pith. sign in

arxiv: 2402.16956 · v2 · pith:Z2QG2JD7new · submitted 2024-02-26 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph· quant-ph

Positivity in Amplitudes and Quantum Entanglement

Rafael Aoude , Gilly Elor , Grant N. Remmen , Olcyr Sumensari This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 04:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-phquant-ph
keywords positivityentanglementS-matrixscattering amplitudesforward amplitudesdisentanglersflavorwave packets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Positivity of the imaginary part of forward elastic amplitudes ensures consistency of the entanglement generated by the S-matrix for states with arbitrary internal quantum numbers such as flavor.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a link between the positivity of the imaginary part of forward elastic amplitudes in perturbative scattering and the requirement that the S-matrix produce physically consistent entanglement when acting on multi-particle states carrying internal quantum numbers like flavor. It examines how the S-matrix evolves entanglement and identifies disentanglers as initial states for which the S-matrix reduces subsystem entanglement. A wave-packet regularization is introduced to handle divergences that appear when computing 2-to-2 entanglement from plane-wave states. A sympathetic reader would care because the result ties standard unitarity and causality constraints on amplitudes to quantum-information properties of scattering processes involving flavored particles.

Core claim

Positivity of the imaginary part of forward elastic amplitudes for perturbative scattering is connected with consistency of the entanglement generated by the S-matrix for states with arbitrary internal quantum numbers such as flavor. Disentanglers are certain highly entangled initial states for which the action of the S-matrix is to decrease subsystem entanglement. A framework based on wave packets regularizes the spacetime divergences that appear in the plane-wave derivation of the 2-to-2 entanglement expression.

What carries the argument

The connection between positivity of Im(forward amplitude) from the optical theorem and the entanglement generated by S-matrix evolution on states with internal quantum numbers, supported by wave-packet regularization of 2-to-2 entanglement.

If this is right

  • Positivity of the forward amplitude imaginary part is required for consistent entanglement generation under the S-matrix for particles with flavor or other internal quantum numbers.
  • Disentanglers form a distinct class of initial states whose entanglement decreases under S-matrix action.
  • The wave-packet method yields finite, regularized expressions for entanglement entropy in 2-to-2 scattering.
  • The positivity-entanglement link applies directly to states with arbitrary internal quantum numbers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Entanglement calculations might supply an independent route to deriving or testing positivity bounds in effective theories with flavor symmetries.
  • The framework could be extended to study information flow and subsystem correlations in multi-particle final states at colliders.
  • Similar connections may appear in non-perturbative or higher-point processes, offering new diagnostics for S-matrix consistency.

Load-bearing premise

The entanglement generated by the S-matrix action on multi-particle states with internal degrees of freedom can be meaningfully compared to the positivity condition on the imaginary part of the forward amplitude without additional assumptions about the form of the S-matrix or the definition of subsystems.

What would settle it

An explicit perturbative S-matrix example in which the imaginary part of the forward amplitude is negative yet all entanglement measures for states with internal quantum numbers remain consistent, or a positive-amplitude case that produces inconsistent entanglement for some flavored initial state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2402.16956 by Gilly Elor, Grant N. Remmen, Olcyr Sumensari, Rafael Aoude.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The blue surface and volume below it corresponds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the connection of positivity of the imaginary part of forward elastic amplitudes for perturbative scattering with consistency of the entanglement generated by the S-matrix, for states with arbitrary internal quantum numbers such as flavor. We also analyze "disentanglers," certain highly entangled initial states for which the action of the S-matrix is to decrease subsystem entanglement. As a by-product, we develop a framework based on wave packets to regularize the spacetime divergences that appear in the plane-wave derivation of the $2\to2$ entanglement expression.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims a connection between positivity of the imaginary part of forward elastic amplitudes for perturbative scattering and consistency of the entanglement generated by the S-matrix acting on states with arbitrary internal quantum numbers such as flavor. It introduces 'disentanglers' as highly entangled initial states for which S-matrix action decreases subsystem entanglement, and develops a wave-packet framework to regularize spacetime divergences appearing in the plane-wave derivation of the 2→2 entanglement expression.

Significance. If the central connection holds under a well-defined notion of subsystem and consistency, the work would link the optical theorem to quantum-information properties of scattering with internal degrees of freedom, offering a new perspective on positivity bounds. The wave-packet regularization is a concrete technical contribution that addresses a known divergence issue in entanglement calculations for scattering states.

major comments (2)
  1. [Definition of subsystem and consistency for internal degrees of freedom] The central claim (abstract and main derivation) links Im(forward amplitude) positivity to entanglement consistency but presupposes a definite bipartition for internal quantum numbers (e.g., flavor). The skeptic note correctly identifies that different bipartitions (particle-type vs. momentum-space) can change whether positivity is required to keep the post-scattering state physical; the wave-packet regularization regularizes plane-wave issues but does not fix this choice, making the necessity claim dependent on an unstated assumption.
  2. [Disentanglers analysis] § on disentanglers: the definition of these states and the claim that S-matrix action decreases their entanglement must be shown to be independent of the positivity assumption itself; otherwise the construction risks circularity with the main positivity-entanglement link.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify in the introduction the precise scope (perturbative vs. non-perturbative) and whether the results extend beyond 2→2 scattering.
  2. Add explicit definitions or appendices for the reduced density matrix when internal degrees of freedom are traced out, to make the entanglement measure reproducible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We appreciate the acknowledgment of the potential link between amplitude positivity and entanglement consistency, as well as the value of the wave-packet regularization. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate to clarify assumptions and strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Definition of subsystem and consistency for internal degrees of freedom] The central claim (abstract and main derivation) links Im(forward amplitude) positivity to entanglement consistency but presupposes a definite bipartition for internal quantum numbers (e.g., flavor). The skeptic note correctly identifies that different bipartitions (particle-type vs. momentum-space) can change whether positivity is required to keep the post-scattering state physical; the wave-packet regularization regularizes plane-wave issues but does not fix this choice, making the necessity claim dependent on an unstated assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the bipartition choice is essential to the definition of entanglement and the consistency condition. The manuscript focuses on states with arbitrary internal quantum numbers such as flavor, and the bipartition is taken with respect to these flavor degrees of freedom, which is the natural and physically motivated choice for the flavored scattering processes considered. Other bipartitions (e.g., momentum-space) are outside the scope and would indeed lead to different requirements. The wave-packet regularization addresses spacetime divergences in the entanglement calculation but does not resolve the bipartition issue. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and main derivation to explicitly state this bipartition assumption, motivate its choice, and reference the skeptic note to clarify that the positivity-entanglement connection is established under this specific bipartition. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Disentanglers analysis] § on disentanglers: the definition of these states and the claim that S-matrix action decreases subsystem entanglement must be shown to be independent of the positivity assumption itself; otherwise the construction risks circularity with the main positivity-entanglement link.

    Authors: The disentanglers are defined as highly entangled initial states on which the S-matrix decreases subsystem entanglement; this definition relies only on the properties of the initial state and the S-matrix action, without reference to positivity. The demonstration that entanglement decreases for these states will be reorganized in the revised section to present the construction first, independently of positivity, followed by the conditions (including positivity where relevant) under which the decrease holds. This separation will make the logical independence explicit and eliminate any potential circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation relies on unitarity and optical theorem applied to S-matrix.

full rationale

The paper connects positivity of Im(forward elastic amplitude) to entanglement consistency via a new wave-packet regularization for plane-wave divergences. This framework is constructed from standard S-matrix properties and does not reduce any central claim to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The abstract and context show an independent exploration of the link for states with internal quantum numbers, with no quoted steps where a prediction equals its input by construction or where uniqueness is imported solely from prior author work. Self-contained against external benchmarks of unitarity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review; standard QFT assumptions such as unitarity and perturbative expansion are implicit but not detailed.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption S-matrix is unitary and acts on states with internal quantum numbers
    Standard assumption in perturbative scattering theory invoked by the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • disentanglers no independent evidence
    purpose: Highly entangled initial states for which S-matrix action decreases subsystem entanglement
    New term and concept introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5616 in / 1165 out tokens · 22666 ms · 2026-05-24T04:07:35.049481+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Automated computation of spin-density matrices and quantum observables for collider physics

    hep-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An automated framework in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO computes tree-level production spin-density matrices and quantum observables for generic collider processes, with validation on ttbar and VV and new applications to multi-to...

  2. Multipositivity Constrains the Chiral Lagrangian

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multipositivity bounds derived from planar tree-level scattering amplitudes constrain Wilson coefficients of the chiral Lagrangian from below by the chiral anomaly.

  3. The Equivalence Principle at High Energies Completes the Spectrum

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tree-level gravitational scattering under the equivalence principle mandates single-particle states in all irreducible representations constructible from a single seed charge, with equal interaction strengths.

  4. A collider as a quantum computer

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Collider scattering processes such as electron-positron annihilation to muon pairs can be represented as quantum circuits with unitary and non-unitary components.

  5. Polarization, Maximal Concurrence, and Pure States in High-Energy Collisions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Local spin polarization imposes an upper bound on concurrence in two-qubit systems that is saturated by pure states, and this bound lowers maximal entanglement in the polarized e+e- to Z to qqbar process relative to t...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Particle Physics at the Higgs Centre

    Let us define ξ = λ2/λ1 > 0 and write x(1) = (cos θ1, sin θ1) as a general unit vector and x(2) = ν(cos θ2, sin θ2) for some ν > 0. (Roughly speaking, ν describes the ratio in the overall size of the couplings of the two elements of the Schmidt basis to the ultraviolet states.) Writing cos(θ1 − θ2) = µ, ξ = ζ/(1 − ζ), and ν = η/(1 − η), the parameter spac...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation,

    M. Froissart, “Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation,” Physical Review 123 (1961) 1053

    work page 1961

  3. [3]

    Unitarity and high-energy behavior of scat- tering amplitudes,

    A. Martin, “Unitarity and high-energy behavior of scat- tering amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 1432

    work page 1963

  4. [4]

    Absolute upper bounds for pi pi scattering,

    L. Lukaszuk and A. Martin, “Absolute upper bounds for pi pi scattering,” Nuovo Cim. A 52 (1967) 122

    work page 1967

  5. [5]

    Locality and Unitarity from Singularities and Gauge Invariance

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Rodina, and J. Trnka, “Locality and Unitarity of Scattering Amplitudes from Singulari- ties and Gauge Invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 231602, arXiv:1612.02797 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    All Loop Scattering as a Counting Problem,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, G. Salvatori, P.-G. Plamon- don, and H. Thomas, “All Loop Scattering as a Counting Problem,” arXiv:2309.15913 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nico- lis, and R. Rattazzi, “Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion,” JHEP 10 (2006) 014, arXiv:hep-th/0602178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    The Story of \cal O: Positivity constraints in effective field theories

    A. Jenkins and D. O’Connell, “The Story of O: Positivity constraints in effective field theories,” arXiv:hep-th/0609159

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Energy's and amplitudes' positivity

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, and E. Trincherini, “En- ergy’s and amplitudes’ positivity,” JHEP 05 (2010) 095, arXiv:0912.4258 [hep-th] . [Erratum: JHEP 11 (2011) 128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Road Signs for UV-Completion

    G. Dvali, A. Franca, and C. Gomez, “Road Signs for UV-Completion,” arXiv:1204.6388 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    The EFT-Hedron,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, “The EFT-Hedron,” JHEP 05 (2021) 259, arXiv:2012.15849 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Consistency of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Consistency of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory,” JHEP 12 (2019) 032, arXiv:1908.09845 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Flavor Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Flavor Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 081601, arXiv:2004.02885 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 149901]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Signs, spin, SMEFT: Sum rules at dimension six,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Signs, spin, SMEFT: Sum rules at dimension six,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 036006, arXiv:2010.04723 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Spinning sum rules for the dimension-six SMEFT,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Spinning sum rules for the dimension-six SMEFT,” JHEP 09 (2022) 030, arXiv:2206.13524 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Convex Geometry Per- spective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field The- ory Space,

    C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, “Convex Geometry Per- spective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field The- ory Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 201601, arXiv:2005.03047 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory,

    T. Trott, “Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory,” JHEP 07 (2021) 143, arXiv:2011.10058 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung, and G. N. Remmen, “Quan- tum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analytic- ity,” Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064076, arXiv:1509.00851 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Positivity of Curvature-Squared Corrections in Gravity

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Positivity of Curvature- Squared Corrections in Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 051601, arXiv:1608.02942 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,” JHEP 12 (2014) 087, arXiv:1407.7865 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Weak Gravity Conjecture from Unitarity and Causality,

    Y. Hamada, T. Noumi, and G. Shiu, “Weak Gravity Conjecture from Unitarity and Causality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 051601, arXiv:1810.03637 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity conjecture,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, J.-Y. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity conjecture,” JHEP 03 (2022) 083, arXiv:2109.13937 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,

    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,” Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 777

    work page 1935

  24. [24]

    On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,

    J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physics Physique Fizika 1 (1964) 195

    work page 1964

  25. [25]

    Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable the- ories,

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable the- ories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880

    work page 1969

  26. [26]

    Observation of quantum entanglement in top-quark pairs using the ATLAS detector,

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Observation of quantum entanglement in top-quark pairs using the ATLAS detector,” arXiv:2311.07288 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,

    Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova, “Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 907, arXiv:2003.02280 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Testing Bell inequalities in Higgs bo- son decays,

    A. J. Barr, “Testing Bell inequalities in Higgs bo- son decays,” Phys. Lett. B 825 (2022) 136866, arXiv:2106.01377 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities,

    C. Severi, C. D. E. Boschi, F. Maltoni, and M. Sioli, “Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 285, arXiv:2110.10112 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas, “Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 666, arXiv:2205.00542 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Quantum state tomography, entanglement detection and Bell violation prospects in weak decays of mas- sive particles,

    R. Ashby-Pickering, A. J. Barr, and A. Wierzchucka, “Quantum state tomography, entanglement detection and Bell violation prospects in weak decays of mas- sive particles,” JHEP 05 (2023) 020, arXiv:2209.13990 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair pro- duction at the LHC,

    R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni, and L. Mantani, “Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair pro- duction at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 055007, arXiv:2203.05619 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Con- straining new physics in entangled two-qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs,

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, and E. Gabrielli, “Con- straining new physics in entangled two-qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 162, arXiv:2208.11723 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Quantum entanglement and top spin correlations in SMEFT at higher orders,

    C. Severi and E. Vryonidou, “Quantum entanglement and top spin correlations in SMEFT at higher orders,” JHEP 01 (2023) 148, arXiv:2210.09330 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2000

    work page 2000

  36. [36]

    Expectations and entropy inequalities for finite quantum systems,

    G. Lindblad, “Expectations and entropy inequalities for finite quantum systems,” Commun.Math. Phys. 39 (1974) 111

    work page 1974

  37. [37]

    Holographic Mutual Information is Monogamous

    P. Hayden, M. Headrick, and A. Maloney, “Holographic Mutual Information is Monogamous,” Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 046003, arXiv:1107.2940 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, “A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section,” JHEP 03 (2021) 178, arXiv:1905.00577 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Entanglement wedge cross section inequalities from replicated geometries,

    N. Bao, A. Chatwin-Davies, and G. N. Rem- men, “Entanglement wedge cross section inequalities from replicated geometries,” JHEP 07 (2021) 113, 7 arXiv:2106.02640 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Entanglement Suppression and Emergent Symmetries of Strong Interactions

    S. R. Beane, D. B. Kaplan, N. Klco, and M. J. Sav- age, “Entanglement Suppression and Emergent Symme- tries of Strong Interactions,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 102001, arXiv:1812.03138 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Symmetry from entangle- ment suppression,

    I. Low and T. Mehen, “Symmetry from entangle- ment suppression,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 074014, arXiv:2104.10835 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Silence of Binary Kerr Black Holes,

    R. Aoude, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, C. S. Machado, and M.-K. Tam, “Silence of Binary Kerr Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 181602, arXiv:2007.09486 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Minimal spin deflection of Kerr-Newman and supersymmetric black hole,

    B.-T. Chen, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, and M. K. Tam, “Minimal spin deflection of Kerr-Newman and supersymmetric black hole,” JHEP 10 (2021) 011, arXiv:2106.12518 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Entanglement Suppression, Enhanced Symmetry and a Standard-Model-like Higgs Boson,

    M. Carena, I. Low, C. E. M. Wagner, and M.-L. Xiao, “Entanglement Suppression, Enhanced Symmetry and a Standard-Model-like Higgs Boson,” arXiv:2307.08112 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Entanglement and the double copy,

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Entanglement and the double copy,” JHEP 05 (2020) 100, arXiv:2002.10470 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Entropy growth in perturbative scattering,

    C. Cheung, T. He, and A. Sivaramakrishnan, “Entropy growth in perturbative scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 045013, arXiv:2304.13052 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Entanglement Entropy: A Perturbative Calculation

    V. Rosenhaus and M. Smolkin, “Entanglement En- tropy: A Perturbative Calculation,” JHEP 12 (2014) 179, arXiv:1403.3733 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    Momentum-space entanglement and renormalization in quantum field theory

    V. Balasubramanian, M. B. McDermott, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Momentum-space entangle- ment and renormalization in quantum field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 045014, arXiv:1108.3568 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Momentum space entanglement from the Wilsonian effective action,

    M. H. M. Costa, J. v. d. Brink, F. S. Nogueira, and G. a. I. Krein, “Momentum space entanglement from the Wilsonian effective action,”Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 065024, arXiv:2207.12103 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Variation of Entanglement Entropy in Scattering Process

    S. Seki, I. Y. Park, and S.-J. Sin, “Variation of Entan- glement Entropy in Scattering Process,” Phys. Lett. B 743 (2015) 147, arXiv:1412.7894 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Entanglement Entropy of Scattering Particles

    R. Peschanski and S. Seki, “Entanglement Entropy of Scattering Particles,” Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016) 89, arXiv:1602.00720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Evaluation of Entanglement Entropy in High Energy Elastic Scattering,

    R. Peschanski and S. Seki, “Evaluation of Entanglement Entropy in High Energy Elastic Scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 076012, arXiv:1906.09696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Variation of entanglement entropy and mutual information in fermion-fermion scattering

    J. Fan, Y. Deng, and Y.-C. Huang, “Variation of en- tanglement entropy and mutual information in fermion- fermion scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 065017, arXiv:1703.07911 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Algorithms for entanglement renormalization

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, “Algorithms for entangle- ment renormalization,” Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009) 144108, arXiv:0707.1454 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  55. [55]

    Consistency Conditions for an AdS/MERA Correspondence

    N. Bao, C. Cao, S. M. Carroll, A. Chatwin-Davies, N. Hunter-Jones, J. Pollack, and G. N. Remmen, “Con- sistency conditions for an AdS multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 125036, arXiv:1504.06632 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Multifield positivity bounds for inflation,

    M. Freytsis, S. Kumar, G. N. Remmen, and N. L. Rodd, “Multifield positivity bounds for inflation,” JHEP 09 (2023) 041, arXiv:2210.10791 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Entanglement in neutrino oscillations

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, and F. Illuminati, “Entanglement in neutrino oscillations,” EPL 85 (2009) 50002, arXiv:0707.4476 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    Neutrino oscillations: Entanglement, energy-momentum conservation and QFT

    E. K. Akhmedov and A. Y. Smirnov, “Neutrino os- cillations: Entanglement, energy-momentum conser- vation and QFT,” Found. Phys. 41 (2011) 1279, arXiv:1008.2077 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Softness and Amplitudes' Positivity for Spinning Particles

    B. Bellazzini, “Softness and amplitudes’ positiv- ity for spinning particles,” JHEP 02 (2017) 034, arXiv:1605.06111 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, “Ampli- tudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,” JHEP 02 (2019) 137, arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th] . 1 Supplemental Material for Positivity in Amplitudes from Quantum Entanglement Rafael Aoude, Gilly Elor, Grant N. Remmen, and Olcyr Sumensari In this Supplemental Material, we first provide a detailed derivatio...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019