{"as_of":"2026-08-15T05:33:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:e52797696cbaeb5577c4bd2723be1475fd417c0d891a572d6a92ee7f0a58e05b","coverage":[{"denominator":50,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":50,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.579174Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":50,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":50,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.08881/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.08881/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.08881/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.821872Z","title":"Technical report (2025)","venue":null,"work_id":"d4bf2f0d-ae45-4c16-bd25-13e9f1940a2a","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.151912Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:80f7c37f9aa22b0df5bc0de157d1745e7cc909fc54a5e4bbd6a528a7c682f536","observation_id":"1ce69d67-5897-4796-a9a1-f25e16f98acd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.953380Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.630578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"bcde789b-1b21-437a-9ba7-81db7e3157fe","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.199131Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:279c381549e1fd35ddce9e41335252dc8055c626fc91d41365184c0b0cb788ab","observation_id":"6785307d-cfb3-4934-b3ab-3204ebaf0e2d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.733690Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.389653Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"063221f1-9f06-44ce-8d8a-acd9955fb1bb","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.267557Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:47d1702ed32f33c075778fee7a3544cad51e4d55312d1e1bb61bdac212f07892","observation_id":"40399c9d-6f8a-4c06-9a3f-74bf1cca2c02","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.507434Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.06941","last_updated":"2025-11-20T00:19:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T21:19:24.140229Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-07T22:42:29Z","title":"The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2506.06941","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.397957Z","title":"arXiv [Preprint] (2025)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.397957Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.06941","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6f2468455a28515bc9fc90e0eb92e02e2535c41d29ccbbc1e8bdd6ebab24f428","observation_id":"c7ed0abb-c784-43f1-90d2-696be4bff6a5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.397957Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5068825","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":null,"venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","work_id":"fde251f6-597f-4015-975e-3e8470eec588","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.534421Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:55b5a32482d327cfad5afa836866bbd791c4bc1b6bc426c2c22fa158a8c28735","observation_id":"c4a39fd7-7a62-447c-82de-3b00d38471ba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.785453Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.146985Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"f8c2eb9d-a6ff-42ee-85e4-222194c17bfd","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.693410Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3a11ed9c5aef798c8e714243859a6d874ed02cdeafa9e18712fa9ab76b3a3f9e","observation_id":"1feccfe9-66c2-4446-ab70-a61535e1d488","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.239394Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:21.978321Z","title":"legal market","venue":null,"work_id":"e7750110-15ba-442f-abcf-bee978ef4679","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.832561Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f6dac9265687d29bfaeb9a95f5d96d98066901c6147aa870d1b50bfc3b155962","observation_id":"66934d1b-b8ae-4a03-9399-99f13253cd02","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:22.048268Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:20.076355Z","title":"Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , G","venue":null,"work_id":"5ecfafe8-cbc0-4c19-b542-1275f6428dcd","year":1968},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:03.942336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:59e895008138301d1f0c1aabd7c135e84a58d5b41a0636d855647fea6900f544","observation_id":"877ac962-bf3a-4a87-8915-920f2e581b2f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:20.939413Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.751457Z","title":"Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol","venue":null,"work_id":"3eadc8ce-c5bc-4fc2-a4af-8e9f46e83c0f","year":1984},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.058912Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0ff21612e7b6f66419aca10affd4056667fa78f615c749242273e34503a0bc2c","observation_id":"5a53bc66-4008-4ec0-add5-7616f1113d52","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.900075Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.442622Z","title":"Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol","venue":null,"work_id":"b73ca94f-b17f-453d-a05c-ee254a50429d","year":1987},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.145351Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fb424fe32995d50d3ef5e3c1a6315dc81be3d785beed7a15bf8cb0eb1b0d882a","observation_id":"654d24e4-8eb6-4994-b1c2-c7fa58e212d7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.591498Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.205814Z","title":"Morison, A","venue":null,"work_id":"526509e5-69f1-4cf8-aaf9-714c60dcc7f9","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.216587Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:91a71ae4bcef9117dbd8225f22543f88d294da61484cdcb0190eea30c8e3a5ae","observation_id":"b483769f-cd04-4861-b2ad-2c66e0d97927","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.309662Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.103829Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"8b535953-4a2c-4406-a7d3-9e5692543593","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.298019Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1283c54b75dc17a76f7dea8e71c387d9b4e83457e49085ba86da14f201e303a","observation_id":"5aac0ba6-ecbd-4cd3-ad47-de1879163074","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.144853Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.970216Z","title":"Technical report (2024).https://www.creativerightsinstitute","venue":null,"work_id":"bbc7c735-0049-4fc8-b700-342ae0676f8d","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.381036Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:60a59806ffebda8878495d24f63886d6d18562022e7abe4feb6ff09910ef55cb","observation_id":"4a67e692-872a-4fe2-a4e8-020949bbad30","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:19.042455Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.816834Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"762c4b8e-ae27-43d7-bfd9-413ed6ff95be","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.495932Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:63489f9594e953e367f4eaa0a2f0f09916b6401a21db88ebb5b3bcd1d1c195fb","observation_id":"2f7b3a27-cbbf-4996-b00a-809f8a9290af","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.902828Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.609317Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"c1c072e4-7046-45fa-9443-9cfce58d45fa","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.628980Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:62979d5dcb71289108b494b16bc898b472d2024daa30c14c1f1a8177f0b791c2","observation_id":"ecb39e43-f6eb-4ae5-8a8e-1af325ed4d85","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.701846Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.434955Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"70d0c22a-c0a6-4031-8d2d-3f960aa74c0f","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.828250Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a2953b52a18dbd413c4641eaf7a57441bdb6b0261dcdfdfac97aad96960510b","observation_id":"bf2ab4b7-ce16-4328-b0a6-21cce2ee569e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.504907Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.292621Z","title":"Technical re- port (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"211a961c-6645-4cad-aa6d-51f421d94846","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:04.955813Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8facd86d4672e74fff94f816927a76ef24b8bbea51445f488b8635a3ed409bf8","observation_id":"2dde9960-56e3-4934-b182-ef19fe12067a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.347207Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.125962Z","title":"Surani et al., AI for scaling legal reform: Mapping and redacting racial covenants in Santa Clara County","venue":null,"work_id":"61187d8c-9e91-4b18-9de9-bac873ed8cb7","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.105328Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a1ef2d75c820cec1c7da321fc44138a5cde2f2aba467075b61a3305db822a26","observation_id":"e64bbc9a-6fa9-4eef-9c57-2aea2eb41fc1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.224561Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.982772Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"a3d68fc2-e93d-49e6-ab1c-a8dd3cbe8117","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.210437Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ffd3f8f8b95843bbcae151a1f81be7f8d66611076ef24405ee842972cd8574a5","observation_id":"e83e63ac-f224-45c3-b99d-bd9ba7544149","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:18.053593Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.799740Z","title":"Technical report (2025)","venue":null,"work_id":"7c6cdd7d-6743-458d-bd24-b89d76808207","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.342345Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d65846b7e8742b486fac1132d8628386dda56d6beffc324f864956d418e80059","observation_id":"eb4e7ca2-fe9f-4199-9a77-d87e7f87e2c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.874226Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.612551Z","title":"Technical report (2025)","venue":null,"work_id":"503138c1-e985-4243-9320-dfe1f0afc381","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.490667Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:59aac2fb71e33946c518d8c6e65204488afebdc476a01cbb71f17472b9f70876","observation_id":"d747b07e-7371-4338-a013-d1d21d2e74b5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.705911Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.356511Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"edb28953-bf35-429f-b404-02b166d4a22b","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.608028Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf7d0b1f36c319dfaffeedc9e75db2e3034e422c4cdd1d393c1f3a16603acc31","observation_id":"1788ea32-b293-4abe-9410-f760e367175f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.483431Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.20362","last_updated":"2024-05-30T17:56:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T23:53:53.676820Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-30T17:56:05Z","title":"Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2405.20362","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.738071Z","title":"Mageshet al., Hallucination-free? Assessing the reliability of leading AI legal research tools","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.738071Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.20362","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fc0efed0cda4db70793bacd5291ce0ba59bfe56847be08ae26d92cd953db50d6","observation_id":"986fb662-d0f2-404d-a0ac-9ef238351b60","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.738071Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.126726Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"0b048d3b-aec9-49d2-a3f3-91bdd35d2ea5","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.855393Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bd58df56538bec9205aabcb73222c7de4b7da57b03bd179decffbeea4f60c968","observation_id":"dff4926b-6ffb-410e-94d6-e75c85a25517","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:17.241254Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.15594","last_updated":"2025-10-19T10:32:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:43:22.011336Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-23T16:03:35Z","title":"A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2411.15594","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.985629Z","title":"Jiang et al., A survey on LLM-as-a-judge","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.985629Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2411.15594","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e01571e6e12c050f3dafb0262eb353f9d50cefb0f5302e5900fe5f8e51a9b588","observation_id":"fb631d3d-c7ad-4aa3-83c1-464afc7d0556","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:05.985629Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.863053Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"1681a4c0-6e07-49f7-8ea4-16d4f87cdc8a","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.094765Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cf618377fea973b18675c9e929e226704ec7f0c83c5def4241d258338ea5dee2","observation_id":"9f0240b4-d52e-4b33-a97a-42667c2218f5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.986987Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.17638","last_updated":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T01:34:20.520817Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T20:38:17Z","title":"Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2502.17638","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z","title":"Blair-Stanek, N","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.17638","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f6e762dae153fac3fc7707204a316b65ba71fbfb01d88595f9c92558cdd59c3","observation_id":"a90de854-08a4-4ae0-bae7-946dd7566361","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.670626Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"8b136a35-19f3-414e-8f97-b5e1ee6b3695","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.324590Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1b69d66f26342c5b7fe9d873e4e7d34f4dfa529d5f395bc359b3460cf427afb","observation_id":"9c05d50d-dc19-4048-a106-7a55dbd8e76f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.759113Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.494400Z","title":"Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis","venue":null,"work_id":"21a71213-c08e-4dee-ab7c-f784c5ccf134","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.423204Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0c44bad3842d4844bd632ebceb41cdfa781425a269f853fe1ae8046cbfc69f58","observation_id":"dfd0c2ea-d23f-4bc6-bab0-9bf8d289f13a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.579001Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.318705Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"4bfd4304-e825-4915-8b4c-ce2f98e493ad","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.529768Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:74172bb7e76acb989affe154106996e630f047bc9917d352c6e901378f4b7e2d","observation_id":"1a095e91-be39-4ece-a31b-ee9389b727e4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.409471Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.121834Z","title":"AI-assisted trial system","venue":null,"work_id":"2b1a1be0-074b-423b-b0c4-bd262baade1f","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.642615Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f440fa42249c7e3e53528d1b72af715564c0b7bcbe32779b6e3784a3f4a93fd3","observation_id":"35c6de16-3ddc-46bc-9f23-82886506b6d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:16.216950Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.879408Z","title":"Thomas, 2024 UK judicial attitude survey","venue":null,"work_id":"ae19d9ae-50e6-450d-ac4c-ba18f6a765d1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.752935Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6976d0a1b8e0fa5bb231de2ec07d8ff60d20a82147870dc5f523f75adf9a5c87","observation_id":"5f0b355a-3595-4843-9765-ca026e669050","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.992449Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.682158Z","title":"Technical report (2024).https://www","venue":null,"work_id":"53f13fbc-a7d6-4f8b-932c-c8e67ff20c9e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:06.881219Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:591a832fa35488d51fab5cbf9b6f8e0a8622ed186576d21a18a181675ab699fb","observation_id":"d6f6ba0a-6b7e-4021-a59e-c1f1faf9516b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.765542Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.485972Z","title":"The Florida Bar News (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"fb107ee0-dd23-43b6-811b-601f8ec96b28","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:07.019023Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d17fcf0640b41082feea09d938f5ba1b17d92df5dc697d2bc978305f7bfc040","observation_id":"954f8457-0867-4ee5-9fef-d939c0dea1d9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.576735Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.269097Z","title":"Technical report (2024).https://www.bloomberglaw.com/ bloomberg-law-research-reports (accessed 17 June 2025)","venue":null,"work_id":"aca29615-39b1-401c-899e-47384c716740","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:07.134002Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f445295d1828072412fc28b298c0486a2072f41875b7803c41a95b3420ad803","observation_id":"875720eb-2d8e-4548-aaf1-a91ef68a024d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.364694Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.065216Z","title":"public and AI experts view artificial intelli- gence","venue":null,"work_id":"94114f70-a8a3-4bf8-b5ca-0c71e0bee3ae","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:07.244417Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dd071456e145427b37eaed9ab35657a7138602d3f3e8dc8fb201822456c87b1c","observation_id":"ac1c1e76-678a-4f43-a541-1a20b2e278a2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:15.169851Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.900379Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"ddfd3de8-8bfa-4acc-a3f1-b15bc06c4d47","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:07.372349Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fc06675bd85ec8d8cea0969ab0ce0907c4d85a16348449042b7eb643080c81ec","observation_id":"f8223809-20dc-460c-8706-05e0c7627b06","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.992467Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.651390Z","title":"democracy in the age of AI","venue":null,"work_id":"ed12e637-18a1-4bad-b6a1-f50aabfa63a7","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:07.512360Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ed78877bfd876c15c56388e34a7375ff2149013fed56411e8d4ea24bb3fcdb16","observation_id":"f4c80cfe-9f03-4329-97e2-f34b581ff84e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.796993Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.424432Z","title":"Technical report (2024)","venue":null,"work_id":"de97fddf-f342-4675-80b5-66bc969dc81e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:07.637149Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:780a4772f3c0903a142caed56c3de2d59d45583e369934cdffadc73653f63b18","observation_id":"76f5d87d-63f8-437f-ae0e-637fa8f7be9a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.542970Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.149110Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"9a5995d4-03d7-4f05-840a-7d89bd609046","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:07.783948Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2d8e1571d1f6d7361cf882656874b1eb8e15492bda954f58ea859b9db0200abf","observation_id":"9af17cdd-adff-46e4-9086-c0b456bf5bc3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.281844Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.905159Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"74ae8d11-4385-4dbe-a59f-5fe989f7b32d","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:07.909567Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d00d87bd55d3cc74845c287dbce5b49420e70dd8d24d9af4e4b1b5916ca3ec7c","observation_id":"7dd45685-b44b-4cb1-b2f6-cbde034358eb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:14.007934Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.681137Z","title":"https://www.legaldive","venue":null,"work_id":"fe1b2213-ed48-4801-a6da-e7d869920c81","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:08.145332Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fe5f8bd13a83894775d0f501ca4319fb7d24b2f096c50156681f5aed5f7773ba","observation_id":"74fa1241-5b9f-4ddc-bb64-0be183477371","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.797548Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.468860Z","title":"Bourdieu, The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field","venue":null,"work_id":"f1166a90-8b32-495f-b235-cd8ac88bb20e","year":1987},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:10.230763Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e3420c6263e99d1513f6884d5c97b1f26982c6065db6a259449a7c90e4331dfa","observation_id":"09ed9d5d-5e7c-40f4-9d50-9c4e887e9239","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.583973Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.221249Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"505cbdb7-063d-407f-8fed-7352882d79cf","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:10.855043Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9b23fc31af780c0dd375e19fc94f34a4b4eddd683462d199499001a0c6f41aaa","observation_id":"0c4f63b6-237f-46be-b5f3-65c30208fc6e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.337730Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.029125Z","title":"73, 02009 (2025)","venue":null,"work_id":"9e741025-33d0-44a7-9ef7-d84f62194f1b","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.060665Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cf6af87be74f6089e1cf16c2d87c6a64c958bf21ae3af0938e6e2658e15e6746","observation_id":"6cc5ad25-a606-4e1a-9925-4c20276a805a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:13.116190Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.793470Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"fff7df4c-1c1d-4075-9b0d-ff57ff053d58","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.192446Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ae2527211e536d67e63715d55ce378963e8f8e3b6d56c80c753d57c67178a05","observation_id":"18900d17-a698-44e0-b39a-bf35f6801bb7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.919151Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.571037Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"1604d1e4-0cf5-47aa-988e-fb9cb415da6e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.285306Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:92905e8c14bef3ee14a73c94501b39733fbba35f3602a5e71190fcc5f91be3e4","observation_id":"16673f08-aaf3-4663-a000-788a9dafce7b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.654276Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.355192Z","title":"Fabiano et al., How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools","venue":null,"work_id":"628cb204-718b-46d4-ac96-86d15023c687","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.386530Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3aa7f62be11bbc63fbe157128034ca5ec32019fdde2bb21e936d923cae3783e3","observation_id":"ca7bbf69-e331-4808-8a6e-77d65efa6ccd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.423553Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.164740Z","title":"Alshami et al., Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: Methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions","venue":null,"work_id":"36c410f9-01b5-42bd-a23d-f77ce16e1904","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.480332Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fff20074faf9812edf7b1dd5a6e6daf6b948b33d42baa7a19920b6a0de18f7bb","observation_id":"a1341417-3b99-4144-bc35-36ef6d28e70f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.254653Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.931247Z","title":"very strict regulation","venue":null,"work_id":"fdca33b1-5897-4e4d-8347-f1132e521885","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:11.579174Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.08881"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5268282428ae95216c75fd9e2f2bc72ecc144f57657d2e198545f9644ab092b3","observation_id":"929d260a-47a7-456c-a041-448f2cd4f22d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:39:12.030244Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.08881","last_updated":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CY","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T10:34:42.390961Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T10:50:29Z","title":"The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":50,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":15,"verified_exact":1,"verified_fuzzy":34},"total_outbound_references":50},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 15 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 50 of 50 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.08881."}