{"as_of":"2026-08-10T05:59:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7cf307a29b71dba7d69c8915f4135e8436dc53a5b5fdf949aeaf7099ce1676e2","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:37:07.227639Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T12:33:24.921159Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.01964","last_updated":"2024-08-06T02:06:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:40:05.778984Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-02T05:43:15Z","title":"Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.01964","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:37:07.227639Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.07748","last_updated":"2025-07-10T13:26:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T00:51:47.248513Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T13:26:34Z","title":"When Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical Governance","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:37:07.227639Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.01964","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.07748"},"observation_digest":"sha256:db91c1600cae1b7771d98989751c56c0346c655f5e0ba5e5a41036cb73097f2b","observation_id":"e73b6d9a-8499-488d-8290-a815d76e4f00","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:37:07.227639Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.01964","last_updated":"2024-08-06T02:06:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:40:05.778984Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-02T05:43:15Z","title":"Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.01964","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.01964","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T12:33:24.921159Z","title":"InFindings of the association for computa- tional linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 2898–2904","venue":null,"work_id":"679bd24a-4c2f-40d3-980f-fe92fd103d36","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.29076","last_updated":"2026-06-02T23:33:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:53:11.162808Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-27T20:29:41Z","title":"Structured Prompt Optimization Meets Reinforcement Learning for Global and Local Interpretability over Complex Text","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T12:25:21.687730Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.01964","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.29076"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22f2133ea3741c8a20c491882f8e388fd42e9c2c809d9f9d16b0b5b3c3a0e1a9","observation_id":"fad21a11-d8be-45fc-9f97-c75973fd0848","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T12:33:24.922923Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2407.01964/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2407.01964/integrity","json":"/paper/2407.01964/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2407.01964"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.01964","last_updated":"2024-08-06T02:06:20Z","latest_version":4,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:40:05.778984Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-02T05:43:15Z","title":"Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2407.01964."}