{"as_of":"2026-08-15T03:40:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:bacd7f3fa1296ff9c8240493bd6c73165b759539bec460c029126665d6b9a8c6","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":7,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":7,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":7,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":7,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T10:34:43.241259Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T08:47:49.684166Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","last_updated":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:03:06.255913Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","title":"Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.06864","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:38:21.650690Z","title":"Validating llm-generated programs with metamor- phic prompt testing,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.07835","last_updated":"2025-02-11T01:12:11Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T05:01:41.799695Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-11T01:12:11Z","title":"Bridging LLM-Generated Code and Requirements: Reverse Generation technique and SBC Metric for Developer Insights","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:38:21.650690Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.06864","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.07835"},"observation_digest":"sha256:89a508dc2744a0dd5c20b974cb5ccdf2018fab770533a6f34c0dc88b05d35b29","observation_id":"83a5046e-82d4-48c3-9dc3-eca41a54f7c0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-08T13:38:21.650690Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","last_updated":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:03:06.255913Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","title":"Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2406.06864","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-03T08:47:49.684166Z","title":"Validating LLM-generated programs with metamorphic prompt testing","venue":null,"work_id":"35df3b13-14d0-48ad-92a5-f5458891843e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.13898","last_updated":"2026-05-12T13:47:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:06:02.817307Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T13:47:26Z","title":"Bidirectional Empowerment of Metamorphic Testing and Large Language Models: A Systematic Survey","version":1},"reference_index":104,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-15T05:15:57.846560Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.06864","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.13898"},"observation_digest":"sha256:66e513e34537aa74491a9ea13ca944d3c915272e62ad1cfb209a81ec17882522","observation_id":"2f671420-3634-40eb-bd4c-6bb9af0dc2bc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-15T05:19:46.565678Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","last_updated":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:03:06.255913Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","title":"Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2406.06864","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-03T08:47:49.684166Z","title":"Validating LLM-generated programs with metamorphic prompt testing","venue":null,"work_id":"35df3b13-14d0-48ad-92a5-f5458891843e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02333","last_updated":"2026-07-02T15:37:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T16:41:20.075618Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T15:37:54Z","title":"Guiding Human Validation of LLM-Generated Code via Verifiable Literate Programming","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T08:42:04.804042Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.06864","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02333"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6fd3a7e229d303ed64ab07b4abbdcacecb0c762919e34f67c34dd5c281ae3c4f","observation_id":"babf031f-03bb-4385-9e3e-d4a0658ecb5b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-03T08:47:49.685605Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","last_updated":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:03:06.255913Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","title":"Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.06864","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T20:26:11.905313Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06864 , year =","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.16646","last_updated":"2026-07-18T05:32:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T00:44:04.681125Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-18T05:32:37Z","title":"Falsification-Based Verification of LLM-Generated Optimization Models: Sound Test Batteries and Their Detection Limits","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T20:26:11.905313Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.06864","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.16646"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d2ececb5f731c086a16e176286a90d57ddd8531b7cd248d7cdb8f531db80886","observation_id":"f9f217ce-49c7-478e-80c5-4589626d3ff2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T20:26:11.905313Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","last_updated":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:03:06.255913Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","title":"Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.06864","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T13:17:36.546350Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06864 , year =","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.20474","last_updated":"2026-05-24T13:46:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T10:55:47.546513Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-24T13:46:54Z","title":"VeriSimpl: Robust Optimization Modeling from Natural Language using Simplification-based Verification","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T13:17:36.546350Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.06864","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.20474"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0300a85ac54310e7f77bcc978cb99b44753a69c2e3a66253a76c8b216def876c","observation_id":"0bc8414c-c64f-451f-b506-6f15c9cd79b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T13:17:36.546350Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","last_updated":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:03:06.255913Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","title":"Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.06864","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T10:34:43.034231Z","title":"2024 , eprint =","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.09799","last_updated":"2026-08-10T16:19:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:59:19.738502Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-10T16:19:00Z","title":"SpecPath: Testing Coding Agents Across Contract-Equivalent Specification Histories","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T10:34:43.034231Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.06864","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.09799"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c60c51d27d6c550ee8842e1cef59218e366868bf636f85db4a41529db61edb21","observation_id":"0c79d044-2a55-4291-9290-e03c44c45013","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T10:34:43.034231Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","last_updated":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:03:06.255913Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","title":"Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.06864","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T10:34:43.241259Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.09799","last_updated":"2026-08-10T16:19:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:59:19.738502Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-10T16:19:00Z","title":"SpecPath: Testing Coding Agents Across Contract-Equivalent Specification Histories","version":1},"reference_index":91,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T10:34:43.241259Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.06864","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.09799"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8f28f77937ceee7db6e8acadc0fdb9cc6b92272064de8e2bea469af180f1e3c9","observation_id":"eba28fe5-b6af-4a81-87df-f26cbe59a92c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T10:34:43.241259Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2406.06864/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2406.06864/integrity","json":"/paper/2406.06864/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2406.06864"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.06864","last_updated":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:03:06.255913Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T00:40:17Z","title":"Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 15 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 7 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2406.06864."}