{"as_of":"2026-08-17T07:15:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:fd700de0df266a9e583546c7c2b6bba3f32e038c736f921d025ff818571fc1c0","coverage":[{"denominator":33,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":33,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.539623Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":35,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":35,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:36:37.665715Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:06:37.437709Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2502.08839","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:36:37.665715Z","title":"Assessing quantum layout synthesis tools via known optimal-swap cost benchmarks,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.24169","last_updated":"2025-05-30T03:24:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T19:26:19.314752Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-30T03:24:22Z","title":"A High-Performance Multilevel Framework for Quantum Layout Synthesis","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:36:37.665715Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.08839","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.24169"},"observation_digest":"sha256:82eb8b112c8dd368c35f573b6b6b58de9245094f643f0f49b3c186690f0f7d76","observation_id":"51f0f46d-8efc-489a-b9f8-d4913fec0c81","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T12:36:37.665715Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.08839","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:06:37.437709Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","venue":"quant-ph","work_id":"36731aa3-5319-4d3d-b12c-79c7c45ce2bc","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.12199","last_updated":"2025-07-16T12:55:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:38:18.527615Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-16T12:55:09Z","title":"Optimized Qubit Routing for Commuting Gates via Integer Programming","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:06:34.719973Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.08839","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.12199"},"observation_digest":"sha256:edc52de93ebe4c67b97e453fa3400137c05e13cb2ae04598045e70f1b5bd48f4","observation_id":"aaa14d3d-71ae-4658-a7d8-c21823d5ab30","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:06:37.513908Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2502.08839/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2502.08839/integrity","json":"/paper/2502.08839/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.405336Z","title":"Qubit allocation","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.405336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:72d9bf8b4e117966ef84a4aafbbcd369eef634ac0cc4f73041b62b732e02cf6c","observation_id":"c38c0be2-6288-4596-b66d-210cf48cc18a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.405336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.410664Z","title":"Optimal SW AP gate insertion for nearest neighbor quantum circuits,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.410664Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d93206aee8144c0a87d8ff485bf616e2c75e7c588390b1ae65a7e9ae606b61ef","observation_id":"139dd644-9282-49aa-8962-eabb743b3c81","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.410664Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.415178Z","title":"MUQUT: Multi-constraint quantum circuit mapping on NISQ comput- ers,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.415178Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3b5036474c5312da31b7d1b3f83493b5547ebb19667073f31e7ba7967d2b687e","observation_id":"a32875c2-fad6-4fc9-8f70-8c3a56f62b85","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.415178Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.419808Z","title":"Mapping quantum circuits to IBM QX architectures using the minimal number of SW AP and H operations,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.419808Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4d949393f818b91c203a2d99edd672e5a8ca8c48d3284841b46dc19ad7f70b43","observation_id":"df614ba1-6b9d-47b3-a9b1-87800f02a999","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.419808Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.424477Z","title":"Optimal layout synthesis for quantum computing,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.424477Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6e32d7d322f321ffb6b420049ccf31b3d143ffc9633506f5e4f68013aba28a29","observation_id":"e44ef3d1-8f3d-4144-ad2f-93a8fc5a510b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.424477Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.428954Z","title":"Optimal qubit mapping with simultaneous gate absorption,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.428954Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fa54aec987b6afeb544a0ac7b8994ba74679cd69cb3c4567fb98f0b3801300aa","observation_id":"45ed2c01-7718-494e-8cbd-4f75b2ec8cca","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.428954Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.434013Z","title":"Time-optimal Qubit mapping","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.434013Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5e62faed147c7a5a58c543ada5a84a75aad6e487d3683f2aeea75587d49d011f","observation_id":"d0c5dce1-aae7-46f1-8580-ba3254fdf1cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.434013Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.438477Z","title":"Qubit mapping and routing via MaxSAT,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.438477Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:56c03b3c28a4f481df9fbbef80247907e71d1b7c015eef9bbee6b2eede9698e8","observation_id":"148077aa-17aa-4604-b8fa-9a295dca4e37","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.438477Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.442399Z","title":"Optimal qubit assignment and routing via integer programming,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.442399Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c73517b3cf7360d45fdc0287a3d84eeaba6e90cbe26df3adaeccbf6eb9e7921c","observation_id":"a491adf0-ab68-4e5b-a3ea-2684d0f4fa7c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.442399Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.446222Z","title":"Scalable optimal layout synthesis for NISQ quantum processors,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.446222Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2283726e716fe702233ff241c676c4ebfcffe114a76651b1437cdd97954652aa","observation_id":"6393ff2a-4a7f-4ad5-88e3-244e7f327a16","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.446222Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.450727Z","title":"Announcing Cirq: an open source framework for NISQ algorithms,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.450727Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:26e4122b494c10560dbfd0eadb9c45d7e5aea0d26197f94db05df4e086f009fa","observation_id":"a929a42f-6d72-4f67-95e6-d38ecef693de","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.450727Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.454697Z","title":"An efficient methodology for mapping quantum circuits to the IBM QX architectures,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.454697Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:77e4c56d6d803a77152046b52d640857ccb77297dccf967fe9a138fe18f5af04","observation_id":"39de3de7-08fc-4bcc-8bda-2620139ab440","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.454697Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.459397Z","title":"(2018) Qiskit","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.459397Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:35a2adf40d2fea58969e4757f5c60a1d48c7967ff9093a895da291299b86ae7b","observation_id":"c6d0764a-9f81-442d-b014-3287cb98b24a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.459397Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.463219Z","title":"An Efficient Methodology for Mapping Quan- tum Circuits to the IBM QX Architectures,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.463219Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:37e5baaa28db076e56e11806bac75c3f158f6f81d75ece5d04002bb05e02e387","observation_id":"29856ba1-521a-4dcc-9bd7-9452846be77e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.463219Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.467298Z","title":"Qubit allocation as a combination of subgraph isomorphism and token swapping,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.467298Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3cfa2d3bfbdd79c00e4a4ca05cc2d6c423a438e9070cada979f551914c27e3b0","observation_id":"61045105-14f3-41cb-bb90-e7845da8ca1f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.467298Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.470985Z","title":"Tackling the qubit mapping problem for NISQ-era quantum devices","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.470985Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5b3d9fc2d3850c492ddfefc96d734d7ff16b557478b614a39588df4fa35b053d","observation_id":"bf2513f9-fdca-4159-b691-381e44b1a23a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.470985Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.474864Z","title":"Formal constraint-based compilation for noisy intermediate-scale quantum systems,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.474864Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b267251a3f74ba9c180e598c44864913e5eb676cb529cf8eb7dda6dc2e75d9c","observation_id":"ebd6c981-25d6-4a76-a02a-842011d87e56","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.474864Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.478703Z","title":"t |ket⟩: a retargetable compiler for NISQ devices,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.478703Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f27efe6789cdfa59e401222c6347e8d39fa9478170b8dbf6ec682615843186e1","observation_id":"262e13ee-b32f-452d-a6b5-eb2e2eaff2d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.478703Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.482559Z","title":"Improved Mapping of Quantum Circuits to IBM QX Architectures,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.482559Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:63daf91a1fc4abfe6ff09132b716dde6a174b3fa0b46adefaca6ea38a033ef74","observation_id":"95fc6b5e-39b2-46eb-8807-8d4ac2fe9fcf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.482559Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.810547Z","title":"Not all SW APs have the same cost: a case for optimization- aware qubit routing,","venue":null,"work_id":"d2465f50-9af1-4851-983d-694e8e074f32","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.486417Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:42872a4c33271c3d4a539d1067898bc8adb8e2393b2bb42841103c43dfaa64b4","observation_id":"94637461-ff86-4be5-8bef-ebe1ecde1d05","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.814910Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.490637Z","title":"A robust quantum layout synthesis algorithm with a qubit mapping checker,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.490637Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9db08f9d2faae4bcd271440ab3057986ce419827862aa0ab0e84ff31fdde91ba","observation_id":"41885945-d58c-4405-9a88-54c92bd8944c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.490637Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.494331Z","title":"Optimizing quantum circuit placement via machine learning,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.494331Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bdb4c05b6a070da86763f972504766d79e0d64d01b1ee75cf450b60cd0de9e6b","observation_id":"04d037ed-77f1-4425-a894-a23bc4075d21","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.494331Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.498062Z","title":"Reinforcement learning and dear framework for solving the qubit mapping problem,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.498062Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6f8cd5eec4a4936883e355c7adcb980fb636aa72f545c72b04ea51217d0091fa","observation_id":"4700762a-e7de-4de9-ac11-c4f77c56c453","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.498062Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.501880Z","title":"A fast and scalable qubit-mapping method for noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.501880Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6bb5bb6b59d5d555d059ac9260d189d6d8ca3b5205e7861bbb0e424ff6500b21","observation_id":"0ab368e0-d27e-4c4d-8f0f-88b46aa80024","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.501880Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.505945Z","title":"CTQr: Control and timing-aware qubit routing,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.505945Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:890ac33cd178e119eb29c3e2b8fb6240cc93c6d23d4f0254e637b1c1c47f3234","observation_id":"db05ee26-0e8e-43a9-866d-6d63d55184f0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.505945Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.509670Z","title":"Efficient qubit routing using a dynamically-extract-and-route framework,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.509670Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:876d6b63be503877a552c4d7d4f4c50a554baafb2e97428b9335999234d9ddac","observation_id":"a2a9b36f-9e5e-4303-9226-e58943625efe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.509670Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.18371","last_updated":"2024-12-03T23:45:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:48:31.660634Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-28T17:10:20Z","title":"ML-QLS: Multilevel Quantum Layout Synthesis","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2405.18371","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.513509Z","title":"ML-QLS: Multilevel quantum layout synthe- sis,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.513509Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.18371","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b9cef8ebf210611ce100981cb6be5d8acceaee6da6116956c9d9cce9af52b86","observation_id":"998549b0-8ffa-4127-98ba-4ed4523fc49d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.513509Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.518055Z","title":"Optimality study of existing quantum computing layout synthesis tools,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.518055Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fc7e539d79ffa4036b7507acb217108c1feda71485ea9a9e84fa1c60c9b3ecc3","observation_id":"93087e50-ac5f-47bb-8203-7b9eec207bad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.518055Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2301.08932","last_updated":"2024-12-20T20:30:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:01:00.272001Z","submitted_at":"2023-01-21T10:05:51Z","title":"Benchmarking Quantum Circuit Transformation with QKNOB Circuits","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2301.08932","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2301.08932","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.711628Z","title":"Benchmarking Quantum Circuit Transformation with QKNOB Circuits","venue":"quant-ph","work_id":"0cad16a2-0f56-4a9a-b869-72a8750c532a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.522031Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2301.08932","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6d41ffc95c7ddb287829ec22a881ba5f705f14fe5f82070cfa9923d0ac1efc27","observation_id":"61b09c08-ba00-4c53-a76c-c1659e674ace","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.718285Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.526560Z","title":"A (sub)graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.526560Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d7dfce829b15ff586c61d84e496c910a0e04f452c4c17daa780723cb2a9a3b9e","observation_id":"3124bc39-78c6-4ff3-b441-e251f76122db","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.526560Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2409.08368","last_updated":"2024-09-12T19:19:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:31:12.765837Z","submitted_at":"2024-09-12T19:19:59Z","title":"LightSABRE: A Lightweight and Enhanced SABRE Algorithm","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2409.08368","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.530484Z","title":"LightSABRE: A lightweight and enhanced SABRE algorithm,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.530484Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2409.08368","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9d333e2f2384a94ec3216fc7067a2e397c3759d5676d3c8cde7408583422ee20","observation_id":"96063be2-a205-4c1d-8a23-19a58ffa7e07","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.530484Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1902.08091","last_updated":"2019-02-28T19:06:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T17:13:09.235772Z","submitted_at":"2019-02-21T15:09:20Z","title":"On the qubit routing problem","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1902.08091","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.535013Z","title":"On the qubit routing problem,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1902},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.535013Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1902.08091","citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6cf8aa6bea18aa25faa123dd8a86988454fdbdcf8a28e384dae3efef450270ef","observation_id":"5dea2d21-0b59-49d7-85b5-5209571b5dc3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.535013Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.539623Z","title":"MQT QMAP: Efficient quantum circuit mapping,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks","version":2},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.539623Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2502.08839"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e85b818634400dfed93e0ea163c6367d0529f0174900f1d782ecb87bc623ff83","observation_id":"75d538e5-0962-4dfa-837a-639df2d19ab4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T23:37:14.539623Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.08839","last_updated":"2025-03-04T19:34:57Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"quant-ph","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T09:18:06.934252Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-12T23:13:01Z","title":"Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":33,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":31,"verified_exact":1,"verified_fuzzy":1},"total_outbound_references":33},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 33 of 33 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2502.08839."}