{"as_of":"2026-08-10T08:26:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:10f21f83a7e48f4ed7bbb39c1d98d19e11def70f4d7527215a23aece94203241","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T04:23:35.059140Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:37:44.278380Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2409.12405","last_updated":"2024-09-19T02:03:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:32:53.333828Z","submitted_at":"2024-09-19T02:03:04Z","title":"On the Effectiveness of LLMs for Manual Test Verifications","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2409.12405","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T04:23:35.059140Z","title":"On the effectiveness of llms for manual test verifications,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.03617","last_updated":"2025-02-05T21:06:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T13:43:47.719527Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T21:06:30Z","title":"Resource-Efficient & Effective Code Summarization","version":1},"reference_index":84,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T04:23:35.059140Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2409.12405","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.03617"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1fa460cf1d899da4326b835ff1bf278545c9883fb11d13e41734fa39f095d7df","observation_id":"8fe49fde-a48e-4c0b-be86-e23905f3a50a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T04:23:35.059140Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2409.12405","last_updated":"2024-09-19T02:03:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:32:53.333828Z","submitted_at":"2024-09-19T02:03:04Z","title":"On the Effectiveness of LLMs for Manual Test Verifications","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2409.12405","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2409.12405","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:37:44.278380Z","title":"On the Effectiveness of LLMs for Manual Test Verifications","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"46d74ea4-878f-4296-805b-7440c407ef73","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13035","last_updated":"2025-07-17T12:06:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T16:14:31.135288Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-17T12:06:29Z","title":"Investigating the Performance of Small Language Models in Detecting Test Smells in Manual Test Cases","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:37:42.380053Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2409.12405","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13035"},"observation_digest":"sha256:529c023a325e815095104b53ac6f78baca12424706c7d3314d0a2d5d8d2a0ad3","observation_id":"ed9cc589-bfcc-4dd2-bf42-96b95d9cbecf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:37:44.404666Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2409.12405/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2409.12405/integrity","json":"/paper/2409.12405/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2409.12405"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2409.12405","last_updated":"2024-09-19T02:03:04Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:32:53.333828Z","submitted_at":"2024-09-19T02:03:04Z","title":"On the Effectiveness of LLMs for Manual Test Verifications"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:30:57.382061+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2409.12405."}