{"as_of":"2026-08-17T16:54:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:02e2802c4473e325dda37cdee950e30d986e27f4e7acb181165745c129978d88","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":4,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":4,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T20:56:57.800865Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:05:52.630398Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.04616","last_updated":"2025-02-20T21:34:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:42:33.329124Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-06T20:33:22Z","title":"Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.04616","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T20:56:57.800865Z","title":"Lrq-fact: Llm-generated relevant questions for multimodal fact-checking","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.11416","last_updated":"2025-05-16T16:29:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:39:49.383602Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-16T16:29:19Z","title":"MID-L: Matrix-Interpolated Dropout Layer with Layer-wise Neuron Selection","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T20:56:57.800865Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.04616","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.11416"},"observation_digest":"sha256:34b1c53138c1eab2f3e55e6c9dec6e15eda6d8ce03a5ffa2fa47fb13bb538f63","observation_id":"e27f21b5-c215-48e7-9457-ab82b2409fb7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T20:56:57.800865Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.04616","last_updated":"2025-02-20T21:34:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:42:33.329124Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-06T20:33:22Z","title":"Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.04616","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:51:46.179013Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.12538","last_updated":"2025-06-14T15:27:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T04:17:59.598581Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-14T15:27:44Z","title":"RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:51:46.179013Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.04616","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.12538"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1daf6437fb7043fdb7309ed4f830b7c52388a046290a81bbcb3e757532fad627","observation_id":"7f4c8b79-16f6-4a57-8b36-7ffde87eebe9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:51:46.179013Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.04616","last_updated":"2025-02-20T21:34:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:42:33.329124Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-06T20:33:22Z","title":"Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.04616","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:41:41.092038Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.13038","last_updated":"2025-06-17T14:31:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T13:30:06.420632Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-16T02:03:41Z","title":"HKD4VLM: A Progressive Hybrid Knowledge Distillation Framework for Robust Multimodal Hallucination and Factuality Detection in VLMs","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:41:41.092038Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.04616","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.13038"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1db617a55fd409d5992bbdbea2638852b0d336e73690cde2b678ecb19c632c47","observation_id":"68d7183d-d260-4832-a783-88d45cf3c915","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:41:41.092038Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.04616","last_updated":"2025-02-20T21:34:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:42:33.329124Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-06T20:33:22Z","title":"Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2410.04616","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2410.04616","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:05:52.630398Z","title":"Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"45b35e5d-2a75-431b-9039-b28784ffc418","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.11821","last_updated":"2025-07-16T00:50:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:40:27.433540Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-16T00:50:09Z","title":"MNIST-Gen: A Modular MNIST-Style Dataset Generation Using Hierarchical Semantics, Reinforcement Learning, and Category Theory","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:05:52.541556Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.04616","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.11821"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ae28d396e572ba7185b1baa8160fd1133dfd398aed94f441e6278b767c3a4a6b","observation_id":"8a4e5e74-d8f9-4f9d-a20e-847d616b4f34","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:05:52.633566Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2410.04616/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2410.04616/integrity","json":"/paper/2410.04616/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2410.04616"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.04616","last_updated":"2025-02-20T21:34:03Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:42:33.329124Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-06T20:33:22Z","title":"Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2410.04616."}