{"as_of":"2026-08-16T21:28:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:d9be273bfe55c8afd0ecde35596047662bb4a092950fb1723422d1799f4ea146","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":3,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":3,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T19:44:09.136937Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T18:16:14.067578Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.10200","last_updated":"2025-01-17T13:48:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:58:49.301242Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-17T13:48:32Z","title":"Test Wars: A Comparative Study of SBST, Symbolic Execution, and LLM-Based Approaches to Unit Test Generation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.10200","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T19:44:09.136937Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.15227","last_updated":"2025-06-18T08:11:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:14:27.248409Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-18T08:11:10Z","title":"Large Language Models for Unit Testing: A Systematic Literature Review","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T19:44:09.136937Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.10200","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.15227"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1f2bd8a51a09efe226ebfc2084b2cd4f3b80f33862e34e1eaca417053116f533","observation_id":"1728f72e-2b68-4971-a452-1e1db9c26ece","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T19:44:09.136937Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.10200","last_updated":"2025-01-17T13:48:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:58:49.301242Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-17T13:48:32Z","title":"Test Wars: A Comparative Study of SBST, Symbolic Execution, and LLM-Based Approaches to Unit Test Generation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2501.10200","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.10200","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2501.10200","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T18:16:14.067578Z","title":"Test Wars: A Comparative Study of SBST, Symbolic Execution, and LLM-Based Approaches to Unit Test Generation","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"a9e29319-49b0-40e8-a7eb-d6df59c539e3","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.22880","last_updated":"2026-07-24T19:46:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:45:11.601582Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-24T19:46:30Z","title":"Do Coverage and Mutation Scores of LLM-Generated Test Suites Correlate with Their Effectiveness? (Replicability Study)","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:31:40.194158Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.10200","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.22880"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ad8951633968945629184795098866be076e7d1894783893e5065b7df7572f91","observation_id":"5d627e40-f342-4aa5-a08f-4d6a30c2a19e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:31:40.649139Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.10200","last_updated":"2025-01-17T13:48:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:58:49.301242Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-17T13:48:32Z","title":"Test Wars: A Comparative Study of SBST, Symbolic Execution, and LLM-Based Approaches to Unit Test Generation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.10200","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:32:18.029267Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.22883","last_updated":"2026-07-24T19:47:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T23:45:40.745459Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-24T19:47:41Z","title":"Evaluating and Mitigating the Misguidance Effect of Buggy Code in LLM-Generated Unit Tests","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:32:18.029267Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.10200","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.22883"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b493c2bb4b119a15655643b1b2f73c832cb61e7a9b84cf97b2a7f2f3bbff577a","observation_id":"6f4a2150-2788-43a2-a3e1-68ada0b452cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:32:18.029267Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2501.10200/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2501.10200/integrity","json":"/paper/2501.10200/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2501.10200"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.10200","last_updated":"2025-01-17T13:48:32Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T12:58:49.301242Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-17T13:48:32Z","title":"Test Wars: A Comparative Study of SBST, Symbolic Execution, and LLM-Based Approaches to Unit Test Generation"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2501.10200."}