{"as_of":"2026-08-11T11:11:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:052d97533c42ab66683736fc86306789450027b36819cc8f7794e7f27b12a8fe","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":6,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":6,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":6,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":6,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:45:43.191396Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-22T04:34:35.305867Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","last_updated":"2023-10-10T17:34:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:30:45.921201Z","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T15:47:31Z","title":"Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2305.13160","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"Can chatgpt defend the truth? automatic dialectical evaluation elicits llms' deficiencies in reasoning","venue":null,"work_id":"fb2537f0-f705-4d89-942b-41ebb411806a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2308.03958","last_updated":"2024-02-15T01:03:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2023-08-07T23:48:36Z","title":"Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models","version":2},"reference_index":46,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-05-16T14:48:08.508109Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2305.13160","citing_paper":"/paper/2308.03958"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4adf65ec266267746974f95a20c8c0758ab8835bfe26723497c7900013fd6cf","observation_id":"d5592b88-58c9-4709-b4a9-e589b0fe4615","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-16T14:48:08.713557Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","last_updated":"2023-10-10T17:34:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:30:45.921201Z","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T15:47:31Z","title":"Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2305.13160","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"Can chatgpt defend the truth? automatic dialectical evaluation elicits llms' deficiencies in reasoning","venue":null,"work_id":"fb2537f0-f705-4d89-942b-41ebb411806a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2309.05653","last_updated":"2023-10-03T02:48:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T14:43:09.380195Z","submitted_at":"2023-09-11T17:47:22Z","title":"MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuning","version":3},"reference_index":48,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:39.330438Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2305.13160","citing_paper":"/paper/2309.05653"},"observation_digest":"sha256:82f5fdb36f62d03b9d3f31e9cde444f370a34dc86ae8cdab0281b9d4769e4178","observation_id":"7dc50bd8-cb66-4f96-b657-1422c089c494","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:39.486599Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","last_updated":"2023-10-10T17:34:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:30:45.921201Z","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T15:47:31Z","title":"Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2305.13160","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:45:43.191396Z","title":"Can chatgpt defend its belief in truth? evaluating llm reasoning via debate, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.17273","last_updated":"2025-01-28T20:06:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T16:10:45.324066Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-28T20:06:09Z","title":"Tailored Truths: Optimizing LLM Persuasion with Personalization and Fabricated Statistics","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:45:43.191396Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2305.13160","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.17273"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec7d512ed06009025d13726b5aa562c4844e9dee2637a2a43cfaf2d60250bb55","observation_id":"faaaa970-02ec-44d4-be60-9ddfed7302c0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:45:43.191396Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","last_updated":"2023-10-10T17:34:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:30:45.921201Z","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T15:47:31Z","title":"Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2305.13160","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:40:57.359166Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.21607","last_updated":"2025-06-20T11:58:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T16:11:41.465013Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-20T11:58:00Z","title":"CORE-KG: An LLM-Driven Knowledge Graph Construction Framework for Human Smuggling Networks","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:40:57.359166Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2305.13160","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.21607"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0693b8d72f807f444641d3cdad6697943c434ae2903a2a8e48fa8c49d9e460ac","observation_id":"60e87c6e-acdc-4666-9514-a8be478ff5d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:40:57.359166Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","last_updated":"2023-10-10T17:34:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:30:45.921201Z","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T15:47:31Z","title":"Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2305.13160","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T10:16:51.264870Z","title":"Can chatgpt defend its belief in truth? evaluating llm reasoning via debate","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2509.04292","last_updated":"2025-09-04T15:03:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:56:43.869188Z","submitted_at":"2025-09-04T15:03:02Z","title":"Inverse IFEval: Can LLMs Unlearn Stubborn Training Conventions to Follow Real Instructions?","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T10:16:51.264870Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2305.13160","citing_paper":"/paper/2509.04292"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d52f527623c40ae5545223986ae244733d9e9605fbe277d483bf389c8354ac73","observation_id":"235258ff-99f6-432f-81a2-93df029e39c2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T10:16:51.264870Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","last_updated":"2023-10-10T17:34:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:30:45.921201Z","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T15:47:31Z","title":"Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2305.13160","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"Can chatgpt defend the truth? automatic dialectical evaluation elicits llms' deficiencies in reasoning","venue":null,"work_id":"fb2537f0-f705-4d89-942b-41ebb411806a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.21967","last_updated":"2026-05-21T03:56:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:47:03.831108Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T03:56:42Z","title":"Reinforced Preference Optimization for Reasoning-Augmented Recommendations","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-22T04:34:28.214871Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2305.13160","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.21967"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bc391c83de6d4f553f29f70a7964870a2c8aed8c83f37451a45f5d99aae8d467","observation_id":"a5b41146-aca3-4a49-9d22-b267c1e72740","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-22T04:34:35.313310Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2305.13160/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2305.13160/integrity","json":"/paper/2305.13160/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2305.13160"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2305.13160","last_updated":"2023-10-10T17:34:15Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:30:45.921201Z","submitted_at":"2023-05-22T15:47:31Z","title":"Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 6 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2305.13160."}