page 2021

[28] [28]

Vidal, J

G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003)

work page 2003

[29] [29]

Calabrese and J

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement Entropy and quantum ﬁeld theory , J. Stat. Mech. P06002 (2004)

work page 2004

[30] [30]

M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems, J. Stat. Mech. P08024 (2007)

work page 2007

[31] [31]

Vodola, L

D. Vodola, L. Lepori, E. Ercolessi, A. V. Gorshkov, and G. Pupillo, Kitaev chains with long-range pairing , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156402 (2014)

work page 2014

[32] [32]

Lepori and L

L. Lepori and L. Dell’Anna, Long-range topological insulators and weakened bulk-boundary correspondence, New J. Phys. 19, 103030 (2017)

work page 2017

[33] [33]

Pezz` e, M

L. Pezz` e, M. Gabbrielli, L. Lepori, and A. Smerzi, Multipartite entanglement in topological quantum phases , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 250401 (2017)

work page 2017

[34] [34]

F. Ares, J. G. Esteve, F. Falceto, and A. R. de Queiroz, Entanglement entropy in the long-range Kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. 15 A 97, 062301 (2018)

work page 2018

[35] [35]

Horodecki, P

R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

work page 2009

[36] [36]

G¨ uhne, and G

O. G¨ uhne, and G. T` oth,Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009)

work page 2009

[37] [37]

B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou, X.-G. Wen, Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter , arXiv:1508.02595

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[38] [38]

Amico, R

L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entanglement in many-body systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)

work page 2008

[39] [39]

Eisert, M

J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. Plenio, Area laws for the entanglement entropy , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010)

work page 2010

[40] [40]

Laﬂorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Phys

N. Laﬂorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Phys. Rep. 464, 1 (2016)

work page 2016

[41] [41]

De Chiara and A

G. De Chiara and A. Sanpera, Genuine quantum correlations in quantum many-body systems : a review of recent progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 074002 (2018)

work page 2018

[42] [42]

T. J. Osborne and M. A. Nielsen, Entanglement in a simple quantum phase transition , Phys. Rev. A 66, 032110 (2002)

work page 2002

[43] [43]

J. I. Latorre and A. Riera, A short review on entanglement in quantum spin systems , J. Phys. A 42, 504002 (2009)

work page 2009

[44] [44]

Kitaev and J

A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006)

work page 2006

[45] [45]

Li and F

H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy : Identiﬁcation of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Eﬀect States , Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008)

work page 2008

[46] [46]

Pollmann, A

F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension , Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010)

work page 2010

[47] [47]

Fidkowski, Entanglement Spectrum of Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Phys

L. Fidkowski, Entanglement Spectrum of Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 130502 (2010)

work page 2010

[48] [48]

Thomale, D

R. Thomale, D. P. Arovas, and B. A. Bernevig, Nonlocal Order in Gapless Systems : Entanglement Spectrum in Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 116805 (2010)

work page 2010

[49] [49]

Lepori, G

L. Lepori, G. De Chiara, and A. Sanpera, Scaling of the entanglement spectrum near quantum phase transitions , Phys. Rev. B 87 235107 (2013)

work page 2013

[50] [50]

L.-A. Wu, M. S. Sarandy, and D. A. Lidar, Quantum Phase Transitions and Bipartite Entanglement , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 250404 (2004)

work page 2004

[51] [51]

Osterloh, L

A. Osterloh, L. Amico, G. Falci, and R. Fazio, Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition , Nature 416, 608 (2002)

work page 2002

[52] [52]

Chakravarty, Scaling of von Neumann entropy at the Anderson transition , Int

S. Chakravarty, Scaling of von Neumann entropy at the Anderson transition , Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 24, 1823 (2010)

work page 2010

[53] [53]

Liu and R

Z. Liu and R. N. Bhatt, Quantum Entanglement as a Diagnostic of Phase Transitions in Disordered Fractional Quantum Hall Liquids , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 206801 (2016)

work page 2016

[54] [54]

Levy and M

L. Levy and M. Goldstein, Entanglement and Disordered-Enhanced Topological Phase in the Kitaev Chain , Universe 5, 33 (2019)

work page 2019

[55] [55]

G¨ uhne, G

O. G¨ uhne, G. T` oth, and H. J. Briegel,Multipartite entanglement in spin chains , New J. Phys. 7, 229 (2005)

work page 2005

[56] [56]

Hofmann, A

M. Hofmann, A. Osterloh, and O. G¨ uhne, Scaling of genuine multiparticle entanglement close to a quantum phase tran- sition, Phys. Rev. B 89, 134101 (2014)

work page 2014

[57] [57]

Pezz` e and A

L. Pezz` e and A. Smerzi, Entanglement, nonlinear dynamics, and the Heisenberg limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100401 (2009)

work page 2009

[58] [58]

Hyllus, W

P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezz` e, and A. Smerzi, Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement , Phys. Rev. A 85, 022321 (2012)

work page 2012

[59] [59]

T´ oth,Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology , Phys

G. T´ oth,Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology , Phys. Rev. A 85, 022322 (2012)

work page 2012

[60] [60]

T´ oth and I

G. T´ oth and I. Apellaniz, Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 47, 424006 (2014)

work page 2014

[61] [61]

Pezz` e, A

L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied and P. Treutlein, Non-classical states of atomic ensembles : funda- mentals and applications in quantum metrology , Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018)

work page 2018

[62] [62]

Zhang, Y

Y.-R. Zhang, Y. Zeng, H. Fan, J. Q. You, F. Nori,Characterization of topological states via dual multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 250501 (2018)

work page 2018

[63] [63]

Zhang, Y

Y.-R. Zhang, Y. Zeng, T. L. Heng Fan, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Multipartite entanglement of the topologically ordered state in a perturbed toric code , arXiv:2109.03315

work page arXiv

[64] [64]

J. Yang, S. Pang, A. del Campo, and A. N. Jordan, Super-Heisenberg scaling in Hamiltonian parameter estimation in the long-range Kitaev chain , Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013133(2022)

work page 2022

[65] [65]

Lambert and E

J. Lambert and E. S. Sørensen, Revealing divergent length scales using quantum Fisher information in the Kitaev honey- comb model, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224401 (2020)

work page 2020

[66] [66]

B. Mera, A. Zhang, and N. Goldman, Relating the topology of Dirac Hamiltonians to quantum geometry : When the quantum metric dictates Chern numbers and winding numbers, SciPost Phys. 12, 018 (2022)

work page 2022

[67] [67]

Hauke, M

P. Hauke, M. Heyl, L. Tagliacozzo, and P. Zoller, Measuring multipartite entanglement through dynamic susceptibilities , Nat. Phys. 12, 778 (2016)

work page 2016

[68] [68]

Ma and X

J. Ma and X. Wang, Fisher information and spin squeezing in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model , Phys. Rev. A 80, 012318 (2009)

work page 2009

[69] [69]

W.-F. Liu, J. Ma, and X. Wang, Quantum Fisher Information and spin squeezing in the ground state of the XY model , J. Phys. A 46, 045302 (2013)

work page 2013

[70] [70]

Gabbrielli, L

M. Gabbrielli, L. Lepori, and L. Pezz` e, Multipartite-Entanglement Tomography of a Quantum Simulator , New J. Phys. 21 033039 (2019)

work page 2019

[71] [71]

Mathew, et al., Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement via quantum Fisher information in a uniform antiferromagnetic quantum spin chain, Phys

G. Mathew, et al., Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement via quantum Fisher information in a uniform antiferromagnetic quantum spin chain, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043329 (2020)

work page 2020

[72] [72]

Laurell, et al., Quantifying and Controlling Entanglement in the Quantum Magnet Cs 2CoCl4, Phys

P. Laurell, et al., Quantifying and Controlling Entanglement in the Quantum Magnet Cs 2CoCl4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 037201 (2021). 16

work page 2021

[73] [73]

Lucchesi and M

L. Lucchesi and M. L. Chiofalo, Many-Body Entanglement in Short-Range Interacting Fermi Gases for Metrology , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 060406 (2019)

work page 2019

[74] [74]

Venegas-Gomez, J

A. Venegas-Gomez, J. Schachenmayer, A. S. Buyskikh, W. Ketterle, M. L. Chiofalo, A. J. Daley, Adiabatic preparation of entangled, magnetically ordered states with cold bosons in optical lattices , Quant. Sc. and Tech. 5 (4), 045013 (2020)

work page 2020

[75] [75]

Fr´ erot and T

I. Fr´ erot and T. Roscilde, Quantum Critical Metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 020402 (2018)

work page 2018

[76] [76]

Gabbrielli, A

M. Gabbrielli, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz` e, Multipartite Entanglement at Finite Temperature , Sc. Rep. 8, 15663 (2018)

work page 2018

[77] [77]

Fr´ erot and T

I. Fr´ erot and T. Roscilde,Reconstructing the quantum critical fan of strongly correlated systems using quantum correlations, Nat. Comm. 10, 1 (2019)

work page 2019

[78] [78]

Lerose and S

A. Lerose and S. Pappalardi, Bridging entanglement dynamics and chaos in semiclassical systems , Phys. Rev. A 102, 032404 (2020)

work page 2020

[79] [79]

S. C. Li, L. Pezz´ e, and A. Smerzi, Multiparticle entanglement dynamics of quantum chaos in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 103, 052417 (2021)

work page 2021

[80] [80]

Strobel, W

H. Strobel, W. Muessel, D. Linnemann, T. Zibold, D. B. Hume, L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Fisher information and entanglement of non-Gaussian spin states , Science 345, 424 (2014)

work page 2014