{"as_of":"2026-08-23T02:30:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:0dee353a93f57befcf744125fed36e3bc0424932f89960a38590903d3477349d","coverage":[{"denominator":25,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":25,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.470996Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":25,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":25,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.10062/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.10062/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.10062/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.835673Z","title":"Applying human values theory to software engineering practice: Lessons and implications,","venue":null,"work_id":"78aa8736-58ee-4769-86ec-0c81ca18eacf","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.420056Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:74942523d4f64a29cc3bffdc9f9ac01cdaf52fb57c6e8139ab1cd97ae2d848f6","observation_id":"9c361db8-5b88-4988-aa03-18b951c72273","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.839129Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.828875Z","title":"An empirical study on the use of snapshot testing,","venue":null,"work_id":"3d3075b2-702e-4839-a67c-143474ff7d1e","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.422657Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c048d6105bb4d2e55d04517c5fc0cdaa0243af78031b334ed05bf6b81c83893f","observation_id":"ba607822-0f18-44e4-b569-46eef408d776","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.831490Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.821575Z","title":"Snapshot testing in practice: Benefits and drawbacks,","venue":null,"work_id":"d5287e2e-65ed-4c1b-8814-6d8c9b719f97","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.425079Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:37c44cd98fa0ed9398b5ed99e3f68bf944a20d67a363d5b06a1f8f4cfbe650cb","observation_id":"0fffbc6c-5079-46a5-9322-fea8db56c5cc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.824733Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.814754Z","title":"Meta open source is transferring jest to the openjs foundation,","venue":null,"work_id":"7fcb067b-64ca-4fb9-8600-d65008c3c38e","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.427197Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8414d47b7329b6260cc7e24fe89fdfd50665dc20f2437fdcdc9d1eea19a22905","observation_id":"a8b39001-14fb-4875-b0fc-db1378e7a9a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.817481Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.429274Z","title":"Sapienz: multi-objective automated testing for android applications,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.429274Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d93f5e4f47609ba7a1fa833572f7c71e30579f78b20acd900f82c95c5e052581","observation_id":"b58d6149-3de5-4dd0-8b80-04d137c52209","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.429274Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.807891Z","title":"Large-scale analysis of framework-specific exceptions in android apps,","venue":null,"work_id":"3fbd4c2f-3f61-4adb-8b25-8d172c33d5f4","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.431555Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ae7a491df5f01c4733dc1329b1b2ee881a88503145f82352bacd62c269200b5a","observation_id":"5fc69242-b961-4165-9951-68edc1415c41","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.810838Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.800465Z","title":"Combodroid: Generating high-quality test inputs for android apps via use case combinations,","venue":null,"work_id":"946c1580-2ec0-44a2-9228-dad6d15ba9a7","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.433891Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:531e74bdb3517eb60f4e29b258099750bba7e2a3347af22f69e4a57b9084c4c4","observation_id":"0307c2e2-1b40-4ba3-b1b6-c57edf42611d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.803131Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2310.15780","last_updated":"2023-10-24T12:30:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:16:14.960316Z","submitted_at":"2023-10-24T12:30:26Z","title":"Make LLM a Testing Expert: Bringing Human-like Interaction to Mobile GUI Testing via Functionality-aware Decisions","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2310.15780","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2310.15780","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.522449Z","title":"Make LLM a Testing Expert: Bringing Human-like Interaction to Mobile GUI Testing via Functionality-aware Decisions","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"f14a539b-e2ca-4a8b-821b-2265bb2f3e05","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.435862Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2310.15780","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fac3bb329358e5dbf23c57cfbbe456ba6a3c00346183a3c1fa560d14cd57da9f","observation_id":"46afb975-4376-4fd1-a5f2-74fa6333b32b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.525000Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.793155Z","title":"Benchmarking automated gui testing for android against real-world bugs,","venue":null,"work_id":"5338a18c-b9e6-4c63-a0d8-3f41029f6116","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.438326Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a943d72f326417d2724673e49cca1cbf3dae6e3ae2818d79635207283a4bd103","observation_id":"f8470fb9-17ad-4129-bca8-61a8abc184a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.796258Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.786381Z","title":"Automated cross-platform inconsistency detection for mobile apps,","venue":null,"work_id":"e7e0d497-737e-433b-9060-753ddf27411a","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.440268Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:190657842566c4298d153fd0eec36468dc66382eb98d56737957b8835a34ddf4","observation_id":"aa38ee1d-d262-463d-9372-c5d21759aafb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.788901Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.779445Z","title":"Owl eyes: spotting ui display issues via visual understanding,","venue":null,"work_id":"e001adc7-1b16-4f59-8e99-d6c49c749491","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.442282Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7cc86d81d8e559966619bd4b9bb2713ed1855e110af533fa0f939a84a1393111","observation_id":"6efc88f1-06a1-4f47-b527-1619075ae1a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.782196Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.771878Z","title":"Glib: towards automated test oracle for graphically-rich applications,","venue":null,"work_id":"4e24a52b-9085-47eb-af39-0853a8d4adfe","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.444299Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f03a0105cba5d25a3ca8477b1124f33ced6b702fbbd27c8bd70c82f661087cc8","observation_id":"4c576a48-7965-43f0-a48c-3af60b1d24e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.774561Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.764693Z","title":"Reducing combinatorics in gui testing of android applications,","venue":null,"work_id":"605d95d5-cdd4-4a4a-9a6a-21fd451097fe","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.446161Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e7dca1f00f6c140e05e872ccf77a9bbad9900919e9ad9812269a5110a7f8df75","observation_id":"b6943336-6b1d-452b-8499-df0a0330f428","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.767262Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.757464Z","title":"Translating video recordings of mobile app usages into replayable scenarios,","venue":null,"work_id":"110acc2a-3261-4b92-b2ce-cf74358e31f0","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.448177Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:633687da9aa8f7d2e4c4237468e5f74bf7a9e582f3b29c9d4f7963d30b0d81a3","observation_id":"543fe5d5-a3c0-4a50-b383-1a7dfa2a84c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.760043Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2302.00886","last_updated":"2023-02-02T05:35:31Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T15:58:19.136184Z","submitted_at":"2023-02-02T05:35:31Z","title":"Read It, Don't Watch It: Captioning Bug Recordings Automatically","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2302.00886","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2302.00886","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.513965Z","title":"Read It, Don't Watch It: Captioning Bug Recordings Automatically","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"b3fe3414-abd3-4193-ae9e-e0fae17bb39f","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.450137Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2302.00886","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c541e6d9ddec2013657ceaa1970fe9061ed9599f827f551e2716bf55d7753c3c","observation_id":"a7c91013-d7ba-439e-96b4-da0fe6071a12","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.516542Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.748280Z","title":"Automatic web testing using curiosity-driven reinforcement learning,","venue":null,"work_id":"c7633353-7868-4067-9905-8e1f4f5fd259","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.452485Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7e8ad341e210117b622009f8b79d81d36923cf1a90756bbed9aa1af53caefad9","observation_id":"fe4799bc-9731-4c5c-9beb-1af8cfd03659","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.752131Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.740573Z","title":"Qexplore: An exploration strategy for dynamic web applications using guided search,","venue":null,"work_id":"89cb1002-987a-4936-9ae1-2598c4755d3c","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.456701Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:325f02ba60aadb0192cb96f57b51354ecc0e9d5f4596cee368602eb14807bdf2","observation_id":"5a59bdf9-b1c7-4fa4-a776-cd85f1fc3b0d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.743285Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.733100Z","title":"Snapshot testing dataset,","venue":null,"work_id":"eed3919e-1d8e-49aa-bbe5-e73406bf73c5","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.458658Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c1a5b7cb47e21165e29c5a6922e82973509f9a06b035ad0f09c6ae4e3be1ea37","observation_id":"db643013-0166-4f63-bde5-b6415e75cb15","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.735745Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.725673Z","title":"The metamorphosis: Automatic detection of scaling issues for mobile apps,","venue":null,"work_id":"c65f76bb-5113-483f-991c-b15c46ee9dfc","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.460537Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:598640cadb33da28cdac77dbed1127a2abe0859589138ca7cb6d06ec66d40f6d","observation_id":"783c1d05-31c4-456f-ae20-10243c296c60","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.728338Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.462367Z","title":"Nighthawk: Fully automated localizing ui display issues via visual understanding,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.462367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:214fd0086442d995f5c6c3b02c28ef604dca5d672b044034c5cd8b73c43d950d","observation_id":"e1b9fe5a-7869-454f-87bf-d36d8b2c7782","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.462367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.03037","last_updated":"2024-12-04T08:00:42Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:20.953347Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T11:58:09Z","title":"Seeing is Believing: Vision-driven Non-crash Functional Bug Detection for Mobile Apps","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.03037","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.464252Z","title":"Seeing is believing: Vision-driven non-crash functional bug detection for mobile apps,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.464252Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.03037","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7452deb4b09b72961a217a885557220dfe273efb68081a5f7a26e0ad79b3643b","observation_id":"edeaa0bd-7511-4fe0-92f0-71cd2b74cdd5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.464252Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.714559Z","title":"Pointfreeco/swift-snapshot-testing: delightful swift snapshot testing","venue":null,"work_id":"db843c72-0267-4bc6-8e80-2efb7aff2dc3","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.466834Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f356623ea8ff2ab1e8aefaf8a79ed07aa9607b49db284011ce1669f691cc12de","observation_id":"111492fc-0408-41e3-95bc-2de9c7c09f51","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.717401Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2503.19786","last_updated":"2025-03-25T15:52:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-03-25T15:52:34Z","title":"Gemma 3 Technical Report","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2503.19786","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.468843Z","title":"Gemma 3 technical report,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.468843Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2503.19786","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e191128f92fd87a394b197e68b4a3fff1c7cff0e1f0a328212798c76ae402c2d","observation_id":"48f4d4f2-8bcf-40ae-8b7c-fbac95b5048a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.468843Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.705847Z","title":"Ollama: A lightweight, extensible framework for building and running language models on the local machine,","venue":null,"work_id":"9cde8967-a1ed-40f1-8600-7af69d93690d","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.470996Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cf3107355677288382745da358cdabe643110c485e45091bf1ad6479b12c6597","observation_id":"665eaf94-c0ff-4c23-b197-18b5c0f3f037","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.709304Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.06018","last_updated":"2021-03-10T12:34:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:39:56.064049Z","submitted_at":"2021-03-10T12:34:36Z","title":"Automatic Web Testing using Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2103.06018","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2103.06018","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.502834Z","title":"Automatic Web Testing using Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning","venue":"cs.SE","work_id":"9ca9042a-f921-4712-8ee5-be451dbccde9","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs","version":2},"reference_index":2021,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.454516Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2103.06018","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.10062"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fa5aab4108d4315495121475927924512db397e96b514a98407b784dcf8a16b5","observation_id":"495cae9b-2761-4f87-95a9-376383e18b7d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T17:44:14.507607Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.10062","last_updated":"2025-07-24T11:58:01Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T15:15:51.373431Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-14T08:47:19Z","title":"LLMShot: Reducing snapshot testing maintenance via LLMs"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":25,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":4,"verified_exact":2,"verified_fuzzy":18},"total_outbound_references":25},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 23 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 25 of 25 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.10062."}