{"as_of":"2026-08-23T17:09:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:5df80a80f3135276be1260f788ca957e8ef31b744692fbbc352610edea22aa97","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T17:58:36.288008Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:24:26.428269Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.19683","last_updated":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:30:22.726245Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","title":"Revisiting the robustness of post-hoc interpretability methods","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.19683","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T17:58:36.288008Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.00726","last_updated":"2025-02-02T09:15:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T16:36:49.694606Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-02T09:15:27Z","title":"Perspectives for Direct Interpretability in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning","version":1},"reference_index":129,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T17:58:36.288008Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.19683","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.00726"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f110c7f79d9081aeabd0a8c7a62207d5ab5ddc2de4b5f47aaf5cfffdb667338c","observation_id":"ac6e34b8-8f03-4284-b089-d5ca36c364fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T17:58:36.288008Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.19683","last_updated":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:30:22.726245Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","title":"Revisiting the robustness of post-hoc interpretability methods","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.19683","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.19683","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:24:26.428269Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19683 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":"f4abd3a8-024c-4beb-835f-b0c17ef9424f","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.29346","last_updated":"2026-06-28T11:29:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T19:08:58.319123Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-28T11:29:15Z","title":"Reliability, Faithfulness, and the Limits of Post-hoc Explanations of Opaque Scientific Models","version":1},"reference_index":141,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:20:23.645840Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.19683","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.29346"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5bbd79063a10d4c2759ffc7d6dcf6ade6dbaa1bf93109ecafc88eb4b7ea60fa","observation_id":"c3b76152-f138-4896-ac52-90788049f5bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-30T08:24:26.429596Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2407.19683/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2407.19683/integrity","json":"/paper/2407.19683/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2407.19683"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.19683","last_updated":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:30:22.726245Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-29T03:55:52Z","title":"Revisiting the robustness of post-hoc interpretability methods"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 23 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2407.19683."}