{"as_of":"2026-08-19T23:41:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:20f9611358d411243ceb4d9a451afc2bced8266f1e12de49ff82978b06f0d1af","coverage":[{"denominator":59,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":59,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.569417Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":59,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":59,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2507.13732/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2507.13732/integrity","json":"/paper/2507.13732/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.357381Z","title":"Un tiers de divorces en moins en 15 ans","venue":null,"work_id":"e5414cba-9cff-4152-a926-0e017981bf96","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.405484Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1f8226bd95ff33fa85bd5013b7f35d2cfe7f63916e02ccc4037d88060a28792f","observation_id":"8fa25ad6-9938-4a69-b1ec-62a645800250","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.360952Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.348814Z","title":"Fairness perceptions of the postdivorce division of childcare and child‐related expenses","venue":null,"work_id":"72abd227-1ced-4261-bc2d-c20b45dc7148","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.408357Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d32320fed0f70c08556c2203822de4ec674b72450563258b85c0bb873938f722","observation_id":"96f6f29a-85f7-4bd7-b2dd-d2b5980b3d4c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.351956Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.341801Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"1c24327a-00fc-42a9-974a-119b744ead7c","year":1974},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.411036Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7875210de515e815e371b84600307dc0c8c7738d030a21d8b64d3a1cb7af4741","observation_id":"4f07c2ee-2d2b-4947-a78f-19d01e3ba6b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.344366Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.334874Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"0518df4e-a8fe-4519-bb60-0610b1dcacb1","year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.413611Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:128f80ccc7fa1553083ffcb87856679524433381d2a4dd9e1d1b5510a3b9fde1","observation_id":"f47bd9ac-384d-4252-bcf8-7fc097b17699","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.337439Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.327569Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"8ad7d7e6-b7a0-4329-b3c2-8c25d815539f","year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.416280Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1079e116738d19e489a0a02b9c9b39329ce726b3fd84d150c7c7c019376927a1","observation_id":"a47114c8-2d69-4ef3-b3ac-32b7f3d4052c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.330267Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.320609Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"be3deb21-6273-4416-8642-419cb59fb445","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.418967Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dbf405b4e3ae43b7d9840c21205f9489d9b322989c9dfdd81d8d3592a95daa27","observation_id":"b86d011f-715f-4743-9d87-47a153a853fa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.322954Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.00976","last_updated":"2022-11-08T12:14:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T15:04:50.885931Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-03T10:50:51Z","title":"LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2110.00976","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.421243Z","title":"LexGLUE: A benchmark dataset for legal language understanding in English","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.421243Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.00976","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6bf47ac2c52e0490e237bdc037b7988ee58f4fe5b6d6ec24f7c3b2fbbe67fc97","observation_id":"b76566c6-4f33-4120-ab5a-aceb1bcac73d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.421243Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2004.12158","last_updated":"2020-05-18T06:32:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:44.812692Z","submitted_at":"2020-04-25T14:45:15Z","title":"How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2004.12158","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2004.12158","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.872749Z","title":"How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"981b9686-2737-4d5e-b2b4-7a97cb93656b","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.423875Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2004.12158","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2607dd7487f49da46f53cc626b402761ad4bd300df0db6f24f24fa2cbe402e9","observation_id":"773394a2-bfea-456e-87d8-396407094b9f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.876178Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.313381Z","title":"Surprisingly Simple: Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Feature Extractors for Tabular and Text Data","venue":null,"work_id":"3aa527ca-379d-4cce-8a2c-3fca0b9b56b2","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.427025Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8cae646c131a39079115dffb6f7c24503e7ce124a10aae29cdf56778709cdcb5","observation_id":"ca2fe1c2-bf15-421a-a0f2-f8d470602eec","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.316079Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.305969Z","title":"Leveraging LLM for Identification and Extraction of Normative Statements","venue":null,"work_id":"f1624050-abdc-4a36-b892-44f92f4f3e6e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.430014Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4eef33b3fecd9081fbe178af1eb6663e33b090352a27f2ef63e0550ede0ab424","observation_id":"ef579c1a-3259-4575-97fd-8ce2a9af78b7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.308762Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.291275Z","title":"Information extraction from employment tribunal judgments using a large language model","venue":null,"work_id":"3138ce43-2246-4fc9-859a-ee23f60eeefb","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.434653Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:abad80bcee3e165090b83ad1baa4d2c0882dde55238134465fc729537574677b","observation_id":"65d5d12f-4575-4b98-868a-d20288f519de","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.294022Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.283804Z","title":"Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback","venue":null,"work_id":"239e05cc-e0a9-4c08-a3e4-7565d3ce56b9","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.437889Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:02c3bb67c81b27cc4eb88690d8694e687fccc233392038a57b5eec94a61778a1","observation_id":"23041353-edd5-4439-8588-74d4c5dddac1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.286528Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2405.06063","last_updated":"2024-05-09T19:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T13:53:56.055080Z","submitted_at":"2024-05-09T19:15:33Z","title":"A Minimalist Prompt for Zero-Shot Policy Learning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2405.06063","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2405.06063","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.862135Z","title":"A Minimalist Prompt for Zero-Shot Policy Learning","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"48b149ac-638d-4ef4-a3f1-f9f5a3a6ac93","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.440297Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2405.06063","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:036b55ec407557cf58670c5e56fdbdc30d2a646bcc93efa1862d6f82ffe53a4a","observation_id":"51c5d595-1476-4aef-b21a-1d32a0bc1ea0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.865218Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.14905","last_updated":"2025-02-18T16:44:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T11:29:06.946682Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-18T16:44:55Z","title":"Think Inside the JSON: Reinforcement Strategy for Strict LLM Schema Adherence","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2502.14905","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.442899Z","title":"Think inside the json: Reinforcement strategy for strict llm schema adherence","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.442899Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.14905","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:234e5247d30702deb1b24356bb88967b25328cbc7b5e7f4de7c03bb7d48febbc","observation_id":"8240a5d3-8df6-419e-a9b5-38da8898339e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.442899Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.276440Z","title":"A brief history of the changing roles of case prediction in AI and law","venue":null,"work_id":"c475ca65-99d4-4842-97c7-046e6bacca44","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.445688Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b3c25155a11a073f1ddf10431d0082ad6504515033ec1abd783e549814e8679e","observation_id":"01d375b2-8e98-4f54-a04b-057e30f93942","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.279285Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.268454Z","title":"A systematic literature review of machine learning methods in predicting court decisions","venue":null,"work_id":"cd382870-405b-4cf3-ba5a-d7cb0bde458f","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.448015Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:43f7b21b0cd24bcb864239fdecfaf6d1486cb4544da9257593b5c71cb538a9b0","observation_id":"ce6e3b9d-90e0-485f-9aa4-ad41f8aa554a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.271018Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.253170Z","title":"Automatic judgement forecasting for pending applications of the European Court of Human Rights","venue":null,"work_id":"5dee43bd-efe0-4a68-97bb-13d54640d022","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.453442Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9b9ae0eb01d3bae18b3d8c640523a0bf3aa80a38b31ebe010df392317cfb7cbf","observation_id":"be9cbeee-3611-48f6-a6fb-ac182afb3d17","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.256300Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.245510Z","title":"Inferring the Winning Party in the Supreme Court from the Pattern of Questioning at Oral Argument","venue":null,"work_id":"89daccf3-d8fc-49f5-87ad-a47230c678f1","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.455724Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ad29004926571fe27e0e41665afbf931f722405fbea115596258b57d03b929c3","observation_id":"3bec96bd-be32-417f-9392-72edfce9f403","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.248124Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.223151Z","title":"The supreme court forecasting project: legal and political science approaches to predicting supreme court decisionmaking","venue":null,"work_id":"73328a93-5f9e-4306-add2-6c60d4802937","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.463745Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:143df79ea9349fe82aa582745f967fccac27584d451b204ee15d9837e19039c8","observation_id":"649dbee9-1f4c-457f-b7c4-d4ddcad3401c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.225730Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1407.6333","last_updated":"2014-07-23T19:08:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T23:25:38.671353Z","submitted_at":"2014-07-23T19:08:33Z","title":"Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1407.6333","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1407.6333","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.843288Z","title":"Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach","venue":"physics.soc-ph","work_id":"ecccee9d-261f-4de4-9592-827c52acb473","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.466260Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1407.6333","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:88a8bb080c48ac10f24aee07f690582b0cc363778c7b4126edc4232a4699508c","observation_id":"07687579-d78d-430c-b1f2-a053c80a4f37","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.845912Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.215992Z","title":"Using Modern Neural Networks to Predict the Decisions of Supreme Court of the United States with State-of-the-Art Accuracy","venue":null,"work_id":"9dc2a914-5011-41d3-9379-1e63d8a5f030","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.468894Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fc62394b10086428474d23bb7f79de5ad7363ebeb8d904c547e8bf80ba433450","observation_id":"5a5cc571-ed17-4a4c-9a08-d53f69732532","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.218732Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.230310Z","title":"A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States","venue":null,"work_id":"d7b3554d-b30c-4632-984c-0adb7da25006","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.471755Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c53d28cfa241d13f5c27a48758a274751a9ee3fe3d1a585d6ac9b1cb21fb477f","observation_id":"d2b5e526-eafc-4726-9a9f-8736b719f662","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.233206Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1712.03846","last_updated":"2017-12-11T15:46:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T20:04:53.035896Z","submitted_at":"2017-12-11T15:46:54Z","title":"Crowdsourcing accurately and robustly predicts Supreme Court decisions","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1712.03846","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1712.03846","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.832219Z","title":"Crowdsourcing accurately and robustly predicts Supreme Court decisions","venue":"physics.soc-ph","work_id":"805b0fa0-0ba7-4d89-80ec-c88bad78063e","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.474141Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1712.03846","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da6aa8b2b041a285735394e6a70a2c09745f59b629c0dbf49184c0e828764afa","observation_id":"2f6b03dc-3650-4d45-bfe7-a8343d8c7540","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.835191Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.237713Z","title":"Improving supreme court forecasting using boosted decision trees","venue":null,"work_id":"2fdcca78-e5cc-474a-8c33-fc9ba2d12e89","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.476946Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ed0c69831d4780862be17c92f7eaf4cc129a5d34e60f56ea8ddd0a978340a370","observation_id":"cec6c033-b768-4b48-807b-349a382de2df","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.240608Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.207089Z","title":"Efficient prediction of court judgments using an LSTM+ CNN neural network model with an optimal feature set","venue":null,"work_id":"acd8e8df-5d99-4e1c-a612-fa5a7e6610d2","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.479096Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e2905145b853e55b26de768dbf637921e091a3c1d41b41308a08c8fdf98ac0c8","observation_id":"c5fa9628-6e46-4add-b4c0-a56db3e5acb9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.210568Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.200164Z","title":"DINU, and Josef V AN GENABITH","venue":null,"work_id":"43b50a11-a213-4209-9aa2-bbf2ad30268a","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.481621Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:641418e5f0d3725219391d98388a74c1ab64c2210960e1b4cf3987912e63ebdb","observation_id":"aa9f3ed7-aa2a-492e-980a-f8c6b18b2c43","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.202619Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.193435Z","title":"DINU, and Josef V AN GENABITH","venue":null,"work_id":"b56e92d5-8771-4235-9602-c7c265a2c59c","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.483904Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:84ad0006e34fa725a7c117cb1c2761fb15fcd31d233cb5992b6d14ca86b4d1b1","observation_id":"81a42f5c-0aa2-4412-859c-e4123191b1d2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.195727Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.185814Z","title":"Legal judgment prediction for Canadian appeal cases","venue":null,"work_id":"31847185-61e9-4c82-af8b-a2f4814d40d8","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.486259Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fa2766a08fff2217c2ed0fd71cc2c071af593fa1f5c25f463489b0fcb785f263","observation_id":"8a9e0579-8379-4468-82a8-715e6eefad9e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.188625Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.178617Z","title":"Legal judgement prediction for UK courts","venue":null,"work_id":"2a644da6-7332-42b4-a281-e417d1e12a45","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.488623Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e7892b70a24cc1a5504f85dac051d27fdf91011d5e33c79664013c4c333517ca","observation_id":"a39bfb1b-f2b3-4de2-92ac-5e2b235356ba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.181445Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2110.00806","last_updated":"2021-10-02T13:50:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T04:25:05.998464Z","submitted_at":"2021-10-02T13:50:21Z","title":"Swiss-Judgment-Prediction: A Multilingual Legal Judgment Prediction Benchmark","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2110.00806","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2110.00806","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.819868Z","title":"Swiss-Judgment-Prediction: A Multilingual Legal Judgment Prediction Benchmark","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"fa83a8db-441b-4cc8-ac0a-25bf502ac186","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.491071Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2110.00806","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a92e96d5b5035502e881f3001073e4ba5b36745f810b2d8a27d2e6cc8a4b3394","observation_id":"95be23fd-8e7f-46c8-aa59-ced58de09ccb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.823489Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.171350Z","title":"ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation","venue":null,"work_id":"c754324b-5659-4670-8aef-40abe7b6643a","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.493701Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8eab7dcac36e82c1984ed7d4e3e94f4ccb0f9514cfb1474ef9c22e50f52ea0f5","observation_id":"0c3441a5-a4b7-47fa-a246-c2c3b5302be7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.174285Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.164121Z","title":"Fact-based court judgment prediction","venue":null,"work_id":"cb495450-07db-4d12-bf98-7cced13b1fa4","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.496593Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5338760039b2517d42e1b7086f5aa243b0898b94791a5b990c8975475c27183d","observation_id":"31b1e249-1b7c-4f20-a978-f6b72b6ac810","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.166891Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.157165Z","title":"Predicting Brazilian court decisions","venue":null,"work_id":"455ee4d1-306d-4528-be9c-458b68bbbab5","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.499070Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1e10ce0ae2a92428c04582ed475a882c5261ed1d37f6fd48e529780a24d222d1","observation_id":"1503c772-f101-4ec0-b39e-a3f215889486","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.159626Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.149800Z","title":"Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A natural language processing perspective","venue":null,"work_id":"dfc93d65-652e-4418-8875-ce51f8af6c37","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.501378Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a7c437d0fed81d54fc0b229285ae3cbcae4c1979127352c11998c9f17ec346ce","observation_id":"9be2a963-ccc2-4e04-9900-00132324639a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.152583Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.142695Z","title":"Predicting judicial decisions: A statistically rigorous approach and a new ensemble classifier","venue":null,"work_id":"9040878b-c8b2-4c80-8113-52ec37e32a00","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.503591Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2a03eaf535a402d827a9503ab83a546326a90e43dbf91b2712e501579e02e885","observation_id":"89a6b4cc-7ebf-48d6-a442-e8f0d7feb475","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.145341Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.135464Z","title":"Judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: Looking into the crystal ball","venue":null,"work_id":"726c173c-f20b-44c1-9617-1248be908d2d","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.506120Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dd6cd8b76b5f5f8a0563c1d632f3c167d63cc6af5755cb3bfec694515a6782ea","observation_id":"3bd93714-e448-4c4a-b8cc-d303e925e30d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.138277Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.120837Z","title":"Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English","venue":null,"work_id":"91a9a57a-7184-4173-861e-1165c6d1a0ce","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.510898Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bbaa7e4a7c6b5d8e327b7d6b05bc120e31cdd1fa5e4e8069f70bd9042865b2d9","observation_id":"46914ab4-1805-442f-bf0c-3f8e7f13cedc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.123675Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2402.07214","last_updated":"2024-06-06T10:53:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T14:19:33.024613Z","submitted_at":"2024-02-11T14:21:37Z","title":"Through the Lens of Split Vote: Exploring Disagreement, Difficulty and Calibration in Legal Case Outcome Classification","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2402.07214","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2402.07214","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.808264Z","title":"Through the Lens of Split Vote: Exploring Disagreement, Difficulty and Calibration in Legal Case Outcome Classification","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"36445014-d5b6-46c7-b71e-8af78289b5e6","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.513376Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2402.07214","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:39a8f2b756df9523a0b2b09c472e68668531e739c54b8da62f730b0aae18d90e","observation_id":"e7f3fb97-5da3-48b3-adb5-b0c3d40146ed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.811122Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.298562Z","title":"PILOT: Legal Case Outcome Prediction with Case Law","venue":null,"work_id":"0beb8c29-661a-4522-b55c-b4edf7084ec1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.515707Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1d3b5e2890b840f344f1bee51cb6d70769f4f87e6cf00a93ff102d3e0b704a41","observation_id":"3dab2c6f-22af-48c2-b4cb-7aada98d4827","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.301407Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1807.02478","last_updated":"2018-07-04T02:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:45.745465Z","submitted_at":"2018-07-04T02:09:06Z","title":"CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Prediction","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1807.02478","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.517773Z","title":"Cail2018: A large-scale legal dataset for judgment prediction","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.517773Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1807.02478","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b38c9448e28ab90f58585bab58e917848c6bf5d1c5c71a34b955c7d7b52ce0f1","observation_id":"0c02f576-4fea-42b6-97a8-75db8febfa46","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.517773Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.021101Z","title":"Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis","venue":null,"work_id":"a586217e-5372-4502-90c3-99a0a5e3100b","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.522887Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fdf611eaee6330467a2e05b3c2b26786138e3d4cdbb0aa07f3773330353b1367","observation_id":"d4c7ff6d-c4d2-45bb-81a8-2e39d404a6c9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.023845Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.013204Z","title":"Legal judgment prediction via topological learning","venue":null,"work_id":"11309c8e-53c3-4855-8af8-a9229c0c5157","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.525009Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4740e97cfda0e9b441e1e9e2f10d4576d3007ba3572c5f4ad5763f4faebd25d7","observation_id":"f5d70384-267c-428a-b9a3-1053f92cbe0c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.015903Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.005157Z","title":"Few-shot charge prediction with discriminative legal attributes","venue":null,"work_id":"84f05b52-659d-47a7-8677-b76735cd4ec7","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.527399Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8bd5c1502e9cd92d2dab5ce9dad917c81cc4edc464a96ec8026f687835e847ce","observation_id":"38e7126d-295a-421a-bd5f-d87a0513ebdd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.008080Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1907.02205","last_updated":"2019-07-04T03:50:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:22:03.438848Z","submitted_at":"2019-07-04T03:50:21Z","title":"An External Knowledge Enhanced Multi-label Charge Prediction Approach with Label Number Learning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1907.02205","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1907.02205","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.789839Z","title":"An External Knowledge Enhanced Multi-label Charge Prediction Approach with Label Number Learning","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"5bac958c-886b-4fa4-a2e3-68bd0c1e7bf8","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.530171Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1907.02205","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aa08b10083a95656047abfd002075bc138b61a02627c16697099893fdf6f47e7","observation_id":"4bcafffc-177a-4810-a044-ca821b6dbb16","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.792788Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1905.03969","last_updated":"2019-05-16T11:19:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T08:06:49.968923Z","submitted_at":"2019-05-10T07:04:12Z","title":"Legal Judgment Prediction via Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1905.03969","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1905.03969","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.778971Z","title":"Legal Judgment Prediction via Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"514e4ef3-c019-47d5-99ae-062de163d389","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.533115Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1905.03969","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c463917945059f4129d1d8d74e6ac0c6cad90f2c0247f708d93d0a2e6c653a2f","observation_id":"24172924-69ca-479c-9b3c-d7771ba547f1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.781874Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.996879Z","title":"Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction","venue":null,"work_id":"bee81bf8-324d-4ca3-ad9a-a24cca337d6c","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.535766Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5ac1948182ac94179703e78c0679d614bb087938257c790e5a93ebc019f7a59e","observation_id":"97c38a23-3e71-497e-b923-09035798bc89","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.999510Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.988380Z","title":"Neurjudge: A circumstance-aware neural framework for legal judgment prediction","venue":null,"work_id":"6484ba1c-2a78-4220-acd6-95de6d1a0033","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.538409Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:98bb2f59a65cb938c36426f7734069aa7d6b71052b9f3e81afa2372d059b4d46","observation_id":"a4013a6f-bb60-48e5-874c-ed1310a9fbaf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.991509Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.540943Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.540943Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:564fd4f888fc06ea8a18e620303ed549fa2e154ca4d281675981117665c8eb5a","observation_id":"6dec88dc-ff13-4196-878d-7c664ec21a35","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.540943Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.980508Z","title":"Ml-ljp: Multi-law aware legal judgment prediction","venue":null,"work_id":"51fdce39-2c4c-4b29-8528-1bba3d47d2f4","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.543310Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:15d74f5a3bf94780c6b75e2db1f9a3e5360a7be1c7aefbd826a63930cf36bd92","observation_id":"ee860a7b-ddee-4f25-b04b-d19f3b9e66cc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.983344Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.546165Z","title":"RLJP: Legal Judgment Prediction via First-Order Logic Rule-enhanced with Large Language Models","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.546165Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ed75f8b1c10678eb1e4e2b440c8e475b475d3fc0d803700eb550e1c736cbda51","observation_id":"d8e4a310-6d35-4e36-ad62-37176e2b6d45","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.546165Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.1841","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-10T05:30:23.456663Z","title":"Using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) to predict criminal charges and sentences from Taiwanese court judgments","venue":"PeerJ Computer Science","work_id":"2216d80f-9adf-4e89-adf4-dbad832d4052","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.548500Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1a6484efd61be3dc7e5d764966ca3cb50979f5548d614284d56a7e156dab6d4","observation_id":"b30e182f-cf96-48b0-b3c3-c41f1b6ccd43","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.599048Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.972981Z","title":"Analysis and prediction of legal judgements in the Slovak criminal","venue":null,"work_id":"b8a367a7-385d-457e-b906-302ae1d880a9","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.551340Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:30b7b823c33b092091f5d42c1f018193755327d945050f0c2b5bd4049181bca9","observation_id":"83542f06-29ab-4347-a0b9-3145121617b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.975685Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2103.13868","last_updated":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:36:21.718551Z","submitted_at":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2103.13868","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2103.13868","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.616624Z","title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"8f0f6f9b-7abb-4e44-bd06-2390ef98c77b","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.553796Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2103.13868","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5f73cf95a4a1b663f86877bd0ce10eac5592a603373fb5d871171a4e724c437b","observation_id":"0827bd76-9b22-4751-a676-1664001362ee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.620139Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"itmconf/2025700","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.943749Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"aa3c05d7-da2c-4995-9a80-dc0ebb4b5772","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.556751Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:43da74d9ebaf5aa351e6a0c1eeece69af2fbd0877a70f03d5618918173426bab","observation_id":"0fc13c28-98fd-43b2-9a93-34af3c087de0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.948167Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.128340Z","title":"Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights","venue":null,"work_id":"89de8a1e-22d8-46b0-8492-a77d99ad24f1","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":62,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.558959Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:71eb1c56028b5a320f2de16420fe2731a4e09c8051b1ea9c7343f671983c76ee","observation_id":"1346a4fb-7df0-4c1c-afad-019c067a7c6f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.131004Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.03913","last_updated":"2025-06-04T13:05:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:55:30.307590Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T13:05:37Z","title":"When Fairness Isn't Statistical: The Limits of Machine Learning in Evaluating Legal Reasoning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2506.03913","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.562020Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.562020Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.03913","citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7af5cd398dcd2e27e1c57097916e13c9181185bf3ab9a55eed7d66b60f39080a","observation_id":"b89f5d48-de39-42b9-9f4d-de36774f73cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.562020Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.964684Z","title":"Legal judgment prediction: If you are going to do it, do it right","venue":null,"work_id":"4d2f0fae-1b69-446a-9036-aec4bf1d66d9","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.564675Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:96524ea1defff4fc42455f51c317b6f984dff9debd6565955db3a18a93304bc3","observation_id":"b81530eb-1a88-492f-82e7-46cb6d04875d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.967552Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.260869Z","title":"Legal Judgment Prediction: A Survey of the State of the Art","venue":null,"work_id":"943ddfbe-dc3a-435a-b3e2-dcc29aa5ee53","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":65,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.567096Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4a476904ec8d955296147a7bd4d9555ce64b8d160c15ada08ddfda3b3177b548","observation_id":"7e1668b2-29c4-4f2d-bac7-1523427259c4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:13.263868Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.953505Z","title":"Predicting Brazilian court decisions","venue":null,"work_id":"0ea7cb89-63ca-44c4-b260-a4c14c46328c","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","version":1},"reference_index":66,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.569417Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2507.13732"},"observation_digest":"sha256:694157ea76b3f67155b224dbf3f97383241f21688f8721712db5b0f352d5e5f9","observation_id":"d464b65d-18f4-44b8-bebf-4a09d4a7a9ac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-06T16:24:12.958226Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.13732","last_updated":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T18:20:03.914545Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-18T08:28:53Z","title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":59,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":10,"verified_exact":11,"verified_fuzzy":38},"total_outbound_references":59},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 59 of 59 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.13732."}