{"as_of":"2026-08-09T21:22:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:fb80603dac5d9b40f314c3f9d61be1c8bf5612fb62dbde7177429b262ef03153","coverage":[{"denominator":65,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":65,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.014612Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":71,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":71,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":6,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":6,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T15:48:03.628195Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T21:05:03.746106Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2506.05069","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T21:05:03.746106Z","title":"Reason-to-recommend: Using interaction-of-thought reasoning to enhance llm recommendation","venue":null,"work_id":"6c0f54f6-f9b2-4a07-a9d4-a148e5e3f8a5","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.27157","last_updated":"2026-05-09T03:19:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:54:15.933170Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-31T04:02:58Z","title":"A Survey on Generative Recommendation: Data, Model, and Tasks","version":2},"reference_index":236,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-18T03:47:08.208082Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.05069","citing_paper":"/paper/2510.27157"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0874d39471b780240507bae795885f00ad9eb66184dd90049e5a1d542212f79","observation_id":"c63c633b-6f82-49b2-8ac2-495ba396f9b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-18T03:50:52.006627Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2506.05069","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T21:05:03.746106Z","title":"Reason-to-recommend: Using interaction-of-thought reasoning to enhance llm recommendation","venue":null,"work_id":"6c0f54f6-f9b2-4a07-a9d4-a148e5e3f8a5","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.03671","last_updated":"2026-04-04T09:52:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:25:05.287765Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-04T09:52:30Z","title":"User Simulator-Guided Multi-Turn Preference Optimization for Reasoning LLM-based Conversational Recommendation","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-13T17:24:18.413112Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.05069","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.03671"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a95e92eed538c6c64096857edb834833a8da89bf0e65c9ce946b4d518fcafaa5","observation_id":"c4006421-143f-4249-91f7-446dfd205180","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-13T17:28:02.567678Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2506.05069","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T21:05:03.746106Z","title":"Reason-to-recommend: Using interaction-of-thought reasoning to enhance llm recommendation","venue":null,"work_id":"6c0f54f6-f9b2-4a07-a9d4-a148e5e3f8a5","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2604.26760","last_updated":"2026-04-29T14:55:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:27:29.904066Z","submitted_at":"2026-04-29T14:55:53Z","title":"Factorized Latent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-05-07T11:19:46.718542Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.05069","citing_paper":"/paper/2604.26760"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2daaa3c2ffcd339f43ec0a83946c8111b468516f9b907d9e46bde77563cc7ebb","observation_id":"4508cacf-2be4-4e3e-816c-9c38acd14059","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-05-12T09:21:25.763329Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2506.05069","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-30T21:05:03.746106Z","title":"Reason-to-recommend: Using interaction-of-thought reasoning to enhance llm recommendation","venue":null,"work_id":"6c0f54f6-f9b2-4a07-a9d4-a148e5e3f8a5","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.14358","last_updated":"2026-05-14T04:35:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:01:30.832235Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T04:35:45Z","title":"Uncovering the Representation Geometry of Minimal Cores in Overcomplete Reasoning Traces","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-30T21:04:02.263300Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.05069","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.14358"},"observation_digest":"sha256:010d61bace91da1f1e05442656ce86c7f1bd35bde2bd5eed052e045250c453a6","observation_id":"d6439a01-fe55-4fc1-9f39-b5726430d388","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-30T21:05:03.748072Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2506.05069","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T01:28:22.786837Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27789","last_updated":"2026-07-30T07:23:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T15:18:43.832236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T07:23:07Z","title":"From Understanding to Action: Feedback-Grounded Policy Discovery for Generative Recommendation","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T01:28:22.786837Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.05069","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:27015d5fa55fe8dcf8dace2b33dbba5f6a6bb6db8889f1e68005a4564526ccf4","observation_id":"96b5f854-b73b-4e82-a2f7-35b79136e00b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T01:28:22.786837Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2506.05069","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T15:48:03.628195Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28997","last_updated":"2026-07-31T03:52:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T00:05:14.510001Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-31T03:52:20Z","title":"Think2Go: Generative Next POI Recommendation with LLM Reasoning","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T15:48:03.628195Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.05069","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28997"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c17da57e651eedf7d173e630244233373fa9b69abbad9249d28ba86708d399a1","observation_id":"d70ffb8e-3a23-4ad1-bde1-6675ee936498","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T15:48:03.628195Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2506.05069/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2506.05069/integrity","json":"/paper/2506.05069/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:35.435361Z","title":"Tallrec: An effective and efficient tuning framework to align large language model with recommendation","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:35.435361Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:27b0f8db332f77f15822e0eba1a56ad416ebe745aa3d4893b55961f7d57563ce","observation_id":"a9d8d624-e92f-4e7b-95e6-0e08dfc54f50","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:35.435361Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.792253Z","title":"Uncovering chatgpt’s capabilities in recommender systems","venue":null,"work_id":"dbe88460-476f-462f-b520-22b1ea2c347b","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:35.520148Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4c5f6079fc04ee9fa23e3f6155bcc1d7ebcc8d4bca9046ee9729d0db18553732","observation_id":"fb7325b1-a9be-4450-9c91-eda3ef106e6b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.796879Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:35.752126Z","title":"Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain, personalized prompt & predict paradigm (p5), 2023","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:35.752126Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8ae37217226b01001f6ad63e73a75e4824fbdfcd227641e06911589cd6af7011","observation_id":"9edcb960-1201-417b-867d-c87d1afde31c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:35.752126Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.773691Z","title":"Llara: Large language-recommendation assistant, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":"27eaf9e8-e2f7-4a65-bb31-aa443d4b2671","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:35.877026Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:552a8f97736e93e57604952b3c153b80e3f76f603d07042f5c7d3f76cd2e231f","observation_id":"655d6982-b0e1-4b69-a603-270a93ae86ee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.778350Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.762587Z","title":"Is chatgpt a good recommender? a preliminary study, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"7a7deab3-d185-4817-8852-0cb096b750b1","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.055090Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7094cd80bed6e7e39207d0c77997f2c54be9a7180472ac45cb9a941d34ddc86","observation_id":"388b9785-1e07-4e25-9347-cd805518ec98","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.766895Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.750082Z","title":"Improving llm-powered recommendations with personalized information, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"fefd4e17-3249-4322-88a1-006edd567e69","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.192505Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:446364afcc0ffaa260365524fd709f8ddd86e6e868c53ebc3ffae7c0ad865b71","observation_id":"f11ed3b6-844b-4a90-896c-cd7ad23fd0da","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.755359Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.738921Z","title":"Let me do it for you: Towards llm empowered recommendation via tool learning","venue":null,"work_id":"02c4d12b-ee36-4ddc-b70c-6b60e855c1d8","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.308668Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6dcc96134d91d3a4f1e2f77cda16eaea5d249eefdb0303cd7d3533983960b14c","observation_id":"9945e07f-24d3-4d00-9315-437d3223df8b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.743357Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.727214Z","title":"Collaborative retrieval for large language model-based conversational recommender systems, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"1939c35d-4c31-4007-9960-1938a23f941d","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.430532Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a190ccc3b61d3c24fec07cb0442ad4184305fa68d38baf6e5adf39186d7743ad","observation_id":"e2a64946-7664-44ea-9dec-8c39df6b7ce3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.731853Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.19623","last_updated":"2025-05-28T14:32:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T14:07:44.224059Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-26T07:45:11Z","title":"AgentRecBench: Benchmarking LLM Agent-based Personalized Recommender Systems","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2505.19623","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.626072Z","title":"Agentrecbench: Benchmarking llm agent-based person- alized recommender systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19623, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.626072Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.19623","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bff38523f86db9d09215ff0b778450945892760477b39783665ec68fd40d7fcb","observation_id":"469d1a14-96ff-4fde-96de-464d916e8a85","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.626072Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.759054Z","title":"Agentsociety challenge: Designing llm agents for user modeling and recommendation on web platforms","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.759054Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:47a508d0136cf7860f19514d30f319ed68dc91a83c8dc34343447123971f171f","observation_id":"c3cce80e-585c-401a-8eb6-617434fb61b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.759054Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.709643Z","title":"Think before recommend: Unleashing the latent reasoning power for sequential recommenda- tion, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"c334f297-6c81-4a5c-9760-7c32276a8fda","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:36.893965Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6287d20dec8734eba00f082b44e6760304534e6bef9a13b25999c1fb05d53f76","observation_id":"6ed5a6d7-ff84-478d-ba84-28bbbfd07976","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.714341Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.697839Z","title":"Got4rec: Graph of thoughts for sequential recommendation, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"35071c40-1dc0-4b52-ab4d-0ff1aae9cf16","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.030301Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:93c52c491bdb612644ec966b40ab37c8d42ec84a05cc19fc7496d64cddb6ace7","observation_id":"32710d2c-70e8-49eb-b7eb-10e78be8090a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.702040Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.682771Z","title":"Cot4rec: Revealing user preferences through chain of thought for recommender systems.Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39(12):13142–13151, Apr","venue":null,"work_id":"b5fcccf7-2e86-4603-91c1-2efce74733e2","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.167864Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a6c6bfe27cd6bf1d06b72c435e1cd5758f0fd31f28032d8169fa55207639be09","observation_id":"9ce3e3dc-69d9-44ac-8015-a1be3191b5a9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.688462Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.669776Z","title":"Chain-of-thought prompting empowered generative user modeling for personalized recommendation.Neural Computing and Applications, 36(34):21723–21742, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":"b88606fa-9c4f-4eb7-a6ae-e71fe37e5a6d","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.298116Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d50b3d4bce97f0f119871356a47528cde2e7ad4ce7387de9506d8c626a9f70c8","observation_id":"35a9b1a6-2a61-4d86-a98f-0054405fc6fa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.674134Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.656241Z","title":"s1: Simple test-time scaling, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"683df6a0-1660-43e5-a2a8-6b31b6e4a1b8","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.464943Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9a64a637ee496dcd73ed34dd51f4e711028d0d5443dc0b454e6f7442779cc796","observation_id":"64f9bc28-698b-41b9-897a-858d0977a84d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.661953Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.606301Z","title":"Light-r1: Curriculum sft, dpo and rl for long cot from scratch and beyond, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.606301Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6cb06b22e93cd48782e2f33a82371083d5afe7996fae0655e720a7f03ae155e8","observation_id":"296936c6-d145-4001-a643-6959d7de1810","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.606301Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.634846Z","title":"Can 1b llm surpass 405b llm? rethinking compute-optimal test-time scaling, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"0f16561a-0fde-48b2-9919-bf80cf777216","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.723985Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ff4db80f42ae704ea94522a7e250088f7e726e9db702429e0d6138cccf76dcd","observation_id":"40fcbc9d-9a2a-418f-abbe-1eb37da7082d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.641904Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.852254Z","title":"Limo: Less is more for reasoning, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.852254Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aad80b0879818e4fa60a1854cbad563ee1a019ffddece654dfe6463ea5f1bad8","observation_id":"e5eb0671-5673-4cfb-81d5-9f75762b7f5f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:37.852254Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.09686","last_updated":"2025-01-23T08:44:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-16T17:37:58Z","title":"Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.09686","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:38.306557Z","title":"Towards large reasoning models: A survey of reinforced reasoning with large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09686, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:38.306557Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.09686","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bd90c0af966065c3b5246b28e4c292396841a90c3f2fcf8fbd9c7c160ed48af0","observation_id":"9dfc5291-9863-4f4e-b904-0db14a0913c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:38.306557Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.616107Z","title":"Prompt learning for news recommendation","venue":null,"work_id":"e9bb2a7c-a2bb-43a0-a6db-4ecce67e1f16","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:38.990638Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:144bec4fb7589a413d006a3be80e3217a9686154c3e3a48e88e5560ec77b2730","observation_id":"be7a9f7d-7381-4004-ae5b-fa0f886e0f97","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.621151Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.601442Z","title":"Towards understanding and mitigating unintended biases in language model-driven conversational rec- ommendation.Information Processing & Management, 60(1):103139, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"74cca1d0-6c64-463f-b0d8-248cd517828d","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.166214Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5a2be49acd22ea2f068b59ee70e5d1f2388c45cd8798e07a08805f995a131f4","observation_id":"474df0c9-3c36-4991-be0d-4abed80f5487","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.607326Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.587160Z","title":"Improving conversational recommenda- tion systems’ quality with context-aware item meta information, 2021","venue":null,"work_id":"71adaf43-2494-4039-b8c7-b681ea9f5015","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.323155Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d1ee00ccbaad6c498c386073389ce82d0d8f5c750917e3836d6bccf5c1fcf0c8","observation_id":"1ff022d6-2047-415e-8069-4a5d12121387","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.591587Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.575251Z","title":"Recommendation as instruction following: A large language model empowered recommendation approach, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"7d9b221b-8a86-41e9-9aaa-53dde50a8e78","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.404451Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7bf7934e36805d6999f58c9e12a69a5dfa90d2bb55cf724fb027368ee84a315d","observation_id":"cc85e229-b1fa-4f17-8794-bf45b4f79ef0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.580278Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.562792Z","title":"Personalized prompt learning for explainable recommen- dation, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"bc376b68-41d6-48f0-be00-33f989679687","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.489482Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e119227d2cfac70eb04aae6b6f732994369f6153773527311a009796a0e96f71","observation_id":"f73c37bd-50c3-4ff4-838f-da03663cd9ba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.567561Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.549698Z","title":"Bridging items and language: A transition paradigm for large language model-based recommendation, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":"884179ab-3acc-4875-b02a-0e66546e5b24","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.613644Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2f81898ddda8e02ce7c295cb06ed703b35bf18dbc9fb6759e8b55f632fad774","observation_id":"27577f6a-da83-4bfe-8e2b-32d67bcf4148","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.554417Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.731275Z","title":"Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system at scale, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.731275Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:15ce918127680fc84aa58bd4145986031b922fa8fefd2717b4f7d80110b599f0","observation_id":"e71cd1ae-f502-4d4c-9e11-cac26fda931e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.731275Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.751064Z","title":"Vapo: Efficient and reliable reinforcement learning for advanced reasoning tasks, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.751064Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a8f0f16ae29bb6a463b67e08f79251b0927bd5f17b52ef9a4a399c430983b170","observation_id":"04dcd98b-694b-402c-b000-7dd61ac16ed6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.751064Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.825478Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.825478Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:172f8938b1609eaccf0feaa046266b0122c9ca72721592417cfeec1935302253","observation_id":"109f20ad-f26a-47f9-a4dc-d25cad2adda7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.825478Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.517547Z","title":"Reinforce++: An efficient rlhf algorithm with robustness to both prompt and reward models, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"f770c092-35e1-46a9-8063-9a3625e31500","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.843586Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:40536630d7efd6aeb66f81d0e88734c8fee3d2ac2a09d32e49e319dd4db47d4e","observation_id":"0be8530e-8641-4084-9e42-a99f768648eb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.523283Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.16720","last_updated":"2026-04-30T02:46:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-21T18:04:31Z","title":"OpenAI o1 System Card","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.16720","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.861633Z","title":"Openai o1 system card.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16720, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.861633Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.16720","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b4b08e5448cb02494ea0c302fddae1f9f10116c80f310cab0b91556228284eda","observation_id":"adbf7bc7-44f4-433d-a51d-15476545ef11","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.861633Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.12948","last_updated":"2026-01-04T03:57:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-22T15:19:35Z","title":"DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.12948","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.867098Z","title":"Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.867098Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.12948","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:25314fcf0ae31ac255a3f303c4a9d309753ab91ccfea68216cf8dd8446ee60b0","observation_id":"7930238a-8fd9-4e71-8920-dfe068494ac8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.867098Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.874155Z","title":"Reft: Reasoning with reinforced fine-tuning, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.874155Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:42107d841ef07d2b021c8496a1f6a855b5464846669cdf85d0debd4b4129c1aa","observation_id":"8c7a147e-5174-4005-a56a-a3f32807754a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.874155Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.879666Z","title":"Maxwell Harper and Joseph A","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.879666Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9cc05d00d1d17c7120c144b120c13850027f4546cd57858cfd65de0edc2b880c","observation_id":"2ee1227d-7a6e-48b0-900c-89c15f19988c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.879666Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2403.03952","last_updated":"2026-04-20T06:05:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T00:56:47.399756Z","submitted_at":"2024-03-06T18:56:36Z","title":"Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoders","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2403.03952","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.885852Z","title":"Bridging language and items for retrieval and recommendation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03952, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.885852Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2403.03952","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:76dd6ffb45810b6c246a2ad238dfdbb8e32c2a44b89fd123fdc9a73c8ca886a7","observation_id":"54681240-9bbb-44f9-81ff-4160d43fcbb7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.885852Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.491137Z","title":"Neural graph collabo- rative filtering","venue":null,"work_id":"f029a075-9389-446a-9118-a5c8cea2f5c9","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.894477Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da4f1bcb0a4f0e601fe6d1d1e3749d80880a92be593cb7202292ca551daaf1dc","observation_id":"3e5bf24e-4b74-4c6d-a3e2-4d8ee8ad73d9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.497734Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.477488Z","title":"Hop-rec: high- order proximity for implicit recommendation","venue":null,"work_id":"b79032cb-1fd5-4b8a-8923-463740e31df8","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.900527Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9c3161253590ade4be774f24236769bf34c6db39ebc73aa137ee9413a9c94f62","observation_id":"0d5194f6-4f84-4e55-b49c-5acc8ea52e20","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.482737Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.907154Z","title":"Hamilton, Rex Ying, and Jure Leskovec","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.907154Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da962580848eeb4770e95c87a023f0c1cc05a29e26adf9063963cdef4f95a0d0","observation_id":"f5e6e79a-91b0-464a-87f3-77dfb0c2383f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.907154Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.456834Z","title":"Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation, 2020","venue":null,"work_id":"0626593b-3747-4ef3-b52f-13ff420c473d","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.914457Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:97a48d37d0a11bbf4e25892cf25c13e5f5aea20ed00c97495f0a9b0b03166032","observation_id":"8a039ec6-c1b2-487b-8fa1-aa1fe692a8e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.463150Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.444465Z","title":"Graph-based embedding smoothing for sequential recommendation.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(1):496–508, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"a5b4a9f0-0833-490b-a9b1-32d91a61d445","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.920344Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:647647153e7c02b91c3819df40365ab5a23a71098bc218137753533b1d2c3e18","observation_id":"76eef3da-b459-4fb9-bba6-77ac403e2ee2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.449369Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.431326Z","title":"Sequential recommendation with graph neural networks, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"63c7ed0c-6ead-47a8-8a4b-e1e6a6aa0426","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.924401Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4efd6936e0491d0ed3697faa8c24cdd7d19ac9fc9c444b95e830df5c73e5a9b7","observation_id":"d7ce2e96-c8df-414b-8dfa-46293cf645f7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.437266Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.420842Z","title":"Dynamic graph neural networks for sequential recommendation, 2021","venue":null,"work_id":"c2c7a294-64f5-4c07-a7c2-9b33ab1c2733","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.927870Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7b4c5bc3caf747d15e8a5e66cf54ffbcda37ac5a6a52790010fb0068152a9e67","observation_id":"2b3b3e80-eec7-4fe6-bf37-c18cd43496b8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.424475Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.410927Z","title":"Knowledge-enhanced graph neural networks for sequential recommendation.Information, 11(8), 2020","venue":null,"work_id":"c63f8133-e04f-451a-9756-dc7f4da2349d","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.931968Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:11fd3236e010a3ca606886d17ef63df0bcddcbe01598d2729ca58f460f4b11e5","observation_id":"a7b60504-3ab7-4f50-85c5-7ddd51341b22","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.414508Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.935597Z","title":"Invisible walls in cities: Leveraging large language models to predict urban segregation experience with social media content.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04773, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.935597Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:26b94aae3e7e3b7084e729128d5bf046d13c78c1e9a615757fbe34237c53bced","observation_id":"3fd8112d-607d-41c1-b0cd-bf970f05b2c5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.935597Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.939032Z","title":"Large language model-driven meta-structure discovery in heterogeneous information network","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.939032Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f9cec60cf1cfb9d8dbd8a67e9387449f19b9b88b78fc0795ac5db5df7937c2ea","observation_id":"8c62e192-1223-4ac0-b190-1e0ed88a7784","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.939032Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.09112","last_updated":"2024-10-10T10:46:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T18:34:29.323700Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-10T10:46:06Z","title":"HLM-Cite: Hybrid Language Model Workflow for Text-based Scientific Citation Prediction","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.09112","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.942384Z","title":"Hlm-cite: Hybrid language model workflow for text-based scientific citation prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09112, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.942384Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.09112","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:049ddde705ca5a7e0830190e7c92d8ac6cc3620ad6e1d073ff8da548d14dbbd0","observation_id":"1cf37803-a597-49b0-ac95-6170f86d54a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.942384Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.394346Z","title":"KCTS: Knowledge- constrained tree search decoding with token-level hallucination detection","venue":null,"work_id":"acda6d41-be6c-4059-b109-d723d3c71054","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.946920Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ede7d29ebca6b53c5b3c3e79991dc19544dd7e13d9f6a566622e5a7d93d5dffc","observation_id":"db17b75a-981d-40a8-a4cb-3fd55a0a4241","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.397850Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.383657Z","title":"Language agent tree search unifies reasoning acting and planning in language models, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":"ca19f13e-c9ce-42fa-bc56-7a785dde38b5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.950169Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1933e4f18d62a9e60132e05089f138cc3796ca6a4367f8916c0256ed0a431f7","observation_id":"d0943b0c-bcf4-4442-9215-57cbf9baa68b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.388079Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.953539Z","title":"Tenenbaum, and Chuang Gan","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.953539Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2b294ba4a84540a053ce85ede50656e12a8f451b00d9e1b968fc7fa8eea14186","observation_id":"38aac20e-9e33-4baa-a39d-421c37fd2da4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.953539Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.367773Z","title":"Don’t throw away your value model! generating more preferable text with value-guided monte-carlo tree search decoding, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":"79e5dd7c-e734-49fc-869c-58827c75911c","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.957385Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f955b9690eac8f125ea26a9f23273e6e3658d3331eb454b0eb49c46f44776531","observation_id":"928e9074-3420-4316-9e8f-eda54a4eb34d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.371184Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.357615Z","title":"A simple model of inference scaling laws, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":"37408133-6d26-4ba9-a8c3-974cb09c9aa1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.960499Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:425ad8defbc39c1ce4b75353a260e6b2d1db6ca4ea72c0dbd6074fc14e425974","observation_id":"529b7155-4401-44a0-9c3e-a7d47e026a8c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.361448Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.964302Z","title":"Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.964302Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:51849da7385cabf048783efce7fc58730516e8f546af0463619a6ff67906b65c","observation_id":"ba416c12-ae19-4821-860d-9c3f14a3429e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.964302Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.967906Z","title":"Le, Christopher Ré, and Azalia Mirhoseini","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.967906Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:38e239cdc0051ebabff25b7a7bbb24da0b2745f81408d01c894a3bc9db9388c1","observation_id":"27c0e4d7-e80a-4953-b39a-aef87de9d962","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.967906Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.12599","last_updated":"2025-06-03T02:14:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-22T02:48:14Z","title":"Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.12599","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.971571Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.971571Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.12599","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:328c320cafc8b2353c75864d78fe638161145fe7d3857a0713c7617b2f3b21f1","observation_id":"9690b752-126d-4007-baa8-b50d61c2b4b2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.971571Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2205.08084","last_updated":"2022-05-19T06:50:31Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T13:22:27.516998Z","submitted_at":"2022-05-17T04:13:42Z","title":"M6-Rec: Generative Pretrained Language Models are Open-Ended Recommender Systems","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2205.08084","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.975207Z","title":"M6-rec: Gener- ative pretrained language models are open-ended recommender systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08084, 2022","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.975207Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2205.08084","citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d68182d14ff5e50f0872eb2580e4208878883f585ea3842cd40989f000383205","observation_id":"f72a6b70-248c-445e-ba66-5f5625ef600e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.975207Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.978763Z","title":"Large language models are zero-shot rankers for recommender systems","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.978763Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c7171c902103f2d70d86e63ad1712809b768bb8ec01a036f428c3bb84757ee0e","observation_id":"1cc8a456-b1bd-40ee-9a4a-5003db581815","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.978763Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.330488Z","title":"Chat-rec: Towards interactive and explainable llms-augmented recommender system, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"b69969d4-34f0-4e3b-8c40-1ccd09d41a2e","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.982128Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5325bd4bfbd6ebcbc4088383d96036138653db96483d9eff0205fa15aeaaf9c9","observation_id":"f2b89212-40fb-45a1-a847-f461203625ef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.334003Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.320476Z","title":"Learning vector-quantized item representation for transferable sequential recommenders, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":"38acb8ff-b7c4-4a1a-a601-a74012e479c7","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.986380Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:42e2762274779c83de041c9be5eb63663c9106fb749d63038df4db263190cd3f","observation_id":"cc51d02e-eaa0-419a-bfc9-fd5f3a442e9b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.324083Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.310719Z","title":"Towards universal sequence representation learning for recommender systems, 2022","venue":null,"work_id":"150f47e6-ade5-4b26-a142-015ee442b850","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.989709Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4042517fa6e297af2f0e44878e54980876a5fa5b4c70513576b81de83bba82c8","observation_id":"6235838c-fbb6-4851-ac38-e96fcb801ba7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.314173Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.300445Z","title":"Where to go next for recommender systems? id- vs","venue":null,"work_id":"fd8b4c68-feda-419e-b423-0354eda8a1ea","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.993263Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:75c35c37fd9a26176e347e0243077808ab72659d894e097cb6816336f38a8169","observation_id":"bb29f070-1785-4a6f-9e35-f59bf1adbcda","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.303991Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.996738Z","title":"Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.996738Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:11cfa16961964a47c0fd24e38f4d0326e908d2c443b084b8c8a79dc7bb918c50","observation_id":"137514b3-97ae-415c-9362-88979be7c039","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:39.996738Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.282913Z","title":"Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks, 2016","venue":null,"work_id":"88dfe37d-e9c0-4b6c-8e9b-1c50d2b919cd","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.000146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ca09e5c8f82711355192707597b4cde4b268e757dc77265bf93194ea8c194ef6","observation_id":"38b6f274-8f69-468a-9041-953480100aba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.286570Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.268032Z","title":"Personalized top-n sequential recommendation via convolutional sequence embedding, 2018","venue":null,"work_id":"71b9b980-400f-4a69-be1e-6f19aca38648","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":62,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.003543Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5c299b04b481d30ba9f852547aed1f88a9ddddcc49a33be164eb073b4508e49","observation_id":"5b90a9ae-b371-4a24-b812-9a5ec8b9e1f6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.273946Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.251794Z","title":"Self-attentive sequential recommendation, 2018","venue":null,"work_id":"ed9afa18-9c04-43c4-853e-9861a05e7d1a","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.007536Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7f0b307e0d47322be68f9b00c7033256900ff45e87c4859ce542043844a5fa97","observation_id":"2cb05821-85bd-4b6a-ae82-50c8e9ff9978","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.258443Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.235894Z","title":"The reasoning process must comply with the following requirements: 1","venue":null,"work_id":"568dfd2c-60a9-432a-8692-d05b3048d2ea","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.011135Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fbace2472ca4ae7506373968eb5e43a37d365fe11fae7d868c015b59b4160504","observation_id":"081da871-16eb-4a2c-b5e4-28be1063e5d0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.243155Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.220965Z","title":"The answers provided are only to guide your reasoning process","venue":null,"work_id":"044c6aac-ada1-4815-83f6-a5ddd15367a7","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation","version":2},"reference_index":65,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.014612Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2506.05069"},"observation_digest":"sha256:08303479525a74e99b7b2b12db1593e3e2c27bde44729a77fcfb7a9a50e03390","observation_id":"f7674c48-2c9b-44b6-adca-16a187597052","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:31:40.227547Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.05069","last_updated":"2025-06-09T09:08:12Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.IR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:49:22.132231Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T14:16:44Z","title":"Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":65,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":26,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":39},"total_outbound_references":65},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 65 of 65 outbound references and 6 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2506.05069."}