{"as_of":"2026-08-20T22:20:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:338bff80f3c3539b1db12a1f3d08ea5c50877d9ac8cd759a7e3ccb53ac8bafc2","coverage":[{"denominator":107,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":100,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.894637Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":100,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":100,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2501.18129/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2501.18129/integrity","json":"/paper/2501.18129/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.575197Z","title":"Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.575197Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f48a53f5bdf0407f946896a5768ddd90a3e0502dd269f80cda33e1d12b2f5ca","observation_id":"68155a76-cf50-4e1e-9827-86beb3e2fc34","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.575197Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.578886Z","title":"Limited progress in improving gender and geographic representation in coral reef science","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.578886Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:399756642def9bb94596b3b2433289eea23faef6a2938f16c664f770b7f591f1","observation_id":"6006097c-017c-4c4e-9469-6270144cfc3c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.578886Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.582243Z","title":"Fast facts: Academia, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.582243Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cab508344708e9508113009909356dd2faa66c1a2b8964a8862e64fdf539581b","observation_id":"b6436323-526f-489e-aafa-b57e2169e638","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.582243Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.15195/v7.a7","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Self-Citation, Cumulative Advantage, and Gender Inequality in Science","venue":"Sociological Science","work_id":"1ebbd97f-8896-4dec-a8b1-e8576c829d48","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.585516Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:90b6e56773eb1978878889522b54dc1e65418fa1470dd4900c66869791014867","observation_id":"a661f192-b9d7-45db-bd04-230ac053714f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.162589Z","resolver_source":"doi_truncated","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0256474","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator","venue":"PLoS ONE","work_id":"aa9a6204-583f-4ffb-8d71-fc6427f6e772","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.588783Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f09e6c7b363117a620df4ab93d12cbc58310e9d21bf2f02f57dff75b984b5116","observation_id":"0b92621f-54cb-494d-b5c9-7f23cbfa03bf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.151526Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[{"edge_observation":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:18:04.78175+00:00","source":"paper_reference_links","state":"open"},"event_date":"2021-11-09","event_type":"correction","notice_doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0259930","provenance":{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T02:58:09.152463+00:00","source":"crossref","source_record_id":"10.1371/journal.pone.0259930->10.1371/journal.pone.0256474:correction"}}],"reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.592145Z","title":"Gen- der disparities in high-quality research revealed by nature index journals","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.592145Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:38a37c36ebe44ae0123de4a880ccc7369fbde4b3ecb859c53437f5831f8c2f27","observation_id":"3f474682-0165-4fcf-86b8-e1172cb14f8f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.592145Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.595344Z","title":"Gender disparities in authorships and citations in transplantation research","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.595344Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9a96e33b0b25ec9803d7fcf5341c4dccc2a5b27596cdcfc6250198e197949603","observation_id":"af82bf5d-65ed-4a59-85e3-93ca8d7d8368","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.595344Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1038/s41550-017-0141","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts","venue":"Nature Astronomy","work_id":"c16e8620-c3ca-4898-9a87-689c3984fe38","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.598328Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f770148b4a58191a5ff7de724a5d3d633b2606e97fc0d3a667f712dbca9a537","observation_id":"4b3ee823-183b-4ca7-a190-e9e72f517b63","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.141156Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[{"edge_observation":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T06:18:04.695296+00:00","source":"paper_reference_links","state":"open"},"event_date":"2017-06-19","event_type":"correction","notice_doi":"10.1038/s41550-017-0182","provenance":{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T02:57:25.945827+00:00","source":"crossref","source_record_id":"10.1038/s41550-017-0182->10.1038/s41550-017-0141:correction"}}],"reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.601052Z","title":"Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 135(1):269–327, 2020","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.601052Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f872837f2425c1ea9258c1446c8ee2f631e215cab981a7eb0c0987f0f4e7fa6","observation_id":"4569613c-cd18-4a39-a36e-9cfede74218c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.601052Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.603816Z","title":"Gender bias in academic recruitment? evidence from a survey experiment in the nordic region","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.603816Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c21e750b05975c248ec996ad81ad80c0b99d6d6c62b80d060979f8670f5e7e57","observation_id":"744f2476-4215-4041-a251-c7dac5675249","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.603816Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.606567Z","title":"Gender differences in academic medicine: retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.606567Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ea735eadc98612f2a968489ab11343d43ad504d1826cff7f09c342dcd4970d19","observation_id":"73a59f8e-f83c-43a3-b31f-1929ade6510f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.606567Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.609451Z","title":"Gender comparisons of social work faculty using h-index scores","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.609451Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d9f967f3c38130abbea24d5af52677647c1fc6793a22bea924ab2a8e05bbbf7c","observation_id":"33d92137-2c26-43b3-b212-57eab2a51247","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.609451Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1002/jnr.24631","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in stem","venue":"Journal of Neuroscience Research","work_id":"90274091-d955-473d-a82d-85aeac7aa1c3","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.612681Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6ac35316e0fb80226f15b7b73f93b422ae49072db709724aa98c25da449fce2b","observation_id":"aaad4478-7728-4144-af69-a97123c326ef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.130199Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2021.14509","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.647193Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"f2f50940-47aa-4bba-94eb-240fee32ee10","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.616043Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ef31818a64c9fc64a9dcf46d0efb151ea86feacc6cf4ebbeecb91e7e92235495","observation_id":"05ebe1b4-b431-41b9-aa9f-5ddab0e86c08","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.652477Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.619332Z","title":"Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.619332Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:18c45f9b8d6b179223a4b7715a99e30e2912bc23ea951e708af3bdeac1249665","observation_id":"b951266c-0515-4961-b644-bc84b37892d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.619332Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.622527Z","title":"A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1960},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.622527Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:909a14c81a966eaaef7c632db993926a97cc6b9235d7e8ccbb0e026cc8fe575d","observation_id":"2ac90e2a-84c1-4e2b-bac5-a8f22c9e8486","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.622527Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.625738Z","title":"2023 cra taulbee survey report, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.625738Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ab472b232c15dfb19d08381d445b7108e367bbbd242822053813337a9bc8c91c","observation_id":"fff167c3-fe14-4ec7-a2bb-bcab705b9b5c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.625738Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.628870Z","title":"Lack of gender bias in citation rates of publications by dendrochronologists: What is unique about this discipline? Tree-Ring Research, 66(2):127–133, 2010","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.628870Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:707a6448c5791d6929287e21f9a170282ebf966fa4a1ec9864ef4cbae8cb7c24","observation_id":"2de6a136-1725-4134-8960-f2ba63a6ed4c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.628870Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.632259Z","title":"Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.632259Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:88555d2640f68de31ec8fb778767a6b354a388b8ed00bb84effa9e927ca1cde1","observation_id":"78f46908-6592-4519-b5b8-1a9995b64648","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.632259Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2024/800","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"For the misgendered chinese in gender bias research: Multi-task learning with knowledge distillation for pinyin name gender prediction","venue":null,"work_id":"be23c599-ce20-4ac2-905c-3845f3f128c5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.635775Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:03b5219a18595ec24edbfb40f92a61e81b42619690b5e62ae62cfdd17e6eb3fd","observation_id":"30993679-9be3-477b-9b2c-c7105020584d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.119756Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.639288Z","title":"Dworkin, Kristin A","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.639288Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:10cddbe36e8db144a6ae00a182b11e68001c0eeb11fd705ab309b562d29bea02","observation_id":"fc76742a-ac46-4fb7-9d21-db84671b64c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.639288Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.642559Z","title":"Gender differences in author- ships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.642559Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:890c4cb2839358a4bba2ab0619c18f22b8100b3df8f8b5165f9b204576eae144","observation_id":"ca923af2-97f0-4de3-818f-bde676e1ef7f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.642559Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.645920Z","title":"Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within aca- demic otolaryngology departments","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.645920Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:34700088355d2b2392079d5b5a7af8ac1ca3086674783e75808caa6dfddeba35","observation_id":"293b0a5a-8b25-47fa-8dbc-13de5387e4dd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.645920Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.648904Z","title":"Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.648904Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5bcef692bbd5ed05c9fa6edbb11c9c1a5b99a4df789ef21062ab5ab9fe2a2e7","observation_id":"73559472-76aa-4a2c-a84d-870e4e5bcbdd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.648904Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.652111Z","title":"Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.652111Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a83388501438464fdf49d4e255c70f3de694fd20eb479fabf0d59ac3f7df907e","observation_id":"0b0cf413-808c-4250-b8b8-ca8370d2a7a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.652111Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.655209Z","title":"Gender (im) balance in citation practices in cognitive neuroscience","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.655209Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cbf135324b6d50a653f6f2c67e00e65749bdeb765523bdc2b8a1c2378706fadd","observation_id":"a929fce6-e903-4bd7-82e3-6cb5952bb5bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.655209Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.658391Z","title":"Comparison of the contri- butions of female and male authors to medical research in 2000 and 2015: a cross-sectional study","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2000},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.658391Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e1333080e489d18bbe33572f81545699753dee70f3bf22f19ac1502a60117325","observation_id":"10b35a3c-fbe3-45e7-9ddb-b2abff89a832","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.658391Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.661907Z","title":"Datasheets for datasets","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.661907Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a74086a867b6089b0d86bb17b486f3bfc0feb01f0dc4df7d18244c8c164e228e","observation_id":"e1bc9606-ff58-4d40-a93f-425f83d84919","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.661907Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.665218Z","title":"Contemporary psychology and women: A gender analysis of the scientific production","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.665218Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f510b23f84ce921de9362e2efb0e87a6143f0ece834415c8a433142cc9af980","observation_id":"aa5fa39e-07aa-4dbb-91be-68c9ebf77a43","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.665218Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s11211-022-00398-z","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Giummarra","venue":"Social Justice Research","work_id":"9a7728b2-b5b2-4e5b-9972-fa0bf5670006","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.668456Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:24851219c7fb27f1304d1d5025da2cf370a500026725ba07de5413638e2f0a99","observation_id":"fdeeae4b-26ac-4c73-9751-a067be62bca6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.104209Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.671890Z","title":"Women are underrepresented and receive differential outcomes at asm journals: a six-year retrospective analysis","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.671890Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cd258153466d96ec93694c9b4c62a9447b7ee0005c127802cd7012c98ebc22f2","observation_id":"296b4f85-a3f0-4826-9f58-9f2343e423d6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.671890Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2009.10830","last_updated":"2020-09-22T21:33:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T09:22:29.472736Z","submitted_at":"2020-09-22T21:33:03Z","title":"Explaining Gender Differences in Academics' Career Trajectories","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2009.10830","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2009.10830","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.569324Z","title":"Explaining Gender Differences in Academics' Career Trajectories","venue":"cs.SI","work_id":"f8fdb4c3-dedd-49d0-ac88-cbca515c6207","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.675012Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2009.10830","citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:30cbdfb1317caee0d5afb00d812a1db4a51fba35e497cb5966fe38502a69e27f","observation_id":"5e6ef3dd-9664-45a7-ab0f-fb4cfb95a8e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.573788Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"4537.00234","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.550512Z","title":"Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder","venue":null,"work_id":"043be31a-a909-4004-966e-630f56090aa5","year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.678577Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a0affe7c806cf2a6172e30bad0068316e247fbfcaa5f77120cef2ba36ed801eb","observation_id":"ce9f8f64-99e1-4232-9e8e-c6829e8a66e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.556070Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.681866Z","title":"The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS biology, 16(4):e2004956, 2018","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.681866Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c64213f44100a3c6b2ba502522487ac6878931b8a1b20f2fca31d3d9c276fe4f","observation_id":"6b12372b-1b45-4c81-93fa-ad32d8d939f4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.681866Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.685753Z","title":"Gates, Roberta Sinatra, and Albert-L´ aszl´ o Barab´ asi","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.685753Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:625746ed12c1820fbe9c07f6297e2b74cb9ad94047a05a152875bda97eecaf92","observation_id":"f75957e5-71bc-48cc-8434-cdb571ffc686","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.685753Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.689645Z","title":"Covid-19 effect on the gender gap in academic publishing","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.689645Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:84710d7ba703c0ef3088c6af40dc3285381c19bc9cf41e195b6ef4c13b69b398","observation_id":"e649b996-f334-458d-ac02-fe7a7cf4951e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.689645Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.693037Z","title":"The effect of data pre-processing on understanding the evolution of collaboration networks","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.693037Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:806c9bdc2fbe3082813701964958f60a49702bb24e4f107109ea4e4c88342e78","observation_id":"09cb7d84-9792-4691-bf4a-42a9e8866af1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.693037Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1002/asi.23489","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Distortive effects of initial-based name disambiguation on measurements of large-scale coauthorship networks","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","work_id":"5daad2cd-c493-4b7b-85f8-09da72e286a4","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.696254Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af52d506b80099e13bb4950a742f452eec806a357980539b003b6717481cf016","observation_id":"079a571f-17d1-43a9-9690-453dbc244420","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.088640Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.699745Z","title":"The impact of name ambiguity on properties of coauthorship networks","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.699745Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4f5e607b9d1922f29d0d77d4b914bc4d8f8c8d94cb418d62794d2dd612c98e4a","observation_id":"857fbb11-fe56-4db5-bc4c-ebf12ab3bcc9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.699745Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1177/23780231211006977","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"King and Megan E","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","work_id":"1535e970-0d86-4783-8875-32ec48610e5c","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.702978Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a65319a9f6285a929b0b9cc2d71787ef2d1a7f10649a829702c1700ad7ca2118","observation_id":"dc83b321-123f-4097-9179-7b6a4f2ebd5b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.078095Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.706247Z","title":"King, Carl T","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.706247Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f49c62676f108f87abc15d2a8a91d795c7e2cf2f4b85c5cf87b502686f06a10","observation_id":"c930ecc4-71fd-4e2f-9d1c-000865edcd40","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.706247Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.709673Z","title":"Influence of the first-mover advantage on the gender disparities in physics citations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.709673Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6ecd32f6ae06d210d448cbeef07892d8b194381eda4c6de228ec1dc8cbd52c2a","observation_id":"19da02bc-3b54-4f9e-86cc-37a7c0f3eb2c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.709673Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.087514Z","title":"Inter- sectional inequalities in science","venue":null,"work_id":"5bdd4aaf-c43d-4648-9d5c-5ae7eb37bbc2","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.712948Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bb5e937633bb1f0ccac50a50c1ae0bb986f9cabf6fe20d0effd5f5e6c9a8ec3d","observation_id":"09491012-2fe5-49c2-ae2a-82f25b829e95","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.090727Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.078818Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"5685a3bb-5b96-4e75-a651-20f79fe325d4","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.716337Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8bfff757570c56adafe47c40879e2f8d62069e7e35cba9ae8cac6d167158aa7e","observation_id":"f472b694-a386-4ba5-adc3-b2ae52fa90f3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.081745Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Qu´ ebec university professors","venue":"Scientometrics","work_id":"5ca34c26-3420-43e8-9b47-2f03be33709a","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.719617Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf5a546ae9f3d4d99adc6fd2cd5a4af2d7d63c87743a0a7f7164b12d0391ae84","observation_id":"66485260-447c-47cd-bb44-308af059fd3d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.054215Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.069958Z","title":"Sugimoto","venue":null,"work_id":"ea27853c-1e48-4d36-835d-c3b06bbf477b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.722749Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3bedc3f75887d0f3ad79f8da07e6ebfd9744d1a981f03799a38cb1d0301649ad","observation_id":"24b19a5f-1ab6-47ba-8b14-4b2610ca5f42","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.072937Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.058662Z","title":"Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study","venue":null,"work_id":"441f804d-93c0-4684-9c4b-bdf520230926","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.729551Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:68e21281f1163e8591df541cf0883de6f0e44c5914c9072c6361e1aa47795fda","observation_id":"b48a0ded-96b0-43e4-b145-4edca0a0ddf8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.062636Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1038/s41562-022-01498-1","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","work_id":"ff4017bd-9bcd-4308-87f2-354038d51420","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.732897Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:45442ed9f50a7b57cea16a214c0f8ce668aa020df16a9876c0f89ea955ddd5ad","observation_id":"593729ae-acd3-4850-9047-fdb3fba2bad3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.036184Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.047362Z","title":"Name-based demographic inference and the unequal distribution of misrecognition","venue":null,"work_id":"94416267-84e4-4ef4-8393-eaf5126b6cc8","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.735980Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7fb991653073657c13acbfce09776ed91a3a5145788148229152389ef95f683d","observation_id":"39cd3f8b-35d7-445b-8d7a-6ce30c4e9944","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.051274Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.036704Z","title":"The voices of medical education scholarship: Describing the published landscape","venue":null,"work_id":"dd9f9723-2054-4d87-95fa-314abd9d92c2","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.738671Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:19a746815ca1d85859f1a9cc04418df289ebb53a6dac8b64183eaea796ba870c","observation_id":"52379717-d81a-4dd6-b9ff-eec2c6d290fc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.040481Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1017/s0020818313000209","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":null,"venue":"International Organization","work_id":"8b49d0e7-71f1-4fec-b2c3-3199270dcef8","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.741578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bd5297ca687f69021a75cf3a818335eb09297f2bf64641564255347307d3e91d","observation_id":"e0aee16e-6fdf-4acc-bb90-525d9aeeec87","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.025278Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.025409Z","title":"How does research productivity relate to gender? analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions","venue":null,"work_id":"5bb53955-1e98-4124-b90b-6eb38558fa76","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.744572Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9095eb9b2e4f60e1436210d810fc17b152d2a22b7d0e2f56d00262203bd21838","observation_id":"350589ee-ad82-4286-9b26-a6a527214a31","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.029363Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.014409Z","title":"Sex differences in academic rank and publication rate at top-ranked us neurology programs","venue":null,"work_id":"820d0f4d-7ef5-4018-a33f-9fbea741f2d2","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.747447Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e754d1936bdfee1b0d98985e86a64ede5534225a2b49a3a3d8c036292e1a0084","observation_id":"4785997a-b11c-4a52-9077-5eb02cddacb5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.018267Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.003519Z","title":"What’s in a name? the frequency and geographic distributions of uk surnames","venue":null,"work_id":"df0a39c4-0ba6-46ae-b5ed-c408d865de93","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.750075Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6b55872b662eeeca36f330cf0a6b5d283630d46c5d57a1ce646c74adcab75ac6","observation_id":"9ddae9ee-ec2b-4326-b309-e9027687b9dc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:15.007639Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.752577Z","title":"Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.752577Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0ed456895726b928d95eac23bf23320f8e5594a54a506699223e633f3cf28af","observation_id":"f6552f5f-58d0-4405-8418-f59a54051981","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.752577Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.988021Z","title":"The gender and geography of publishing: a review of sex/gender reporting and author representation in leading general medical and global health journals","venue":null,"work_id":"47e535a1-3453-43db-a80c-eee6670b6ac9","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.755213Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6799d370defd5e73b29b89a53b06f7ece8c412490ee76cce265187ed4aef01d9","observation_id":"b54593ee-2756-43ee-aa96-50b8dc7a7061","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.991728Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.977918Z","title":"The effect of gender in the publication patterns in mathematics","venue":null,"work_id":"c6406e3e-7b0c-4715-ab82-6f3df940e05d","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.758080Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a6138632bc0dbb58595f287b7cd7bfda2158a35bad60f907322265d4294050df","observation_id":"cc3afd5e-b6b3-45e4-8731-69cad8496ba4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.981426Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0195773","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Fegley, Jana Diesner, and Vetle I","venue":"PLoS ONE","work_id":"f46a84af-8473-40e6-bb43-7c522f395bd1","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.760812Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:496490ccc1e93fac6435410f6c4a9024b9e48cbfcbde2c3c4af6d019f91f756b","observation_id":"46a3daa8-819c-43cd-b823-2cf0bc105f90","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.014592Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.763991Z","title":"Model cards for model reporting","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.763991Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c04c85c18f287343fe6c76918e6ac13a9e3cb09150bc0982c4a2410a42881b34","observation_id":"59685a49-167c-410a-b51f-8d2e2857d6fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.763991Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.766825Z","title":"Mohammad","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.766825Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1df2d2273bb8a994a1397773722637f00df1395981452bfd4784d34bedad2398","observation_id":"99d4f7cf-a8ac-4871-9ec7-8bd4706148b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.766825Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.969153Z","title":"Open science, communal culture, and women’s participation in the movement to improve science","venue":null,"work_id":"48bac3e7-3006-444d-a6b0-0dbe40c169dc","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.769877Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c02bdc11383da015bc6bcd5dce80593f982f4ec5467a33de1fe5d9c17ae451c","observation_id":"128a2fac-5762-481e-a844-634dca6a9fef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.972238Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.960384Z","title":"The gendered nature of authorship","venue":null,"work_id":"6a5bebb0-cc53-437b-b9b6-443f26511ede","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":62,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.772792Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2e9aebb7c00c7d69c7a75990fe57028a58be1e7a63e5e67a3d3da3ec64b01936","observation_id":"8238d6ff-dcf2-4c12-9f80-d1e3957f5690","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.963305Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.775792Z","title":"Gender inequality and research performance: moving beyond individual-meritocratic explanations of academic advancement","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.775792Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5307fb6088bdc6934c9d4d58735e8bbb79b0ec0952046513702baa273cb53af3","observation_id":"e0680b8b-e022-40fe-ada5-478f2b4524bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.775792Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.951603Z","title":"Three decades of tourism scholarship: Gender, collaboration and research methods","venue":null,"work_id":"98cac6ad-deab-4c6e-836a-6543fc922139","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.778894Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0153b03a117d63b7daad53f3764e6ea7242690abc1008ad762c42531875ed86f","observation_id":"50732d08-da3f-4711-bce8-ceb48f20a331","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.954469Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.781972Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":65,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.781972Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:40e88dbef836e12f7e338c1ef1b640a0c44ffc69950c26511abb9e1968ed92b1","observation_id":"d9d90cc5-6e65-416b-924a-74e4b48d096f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.781972Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.943253Z","title":"Gender gap or gender bias in peace research? publication patterns and citation rates for journal of peace research, 1983–2008","venue":null,"work_id":"20d5b582-6759-4f16-8058-8f4a802109ad","year":1983},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":66,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.784851Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:64bc8debcd337c2c5822dc77791887160916c1fe19b5c1988c19ea0806a2db3b","observation_id":"9ade2189-805c-4931-96de-9543b1d8d3cb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.946209Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.934982Z","title":"Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience","venue":null,"work_id":"239a4e46-c6ef-4d51-8516-1433c1e6c0bf","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":67,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.788504Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff71fd7fe6d63167fd66efee509497721432e58741eab0ffdec78b52b4dab43a","observation_id":"5f04c9db-94fb-4b12-9322-d78d575d00a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.938067Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04383-w","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Gender disparities in Russian academia: a bibliometric analysis","venue":"Scientometrics","work_id":"fe89cb32-169c-4ad1-8f02-24a5d0507546","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":68,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.791965Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bdb705dddb2e969e898321eab57c05bdc7184bc23917e63d751379222be47599","observation_id":"dd107681-f199-4bb8-af82-588db99d5253","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.991575Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.795361Z","title":"Do women undertake in- terdisciplinary research more than men, and do self-citations bias observed differ- ences? Quantitative Science Studies , 3(2):363–392, June 2022","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":69,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.795361Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3cb89cd4f9874e9fa7818999c8b08c855154d90e9504d36168cb999570a83e3b","observation_id":"42c1e63e-1bed-4df5-906c-ff051e3298b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.795361Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.926797Z","title":"Gender disparity among leaders of canadian academic radiology departments","venue":null,"work_id":"2493148c-16c8-4629-b771-28fa87938dcc","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":70,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.798646Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:10f6f3eadc551cbe540b1df6337484468b8530b5a872ed07eb14ac4835e01f96","observation_id":"0f6a49aa-42b5-446b-83f5-27f1fa84ef9f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.929724Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.917851Z","title":"Longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic productivity among medical faculty across 24 medical schools in the united states","venue":null,"work_id":"8265dfb5-5b4f-40a8-ad13-fba5fe55b265","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":71,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.801864Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b37d0c6cd7006139dcd3907c80eec33fc41e0cb7da17ae132e96023dfd716a6c","observation_id":"eb86eeed-fb8c-4d27-be2e-2c81c17f6051","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.921426Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2021.66473","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.316189Z","title":"Gender Bias in the News: A Scalable Topic Modelling and Visualization Framework","venue":null,"work_id":"8ae14ed2-ccca-46d5-9d44-6a78086add1c","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":72,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.805205Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1e632524d7df03654e5215e09096138e38898bdc335b8bfe5b8d5edbcaa8d825","observation_id":"133bffac-d04d-4d02-a3e9-5ae473c682e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.322743Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.908049Z","title":"Why status matters for inequality","venue":null,"work_id":"0f359977-2375-4359-81b3-c4b3398c2c95","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":73,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.808610Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d24baaf7a97c4bee98ef62e20510f7cd02485d062fc37a9703fd3f6fab15e94","observation_id":"21aea308-3606-4476-8fd0-a6a3155eb2e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.911552Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.811921Z","title":"Ross, Britta M","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":74,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.811921Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53ff8b3ab6ef98a90cdeca4bec332c4cc64dfd1ef9fb763d7216283ab2bf7b1a","observation_id":"7c63f36d-1d37-4b37-9915-d872a19ff577","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.811921Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.898434Z","title":"Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology","venue":null,"work_id":"56e8d3a6-9889-4dca-8649-c0c73efdaafd","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":75,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.815652Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff9da93ef105efa4873e5e1cc999ab9cc22e78a30433acdc95346198b36dc677","observation_id":"8a590654-7a01-4fe7-bbd0-a9fd69a90e66","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.902009Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.888713Z","title":"Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services","venue":null,"work_id":"ed4b4a89-273d-4574-a974-0e88166e7c85","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":76,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.819053Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ea341771401298f53e6515e9c8c5ac261f501c21630c5a61fd4b129ad2a53743","observation_id":"ce7e4f8a-5045-4172-aee4-fd42f018dfc5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.892259Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.822393Z","title":"Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":77,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.822393Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6871fa8b7cbb8d0fa568967b970352fd2c8a0655449fb8319d396a999d08497f","observation_id":"60b88125-24ec-42d6-ae9b-40e5da2d4aed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.822393Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.878529Z","title":"The changing face of epidemiology: gender disparities in citations? Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 28(2):159, 2017","venue":null,"work_id":"0b45983f-fced-4871-9681-efb69371892f","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":78,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.825900Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ae3fa670e070f2097c855fe0f42bfdb5fdec68b822aebbf4969cf73c6ac0fbaf","observation_id":"77afd33e-b40b-4a48-a83c-cdd0f8b8f686","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.882341Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.868890Z","title":"Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applica- tions, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis","venue":null,"work_id":"de34cb7a-adaf-464f-9758-a18ce4f42676","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":79,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.829270Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6001d908ea33a2ed39b71d6e5e02043ad249ab746f4cc19ceb4542e287cf6891","observation_id":"6f74596d-9707-4184-9b49-afdc1fdf5253","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.872440Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.859249Z","title":"Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap","venue":null,"work_id":"7ba0ec5c-ecf6-4220-9a96-d6546a9d0753","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":80,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.832660Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8a11f0f75fa0cc358ef4e4e889a4bb5bf785a8a11ae43bfde74ac23484c5c303","observation_id":"749378e4-d8b3-4b26-8f8e-ec7a118853e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.862862Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.849660Z","title":"The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements","venue":null,"work_id":"ba8027a8-084c-4b99-8fe3-a3e2464c8072","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":81,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.835941Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4fdcfc20d1179ce7a95bbcc2c24f5d51d35557023ff4e264e2b1c30eb9ebd8ff","observation_id":"0363779a-1415-4baa-ab88-37f21e88f4c3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.852939Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.841144Z","title":"Peer re- view and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals","venue":null,"work_id":"3db49976-d6a8-4228-98ef-1180a0d55b7a","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":82,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.839283Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bcc689c1769c915f7baa64bf097961bb3599e49495d79a7df20ad1b6ef86acbf","observation_id":"f9fafe70-f707-4e0a-bd9b-0c0ffc4efa70","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.844137Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.832158Z","title":"Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the covid-19 pandemic","venue":null,"work_id":"c8ca9705-1bce-4777-a2b7-dee5ac055549","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":83,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.842681Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8ec745923d748010d763023c322fb8fa73698d2b5af850b42e3693987c2eec7d","observation_id":"28e7569e-9566-41a2-b861-cf82543e5091","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.835144Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.823022Z","title":"Gender differences in publication productivity among academic scientists and engineers in the us and china: similarities and differences","venue":null,"work_id":"13497f0b-e34c-4064-a508-cd1a73ba78fe","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":84,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.845898Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:210c650a00bc82e4229317d8c6b43de33e11049edec0cd36ba0edab0d52bd1a1","observation_id":"ece86646-3585-480f-b41c-b585d23b0117","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.826161Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.814772Z","title":"Teich, Jason Z","venue":null,"work_id":"e86915cb-c705-46c1-9093-845708dc3fa7","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":85,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.849008Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2ea215072e9266023ca60ff637664beac03d553268f88ed94082047cb34e5b1d","observation_id":"6418a550-eb31-441c-a783-9626b987e267","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.817616Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.806033Z","title":"Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six english-speaking countries 1996–2014","venue":null,"work_id":"94caa354-7d0a-4f6a-8e70-889bee3bdcd4","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":86,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.852233Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5b95069d57b673939f77c853d0fc207bbd4a07ded0e4cda4701d945038b6ab86","observation_id":"c33f9563-c967-4b58-a35c-83167e630a12","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.809099Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.797327Z","title":"Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals","venue":null,"work_id":"afd2a717-8789-4f3f-a211-e95929599989","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":87,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.854871Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:168afceaedbcd3a491251c4f1b0a29988d713ebddaabd72ca9ab9c1a5e68fab7","observation_id":"4eba156c-7dc2-4573-9f1e-8685f0430500","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.800408Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.787337Z","title":"Gendec: A machine learning-based framework for gender detection from japanese names","venue":null,"work_id":"dc6fb8b8-ad64-44e3-8bb9-03f33349b302","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":88,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.857571Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:52949d7b79560b617630d2af51f5659ef6549a294491aa8bcb73ef1a2c4a0dd8","observation_id":"f54fd6bc-099a-4ba8-90fa-fb04e1c3a0d6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.791136Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.777004Z","title":"Ethnea–an instance-based ethnicity classifier based on geo-coded author names in a large-scale bibliographic database","venue":null,"work_id":"855e8664-72b0-44d5-a827-8bb8fbea393e","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":89,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.860298Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:270401620c52c00ee92a0b82ac0c86d88486f8991229f95dae7ead0f36a8ca16","observation_id":"3a116b05-f5c4-47ec-a9a4-8fe907f195fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.780749Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.766910Z","title":"Gender identification in chinese names","venue":null,"work_id":"6cf128c0-9c9f-437c-9ed5-3ccfdf476e95","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":90,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.863106Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a901d1dba5e3fabf8c9e5bb1b5420ccbc469476bb024d45aef9ef9be7271ce34","observation_id":"52e333bc-defd-492f-8360-34d589751af3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.770367Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.756456Z","title":"Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study","venue":null,"work_id":"f5a1af79-57fe-4e83-94a7-e8bfdfd0a5dc","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":91,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.866204Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1809d2a869154d04b735b3db0c810dca6865ff265e5bccdaf35b44e70fdcb4c6","observation_id":"b4e26b1f-8bfa-4e0e-9c95-cd4e2fd46e15","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.760001Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.745294Z","title":"Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact","venue":null,"work_id":"6cdbd494-03da-449f-be3b-b20dfd82d3d8","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":92,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.868954Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:104e06bba2d1b2d2d34c9c5719855de3e1fcc6c94f8441830a8f4701e7f9da1a","observation_id":"89656989-2707-4f91-90aa-be9370e1d144","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.749686Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.734287Z","title":"Gender differences in authorship of critical care literature","venue":null,"work_id":"a5718034-c30f-4e27-bf5f-44ec1b3f0e06","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":93,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.871703Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c4bb81eaefc5025c3dad0d1783281ffd14041ef80ba210a39e8051ceaa6e6911","observation_id":"1d3a884b-0c5f-4dd3-9788-9d14de9a309a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.738128Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.874436Z","title":"Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars’ work","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":94,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.874436Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8d17ed96f4e88e9ae852abf4329d90bddd2a01ac2e6fbe01089c947f18ed1d93","observation_id":"3e8168f2-56d9-49e6-8b16-c0f41606521b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.874436Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.723187Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"e03469df-2bbe-40bd-8574-f85d67c39f41","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":95,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.877244Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:19fbba633a778bfc566d326074a4e62cd25b85d6017d22f03aac825efeded586","observation_id":"08b152fd-2fd6-4474-b5a9-0151f267768f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.726753Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.713748Z","title":"The role of gender in scholarly authorship","venue":null,"work_id":"c9170e0c-21ae-4aba-9895-7e3e4cec27d1","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":96,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.883272Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f698ff18b2e5e18d25f8072f36f7db034831aa58c2ef699fec55f4af9f7149d7","observation_id":"05a9c473-bdf6-41f0-a2a5-d9c2d345b934","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.716829Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.885982Z","title":"National hiring experiments reveal 2: 1 faculty preference for women on stem tenure track","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":97,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.885982Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cb0a2fe011ea0491c7bf15b6e2dfd91b24d1fa0fcaa7276e9f93a7e23e5b820c","observation_id":"5c7fca50-c8a4-4b7f-acb1-c095de5f04bc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.885982Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1111/soc4.13189","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"The gender citation gap: Approaches, explanations, and implications","venue":"Sociology Compass","work_id":"944a4b72-bcdf-4a56-95f0-5a21172f90ca","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":98,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.888995Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1b74ddeda412da0b7f4ee232fe30306fc6acf139fef4d1cf13e5c6c8e279a0dc","observation_id":"68e5e818-72b4-480e-8a76-e31dba2ffa48","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.950352Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.703948Z","title":"The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men’s) published research.PLoS One, 15(4):e0230043, 2020","venue":null,"work_id":"8e72daf4-eff2-445d-9918-3e497e100cc7","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":99,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.891940Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a0542fb3241d62cdac01817c7d28e53477679ec543a07aac3b76bcc6a591ef65","observation_id":"fc19d34c-4f15-4a9f-835e-1ded6dd1afc7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.707563Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.694253Z","title":"Trends in female authorship in major journals of 3 oncology disciplines, 2002-2018","venue":null,"work_id":"6e7167b9-17c9-41cf-a9da-c22441758641","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards","version":1},"reference_index":100,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:13.894637Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2501.18129"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e8ea9f3932b88c1fee755b137562e447339b7cbdb531392b448e3ae765548961","observation_id":"a8497f26-6037-4398-b582-0d9755c73552","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-10T00:37:14.697990Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.18129","last_updated":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.DL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:44:02.796640Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-30T04:22:50Z","title":"Revisiting gender bias research in bibliometrics: Standardizing methodological variability using Scholarly Data Analysis (SoDA) Cards"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":100,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":4,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":41,"verified_exact":16,"verified_fuzzy":38},"total_outbound_references":107},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 20 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 100 of 107 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2501.18129."}