To CPL, or not to CPL? What we have not learned about the dark energy equation of state
read the original abstract
We show that using a Taylor expansion for the dark energy equation-of-state parameter and limiting it to the zeroth and first-order terms, i.e., the so-called Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization in regimes where it has been shown to fail as a physics-based two-parameter model, instead of allowing for higher-order terms and then marginalizing over them, adds extra information not present in the data and leads to markedly different and potentially misleading conclusions. Fixing the higher-order terms to zero, one concludes that vacuum energy that is currently non-dynamical (e.g., the cosmological constant) is excluded at several $\sigma$ significance as the explanation of cosmic acceleration, even in Dark Energy Spectroscopic Survey (DESI) DR1 data. Meanwhile, instead marginalizing over the higher-order terms shows that we know neither the current dark energy equation of state nor its current rate of change well enough to make such a claim. The CPL parametrization also implies that dark energy exhibits phantom behavior at high redshifts, while we show that by allowing the higher-order terms -- which is required in order to capture the behavior of the dark energy equation of state in regimes beyond the validity of the CPL parametrization -- the evidence for this phantom-like dark energy significantly weakens. This is not an argument for the higher-order phenomenological parametrizations, but rather a caution regarding such parametrizations in general. This issue has become more prominent now with the recent release of high-quality Stage IV galaxy survey data. The results of analyses using simple parametrizations should be interpreted with great care.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
A class of decelerating inhomogeneous cosmological models giving rise to accelerating FLRW universes at large scales
Inhomogeneous decelerating models generate effective accelerating FLRW universes at large scales through backreaction that mimics a running dark-energy term.
-
Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination
Model-independent reconstruction finds 96.7-98.5% probability of phantom crossing if recombination is standard, but early new physics to ease Hubble tension weakens this preference while requiring unrealistically high...
-
Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 2. Constraints on Dark Energy, Spatial Curvature, and Neutrino Masses
Reanalysis of DESI full-shape clustering data tightens constraints on neutrino mass, spatial curvature, and dark energy equation-of-state parameters relative to BAO-only results.
-
Mapping the redshift drift at various redshifts through cosmography
Cosmographic Taylor and Padé models fitted to Pantheon+SH0ES+GRB+DESI BAO data yield redshift drift predictions compatible with ΛCDM and ω0ω1CDM at 1-2σ, with mock drift data tightening q0 and j0 bounds.
-
How Complex is Dark Energy? A Bayesian Analysis of CPL Extensions with Recent DESI BAO Measurements
Bayesian evidence from DESI BAO plus CMB and SN data favors the standard CPL evolving dark energy model over both simpler constant-w and more complex higher-order extensions.
-
Beyond CPL: Evidence for dynamical dark energy in three-parameter models
Two three-parameter extensions of the mAH dark energy parametrization are compared to LambdaCDM, wCDM, CPL and others using CMB, DESI BAO, H(z), RSD and three SNIa samples, yielding Delta chi-squared improvements of 6...
-
No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison
Local goodness-of-fit gains for w0wa and phantom crossing vanish under global Bayesian evidence, showing no statistically robust evidence for dynamical dark energy across datasets.
-
No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison
Global Bayesian evidence shows no statistically significant support for dynamical dark energy or phantom crossing despite limited local fit improvements in the w0wa parametrization.
-
Study of the cosmological tensions and DESI-DR2 in the framework of the Little Rip model
The Little Rip model reduces the Hubble tension below 3σ with CMB plus BAO data but only improves the statistical fit to CMB data alone per Bayes factors, and shifts toward quintessence behavior when DESI-DR2 is included.
-
Comparing Minimal and Non-Minimal Quintessence Models to 2025 DESI Data
Quintessence models with standard potentials give only modest improvements over Lambda to DESI data on evolving dark energy, while non-minimal couplings allow temporary phantom behavior but face tight gravity constrai...
-
The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2
This review traces the history of dynamical dark energy, presents the no-go theorem against single-field crossing of w = -1, and surveys viable Quintom constructions including multi-field models and modified gravity i...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.