{"as_of":"2026-08-10T19:09:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:bc7fba0a43a2aa8c3bb404875988998f59b361a6749b955d160abcde2f282495","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":12,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":12,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":12,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":12,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:28:52.855847Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-24T00:38:39.819593Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16369 (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"860c54c3-6fa3-4579-a8b4-41b533bc62e8","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.13068","last_updated":"2026-04-18T08:25:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T20:18:53.393132Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-20T17:17:55Z","title":"Uncovering Logit Suppression Vulnerabilities in LLM Safety Alignment","version":4},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-24T00:38:36.992597Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2405.13068"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ddf147947224f8c2cacdcc4951267065843c5083b6139f93d1760adb5cf6a6fe","observation_id":"366c2e06-2992-430f-869e-3a8443a2753c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-24T00:38:39.826939Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16369 (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"860c54c3-6fa3-4579-a8b4-41b533bc62e8","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.04295","last_updated":"2024-08-30T11:57:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T23:34:13.332065Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-05T06:57:30Z","title":"Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey","version":2},"reference_index":123,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-15T02:20:44.368219Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2407.04295"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d3fd3244df8878d5690310f6ff9dd299c5b855c1f0bef0df056b35a8c461fe56","observation_id":"e224c9e7-a992-4dda-95ae-7a0912f68518","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-15T02:20:44.527408Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:28:52.855847Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.06391","last_updated":"2025-06-05T16:53:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:20:47.850082Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T16:53:29Z","title":"From Rogue to Safe AI: The Role of Explicit Refusals in Aligning LLMs with International Humanitarian Law","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:28:52.855847Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.06391"},"observation_digest":"sha256:71d613d597e3f83f2432992295d31005ac79a2f8b644e7f5bd0e54c15f82ba00","observation_id":"34896cab-3e45-46f0-b59a-f53c3fcb04d0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:28:52.855847Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:40:20.621417Z","title":"Don’t say no: Jailbreaking llm by suppressing refusal","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.07402","last_updated":"2025-06-09T03:52:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:07:41.500171Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-09T03:52:43Z","title":"Beyond Jailbreaks: Revealing Stealthier and Broader LLM Security Risks Stemming from Alignment Failures","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:40:20.621417Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.07402"},"observation_digest":"sha256:779ca27fd15ebb925f304d2ff0627cc3db0bf9fb1e4b75554dc8e55876b1a096","observation_id":"72ba783a-5b5a-4037-a109-1035b69cdfe8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:40:20.621417Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:20:57.656839Z","title":"Don’t say no: Jailbreaking llm by suppressing refusal.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.163692024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.18543","last_updated":"2026-05-25T10:15:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:35:45.497926Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-23T11:53:31Z","title":"SoK: A Comprehensive Security Analysis of Jailbreak Resilience in GPT and DeepSeek Models","version":2},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:20:57.656839Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.18543"},"observation_digest":"sha256:74e9935e0e81d0ce4e6e0dd9125f4fcc5e1b80bbfe20e16350733c9cca7bda39","observation_id":"42a48662-4628-4735-83ee-9602c01ffcd3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:20:57.656839Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T21:34:41.418171Z","title":"Don’t say no: Jailbreaking llm by suppressing refusal,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.23930","last_updated":"2025-06-30T14:59:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T17:35:03.005113Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-30T14:59:25Z","title":"Leveraging the Potential of Prompt Engineering for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T21:34:41.418171Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.23930"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f622edb0d1355c51e5d8e759e646d0f1871422537cff5f401b95dc159ff664a4","observation_id":"36a7ccd1-900a-40af-92c3-8adda79cb4ea","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T21:34:41.418171Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T20:31:33.756873Z","title":"Don’t say no: Jailbreaking llm by suppressing refusal","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.10404","last_updated":"2025-08-14T07:12:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:31:17.622343Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-14T07:12:44Z","title":"Layer-Wise Perturbations via Sparse Autoencoders for Adversarial Text Generation","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T20:31:33.756873Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.10404"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5da7969cbac4fff2ffa2ecb0d63955d73cdb0d2954f69b216cea8fb22c440916","observation_id":"17b10907-dc4b-451b-b535-e0841e28f91e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T20:31:33.756873Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T14:51:03.812481Z","title":"Don’t Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Sup- pressing Refusal","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.20848","last_updated":"2025-08-28T14:40:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T22:07:47.609622Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-28T14:40:27Z","title":"JADES: A Universal Framework for Jailbreak Assessment via Decompositional Scoring","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T14:51:03.812481Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2508.20848"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f0eee666e5e7de9af903325552f2e371dc7a30362d4149d73224f7a66cbf09f6","observation_id":"0acbcdc5-64f0-4ef2-937b-b660adecc5c2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T14:51:03.812481Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T09:25:58.741705Z","title":"Don’t say no: Jailbreaking LLM by suppressing refusal.CoRR, abs/2404.16369, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.15476","last_updated":"2026-07-04T04:20:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T02:45:04.316908Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-17T09:38:54Z","title":"SoK: Systematizing LLM Prompt Security: Taxonomies, Datasets, and Unified Evaluation of Attacks and Defenses","version":3},"reference_index":246,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T09:25:58.741705Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.15476"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d9f1ec02d037821aa600b78b84de9be9303c5a36528ded8c808e3576d4bae342","observation_id":"53dee416-6ad5-4d83-a501-a5a3c659e3de","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T09:25:58.741705Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16369 (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"860c54c3-6fa3-4579-a8b4-41b533bc62e8","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2601.02670","last_updated":"2026-04-08T04:11:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T22:40:46.465095Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-06T02:58:22Z","title":"Break Me If You Can: Self-Jailbreaking of Aligned LLMs via Lexical Insertion Prompting","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-16T18:04:44.543311Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2601.02670"},"observation_digest":"sha256:56a64364652cacaf3e33de630ae2f75de37c29dab5c50acd5532baa3ad94f184","observation_id":"85d5ee7b-4e79-40c2-a9b7-8a97940035a2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-16T18:08:13.063281Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16369 (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"860c54c3-6fa3-4579-a8b4-41b533bc62e8","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.11309","last_updated":"2026-04-13T11:12:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T14:33:23.383610Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-13T11:12:30Z","title":"The Salami Slicing Threat: Exploiting Cumulative Risks in LLM Systems","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T16:07:31.602378Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.11309"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ede84d1958bd00839fb5b709083896c28c9ee5003a7db0aab5af94ff9c0b7f8c","observation_id":"a46b9f70-7727-424c-9626-25a7dfb622f3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-11T09:16:03.956567Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2404.16369","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16369 (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"860c54c3-6fa3-4579-a8b4-41b533bc62e8","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.21674","last_updated":"2026-05-20T19:31:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T23:32:05.693503Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-20T19:31:07Z","title":"Adversarial Reframing: A Framework for Targeted Generation in Language Models","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-22T09:35:51.862736Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.16369","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.21674"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d97820ccad1c7cb3be2909c0cfd886a53bd581e927438aa779319a94515b2ee4","observation_id":"ed39c6ea-b358-4627-9245-5009824ddd61","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-22T09:36:20.999209Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2404.16369/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2404.16369/integrity","json":"/paper/2404.16369/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2404.16369"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.16369","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:27:32Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T21:23:08.873449Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-25T07:15:23Z","title":"Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 12 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2404.16369."}