{"as_of":"2026-08-21T13:15:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7482bdab4632c3caaa66b6e0c7a371e1b4e4712ac09892e5d27817d9bac18f72","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":5,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":5,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":5,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":5,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T22:24:59.576587Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T17:04:56.390773Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2312.16549","last_updated":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T23:22:20.905338Z","submitted_at":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","title":"How Robust are LLMs to In-Context Majority Label Bias?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2312.16549","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:47:43.803848Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16549 (2023)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.18924","last_updated":"2024-11-28T05:24:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T07:34:00.358960Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-28T05:24:51Z","title":"The Impact of Example Selection in Few-Shot Prompting on Automated Essay Scoring Using GPT Models","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:47:43.803848Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2312.16549","citing_paper":"/paper/2411.18924"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ded5613d4a7ffd71a34b45a407372ea7b29adb065835b6d06487470c7103481","observation_id":"5dd8f1be-d2b1-49e0-bf59-feb24ca057b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T10:47:43.803848Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2312.16549","last_updated":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T23:22:20.905338Z","submitted_at":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","title":"How Robust are LLMs to In-Context Majority Label Bias?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2312.16549","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T23:52:00.861710Z","title":"How robust are llms to in-context majority label bias? arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16549, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.04037","last_updated":"2025-05-30T03:11:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:43:55.366014Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-06T12:57:50Z","title":"Exploring Imbalanced Annotations for Effective In-Context Learning","version":2},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T23:52:00.861710Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2312.16549","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.04037"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0645c9343abea5f2eaab6aa909bc3b7ee3dd4ee4ea1b0254c812219b7a31ee57","observation_id":"5666dd03-3aa8-4fe2-a9a5-e674da4184e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T23:52:00.861710Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2312.16549","last_updated":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T23:22:20.905338Z","submitted_at":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","title":"How Robust are LLMs to In-Context Majority Label Bias?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2312.16549","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T22:24:59.576587Z","title":"How robust are llms to in- context majority label bias?arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16549, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.07251","last_updated":"2025-05-12T05:57:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:38:41.368007Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-12T05:57:39Z","title":"Incomplete In-context Learning","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T22:24:59.576587Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2312.16549","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.07251"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9342985a0b63c5fe1fc8439446d4af743c967780508680c40a263d99bfd4a23a","observation_id":"26cd35f1-ff27-4fe3-9998-4d6e690351fe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T22:24:59.576587Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2312.16549","last_updated":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T23:22:20.905338Z","submitted_at":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","title":"How Robust are LLMs to In-Context Majority Label Bias?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2312.16549","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2312.16549","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T17:04:56.390773Z","title":"How ro- bust are LLMs to in-context majority label bias?","venue":null,"work_id":"1273586f-27a3-4622-ad95-a788f2b57fa0","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.22714","last_updated":"2026-06-09T17:40:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T01:20:59.459430Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T16:51:04Z","title":"AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgments","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-22T05:08:30.607268Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2312.16549","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.22714"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f0e7abc1f1768da15d53ea9a081444bbef4922f76d93cf97d6564e359ace9b41","observation_id":"cf1d4fdf-6e18-4853-aa96-f9647dd536b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-22T05:11:06.793659Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2312.16549","last_updated":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T23:22:20.905338Z","submitted_at":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","title":"How Robust are LLMs to In-Context Majority Label Bias?","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2312.16549","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2312.16549","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T17:04:56.390773Z","title":"How ro- bust are LLMs to in-context majority label bias?","venue":null,"work_id":"1273586f-27a3-4622-ad95-a788f2b57fa0","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.22714","last_updated":"2026-06-09T17:40:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T01:20:59.459430Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-21T16:51:04Z","title":"AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgments","version":3},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T17:04:22.688250Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2312.16549","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.22714"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9cf69ef4298382997ac0be6b78a891d87bedeeada9737598dbdf6b62cfba7f84","observation_id":"51eed431-f71f-408f-9891-0905eeb0f13a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-30T17:04:56.392225Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2312.16549/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2312.16549/integrity","json":"/paper/2312.16549/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2312.16549"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2312.16549","last_updated":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T23:22:20.905338Z","submitted_at":"2023-12-27T12:20:12Z","title":"How Robust are LLMs to In-Context Majority Label Bias?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 21 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 5 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2312.16549."}