Amplitude analysis of psi(3686)to γ K_S⁰ K_S⁰
Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 02:42 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The first amplitude analysis of ψ(3686)→γ K_S^0 K_S^0 determines branching fraction ratios for f0 and f2 states relative to J/ψ decays.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The data sample is well described with four poles for the f0-wave and three poles for the f2-wave. The observed f0 and f2 states agree with those produced in radiative J/ψ decays. The production behaviors are quantified through residues and converted branching fractions, yielding the ratios B(ψ(3686)→γ f0,2)/B(J/ψ→γ f0,2) that constrain the internal structure of the f0,2 states, especially their potential mixing with glueball components.
What carries the argument
One-channel K-matrix parametrization with four f0-wave poles and three f2-wave poles that describes the KS0KS0 system dynamics and extracts production amplitudes from the residues.
If this is right
- The pole positions remain consistent with established resonance states.
- The f0 and f2 states match those seen in J/ψ radiative decays.
- Residues permit conversion to branching fractions and the ratios to J/ψ results.
- The ratios supply direct experimental input on possible glueball mixing in the f0 and f2 states.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Deviations of the measured ratios from pure quark-model expectations would indicate measurable glueball content.
- The same K-matrix framework could be applied to other radiative charmonium decays to map mixing patterns across the spectrum.
- Future coupled-channel analyses could test whether the single-channel assumption holds when additional decay modes are included.
Load-bearing premise
A single-channel K-matrix using exactly four f0 poles and three f2 poles is sufficient to describe the entire KS0KS0 mass spectrum without significant contributions from other partial waves, backgrounds, or multi-channel effects.
What would settle it
A substantially worse fit quality, large shifts in pole parameters, or the need for an additional pole when the model is extended to include multi-channel couplings or extra waves would show the parametrization is insufficient.
read the original abstract
Using $(2712\pm14)\times10^6$ $\psi(3686)$ events collected with the BESIII detector, we perform the first amplitude analysis of the radiative decay $\psi(3686)\to \gamma K_S^0 K_S^0$ within the mass region $M_{K_S^0 K_S^0 }<2.8$ GeV/$c^2$. Employing a one-channel K-matrix approach for the description of the dynamics of the $K^0_S K^0_S$ system, the data sample is well described with four poles for the $f_0$-wave and three poles for the $f_2$-wave. The determined pole positions are consistent with those of well-established resonance states. The observed $f_0$ and $f_{2}$ states are found to be in agreement with those produced in radiative $J/\psi$ decays. The production behaviors of $f_0$ and $f_2$ poles in $\psi(3686)\to\gamma K_S^0 K_S^0$ are qualified with their residues and the converted branching fractions. By comparing with $J/\psi\to\gamma K_S^0 K_S^0$ decay, the ratios $\frac{\mathcal{B}(\psi(3686)\to\gamma f_{0,2})}{\mathcal{B}(J/\psi\to\gamma f_{0,2})}$ are determined, which provides crucial experimental inputs on the internal structure of the $f_{0,2}$ states, especially their potential mixing with glueball components.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports the first amplitude analysis of the radiative decay ψ(3686)→γ K_S^0 K_S^0 using (2712±14)×10^6 events collected with BESIII. A one-channel K-matrix parametrization is employed for the K_S^0 K_S^0 system below 2.8 GeV/c², describing the data with four f0-wave poles and three f2-wave poles whose positions are consistent with established resonances. Branching fractions are extracted from the fit residues and used to form ratios relative to the corresponding J/ψ→γ K_S^0 K_S^0 results, providing inputs on f0,2 internal structure and possible glueball mixing.
Significance. If the one-channel K-matrix adequately captures the dynamics, the reported ratios supply important experimental constraints on scalar and tensor meson structure. The large event sample and consistency of pole positions with known states are positive features; the work is independent of prior J/ψ measurements in the sense that the two data sets are distinct.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the data sample is well described with four poles for the f0-wave and three poles for the f2-wave' is load-bearing for the extracted residues and the headline branching-fraction ratios, yet no fit-quality metrics (χ²/dof, pull distributions, or comparison to alternative parametrizations) are provided to substantiate sufficiency of the one-channel K-matrix or absence of multi-channel leakage.
- [Abstract] The conversion of K-matrix residues into branching fractions (used for the ψ(3686)/J/ψ ratios) assumes the chosen parametrization fully accounts for all dynamics below 2.8 GeV/c²; any unmodeled background, higher partial waves, or coupled-channel effects would be absorbed into the residues, directly affecting the central claim about glueball mixing.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to improve clarity on fit quality and parametrization limitations.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the data sample is well described with four poles for the f0-wave and three poles for the f2-wave' is load-bearing for the extracted residues and the headline branching-fraction ratios, yet no fit-quality metrics (χ²/dof, pull distributions, or comparison to alternative parametrizations) are provided to substantiate sufficiency of the one-channel K-matrix or absence of multi-channel leakage.
Authors: The full manuscript describes the amplitude fit in detail (Section on amplitude analysis), including the K-matrix parametrization and resulting pole positions. We agree the abstract is too concise on this point. In revision we will add explicit fit-quality information (χ²/dof and reference to pull distributions) to both the abstract and main text, plus a brief comparison to alternative parametrizations explored during the analysis. These additions will substantiate the claim that the data are well described. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] The conversion of K-matrix residues into branching fractions (used for the ψ(3686)/J/ψ ratios) assumes the chosen parametrization fully accounts for all dynamics below 2.8 GeV/c²; any unmodeled background, higher partial waves, or coupled-channel effects would be absorbed into the residues, directly affecting the central claim about glueball mixing.
Authors: We acknowledge that the one-channel K-matrix is an approximation and that unmodeled effects could be absorbed into the residues. The manuscript already notes consistency of pole positions with known resonances and agreement with J/ψ results as supporting evidence. In the revised version we will expand the systematic-uncertainty section to quantify possible biases from the single-channel assumption and higher waves, and add an explicit caveat on coupled-channel limitations when interpreting the branching-fraction ratios for glueball-mixing studies. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; independent fit to new data with external comparison
full rationale
The paper fits a one-channel K-matrix (four f0 poles, three f2 poles) directly to the new ψ(3686)→γKS0KS0 data sample, extracts residues, converts them to branching fractions via standard formulas, and forms ratios against previously published J/ψ results obtained from a separate data set. No step reduces a claimed prediction or ratio to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest solely on a self-citation whose content is unverified. The J/ψ reference is an external measurement; the present analysis is self-contained against that benchmark.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (3)
- f0-wave pole positions and residues
- f2-wave pole positions and residues
- overall normalization and background parameters
axioms (2)
- domain assumption The one-channel K-matrix formalism correctly encodes analyticity and unitarity for the S- and D-wave amplitudes in the KS0KS0 system.
- domain assumption Higher partial waves and multi-channel couplings can be neglected below 2.8 GeV/c².
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Employing a one-channel K-matrix approach for the description of the dynamics of the KS0KS0 system, the data sample is well described with four poles for the f0-wave and three poles for the f2-wave.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
The ratios B(ψ(3686)→γ f0,2)/B(J/ψ→γ f0,2) are determined, which provides crucial experimental inputs on the internal structure of the f0,2 states, especially their potential mixing with glueball components.
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Model-independent Study of Magnetic Dipole Transitions in Quarkonium
N. Brambilla, Y. Jia and A. Vairo,Model-independent study of magnetic dipole transitions in quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 054005 [hep-ph/0512369]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[2]
R. L. Jaffe and K. Johnson,Unconventional States of Confined Quarks and Gluons, Phys. Lett. B 60 (1976) 201
work page 1976
- [3]
-
[4]
Barnes,A Transverse Gluonium Potential Model With Breit-fermi Hyperfine Effects, Z
T. Barnes,A Transverse Gluonium Potential Model With Breit-fermi Hyperfine Effects, Z. Phys. C 10 (1981) 275
work page 1981
-
[5]
J. M. Cornwall and A. Soni,Glueballs as Bound States of Massive Gluons, Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 431
work page 1983
-
[6]
Semirelativistic potential model for glueball states
F. Brau and C. Semay,Semirelativistic potential model for glueball states, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 014017 [hep-ph/0412173]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
-
[7]
M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov,QCD and Resonance Physics: Applications, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 448
work page 1979
-
[8]
Masses, decays and mixings of gluonia in QCD
S. Narison,Masses, decays and mixings of gluonia in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 509 (1998) 312 [hep-ph/9612457]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
-
[9]
UKQCD collaboration, A Comprehensive lattice study of SU(3) glueballs, Phys. Lett. B309 (1993) 378 [hep-lat/9304012]. – 15 –
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
-
[10]
Numerical Evidence for the Observation of a Scalar Glueball
J. Sexton, A. Vaccarino and D. Weingarten,Numerical evidence for the observation of a scalar glueball, Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 4563 [hep-lat/9510022]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
-
[11]
C. J. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon,The Glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 034509 [hep-lat/9901004]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
-
[12]
Monte Carlo study of glueball masses in the Hamiltonian limit of SU(3) lattice gauge theory
M. Loan, X.-Q. Luo and Z.-H. Luo,Monte Carlo study of glueball masses in the Hamiltonian limit of SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A21 (2006) 2905 [hep-lat/0503038]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[13]
Glueball Spectrum and Matrix Elements on Anisotropic Lattices
Y. Chen et al.,Glueball spectrum and matrix elements on anisotropic lattices, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 014516 [hep-lat/0510074]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[14]
UKQCD collaboration, Glueball mass measurements from improved staggered fermion simulations, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 034501 [arXiv:1005.2473]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[15]
SESAM and T χL collaboration, Static potentials and glueball masses from QCD simulations with Wilson sea quarks, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 054503 [hep-lat/0003012]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
-
[16]
Glueball spectrum from $N_f=2$ lattice QCD study on anisotropic lattices
W. Sun, L.-C. Gui, Y. Chen, M. Gong, C. Liu, Y.-B. Liu et al.,Glueball spectrum from Nf = 2 lattice QCD study on anisotropic lattices, Chin. Phys. C 42 (2018) 093103 [arXiv:1702.08174]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[17]
BESIII collaboration, Amplitude analysis of theπ0π0 system produced in radiative J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 052003 [arXiv:1506.00546], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 039906 (2016)]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[18]
BESIII collaboration, Amplitude analysis of theKSKS system produced in radiativeJ/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 072003 [arXiv:1808.06946]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[19]
BESIII collaboration, Partial wave analysis ofJ/ψ → γηη, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 092009 [arXiv:1301.0053], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 119901 (2013)]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
- [20]
- [21]
-
[22]
BESIII collaboration
-
[23]
S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze, T. Xiao and K. K. Seth,Comprehensive Study of the Radiative Decays ofJ/ψ and ψ(2S) to Pseudoscalar Meson Pairs, and Search for Glueballs, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 052006 [arXiv:1502.01686]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
- [24]
-
[25]
BESIII collaboration, Design and Construction of the BESIII Detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 614 (2010) 345 [arXiv:0911.4960]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[26]
C. Yu et al.,BEPCII Performance and Beam Dynamics Studies on Luminosity, in7th International Particle Accelerator Conference, p. TUYA01, 2016, DOI
work page 2016
- [27]
-
[28]
Lu et al.,Online monitoring of the center-of-mass energy from real data at BESIII, Radiat
J.-d. Lu et al.,Online monitoring of the center-of-mass energy from real data at BESIII, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods4 (2020) 337. – 16 –
work page 2020
-
[29]
J.-W. Zhang et al.,Suppression of top-up injection backgrounds with offline event filter in the BESIII experiment, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods6 (2022) 289
work page 2022
-
[30]
Li et al.,Study of MRPC technology for BESIII endcap-TOF upgrade, Radiat
X. Li et al.,Study of MRPC technology for BESIII endcap-TOF upgrade, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods1 (2017) 13
work page 2017
-
[31]
Guo et al.,The study of time calibration for upgraded end cap TOF of BESIII, Radiat
Y.-X. Guo et al.,The study of time calibration for upgraded end cap TOF of BESIII, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods1 (2017) 15
work page 2017
-
[32]
P. Cao et al.,Design and construction of the new BESIII endcap Time-of-Flight system with MRPC Technology, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A953 (2020) 163053
work page 2020
-
[33]
GEANT4 collaboration, GEANT4–a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250
work page 2003
-
[34]
The Precision Monte Carlo Event Generator KK For Two-Fermion Final States In e+e- Collisions
S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward and Z. Was,The Precision Monte Carlo event generatorKK for two fermion final states ine+e− collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun.130 (2000) 260 [hep-ph/9912214]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
-
[35]
D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462 (2001) 152
work page 2001
-
[36]
Ping,Event generators at BESIII, Chin
R.-G. Ping,Event generators at BESIII, Chin. Phys. C 32 (2008) 599
work page 2008
-
[37]
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001
work page 2024
-
[38]
J. C. Chen, G. S. Huang, X. R. Qi, D. H. Zhang and Y. S. Zhu,Event generator forJ/ψ and ψ(2S) decay, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 034003
work page 2000
-
[39]
R.-L. Yang, R.-G. Ping and H. Chen,Tuning and Validation of the Lundcharm Model with J/ψ Decays, Chin. Phys. Lett.31 (2014) 061301
work page 2014
-
[40]
E. Barberio, B. van Eijk and Z. Was,PHOTOS: A Universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections in decays, Comput. Phys. Commun.66 (1991) 115
work page 1991
-
[41]
B. S. Zou and D. V. Bugg,Covariant tensor formalism for partial wave analyses of psi decay to mesons, Eur. Phys. J. A16 (2003) 537 [hep-ph/0211457]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
- [42]
- [43]
-
[44]
F. James and M. Roos,Minuit: A System for Function Minimization and Analysis of the Parameter Errors and Correlations, Comput. Phys. Commun.10 (1975) 343
work page 1975
-
[45]
Langenbruch,Parameter uncertainties in weighted unbinned maximum likelihood fits, Eur
C. Langenbruch,Parameter uncertainties in weighted unbinned maximum likelihood fits, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 393 [arXiv:1911.01303]
- [46]
-
[47]
BESIII collaboration, Search for hadronic transitionχcJ → ηcπ+π− and observation of χcJ → K ¯Kπππ, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 012002 [arXiv:1208.4805]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[48]
L. Von Detten, F. Noël, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter and B. Kubis,On the scalarπK form factor beyond the elastic region, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 420 [arXiv:2103.01966]. – 17 –
-
[49]
A. Rodas, A. Pilloni, M. Albaladejo, C. Fernandez-Ramirez, V. Mathieu and A. P. Szczepaniak, Scalar and tensor resonances inJ/ψ radiative decays, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 80 [arXiv:2110.00027]. – 18 – The BESIII Collaboration M.Ablikim 1, M.N.Achasov4,c, P.Adlarson77, X.C.Ai 82, R.Aliberti36, A.Amoroso76A,76C, Q.An 73,59,a, Y.Bai58, O.Bakina37, Y.Ban47,h,...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.