{"as_of":"2026-08-09T13:23:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:8de6f01324f386b72f90763600c7ee52d90c2926d661a99754c25216737b8f21","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":1,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T05:47:18.135752Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.09472","last_updated":"2022-10-19T15:00:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T20:02:15.323049Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-17T23:28:22Z","title":"Multi-granularity Argument Mining in Legal Texts","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2210.09472","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T05:47:18.135752Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09472 , year =","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13260","last_updated":"2026-07-14T20:47:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:00:35.881926Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-14T20:47:38Z","title":"Discourse-Aware Policy Analysis with Argumentation: A Hybrid LLM-Symbolic Framework for Disaster Governance","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T05:47:18.135752Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2210.09472","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13260"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d35cf6d9307c2f9935752e161adf99ba58ea92d407c706306f17446c4100a0f5","observation_id":"15c8c8ec-92b5-403a-9425-fae4fdcf3ef9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T05:47:18.135752Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2210.09472/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2210.09472/integrity","json":"/paper/2210.09472/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2210.09472"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2210.09472","last_updated":"2022-10-19T15:00:55Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T20:02:15.323049Z","submitted_at":"2022-10-17T23:28:22Z","title":"Multi-granularity Argument Mining in Legal Texts"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2210.09472."}