{"as_of":"2026-08-18T23:45:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:1844c66e1fe5177cffd03536f8da9ec61abde88c8e26770326454b257b1594cf","coverage":[{"denominator":10,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":10,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.223048Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":13,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":13,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":3,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":3,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:51:00.933549Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T14:48:33.325669Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2603.01221","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-03T14:48:33.325669Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","venue":"cs.MA","work_id":"5d257894-7bb4-4346-8887-6e8b9f65baed","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.13591","last_updated":"2026-06-11T17:12:11Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T22:17:31.317625Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-11T17:12:11Z","title":"Multiagent Protocols with Aggregated Confidence Signals","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-27T06:53:51.778069Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2603.01221","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.13591"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f82b44c33c8f3ad94e781f09e2b4d7fa7805a300a635594a047b6d3ea8fc276","observation_id":"d52205bc-578d-4338-ada6-d065fb7e43e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-03T14:48:33.327100Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2603.01221","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T17:46:57.614947Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01221 , year =","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17531","last_updated":"2026-07-20T04:09:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T20:42:17.522626Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T04:09:19Z","title":"Oracle Gap and Signal Fidelity: A Fixed-Pool Diagnostic for Test-Time Collaboration","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T17:46:57.614947Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2603.01221","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17531"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e5b2fa4794d9022f503c81c6499ae96a04cea5bec6e6675bfc008eec4c414593","observation_id":"14f8cc6a-b85a-4907-b5c4-3680769c2c45","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T17:46:57.614947Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2603.01221","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:51:00.933549Z","title":"Epistemic gain, aleatoric cost: Uncertainty decomposition in multi-agent debate for math reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01221, 2026","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.03648","last_updated":"2026-08-04T13:31:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T18:27:05.302744Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-04T13:31:24Z","title":"Group Perspective Matters: Regulating Debate Relationships Can Mitigate Blind Conformity in Multi-Agent Debate","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:51:00.933549Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2603.01221","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.03648"},"observation_digest":"sha256:394e9e9dbe1d3506f4844f86f89f1cb98fe231178d55c5079f96a4f1addb4e86","observation_id":"ac3e9db2-b22b-4deb-be4c-abe0b0008005","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:51:00.933549Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2603.01221/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2603.01221/integrity","json":"/paper/2603.01221/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.888465Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.888465Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8d5053938823041b096161b69315f1c33527d567c22e315043950daf351bccf8","observation_id":"8d728311-c935-4cde-9029-3db325c71b99","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.888465Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.825647Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.825647Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3422560f9b115981990f7e117b6581bac72c7bb1357b95f852dd04521c6722fa","observation_id":"b0b71945-69c2-42c3-a2a7-d80859610b74","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.825647Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.034692Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.034692Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:79e500c146f47eb1dfc528956edff849e3a84c0cb77275ce2434ac28d6c28fbb","observation_id":"a26265ac-4966-42a2-bf06-744605946354","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.034692Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.769414Z","title":"Consider a vertical cross-section of the cone through its axis","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.769414Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7751a884d35a2a783372e7fcfe22c5aef50af78db41540afb4a0984d1652e357","observation_id":"df68cafa-e16c-4ae9-9856-2556f3f8ede4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.769414Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.963185Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.963185Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c009e0bb4f9f0c5eb8ec42e155ff2688b66571a10c94bb8072d48300f807051e","observation_id":"076dfe39-9199-4c37-a4b5-d0a0852a712c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:43.963185Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.066173Z","title":"Corrected Reasoning:","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.066173Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9cdfc520394fcb951c744f6cb873cb4fea99463619ffa30ed4465f40d7d6f12c","observation_id":"44821590-2c83-41b3-a499-1cc6c3d03df3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.066173Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.109018Z","title":"The radius of the sphere, r, is the radius of the inscribed sphere","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.109018Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:161045cd2679b43598dbc0e39a8ab9aea4bdd6b3eeb7d02e875803752b5bc6f3","observation_id":"7ba52118-1c96-4486-b69a-91cc800fe1f8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.109018Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.181757Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.181757Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:40fdf159e38b6ddcf5ded912e7a4ec1ce48c31c0cfc4c54b6ac30fa2ee22319f","observation_id":"fc129565-2c6b-4937-8123-b49e2089dab6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.181757Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.194487Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.194487Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e355559c9c1eb4a32d425fe800ee0418b84e249aac9f23f4589e6600fdcf3866","observation_id":"a04e6d93-e575-4170-a344-3ea066cc747e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.194487Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.223048Z","title":"approximation traps,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.223048Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2603.01221"},"observation_digest":"sha256:202300b998fc1529b3e7f1c41d4441d3942daeffbc73f2aa1fed4243b15d799b","observation_id":"c62fbff5-bef0-4886-a408-7a64489b46a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T19:45:44.223048Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.01221","last_updated":"2026-06-17T08:15:33Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.MA","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:48:22.007037Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-01T18:37:39Z","title":"Epistemic Gain, Aleatoric Cost: Uncertainty Decomposition in Multi-Agent Debate for Math Reasoning"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":10,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":10,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":10},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 18 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 10 of 10 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2603.01221."}