pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.12898 · v3 · submitted 2025-03-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

A Sample of Active Galactic Nuclei with Intermediate-mass Black Holes Extended to z approx 0.6

Wen-Juan Liu , Luis C. Ho , Xiao-Bo Dong , Su Yao , Paulina Lira , Yicheng Guo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords intermediate-mass black holesactive galactic nucleiSloan Digital Sky Surveyblack hole massEddington ratioredshift evolutionbroad emission lines
0
0 comments X

The pith

A sample of 930 AGNs with intermediate-mass black holes extends redshift coverage to z ≈ 0.57 and shows declining accretion rates at lower redshifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper assembles a uniform catalog of 930 active galactic nuclei powered by black holes no more massive than two million solar masses, identified from Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectra through the presence of broad H-alpha or H-beta emission lines. By exploiting the wide wavelength range of BOSS and eBOSS observations, the selection reaches out to redshift 0.57, more than doubling the previous typical limit of 0.35. Black hole masses in the sample range from 10,000 to about two million solar masses, with Eddington ratios between 0.01 and 1.9. An initial inspection of the data reveals that both the highest accretion rates and the luminosities of the broad H-alpha lines fall as redshift decreases, suggesting that accretion activity at the low-mass end slows over cosmic time in a manner reminiscent of downsizing trends in more massive systems.

Core claim

We present a sample of 930 intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) active galactic nuclei (AGNs) with black hole masses of M_BH ≤ 2 × 10^6 M_⊙, uniformly selected from the Seventeenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, based on the detection of broad Hα or Hβ emission lines. Taking advantage of the wide wavelength coverage of BOSS/eBOSS spectroscopy, our sample extends the redshift coverage of low-z IMBH AGNs to z ≤ 0.57. This sample encompasses black hole masses from 10^{4.0} to 10^{6.3} M_⊙, with Eddington ratios ranging from 0.01 to 1.9. Among the z > 0.3 subset, 24 sources exhibit detectable broad Mg II λλ2796,2803 emission lines. A preliminary analysis reveals a marked decline in

What carries the argument

Virial black hole mass estimates derived from the width of broad emission lines and continuum luminosities, used to isolate systems with M_BH ≤ 2 × 10^6 M_⊙ from SDSS spectra.

If this is right

  • The catalog supplies a statistically useful set of low-mass black hole AGNs at intermediate redshifts for demographic studies.
  • The observed decline in maximum Eddington ratio and Hα luminosity with decreasing redshift indicates possible cosmic evolution in accretion activity at the low-mass end.
  • Detection of broad Mg II lines in a subset of higher-redshift objects allows direct comparison of emission-line properties across different species.
  • Uniform selection from a single large survey reduces heterogeneity compared with earlier compilations limited to lower redshifts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the redshift trend persists in larger samples, it could link the growth of low-mass black holes to the broader pattern of galaxy downsizing.
  • Cross-checks with future wide-field surveys such as DESI could test whether the decline continues or flattens at still higher redshifts.
  • A subset of objects with multiple emission lines offers a starting point for reverberation-mapping campaigns to calibrate virial masses at the low-mass end.

Load-bearing premise

The virial black hole mass estimates derived from broad-line widths and continuum luminosities correctly identify objects with M_BH ≤ 2 × 10^6 M_⊙ without substantial contamination from higher-mass systems or non-virial motions.

What would settle it

Independent mass measurements, such as stellar velocity dispersion in the host galaxies, showing that a substantial fraction of the selected objects have true black hole masses above 2 × 10^6 solar masses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.12898 by Luis C. Ho, Paulina Lira, Su Yao, Wen-Juan Liu, Xiao-Bo Dong, Yicheng Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the continuum and emission-line fitting for two example IMBH AGNs. For each object, the upper panel shows the continuum decomposition based on the SDSS spectrum (black), with the total model overlaid in red. The AGN power-law continuum, host galaxy starlight, and Fe II multiplets (optical and UV) are shown in purple, blue, and orange, respectively. In the Mg II region, due to large uncertai… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a): Redshift distribution for our IMBH sam￾ple, compared with that from Greene & Ho (2007b), Dong et al. (2012), and Liu et al. (2018). (b): Distribution of broad Hα of our IMBH sample at z ⩽ 0.57, with z ⩾ 0.35 objects highlighted in red. For comparison, the IMBH sam￾ples from Greene & Ho (2007b), Dong et al. (2012), and Liu et al. (2018) are displayed. A typical 1-σ error bar is shown (lower-right), rep… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the spectra of MagE (red) and SDSS (black) for an IMBH AGN (J082033.39+074246.8) and an object classified as “uncertain” (J145032.55+271257.1) by our pipeline. The green lines indicate the fitted continua for MagE and SDSS spectra. The inset panels provide a zoomed-in views of Hβ and Hα regions in the MagE and SDSS spectra (continuum subtracted), with the MagE spectrum scaled to match the S… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of Mg II emission line fitting for four sources with both SDSS and DESI spectra. Each panel focuses on the rest-frame wavelength range 2740–2860 ˚A, covering the Mg II λλ2796, 2803 doublet. Both SDSS and DESI spectra are plotted in black; the DESI spectra are vertically offset for clarity, with the offset values labeled in the figure. No spectral smoothing is applied. Colored lines represent t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distributions of our IMBH sample on the (a) log MBH-logLbol/LEdd and (b) log MBH-logLHα planes. Grey open circles represent all IMBHs. The orange, green, and red contours indicate the subsamples within three red￾shift bins: z ⩽ 0.07, 0.12 < z < 0.18, and z > 0.35, re￾spectively. Each set of contours encloses 30% and 95% of the respective subsample. The histograms along the top and right margins show the di… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Narrow-line diagnostic diagrams of our IMBH sample, showing [O III] λ5007/Hβ versus (a) [N II] λ6583/Hα, (b) [S II] λλ6716, 6731/Hα, and (c) [O I] λ6300/Hα. The dashed and dotted blue curves separating H II regions, Seyfert galaxies, and LINERs are taken from Kewley et al. (2001) and Kewley et al. (2006), respectively. In panel (a), the dash-dotted line shows the empirical division between star-forming gal… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of broad-line widths: FWHMMg II versus FWHMHα for 24 IMBHs with detectable Mg II emis￾sion (black and red dots). Black points represent measure￾ments from SDSS spectra. Red points highlight three sources (J1020+3232, J1219+0056, and J2222+0223) for which both Mg II and Hα lines are detected by higher resolution DESI spectra, yielding more reliable measurements; these three sources are also shown… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a sample of 930 intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) active galactic nuclei (AGNs) with black hole masses of $M_\mathrm{BH} \leqslant 2 \times 10^{6}$ M$_{\odot}$, uniformly selected from the Seventeenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, based on the detection of broad H$\alpha$ or H$\beta$ emission lines. Taking advantage of the wide wavelength coverage of BOSS/eBOSS spectroscopy, our sample extends the redshift coverage of low-$z$ IMBH AGNs to $z\leqslant0.57$, significantly improving upon previous studies that where generally limited to $z\leqslant0.35$. This sample encompasses black hole masses from $10^{4.0}$ to $10^{6.3}$ M$_{\odot}$, with Eddington ratios ranging from 0.01 to 1.9. Among the $z>0.3$ subset, 24 sources exhibit detectable broad Mg II $\lambda\lambda2796,2803$ emission lines, including eight confirmed by independent DESI spectra. A preliminary analysis reveals a marked decline in both the maximum accretion rate ($L/L_\mathrm{Edd}$) and broad H$\alpha$ luminosity with decreasing redshift, possibly reflecting a cosmic evolution of accretion activity at the low-mass end, akin to the ``downsizing'' evolutionary trend seen in high-mass AGNs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a sample of 930 IMBH AGNs (M_BH ≤ 2×10^6 M_⊙) uniformly selected from SDSS DR17 via detection of broad Hα or Hβ lines, extending the redshift range to z ≤ 0.57. It additionally reports a preliminary decline in maximum Eddington ratio and broad Hα luminosity toward lower redshift, interpreted as possible downsizing at the low-mass end.

Significance. If the virial mass selection proves robust, the sample size and extended redshift coverage would represent a useful expansion of existing low-mass AGN catalogs, enabling statistical studies of accretion at M_BH ~10^4–10^6 M_⊙ and providing an observational test of evolutionary trends previously seen only in higher-mass systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sample selection and black-hole mass estimation] Sample construction: The M_BH ≤ 2×10^6 M_⊙ cut is applied using single-epoch virial estimators calibrated on reverberation-mapped AGNs with M_BH ≳ 10^7 M_⊙. The manuscript provides no quantitative assessment of extrapolation errors in the R–L relation or virial factor f at the low-mass end, nor any test for non-virial contributions to line width; this directly affects sample purity and the validity of the reported redshift trends in L/L_Edd and L_Hα.
  2. [Results and preliminary analysis] Trend analysis: The abstract states that a 'preliminary analysis reveals a marked decline' in maximum accretion rate and broad Hα luminosity with decreasing redshift, yet the text supplies no completeness corrections, selection-function modeling, or error budget that would allow the reader to evaluate whether the trend is robust against Malmquist bias or redshift-dependent detection thresholds.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'where generally limited' should read 'were generally limited'.
  2. [Sample description] The eight sources with independent DESI confirmation of Mg II are noted but not compared quantitatively to the SDSS-based mass and luminosity estimates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below in detail and have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional discussion where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sample selection and black-hole mass estimation] Sample construction: The M_BH ≤ 2×10^6 M_⊙ cut is applied using single-epoch virial estimators calibrated on reverberation-mapped AGNs with M_BH ≳ 10^7 M_⊙. The manuscript provides no quantitative assessment of extrapolation errors in the R–L relation or virial factor f at the low-mass end, nor any test for non-virial contributions to line width; this directly affects sample purity and the validity of the reported redshift trends in L/L_Edd and L_Hα.

    Authors: We agree that the single-epoch virial estimators are calibrated primarily on higher-mass systems and that extrapolation to the IMBH regime carries uncertainties in the R–L relation and virial factor. The manuscript employs the standard Greene & Ho (2005) and subsequent calibrations widely used in the literature for low-mass AGN samples. In the revised version, we have added a dedicated subsection in the methods discussing these extrapolation uncertainties, referencing studies on low-mass virial mass estimates (e.g., recent works on IMBH candidates). We also note that our selection is based on the presence of broad lines rather than mass alone, which mitigates some purity issues, but we acknowledge that quantitative error budgets for f at low masses are not provided here. Such detailed tests are deferred to a follow-up study focused on mass validation, as this paper primarily presents the catalog. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results and preliminary analysis] Trend analysis: The abstract states that a 'preliminary analysis reveals a marked decline' in maximum accretion rate and broad Hα luminosity with decreasing redshift, yet the text supplies no completeness corrections, selection-function modeling, or error budget that would allow the reader to evaluate whether the trend is robust against Malmquist bias or redshift-dependent detection thresholds.

    Authors: The trends are explicitly labeled as 'preliminary' in both the abstract and main text to reflect the absence of full selection-function modeling. We concur that Malmquist bias and redshift-dependent detection thresholds could influence the observed decline in maximum L/L_Edd and L_Hα. In the revision, we have expanded the discussion section to include a qualitative assessment of these potential biases and added explicit caveats stating that the trends are suggestive only. We have also clarified that a quantitative analysis incorporating completeness corrections and error budgets is beyond the scope of this catalog paper but is planned for a subsequent work. This addresses the referee's concern without overstating the current results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational catalog with standard estimators

full rationale

The paper constructs a sample by applying established single-epoch virial mass estimators (cited from prior literature) to SDSS spectra and reports observed trends in the resulting catalog. No derivation, model fitting, or prediction is presented that reduces to its own inputs by construction. The M_BH ≤ 2×10^6 M_⊙ cut is a selection threshold, not a self-referential output. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any claimed result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard spectroscopic assumptions and public survey data rather than new theoretical constructs.

free parameters (1)
  • Black hole mass upper limit
    M_BH ≤ 2 × 10^6 M_⊙ used to define the IMBH sample
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Broad Hα or Hβ line widths and luminosities yield reliable virial black hole mass estimates
    Invoked for uniform selection of the 930 sources

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5815 in / 1290 out tokens · 34024 ms · 2026-05-23T00:03:23.250835+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [2]

    2019, ApJ, 875, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab100d

    Bahk, H., Woo, J.-H., & Park, D. 2019, ApJ, 875, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab100d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab100d 2019

  3. [3]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  4. [4]

    J., Ho, L

    Barth, A. J., Ho, L. C., Rutledge, R. E., & Sargent, W. L. W. 2004, ApJ, 607, 90, doi: 10.1086/383302

    work page doi:10.1086/383302 2004

  5. [5]

    2009, ApJ, 697, 160, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/160 Bogd´ an,´A., Goulding, A

    Vestergaard, M. 2009, ApJ, 697, 160, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/160 Bogd´ an,´A., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 126, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/1/160 2009

  6. [6]

    2003, , 341, 501, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06431.x

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003

  7. [7]

    V., Katkov, I

    Chilingarian, I. V., Katkov, I. Y., Zolotukhin, I. Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad184

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad184 2018

  8. [8]

    2024, ApJ, 969, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4966

    Cho, H., & Woo, J.-H. 2024, ApJ, 969, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4966

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4966 2024

  9. [9]

    L., Songaila, A., Hu, E

    Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., Hu, E. M., & Cohen, J. G. 1996, AJ, 112, 839, doi: 10.1086/118058

    work page doi:10.1086/118058 1996

  10. [10]

    The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III

    Dawson, K. S., Schlegel, D. J., Ahn, C. P., et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 10, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/1/10

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/1/10 2013

  11. [11]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    Dawson, K. S., Kneib, J.-P., Percival, W. J., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 44, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/44 DESI Collaboration, Aghamousa, A., Aguilar, J., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00036, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1611.00036 DESI Collaboration, Abdul-Karim, M., Adame, A. G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14745, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14745

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/44 2016

  12. [12]

    M., Mandelbaum R., Ishak M., Seljak U., Nichol R., Pimbblet K

    Dong, X., Wang, T., Wang, J., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 581, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12560.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12560.x 2008

  13. [13]

    C., Yuan, W., et al

    Dong, X.-B., Ho, L. C., Yuan, W., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 167, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/167

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/755/2/167 2012

  14. [14]

    C., et al

    Dong, X.-B., Wang, J.-G., Ho, L. C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/86

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/2/86 2011

  15. [15]

    V., & Ho, L

    Filippenko, A. V., & Ho, L. C. 2003, ApJL, 588, L13, doi: 10.1086/375361

    work page doi:10.1086/375361 2003

  16. [16]

    V., Ho, L

    Filippenko, A. V., Ho, L. C., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1993, ApJL, 410, L75, doi: 10.1086/186883

    work page doi:10.1086/186883 1993

  17. [17]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63, doi: 10.1086/316293

    work page doi:10.1086/316293 1999

  18. [18]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2004, ApJ, 610, 722, doi: 10.1086/421719 —. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122, doi: 10.1086/431897 —. 2007a, ApJ, 667, 131, doi: 10.1086/520497 —. 2007b, ApJ, 670, 92, doi: 10.1086/522082

    work page doi:10.1086/421719 2004

  19. [19]

    E., Strader, J., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 257, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835 2020

  20. [20]

    2005, A&A, 441, 417, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042134

    Hasinger, G., Miyaji, T., & Schmidt, M. 2005, A&A, 441, 417, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042134

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042134 2005

  21. [21]

    Heckman, T. M. 1980, A&A, 87, 152

    work page 1980

  22. [22]

    M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., et al

    Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., et al. 2004, Astrophys. J., 613, 109, doi: 10.1086/422872

    work page doi:10.1086/422872 2004

  23. [23]

    Ho, L. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 475, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110546 —. 2009, ApJ, 699, 626, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/626

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110546 2008

  24. [24]

    C., Filippenko, A

    Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1997a, ApJS, 112, 315, doi: 10.1086/313041 —. 1997b, ApJ, 487, 568, doi: 10.1086/304638

    work page doi:10.1086/313041

  25. [25]

    C., Filippenko, A

    Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., Sargent, W. L. W., & Peng, C. Y. 1997c, ApJS, 112, 391, doi: 10.1086/313042

    work page doi:10.1086/313042

  26. [26]

    C., & Kim, M

    Ho, L. C., & Kim, M. 2014, ApJ, 789, 17, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/17 —. 2015, ApJ, 809, 123, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/123

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/1/17 2014

  27. [27]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 2020

  28. [28]

    2003, , 341, 501, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06431.x

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003a, MNRAS, 341, 33, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x 2003

  29. [29]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003b, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  30. [30]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  31. [31]

    2007, , 374, 1413, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11246.x

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x 2006

  32. [32]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 2013

  33. [33]

    B., Ho, L

    Kraemer, S. B., Ho, L. C., Crenshaw, D. M., Shields, J. C., & Filippenko, A. V. 1999, ApJ, 520, 564, doi: 10.1086/307486

    work page doi:10.1086/307486 1999

  34. [34]

    T., Green, R

    Laor, A., Jannuzi, B. T., Green, R. F., & Boroson, T. A. 1997, ApJ, 489, 656, doi: 10.1086/304816

    work page doi:10.1086/304816 1997

  35. [35]

    Le, H. A. N., Woo, J.-H., & Xue, Y. 2020, ApJ, 901, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abada0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abada0 2020

  36. [36]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab298b

    Liu, H.-Y., Liu, W.-J., Dong, X.-B., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab298b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab298b 2019

  37. [37]

    2018, ApJS, 235, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab88e

    Liu, H.-Y., Yuan, W., Dong, X.-B., Zhou, H., & Liu, W.-J. 2018, ApJS, 235, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab88e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab88e 2018

  38. [38]

    2021, ApJ, 915, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf82c

    Liu, W.-J., Lira, P., Yao, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 915, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf82c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf82c 2021

  39. [39]

    2006, AJ, 131, 790, doi: 10.1086/498711

    Lu, H., Zhou, H., Wang, J., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 790, doi: 10.1086/498711

    work page doi:10.1086/498711 2006

  40. [40]

    2024, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Witstok, J., et al. 2024, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5 2024

  41. [41]

    Markwardt, C. B. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 411, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, ed. D. A

    work page 2009

  42. [42]

    Non-linear Least Squares Fitting in IDL with MPFIT

    Bohlender, D. Durand, & P. Dowler, 251, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0902.2850

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0902.2850

  43. [43]

    L., Burles, S., Thompson, I

    Marshall, J. L., Burles, S., Thompson, I. B., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, ed. I. S. McLean & M. M. Casali, 701454, doi: 10.1117/12.789972

    work page doi:10.1117/12.789972 2008

  44. [44]

    2025, ApJ, 982, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd

    Pucha, R., Juneau, S., Dey, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd 2025

  45. [45]

    E., Greene, J

    Reines, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Geha, M. 2013, ApJ, 775, 116, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/116

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/116 2013

  46. [46]

    T., Chitre, S

    Runnoe, J. C., Brotherton, M. S., & Shang, Z. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 478, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20620.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20620.x 2012

  47. [47]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/305772 1998

  48. [48]

    Shen, Y., & Kelly, B. C. 2012, ApJ, 746, 169, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/169

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/2/169 2012

  49. [49]

    2006, ApJ, 650, 57, doi: 10.1086/506376

    Tsuzuki, Y., Kawara, K., Yoshii, Y., et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 57, doi: 10.1086/506376

    work page doi:10.1086/506376 2006

  50. [50]

    2003, ApJ, 598, 886, doi: 10.1086/378940 Vanden Berk, D

    Ueda, Y., Akiyama, M., Ohta, K., & Miyaji, T. 2003, ApJ, 598, 886, doi: 10.1086/378940 Vanden Berk, D. E., Richards, G. T., Bauer, A., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 549, doi: 10.1086/321167

    work page doi:10.1086/378940 2003

  51. [51]

    Veilleux, S., & Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, ApJS, 63, 295, doi: 10.1086/191166 V´ eron-Cetty, M. P., Joly, M., & V´ eron, P. 2004, A&A, 417, 515, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035714

    work page doi:10.1086/191166 1987

  52. [52]

    2021, Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 732, doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00364-9

    Volonteri, M., Habouzit, M., & Colpi, M. 2021, Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 732, doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00364-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00364-9 2021

  53. [53]

    2009, ApJ, 707, 1334, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1334

    Wang, J.-G., Dong, X.-B., Wang, T.-G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1334, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1334

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/707/2/1334 2009

  54. [54]

    Woo, J.-H., Le, H. A. N., Karouzos, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3e 2018

  55. [55]

    J., Greene, J

    Xiao, T., Barth, A. J., Greene, J. E., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 28, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/28

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/739/1/28 2011

  56. [56]

    2006, ApJS, 166, 128, doi: 10.1086/504869

    Zhou, H., Wang, T., Yuan, W., et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 128, doi: 10.1086/504869

    work page doi:10.1086/504869 2006