{"as_of":"2026-08-22T22:31:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:80c199ffdfeec30782366d242197618ce4237d3b9b66c053c933ce0fd44adfb9","coverage":[{"denominator":15,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":15,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.026358Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":16,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":16,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-05-13T18:45:23.801303Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-05-13T18:48:07.919233Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2505.16339","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-05T21:23:00.469572Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"3cbe2d91-5b88-42d4-ad72-dcce63af0820","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.03196","last_updated":"2026-04-03T17:15:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T04:38:17.724504Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-03T17:15:15Z","title":"From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-13T18:45:23.801303Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.16339","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.03196"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1f623a2036d669f0110500edf6403a04c59a60c056af7859d24f07260de959dd","observation_id":"3e918104-2b09-4054-95b8-3c9d90099e92","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-13T18:48:07.921114Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2505.16339/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2505.16339/integrity","json":"/paper/2505.16339/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.08774","last_updated":"2024-03-04T06:01:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T09:58:46.058102Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-15T17:15:04Z","title":"GPT-4 Technical Report","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2303.08774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.814520Z","title":"Gpt-4 technical report,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.814520Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.08774","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c7ad52f203ea8c7798f62a2357b0ac91a8984a472b5297e3b160bf57658c44c9","observation_id":"ecc9deb1-bed5-4872-85ce-9e3722a16b72","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.814520Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.15115","last_updated":"2025-01-03T02:18:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T18:50:07.059564Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-19T17:56:09Z","title":"Qwen2.5 Technical Report","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.15115","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.860546Z","title":"Qwen2.5 technical report,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.860546Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.15115","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:33f38579ddfbbc12be25e540119e8aea5b3cb7c8a52f4042f200d7d77f715fce","observation_id":"6a7717fa-c7d1-4970-8911-689b5efe7ee7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.860546Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2403.08295","last_updated":"2024-04-16T12:52:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T03:29:01.959523Z","submitted_at":"2024-03-13T06:59:16Z","title":"Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2403.08295","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.916984Z","title":"Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.916984Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2403.08295","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ddeea6b5ac55574baa57ba6ae7ea4096d246e129d488631236d92d2ed42cf3bf","observation_id":"0eaac7b8-0794-4f04-9960-7360d4ae59e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.916984Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.968525Z","title":"Large language models for software engi- neering: A systematic literature review,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.968525Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0fac6dbde0e82bd1f182b5b74cba149a7b93d0114f6a8ef0901d2df5b823630","observation_id":"c3e5dfa3-f705-4807-be7b-ad7fd6692382","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:20.968525Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.11401","last_updated":"2024-11-29T09:48:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T18:28:53.464486Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-18T09:24:01Z","title":"Deep Learning-based Code Reviews: A Paradigm Shift or a Double-Edged Sword?","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2411.11401","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.048185Z","title":"Deep learning-based code reviews: A paradigm shift or a double-edged sword?","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.048185Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2411.11401","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ed03185c863da39ca41e52307fb0f7697b71e9a31b6f85161b58eec8184997f1","observation_id":"1761baef-4f25-4ef5-9973-190ae31b104c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.048185Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.966263Z","title":"Improving automated code reviews: Learning from experience,","venue":null,"work_id":"bbc9e31b-ef5a-4d9d-b97b-b8941ffbe4b5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.106965Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:995a74c0fa458e625ea4523ff0ecd2d62b8d4686a7053910c844f01170dc85af","observation_id":"2d3f0138-deee-4205-bc0a-cea603a30d24","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:23.004160Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.788640Z","title":"AI-assisted assessment of coding practices in modern code review,","venue":null,"work_id":"acaa8f80-c1c2-412a-8e61-b05c46136e1f","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.175714Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:49a6f856b76d2d42abbfaaa5546c872bdeea890ea0a45eec250fd7a2eed6c25b","observation_id":"4e0cea4d-f4cd-42e4-8db6-f16585547bbf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.882609Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.254531Z","title":"AI-powered code review with LLMs: Early results,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.254531Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c37b7af2037711d130cc6b9bfa6ad7901fe8bc6e8e8d27b452e43d20ced5b0c","observation_id":"12de46da-f97d-4d24-bf22-16f13f3b3d75","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.254531Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.02092","last_updated":"2025-01-03T20:42:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:36.688632Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-03T20:42:51Z","title":"Human and Machine: How Software Engineers Perceive and Engage with AI-Assisted Code Reviews Compared to Their Peers","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.02092","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.350899Z","title":"Human and machine: How software engineers perceive and engage with AI-assisted code reviews compared to their peers,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.350899Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.02092","citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:999b47569bc0c574ee90b6733e15978328818e27a116f0cc0b11ed0c36967547","observation_id":"538814b6-4b3a-468b-9116-380fb42d54bc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.350899Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.710081Z","title":"Towards automating code review activities,","venue":null,"work_id":"2ae9da3e-b04e-4274-a6bd-341d74ba6ad6","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.465498Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e13787d567b60895b22599f23598e0856b8c472b7f951b25de374d7d9f802c1c","observation_id":"1c193770-92df-4517-b198-3dd99575be0f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.742001Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.584736Z","title":"A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.584736Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:69e1e1334d33faf116eb0fcec9698fbcb4ff6486048c3f1ee10a47e2050d09f2","observation_id":"3af95178-0475-4471-b484-b63c6b775297","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.584736Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.623789Z","title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology,","venue":null,"work_id":"5c8af0b9-2de1-481c-8cc6-c17f068181d3","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.674934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4267614a146b294264647c031fc86a62a0356636aeeeb4ac08a8369e325f36fb","observation_id":"8b87a2ba-6222-4870-8910-67aaa4e3d14e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.656603Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.475160Z","title":"Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews,","venue":null,"work_id":"167082c9-08ff-4e32-8f95-23301f28fa89","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.790131Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b17587fb1903548ae2bf170ca3e4c7be60c9ff4075cf5761f9fc3810d8b9944","observation_id":"051484dd-6437-4be5-800b-9c9d93c507e5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.576323Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.346971Z","title":"Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling,","venue":null,"work_id":"5e2eb658-f4c6-4ea0-8acf-a612aa25ec42","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:21.936711Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:377415b6e41939ddb3366c02dea03ed91bd1e6133ed1edb00fac6ca81e7640f5","observation_id":"0147f581-69c8-49ff-b83f-5c459db70e7d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.419131Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.257666Z","title":"How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability,","venue":null,"work_id":"d5cdf053-63f9-4870-af4d-02d216c0eabb","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.026358Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2505.16339"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e0cce6f2740cb2d5672c151e2b61401c91f0738e13a472d7959750ec5c3e4242","observation_id":"9ef9d6c8-e057-4e2f-a4e0-b7ffaaad5d27","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T15:05:22.299977Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.16339","last_updated":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T16:21:58.823331Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-22T07:54:07Z","title":"Rethinking Code Review Workflows with LLM Assistance: An Empirical Study"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":15,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":8,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":7},"total_outbound_references":15},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 15 of 15 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2505.16339."}