{"as_of":"2026-08-09T18:48:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:a4c664de6a2df2b32cab40cb2212acd210de89c9afc5374719d995fc62d2d4bf","coverage":[{"denominator":29,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":29,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.994010Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":29,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":29,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2511.10871/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2511.10871/integrity","json":"/paper/2511.10871/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.134351Z","title":"online\" 'onlinestring :=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.134351Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0e63160489cbc6f6206a1dadc9cb255f005873bf6464df00cc89d4912394f3b8","observation_id":"f0f1ed11-e3e5-4caf-96b3-5c28d4186afe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.134351Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.206856Z","title":"write newline","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.206856Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a03244e3400733d2604f8ad29ee625fb8cbca975461e67399b43619fb52d164c","observation_id":"0d24b393-da26-4db2-8859-229d77f5ea94","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.206856Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.353678Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.353678Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2fb0854d8218518757a7105f36d2dcaa5ca1889b08254270a3fca2d050035308","observation_id":"05ff7baa-6c71-4bad-b78b-4f3987cf1b28","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.353678Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.477076Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.477076Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:725d44cf1a9f4243ba0c582f474c014ce277335c8e0fdac8c4945c8064c7c79e","observation_id":"b1ec61f6-0673-4dfb-851b-d2a7a8dc7ee9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.477076Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.13995","last_updated":"2025-09-29T21:29:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T19:22:54.812668Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-20T06:45:17Z","title":"ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMs","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2505.13995","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.600580Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.600580Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.13995","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9575706c7c18e5c644f8dd76bb62cba77ebb9d728d063c523ef7c2fd9ba97ac5","observation_id":"866275e1-8da7-4036-a274-4e9b062873ad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.600580Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.747057Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.747057Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a38026bd6acac1d37d88c381ecb55a66be589b87048d76410a99b76929753fe5","observation_id":"81018bcd-6f28-47f0-884e-3fc3427d7b8f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.747057Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.876696Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.876696Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:67b2cc0f94ab9bff6b940c6e90fc045b02ee40a945c79496e7feb8f6a2d934cf","observation_id":"666cfe4f-d27c-4084-815f-30cb8fa78ce2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:35.876696Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.001794Z","title":"Agarwal, Joanna Lin, Anson Zhou, Roxana Daneshjou, and Sanmi Koyejo","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.001794Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f0d0f6e7dcce31732e32a9da328365539af13ce273230121f41df287daf9627","observation_id":"62d991ca-a5f4-4cbe-b025-063dce40c8a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.001794Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2503.19786","last_updated":"2025-03-25T15:52:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-03-25T15:52:34Z","title":"Gemma 3 Technical Report","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2503.19786","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.163337Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.163337Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2503.19786","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:18550fd7afe8d42bf4986deba5014e546f753c1370d9d3b656b97b16bb509d4d","observation_id":"b4e23704-052e-444b-82d9-6609b0a4fc34","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.163337Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.21783","last_updated":"2024-11-23T23:27:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:55:11.576666Z","submitted_at":"2024-07-31T17:54:27Z","title":"The Llama 3 Herd of Models","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.21783","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.330837Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.330837Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.21783","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:70e7d65454751bb80cb7d8eb98d0580b698af7effa101d661184e5eab3d9c731","observation_id":"b43a1658-3c0f-4de1-a513-163fda91449d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.330837Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.449384Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.449384Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c6e5f1cfa78eb71f27b98487a848fb27ef81da06627cd8bdef78717c0b2c30ba","observation_id":"0bb2cb43-213b-4ac1-9d8b-8a122797c893","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.449384Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.611108Z","title":"Hua and 1 others","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.611108Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cf40f9354a4aeca8fdb9318e3105924209907868566ccef48cc0b93078b92fff","observation_id":"8159edab-df34-4bd6-938c-34701b579910","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.611108Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.21919","last_updated":"2025-07-30T10:11:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T10:27:09.032436Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-29T15:33:20Z","title":"Training language models to be warm and empathetic makes them less reliable and more sycophantic","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2507.21919","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.762542Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.762542Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2507.21919","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8abda792a966afc9098fed4ac338b5671de4a837b454844e234398855559ddd7","observation_id":"0678f2cd-9d72-460f-b0a2-b67d5f525155","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.762542Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.887876Z","title":"Kim and 1 others","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.887876Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:01d8b30407cb0e8067737e3d674a25fd9af9a348427586f189b54bea03b74d2b","observation_id":"418e4071-5b3e-4160-93f2-d74a6a6dfebd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:36.887876Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.051676Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.051676Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b5754d9a0e1859e78677a60c0c0f8fc344136c3c63ef927ed2704dc96e6f9c41","observation_id":"8708a580-0a36-4aeb-b198-a10e51576b0e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.051676Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.201365Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":16,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.201365Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c60777d524a54581233bca496ec38f4d662c59812bd8a2e4c0f08c0a13484caf","observation_id":"d77025a6-b308-48f6-996c-26010e3a76c4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.201365Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.353625Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":17,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.353625Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:36a50622de091243e402c22bc23d0518184654974f964b175581721ee2f94dfb","observation_id":"6a2b4778-75de-4daf-affa-8f94ff11766c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.353625Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.481312Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.481312Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:051b40bf4d9b5508a7891c8bc838d9c83483e05148cd2243a7b171b00e92bd70","observation_id":"6c531c95-5e05-45b8-a447-72f53dfd959f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.481312Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.592248Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":19,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.592248Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b7f17798f83e44cdd70e051713224c6cff34b250db9f40c7fd2af78c320db461","observation_id":"d8cc81a5-a0f2-4b3d-94af-90b2685864a4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.592248Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2212.09251","last_updated":"2022-12-19T05:13:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2022-12-19T05:13:52Z","title":"Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2212.09251","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.749781Z","title":"e Luko s i \\=u t \\","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":20,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.749781Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2212.09251","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:54b3628813c8b7fe64b5022ab7e997820e23383d8c9ed262df42e1a8cb18983e","observation_id":"b35f90a8-7561-40b7-b702-d738f07ea3b2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.749781Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1176/appi.pn.2025.10.10.5","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":null,"venue":"Psychiatric News","work_id":"d0f5b21f-33f6-4319-991a-3fc43f165a7b","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":21,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.864869Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9769aa7ad31569f6923be61879db2bc8be187ecaf7ad177e52b9db77918d722d","observation_id":"cdd49f0c-3d1d-4f9f-8c4d-29f45343b6d1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:53:28.366333Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.981811Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":22,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.981811Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ab72cdd616a1f15bc91c9491314ccabb048cbaa2b905213c9ba973a13d681525","observation_id":"5f664734-adb3-4620-a9b4-46f97c3fbb9e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:37.981811Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.02990","last_updated":"2025-07-01T18:00:04Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T08:11:38.202399Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-01T18:00:04Z","title":"`For Argument's Sake, Show Me How to Harm Myself!': Jailbreaking LLMs in Suicide and Self-Harm Contexts","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2507.02990","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.117769Z","title":"Schoene and 1 others","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":23,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.117769Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2507.02990","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f92fc47fc59da1b07026288703664804a68a203af83b5ad3accd8a8719a2ef4","observation_id":"6b9c099e-52ba-41a4-a45c-33223954d90a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.117769Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2310.13548","last_updated":"2025-05-10T07:10:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2023-10-20T14:46:48Z","title":"Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2310.13548","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.233633Z","title":"Bowman, Newton Cheng, Esin Durmus, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Scott R","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":24,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.233633Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2310.13548","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:431d34cd9ac1c6f0411a7248d959e7a9832ed7c651b5425eb79646ca6cd429aa","observation_id":"0891fa8f-241d-4331-a987-fdbc95b00893","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.233633Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.410630Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":25,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.410630Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:445c0b74af79e2358b238ecfd5343ab1876009fa189a302608619c0a3cfb6dc8","observation_id":"6564ac62-5ebe-4f53-9531-e60e843e7dbd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.410630Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.545029Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.545029Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ffd871315762e28a21fc144c3616d3d3325ffc199f68aaaf4cf736c2da23067c","observation_id":"b9d59b16-8c95-4bad-a0a2-a057a3d83044","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.545029Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2308.03958","last_updated":"2024-02-15T01:03:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2023-08-07T23:48:36Z","title":"Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2308.03958","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.669675Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":27,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.669675Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2308.03958","citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d455702555419defb21574ef5dd6b37200f5bbf620b3e4b24754a793d0ec887e","observation_id":"76b55aaa-5dbf-4044-8a5d-ec0f6202dace","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.669675Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.803183Z","title":"Yudkin and 1 others","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":28,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.803183Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ba525bb6beff6e63251929854de022c60223c96af3241fb5b2fb2fa7a25ea9b0","observation_id":"a47c48f4-aa64-4bcb-b1f3-c5a353e85895","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.803183Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.994010Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems","version":2},"reference_index":29,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.994010Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2511.10871"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2b1b502e040f502718af9ed18b26e4073ab370e3c6b4e76a292d71adbc150d0","observation_id":"b674571b-2de9-4ce6-a22d-b9c51cac795f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-04T06:48:38.994010Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2511.10871","last_updated":"2026-01-09T18:47:24Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T04:23:06.609813Z","submitted_at":"2025-11-14T00:55:28Z","title":"From Fact to Judgment: Investigating the Impact of Task Framing on LLM Conviction in Dialogue Systems"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":29,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":28,"verified_exact":1,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":29},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 29 of 29 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2511.10871."}