{"as_of":"2026-08-11T18:09:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ddc67024c3353173986fda663c69af2704449876cc3b4cd5d26046de1e2060e2","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":9,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":9,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":9,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":9,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":1,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[{"count":1,"observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","source":"arxiv_reference"}],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z","title":"Blair-Stanek, N","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:556ab317e99a7fd11e84ea9a55d1965236fa12ac1575d990213b560e940fa5f2","observation_id":"a90de854-08a4-4ae0-bae7-946dd7566361","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.17638","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","venue":"ArXiv.org","work_id":"003c0a26-c763-452f-9a6e-a7b344c9b741","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2601.15599","last_updated":"2026-02-20T20:53:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T22:42:36.961014Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-22T02:49:06Z","title":"Autonomous Business System via Neuro-symbolic AI","version":3},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-16T12:45:04.815856Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2601.15599"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a2c9d884080457cd486989e8874e98dd4d9509792dfbca808a30cc3667bafe3","observation_id":"1d89fad8-5f31-45ad-8f23-1e6119d527d7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-16T12:47:53.370480Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T18:37:26.607019Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.08286","last_updated":"2026-07-29T06:38:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:00:25.803162Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-09T12:01:42Z","title":"LAMUS: A Large-Scale Corpus for Legal Argument Mining from U.S. Caselaw using LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T18:37:26.607019Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2603.08286"},"observation_digest":"sha256:349001db638d070f7f4de73cce2ae78b10f22e3a202ad85f4c80054da38064a6","observation_id":"68eb8530-42a2-4702-9404-28e821aac688","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T18:37:26.607019Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.17638","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","venue":"ArXiv.org","work_id":"003c0a26-c763-452f-9a6e-a7b344c9b741","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.14607","last_updated":"2026-05-02T15:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T01:13:36.359902Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-16T04:26:18Z","title":"GDPR Auto-Formalization with AI Agents and Human Verification","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-10T11:12:17.028017Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.14607"},"observation_digest":"sha256:29a4c248220594a4be915684a2e562053b808f9b9e57525e623ec24dd9d6c333","observation_id":"ed4753f2-3861-41e4-9375-767efbb6bb69","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-10T11:15:09.359635Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.17638","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","venue":"ArXiv.org","work_id":"003c0a26-c763-452f-9a6e-a7b344c9b741","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.16280","last_updated":"2026-04-10T17:24:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T10:04:20.856261Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-10T17:24:34Z","title":"Beyond Imperfect Alternatives with Rulemapping: A Neuro-Symbolic Case Study on Online Hate Speech","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-21T09:21:55.537331Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.16280"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8ff0db8df111e2d9b7f28abda0ba9fcebc4f3f2b3418ef988822d3f3c291a789","observation_id":"6a611050-8ac3-4bdb-ab58-3af590e29d50","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-21T09:24:05.422250Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.17638","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","venue":"ArXiv.org","work_id":"003c0a26-c763-452f-9a6e-a7b344c9b741","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.26530","last_updated":"2026-05-26T04:20:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T03:50:47.416073Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T04:20:06Z","title":"Which Changes Matter? Towards Trustworthy Legal AI via Relevance-Sensitive Evaluation and Solver-Grounded Reasoning","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T18:39:41.991608Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.26530"},"observation_digest":"sha256:82ca6a2afcec91051002c86b63c02dc411c796f365300124db728a58e1dc72d5","observation_id":"0320be17-92de-4ba2-9684-9a871d337af1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T18:43:50.589345Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.17638","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","venue":"ArXiv.org","work_id":"003c0a26-c763-452f-9a6e-a7b344c9b741","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01145","last_updated":"2026-07-06T16:09:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-30T15:24:45.114962Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T10:27:18Z","title":"Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches","version":3},"reference_index":143,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-01T07:22:25.349398Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01145"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dae1b4274a72cb0dafe11c77294f6160e549a0cd302fcd34b538b9cbbfd40bf0","observation_id":"b7fa594f-54ad-46fe-9b9c-a04a5f60b279","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T08:35:34.075399Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.17638","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","venue":"ArXiv.org","work_id":"003c0a26-c763-452f-9a6e-a7b344c9b741","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.16118","last_updated":"2026-06-19T01:41:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T23:52:37.922109Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-15T02:14:49Z","title":"Know Your Limits : On the Faithfulness of LLMs as Solvers and Autoformalizers in Legal Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":53,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-06-27T04:24:11.949884Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.16118"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1849cc8729d4c6fd428715e384c08e97841e6d6f9d8930ebaeb14b083f57ec40","observation_id":"18a823f3-d181-4c8a-91a2-4ae94da15018","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-03T17:18:43.427281Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.17638","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","venue":"ArXiv.org","work_id":"003c0a26-c763-452f-9a6e-a7b344c9b741","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.23913","last_updated":"2026-06-22T20:21:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T22:25:50.164327Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-22T20:21:49Z","title":"Closing the Loop: Formally Verified Law as a Reward Signal for Self-Improving Legal AI","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T08:39:23.985069Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.23913"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2b626d72241281046451f65b4992abeb7a234971ce83dfc1bf9cee246eafdb66","observation_id":"00835e06-b6a5-4681-8938-6470b83b3258","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-04T10:39:45.207554Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2502.17638/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2502.17638/integrity","json":"/paper/2502.17638/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2502.17638"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CY","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T17:51:57.843180Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 9 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2502.17638."}