{"as_of":"2026-08-07T12:14:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:688ca09fa3a1ea832dec4d8da9a2741fc65b506ce5795f9ce174673bff91fb60","coverage":[{"denominator":40,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":40,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.620188Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":41,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":41,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T17:01:22.732390Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"arxiv_reference","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T17:03:40.781837Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2507.01413","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T17:03:40.781837Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"e290cf3e-2a37-4852-8a6b-e81b946e30c5","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.27593","last_updated":"2026-05-26T19:06:39Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T23:37:16.981482Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T19:06:39Z","title":"Voluntary Collusion with Secret Tools in Competing LLM Agents","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T17:01:22.732390Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2507.01413","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.27593"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c6c573eeaafd89494c693c3ce82df9f1f2112daf2a29dad1753646da6dc2cc72","observation_id":"8a611cff-f212-46c9-b92f-160f71082b57","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T17:03:40.783671Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.01413/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.01413/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.01413/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.394895Z","title":"write newline","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.394895Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e445f25ec82ecbd62c99f2399b252b6368d680f6156325f768e8e4f92f4e5f3d","observation_id":"9616cf6e-0440-40ba-928e-bcbd7a55c06f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.394895Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:48.291332Z","title":"Claude 3.7 sonnet and claude code, February 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"6890faff-2f26-4239-a6f2-df2d8cfa8724","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.485957Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2c74640efcd1dc3d3960e51c1217391a472f11cb12cc88d70685eb25a51add58","observation_id":"0e3b7215-b3af-45aa-9288-97e091863ba7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:48.356668Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:48.130338Z","title":"Adaptive algorithms and collusion via coupling","venue":null,"work_id":"ffe59de4-05e0-478b-b1e2-4dcbeb88a1f9","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.621328Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1598d227ea645801df1fb8ae4d7f08b187a37ce50a287451c352d75e418c3232","observation_id":"24cfd4be-6c33-4a4f-8f04-d8db21df5ed5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:48.199430Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.08167","last_updated":"2025-01-20T17:34:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T20:20:55.958338Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-14T14:49:14Z","title":"Potential and Perils of Large Language Models as Judges of Unstructured Textual Data","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2501.08167","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2501.08167","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:44.162688Z","title":"Potential and Perils of Large Language Models as Judges of Unstructured Textual Data","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"70b00ad7-da0f-4509-bdca-d021ce88ed08","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.713839Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.08167","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:75eda7f6bddb519cfa684bbfb1cebdb1d38bd7b579ac11097a9d33abfbbbf220","observation_id":"30f2565f-2dbe-401e-adbc-0d15ed0a7c2f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:44.279798Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.996156Z","title":"High-frequency trading and price discovery","venue":null,"work_id":"2517ce3a-d801-4058-8c2c-b2e2b8be5d3d","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.816706Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:371e62b2d39681ff624f76771cc3e17760989c15b2c85309820ef3a15b111f40","observation_id":"7fbf156f-4a9d-490b-9be2-659d303e26d9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:48.058982Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"7295.2008","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.932412Z","title":"The nature of collusion facilitating and collusion breaking power of simultaneous ascending price and descending price auctions","venue":null,"work_id":"087195bf-7e7d-492b-8241-50c0148c0e6e","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.923314Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a74cd9ca3d895688f418996de935b4c03421b06a4ae60863a1db4554ecedb650","observation_id":"f7d940cd-9c47-4ec5-9b9d-7fc6ab48b7b5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:44.071860Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.999404Z","title":"Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.999404Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:79d3ce12f5a12e840f98683ec7747994cd221de39744d1471ce229e2c1ada6c1","observation_id":"18b37a23-0933-401a-8ad2-3e8405044e88","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:39.999404Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.836157Z","title":"Fast K rippendorff: Fast computation of K rippendorff's alpha agreement measure","venue":null,"work_id":"21a9da6a-7a5a-446e-89f0-7d14d1e13072","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.078222Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5bb38a624ca3979188296c5fa31b1d56aa545d4d29dcb1d454119429626bc63","observation_id":"af6f5801-8a86-4017-92b3-fd273150a924","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.923273Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.644272Z","title":"An empirical analysis of algorithmic pricing on amazon marketplace","venue":null,"work_id":"cd5fe80a-2c60-4cb4-a90a-9e8aefe14803","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.167197Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7654104ab5ffb61aba31edf10570b0f7d0ff1894a0d85cbb8653b1ee22592725","observation_id":"0342c62d-52fa-4033-b835-aaf29037722b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.729510Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.499383Z","title":"and Bruten, J","venue":null,"work_id":"3d5d64af-caa7-4cbb-8fb9-9f4a8cc60769","year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.244115Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7e01a4c761b7cdd71457a07b5805834c9b91bad943b0f4517c83f55915253b15","observation_id":"acb50df3-f85a-4432-a5cc-36de361287c2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.557370Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.301108Z","title":"Algorithmic collusion detection","venue":null,"work_id":"f24d928c-544f-41bd-bfad-e306489d3232","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.336169Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:45f419a4d8cec6df46ed7791cc792999b23e1fe076689bbc0c208071e4ecd9ff","observation_id":"0422314e-8878-4358-ac59-831ed139caee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.390809Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.155168Z","title":"W., Goldstein, I., and Ji, Y","venue":null,"work_id":"854e068c-9a93-4fa6-8f72-bce0fe7ae4f5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.434904Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9d7e0eefe0ee7b1e57d2c5fc258be3a3d14967f59846a561b4c6f854a6bee4c1","observation_id":"e3989494-ac1d-45fd-98af-170114fd092a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.215047Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.10811","last_updated":"2024-11-16T14:12:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T19:51:24.166504Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-16T14:12:50Z","title":"Detecting collusion in procurement auctions","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2411.10811","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2411.10811","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.758158Z","title":"Detecting collusion in procurement auctions","venue":"cs.GT","work_id":"321c9015-e794-46ca-a1e7-ed58b999521d","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.519930Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2411.10811","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:09105cef4ebc62aa685a2ebb90a9c3269afcbb258169b04fe73f559aee081b08","observation_id":"6651b710-7c68-4277-8d7c-190a8254875f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.815325Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.5281/zenodo.5830894","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.036502Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"7f45d2fe-d14d-41e5-bdd9-94f11228ad21","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.587926Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6d56dac9b650ae58910ea5df3ab16633242d50f777be17b67c0002fb40382874","observation_id":"ef106260-4ac6-4bd1-9a01-14ede66deac9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.092930Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.683623Z","title":"A., and Shorrer, R","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.683623Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:97cb237192054f6b02fc316d79303a8ce677648ccd001611e5d6e192f134abf5","observation_id":"478a9d2e-45ed-4909-90c5-8743689cbac8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.683623Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.14143","last_updated":"2025-02-19T23:03:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T20:39:28.583884Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-19T23:03:21Z","title":"Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2502.14143","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.843967Z","title":"Multi-agent risks from advanced ai","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.843967Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.14143","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:25a7c59db4c27688152b6e72a345b3acaa53155fdf2d8aab7d42f4f18c64dbbf","observation_id":"f207f82b-db61-4b48-b241-97f087f95919","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.843967Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:46.910504Z","title":"Auctions: Theory and practice","venue":null,"work_id":"7be2f897-8355-4d34-b061-72d4db69eb41","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:40.941114Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:45863ee5ef5b23cea015c0ae9458563b59e6a5a7b97caf4795b9af2151a6845b","observation_id":"56142d73-4513-4c56-8ae8-bdd7e1c45878","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:47.071968Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:46.662057Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"535ae664-15b9-4771-9b2e-876f5e2a65d0","year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.011178Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:08017486caf3d86b82f01466d7c79c15afa6f36f4fd65a63b0f157894ecb9213","observation_id":"56ae283e-9061-4afa-9e65-c32802015b3f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:46.771809Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2021.76596","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.546396Z","title":"Systemic failures and organizational risk management in algorithmic trading: Normal accidents in finance","venue":null,"work_id":"8992b65f-62d5-46ba-b67d-c691df8f4572","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.064625Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b6197346c6da6ea70286e8b6f62498974a18bfaa527461d6540323e7bb9fd4f9","observation_id":"8ec77234-7eb4-4fe7-8891-ee35cdfeee94","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.585419Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.12856","last_updated":"2025-08-11T15:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:48:00.070861Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T13:15:14Z","title":"AI-AI Bias: large language models favor communications generated by large language models","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2407.12856","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2407.12856","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.377717Z","title":"AI-AI Bias: large language models favor communications generated by large language models","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"5390fd8f-4436-4b96-b4bc-7b6cc5403b45","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.149357Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.12856","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a36fc0b9f63bd4e789034f2543415b49f55e605a66a56d338d167456da8a6284","observation_id":"5e0fe448-67e3-423b-a83d-cf56ea102f48","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:43.419672Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:46.301826Z","title":"Y., Ojha, S., Cai, K., and Chen, M","venue":null,"work_id":"d4ed150a-87a4-4eb8-b4f9-d434ae506609","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.200887Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:499fb2d081a9bc62949e53d7452507603afab86665dfde5702f7b753c689bf3a","observation_id":"097f252c-6310-4e3e-b7c9-0469b5a7614c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:46.467517Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:46.018063Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"6d8794c7-4f8a-4ec8-979e-a8e3e6e57294","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.273019Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:11d42921ef82d4dbbbb6179478b2061675feac035e2fc62f29683463b099ad3a","observation_id":"ad3cfe84-34b7-4394-89c7-9e1e110c05ad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:46.160124Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.324423Z","title":"S., Cope, D., and Schoots, N","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.324423Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4caa0f9405db7473b633165e3e5b2aa1745b08206892d61acc1a5ff2072316d9","observation_id":"4a8756d8-2822-4598-956e-76621aeb8dc2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.324423Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1257/aer.82.3.579","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.910144Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"89b009fd-4682-4e2b-b665-c08f7092ffca","year":1992},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.429974Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b354da770075d20c14fc0110bb897624d8eded0d08bdca2e6ce481ef9c1e7226","observation_id":"db41defd-994c-4d66-b712-858b2dc72b50","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.968043Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:45.749980Z","title":"Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here","venue":null,"work_id":"6f4c1b79-7e79-4a25-8824-4636eb164292","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.519996Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:691fc7776f54ddeb9d096c64305826828ce6cbdeceaec0d6b867aeffee51ce0f","observation_id":"b8b09066-d3d7-4c4f-b316-fa09c6b9c879","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:45.883770Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1613/jair.1.14567","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.821167Z","title":"and Nguyen, L","venue":null,"work_id":"23fcfe24-031c-4a4b-9cf9-730cc533b562","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.604851Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:890c0ccddf7d53392f79cc6d17d7034504a02ec84d7812512c5e76700b97e888","observation_id":"42fbe8de-0c68-48f6-bab3-c51342136dbf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.856734Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2402.07510","last_updated":"2025-07-25T12:28:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:30:15.183572Z","submitted_at":"2024-02-12T09:31:21Z","title":"Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganography","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2402.07510","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.667146Z","title":"R., Baranchuk, M., Strohmeier, M., Bolina, V., Torr, P","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.667146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2402.07510","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af5729999f2ab79c911d3c6a0ed729034fedacef8f4ee5dad3a0c378aeb51d65","observation_id":"eb6febe5-3cc4-4dc0-9fd3-c888943a7867","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.667146Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:45.474326Z","title":"Introducing gpt-4.1 in the api, April 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"56e44c3f-8cbd-4d29-9328-1f1c580ab5de","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.740293Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cc175ec80597cd5dc6ef5d77f086fe312fbecb44565826807959fff5b5d02dfd","observation_id":"4d50e50a-d1ff-4561-996a-f02a17151f7f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:45.616178Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.13076","last_updated":"2024-04-15T16:49:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:02:53.240463Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-15T16:49:59Z","title":"LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.13076","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.793378Z","title":"R., and Feng, S","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.793378Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.13076","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:62eccffea2a216ce40e3fc6a58ccb2b57af8cc39253c3edf13088f09a16d712f","observation_id":"a14b3870-6674-4ae9-bbd0-3c95a9225e71","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.793378Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1086/261885","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.703561Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"2c226283-8d17-4e2c-8afd-3939d581bd0c","year":1993},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.868616Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4a24a4021eb3636d918713ebeb4c0031f30b0dfd5c9030d02a938a9f416cb3b","observation_id":"8c59b02c-8ea6-4a9a-a24f-a2b7eac80270","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.767763Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.936962Z","title":"The mask benchmark: Disentangling honesty from accuracy in ai systems, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.936962Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:05fc294e0c72e3abaf0c12d0227fc8040f5a03f430b16f2bb0dc47899e0b4758","observation_id":"064162af-e87b-4d01-bbd9-b09bacdcb69f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:41.936962Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2311.07590","last_updated":"2024-07-15T08:51:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T14:42:36.955119Z","submitted_at":"2023-11-09T17:12:44Z","title":"Large Language Models can Strategically Deceive their Users when Put Under Pressure","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2311.07590","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.045271Z","title":"Large language models can strategically deceive their users when put under pressure, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.045271Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2311.07590","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e398171332a35d4baad577bf87958a2b03bdfca56e708bd3ea11c0faa670a54c","observation_id":"153780e5-c91b-40b6-b0eb-ced2a4c85ef3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.045271Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:45.179156Z","title":"and Wood-Doughty, Z","venue":null,"work_id":"7ed64555-62a7-4f00-863a-68a395e3c518","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.110162Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:036eeb9ced358e455ee085ffb2f7ba9198582f740c38bb030cfb9beea959c513","observation_id":"b8e74b6d-86db-4d08-9cb1-2e0f4bf3d667","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:45.357826Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2403.12345","last_updated":"2024-03-19T01:28:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T00:43:38.021160Z","submitted_at":"2024-03-19T01:28:01Z","title":"Performance Portable Monte Carlo Particle Transport on Intel, NVIDIA, and AMD GPUs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2403.12345","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.171115Z","title":"Algorithmic competition in digital ad auctions","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.171115Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2403.12345","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:46a7f0afb86d7c86e9bd2e47af253e95a6e09e6f31978005f78a5324757e073a","observation_id":"dd02fa90-78c1-4272-95ba-9a25aecffc48","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.171115Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.12624","last_updated":"2025-08-18T00:07:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T14:58:17.402553Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-18T13:49:54Z","title":"Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judges","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2406.12624","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.258308Z","title":"S., Choudhary, K., Ramayapally, V","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.258308Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.12624","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aab5d52065d9af33fc40adedef8fefe420ae040543bcd86761ab89ee37a05c19","observation_id":"65b8d7fa-94da-4a15-bcf1-17f2e4e41e66","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.258308Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:44.942164Z","title":"The structure and behaviour of the Continuous Double Auction","venue":null,"work_id":"2db3b063-2ddf-4772-9f95-f33abbf9a1e5","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.331364Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ef55af219542ee0aa05f1c17a425ba139d8e55d22ff10f21ddf0642bbe1022e6","observation_id":"c22ee018-827c-4c01-94b6-d88bc18c915a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:45.083920Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.443725Z","title":"I., Onizuka, M., Tang, S., and Xiao, C","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.443725Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0a6e4b2c3044a7cccec25f86c7868310f9feee826324801a812cbfdb3543934","observation_id":"d9be78e2-c60d-4777-9610-2127e2819b2b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.443725Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.13639","last_updated":"2025-06-16T16:04:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:26:19.217552Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-16T16:04:43Z","title":"An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge: How Design Choices Impact Evaluation Reliability","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2506.13639","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.489401Z","title":"An empirical study of llm-as-a-judge: How design choices impact evaluation reliability, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.489401Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.13639","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0e0e48054891995238a1e5fe543c53707b68a6338be9505066c80b723bfe165a","observation_id":"4abf00ce-8520-4104-89e0-460594eeca8c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.489401Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:44.643765Z","title":"Webshop: Towards scalable real-world web interaction with grounded language agents","venue":null,"work_id":"ca93cdd0-1298-4d6d-941d-f24e12dfef25","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.545177Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f6520403879be5b4c9b89b208123651dce344f3b0657ac92a2659e5e62f8ad1","observation_id":"f1d18d87-1747-412e-b781-c5664fd27d19","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:44.809757Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:44.363957Z","title":"Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena","venue":null,"work_id":"716dad53-4557-4872-a745-be89a7e6c332","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:42.620188Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.01413"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fdf2359a40eafae80c307e15c6c0ab694888fa58e54c61a3cd877c36a59905f9","observation_id":"2816433c-50cd-4067-94a1-bae35fdc2878","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:57:44.464095Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.01413","last_updated":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.GT","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:49:38.420684Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-02T07:06:49Z","title":"Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":40,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":15,"verified_exact":8,"verified_fuzzy":16},"total_outbound_references":40},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 40 of 40 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2507.01413."}