{"as_of":"2026-08-10T05:44:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:03b40589a6c58c4deac5057504ab3bca06954c32e51594426cf9b09b7e04d7d0","coverage":[{"denominator":15,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":15,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.881052Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":15,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":15,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2506.05062/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2506.05062/integrity","json":"/paper/2506.05062/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.024204Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"62d8a950-98a8-4f82-aa98-d6bf64e8eb7b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.860050Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:20b2d1936478bee908d43c92f3d898227f34525fc63d085e0d6160149a4a1b17","observation_id":"33d6d86c-72c1-42ed-a735-2c4df29cb826","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.026276Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.017934Z","title":"Most arguments in this speech support the topic","venue":null,"work_id":"dc2323ed-c4ba-4a16-8afb-c640cfdbc4f8","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.862191Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cf7bd3b50b164457345d9023138d0f63263f3fe50dbe4ac87bbf087ace31bcfa","observation_id":"39b7c9d9-06ab-4d2e-880d-29cf93d08887","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.020315Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.011813Z","title":"Pipeline-set-1","venue":null,"work_id":"3b247bbd-52dd-409e-9aa6-b7683ba82574","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.864181Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7b19549e1cb6acc4e4331b41fcd480208fc833243300772bb5be7727db057b0d","observation_id":"a864ccc4-1335-4394-a70e-f46e328212bf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.014024Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.977440Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"69e6b6cf-ddc8-4403-8476-d6848e818849","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.874699Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ff8e5266b57d8ac55c39bc5fcee105fe8af798de47d346ddb304a67991b3df6","observation_id":"2b187ff4-7b09-43ef-b547-33a2ccbcb096","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.979680Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.971323Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"b8213e35-4b7e-4dfc-b3cb-908a45f75506","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.876897Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec457d95499da1230f41ba7acf0b5f3a2220abb48ef2f461be0c1ae9a02a0b28","observation_id":"074e1a82-a236-4b20-a8dc-06cf6f5cd173","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.973410Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.964415Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"6c8f41be-9fdf-4b65-80e6-ce5ae8feae84","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.879038Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dd5964fbfdc593bbfee172f960c712db1b5e5a38c715118158d6c75317c70912","observation_id":"6f4aa0ec-40a9-488b-ac06-e7b466a42749","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.967061Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.956927Z","title":"The argument for reform is strong","venue":null,"work_id":"d041fb7e-19c5-44cb-a184-bbd30898c577","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.881052Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:417731d3330a19af0f317dd8605b0d72a00a525da7f97db174db9e4b12f0d41b","observation_id":"ab511778-c2a4-42c0-b5da-9974dc366b36","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.959872Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.004730Z","title":"In general, results for the CoT prompt seem to be more challenging to parse","venue":null,"work_id":"90696b7a-ff8b-4d8b-80c3-f6e3387190f5","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.866252Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6c216d44635bc01e991cb0e5471893ceecd56bc08c74295472fb40ae88f42b3d","observation_id":"b86c1e15-fc16-49e2-a1b0-13b486042ea9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.007816Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.998625Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"35ec4874-be18-4f99-97fa-76bb48a00ffc","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.868783Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6b6ce209f4569f26217dc1255fce7c65d2b05c1fa2a94f57d3522e62d7890888","observation_id":"02956fd4-41e3-4089-85f0-214d724bc912","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.000706Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.990924Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"7f0bbc82-b95c-4084-8f87-dc286f8e961e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.870745Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2dec16238f6e3f012ddef1139f012ccac70f474b65ba0a345de98ff7d2be0652","observation_id":"e2db4569-ce24-402a-bb11-70f45758816c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.993866Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.983670Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"74580d4f-1e5f-411f-9bb0-3f2cbcb9b237","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.872842Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:68a6ca8a16d91a3c2661a69669093dbeb1de0d15f24c2cec231ab40740cd5f80","observation_id":"575f073d-bfac-4c1e-a1c3-2fcc5205040a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.986307Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.030291Z","title":"This speech is a good opening speech for supporting the topic","venue":null,"work_id":"2be9f550-d7bf-4040-bd17-b16026bf4060","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":2019,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.857664Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1840f7351eed31013d57d3e35ab9d499fc8432af47e938c6f9b08baae2b3670b","observation_id":"a17ae3ce-5541-47ac-8fc1-431e287fc676","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.032593Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.036267Z","title":"InProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 7073–7086, Online","venue":null,"work_id":"cf86902f-2f72-4869-b7c6-e2b171419ba0","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":2020,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.852834Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:472bacc51acfcde527160f2adbfd14509808335ac61f8e0da8e9f2939e600f8b","observation_id":"fb420f3d-ed82-4e07-ae54-8b78c3c98301","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:01.038756Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.15621","last_updated":"2023-04-13T10:59:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T19:13:44.449441Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-27T22:30:39Z","title":"ChatGPT as a Factual Inconsistency Evaluator for Text Summarization","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2303.15621","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.849793Z","title":"Shachar Mirkin, Michal Jacovi, Tamar Lavee, Hong- Kwang Kuo, Samuel Thomas, Leslie Sager, Lili Kotlerman, Elad Venezian, and Noam Slonim","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":2023,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.849793Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.15621","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cf3598d8d631a366788efb800bfef21f28c924500f75f19b6d34a0d63d6c0f39","observation_id":"7d791c09-863a-4a28-9d48-9f061c101aeb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.849793Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.855058Z","title":"This speech is a good opening speech for supporting the topic","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation","version":2},"reference_index":2024,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.855058Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8cac0eb1b02c8ac29c745f5432955701ec74f4fb5d35d53c5b7751e1a705b2cd","observation_id":"bc470726-7043-45dd-b61e-e400e80946ce","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:00.855058Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05062","last_updated":"2025-09-09T07:31:56Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T01:46:37.472653Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:06:51Z","title":"Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluation"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":15,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":1,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":9,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":5},"total_outbound_references":15},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 15 of 15 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2506.05062."}