{"as_of":"2026-08-09T16:59:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7514492aa88f248f0fead4c22182142704f17d7a230b94bc155952710ebc3a73","coverage":[{"denominator":9,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":9,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.270902Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":9,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":9,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2602.18446/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2602.18446/integrity","json":"/paper/2602.18446/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.835324Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.835324Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:73839c01d1abf6d3bb56fdca24fc2d25715f220d04c80d1a00785088aa41f605","observation_id":"d904dd58-f934-4425-8d29-d5ab6290af64","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.835324Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.899541Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.899541Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8af731b049f7307db8e3621344da347d8d7e624566b29a4fd05f30f66ea1d14a","observation_id":"3f18041d-9530-4978-872f-5a99562ed9f3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.899541Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"parse_uncertain"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.020949Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.020949Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:320489a9ad19800c8a242ca3455efcecd84bdbbebb48ba4389495876d7bd3679","observation_id":"4059a4d2-8caa-43da-8e92-a468750cf8e1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.020949Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.123293Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.123293Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5212892ecadd5b0ef810d26da1417a61fe17592136c1240f0d96ce198f96c4e7","observation_id":"6bccf4b7-4778-45ed-9cde-70a0313693c4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.123293Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.197874Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.197874Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:10f80f72a91095cab13daf91584a1a0e271e2592fdb90d16c3daff0989402c4c","observation_id":"fe59c6c8-c022-41fc-944a-3e2c6cf4e654","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.197874Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.270902Z","title":"aspect_evaluations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.270902Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d4ddf7e63c179ea0d724dcb9de3a05187c5f2e29be6fd2d03c1441abf28a48e8","observation_id":"51ed57b0-1621-4e3d-bb78-3eda4c708b14","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:37.270902Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2409.02076","last_updated":"2025-01-23T00:52:08Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T15:51:57.712199Z","submitted_at":"2024-09-03T17:25:54Z","title":"LongGenBench: Benchmarking Long-Form Generation in Long Context LLMs","version":7},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2409.02076","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.745085Z","title":"aspect_evaluations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":2017,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.745085Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2409.02076","citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:718cfaf61dfb24c158adbd6b6a7c4d82f748b8d90669a42ebba6f58ba27d3075","observation_id":"ce0b2320-f62b-402a-a16e-9dd7df26f50b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.745085Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.624054Z","title":"InProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing, pages 8211–8227","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":2024,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.624054Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0a3bb95526f802ed9f01b6f4cbf75f5a5ccd1c1f6982a858e02b9f67806b43b","observation_id":"80f68c1a-3127-4e4e-bfb7-2417db59b4d5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.624054Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.14851","last_updated":"2025-05-09T05:26:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T20:25:49.871084Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-24T15:49:10Z","title":"JustLogic: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Deductive Reasoning in Large Language Models","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.14851","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.528740Z","title":"Finale Doshi-Velez and Been Kim","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports","version":2},"reference_index":2025,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.528740Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.14851","citing_paper":"/paper/2602.18446"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e28fe7c62de157cf6ba4cffc13a81b2806c03c294125c472d475668709782f13","observation_id":"7362ad27-72dd-4ec8-85fb-8925dfdd4e3e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T07:39:36.528740Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2602.18446","last_updated":"2026-06-25T03:52:17Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:55:44.433053Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-27T14:06:33Z","title":"ReportLogic: Evaluating Logical Quality in Deep Research Reports"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":9,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":1,"unresolved":8,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":9},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 9 of 9 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2602.18446."}