pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.07420 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.stat-mech· quant-ph

Qubit discretizations of d=3 conformal field theories

Hansen S. Wu , Ribhu K. Kaul This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 15:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords qubit discretizationconformal field theoryscaling dimensionsquantum simulationIsing modelstate-operator correspondencepolyhedral lattice
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scaling dimensions of three-dimensional conformal field theories can be read from the low-energy spectrum of small qubit systems on polyhedral lattices.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a method to extract scaling dimensions of d=3 conformal field theories by simulating quantum many-body systems on qubits. Couplings are chosen on a polyhedral lattice so that the conformal state-operator correspondence appears clearly in the energy spectrum. This protocol is tested on the Ising model, recovering several scaling dimensions to within a few percent using only 20 qubits. It relies on little beyond conformal invariance itself and is positioned as feasible on near-term quantum hardware for problems that remain difficult classically. The approach opens a route to studying a range of 3D CFTs through quantum simulation.

Core claim

By tuning the couplings of a quantum many-body Hamiltonian on a polyhedral lattice, the low-lying spectrum of a modest number of qubits directly encodes the scaling dimensions of the corresponding d=3 conformal field theory through the state-operator correspondence, as demonstrated by accurate extraction of several operators in the Ising CFT from a 20-qubit system.

What carries the argument

The conformal state-operator correspondence observed in the spectrum of a qubit Hamiltonian on a polyhedral lattice with couplings tuned for maximal accuracy.

If this is right

  • Scaling dimensions of multiple operators in the 3D Ising CFT are recoverable to a few percent accuracy from the spectrum of a 20-qubit system.
  • The same protocol applies to other d=3 CFTs with only the assumption of conformal invariance.
  • Near-term quantum platforms can address 3D CFT problems that are computationally hard on classical hardware.
  • Implementation requires polyhedral lattice geometries and precise coupling tuning on qubit devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Quantum simulators could access CFT data for models lacking exact solutions by direct spectrum measurement.
  • The polyhedral lattice choice may generalize to other dimensions or lattice geometries for improved accuracy.
  • Direct comparison of simulated spectra against known CFT tables would provide a near-term experimental test.
  • The method could be combined with variational quantum eigensolvers to reach larger system sizes.

Load-bearing premise

Specific choices of couplings on the polyhedral lattice make the conformal state-operator correspondence visible most accurately in the low-energy spectrum.

What would settle it

Measuring the low-lying spectrum of the 20-qubit Ising Hamiltonian at the proposed couplings and finding extracted scaling dimensions that differ from known CFT values by far more than a few percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.07420 by Hansen S. Wu, Ribhu K. Kaul.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. In the manuscript we validate our proposal on two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The spectrum of the nearest neighbor transverse field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: identify the point where |c| is minimized with respect to the σ tower of constraints Sσ = {1, 2, 3}. In Table II, the most relevant scaling dimensions extracted on the dodecahedron vary at the few percent level on which set of constraints we try to satisfy. The variation is higher for the icosahedron than the dodecahedron, lead￾ing us to conclude that these variations are a finite size effect that would ge… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of scaling dimensions and spin inferred [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Classical simulation of the quantum simulator proto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose that scaling dimensions of d=3 conformal field theories can be studied on a system of qubits with near term quantum simulation platforms. Our proposal chooses couplings of quantum many-body problems on a polyhedral lattice at which the conformal state-operator correspondence can be observed most accurately in the spectrum. We validate our protocol on the Ising model where we extract the scaling dimensions of a number of scaling operators with a few percent accuracy from the spectrum of a system of just 20 qubits. The procedure makes only minor assumptions beyond general conformal invariance -- it may hence be applied widely. Requirements and challenges to realize this proposal on quantum computers are discussed. Our results demonstrate that for current or near term qubit platforms, three dimensional conformal field theories present a unique opportunity -- a forefront problem that is difficult on classical computers but may be solved through quantum simulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that scaling dimensions of d=3 CFTs can be extracted from the low-lying spectrum of qubit Hamiltonians on polyhedral lattices by tuning couplings to optimize the conformal state-operator correspondence. It validates the protocol on the 3D Ising CFT, reporting few-percent accuracy in extracted dimensions from a 20-qubit system, and claims the method relies only on minor assumptions beyond general conformal invariance, making it suitable for near-term quantum simulators.

Significance. If the coupling-selection procedure can be made non-circular and the error analysis strengthened, the approach could enable quantum simulation of 3D CFT data that remains challenging for classical methods such as conformal bootstrap or Monte Carlo. The Ising validation with small qubit counts demonstrates a concrete advantage for current hardware, and the emphasis on polyhedral lattices provides a clear discretization route.

major comments (2)
  1. [Protocol section] Protocol section (likely §3): the claim that couplings are chosen 'at which the conformal state-operator correspondence can be observed most accurately' lacks an explicit, non-circular algorithm. The Ising validation uses the known critical point; without a concrete optimization criterion or search method that does not presuppose the target spectrum, the procedure cannot be applied to unknown CFTs as asserted.
  2. [Ising validation] Ising validation (likely §4): the reported few-percent accuracy in scaling dimensions is presented without a full error budget, including finite-size corrections, lattice discretization artifacts, and the precise matching procedure between eigenstates and operators. This undermines quantitative assessment of the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the description of spectrum extraction and coupling choice remains high-level; a sentence clarifying the non-circular selection criterion would improve readability.
  2. [Methods] Notation: the definition of the polyhedral lattice Hamiltonian and the precise form of the state-operator map should be stated explicitly with an equation number for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback. We appreciate the recognition of the potential of our approach for quantum simulation of 3D CFTs. Below, we address the major comments point by point and outline the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Protocol section] Protocol section (likely §3): the claim that couplings are chosen 'at which the conformal state-operator correspondence can be observed most accurately' lacks an explicit, non-circular algorithm. The Ising validation uses the known critical point; without a concrete optimization criterion or search method that does not presuppose the target spectrum, the procedure cannot be applied to unknown CFTs as asserted.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, non-circular algorithm for selecting the couplings is essential for the protocol to be applicable to unknown CFTs. In the current manuscript, the Ising validation indeed uses the known critical couplings of the model. To address this, we will revise §3 to include a concrete optimization procedure: we propose scanning the coupling space and selecting the point that maximizes the 'conformality' measure, defined as the alignment of the spectrum with expected CFT features such as the appearance of degenerate multiplets corresponding to spin and parity quantum numbers, and the approximate satisfaction of the state-operator correspondence without assuming the numerical values of the dimensions. This criterion does not presuppose the target spectrum values but relies on the structural properties of conformal invariance. We believe this makes the method non-circular and suitable for broader application. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Ising validation] Ising validation (likely §4): the reported few-percent accuracy in scaling dimensions is presented without a full error budget, including finite-size corrections, lattice discretization artifacts, and the precise matching procedure between eigenstates and operators. This undermines quantitative assessment of the central claim.

    Authors: We concur that a full error budget is necessary to substantiate the few-percent accuracy claim. In the revised version, we will expand §4 to provide a detailed breakdown of errors, including estimates of finite-size corrections based on the polyhedral lattice size, discretization artifacts arising from the qubit encoding of the continuum fields, and a step-by-step description of the eigenstate-to-operator matching procedure using conserved quantum numbers and degeneracy patterns. This will enable a more rigorous quantitative evaluation of the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal grounded in general conformal invariance with independent Ising validation

full rationale

The paper proposes selecting couplings on polyhedral lattices to observe the conformal state-operator correspondence most accurately in the qubit spectrum, then validates by extracting known Ising CFT scaling dimensions to a few percent accuracy from a 20-qubit system. This relies on general conformal invariance with only minor additional assumptions and does not reduce the extracted dimensions to fitted parameters or self-definitions by construction. No load-bearing steps collapse to self-citations, ansatze smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results; the central claim remains independent of the validation data and is presented as applicable to unknown d=3 CFTs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that suitably chosen finite-size qubit Hamiltonians on polyhedral lattices will exhibit an accurate conformal state-operator correspondence in their low-lying spectrum; this choice of couplings is the main free parameter introduced by the work.

free parameters (1)
  • polyhedral-lattice couplings
    Specific interaction strengths chosen so that the finite-system spectrum most accurately reflects the infinite-volume CFT scaling dimensions.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption conformal invariance of the target d=3 theory
    The protocol assumes the underlying theory is conformally invariant and that the state-operator correspondence holds sufficiently well in the chosen finite geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1252 out tokens · 34712 ms · 2026-05-15T15:41:54.400298+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997)

    work page 1997

  3. [3]

    Applied Conformal Field Theory

    P. Ginsparg, Applied conformal field theory (1988), arXiv:hep-th/9108028 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  4. [4]

    K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group and critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.55, 583 (1983)

    work page 1983

  5. [5]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization-group theory, Physics Reports368, 549 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Hasenbusch, Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three-dimensional ising universality class, Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three-dimensional ising universality class, Phys. Rev. B82, 174433 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    A. M. Polyakov, Conformal symmetry of critical fluctu- ations, JETP Lett.12, 381 (1970)

    work page 1970

  8. [8]

    Rychkov,EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D≥33 Dimensions(Springer International Publish- ing, 2017)

    S. Rychkov,EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D≥33 Dimensions(Springer International Publish- ing, 2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    El-Showk, M

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Solving the 3d ising model with the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D86, 025022 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 10.1103/revmod- phys.89.015003 (2017)

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applica- tions, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 10.1103/revmod- phys.91.015002 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmod- 2019

  11. [11]

    Rychkov, Conformal bootstrap: From polyakov to our times, International Journal of Modern Physics A40, 10.1142/s0217751x25300212 (2025)

    S. Rychkov, Conformal bootstrap: From polyakov to our times, International Journal of Modern Physics A40, 10.1142/s0217751x25300212 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x25300212 2025

  12. [12]

    W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann, and Y.- C. He, Uncovering conformal symmetry in the 3d ising transition: State-operator correspondence from a quan- tum fuzzy sphere regularization, Physical Review X13, 10.1103/physrevx.13.021009 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.021009 2023

  13. [13]

    R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, in Feynman and computation(cRc Press, 2018) pp. 133– 153

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Georgescu, S

    I. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simula- tion, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 153–185 (2014). 8

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Altman, K

    E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Dem- ler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriks- son, K.-M. C. Fu, M. Greiner, K. R. Hazzard, R. G. Hulet, A. J. Koll´ ar, B. L. Lev, M. D. Lukin, R. Ma, X. Mi, S. Misra, C. Monroe, K. Murch, Z. Nazario, K.-K. Ni, A. C. Potter, P. Roushan, M. Saffman, M. Schleier- Smith, I. Siddiqi, R. Simmonds,...

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. Brandao, D. A. Buell,et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, nature574, 505 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Y. Kim, A. Eddins, S. Anand, K. X. Wei, E. Van Den Berg, S. Rosenblatt, H. Nayfeh, Y. Wu, M. Zale- tel, K. Temme,et al., Evidence for the utility of quan- tum computing before fault tolerance, Nature618, 500 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579–584 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227–232 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Salath´ e, M

    Y. Salath´ e, M. Mondal, M. Oppliger, J. Heinsoo, P. Kurpiers, A. Potoˇ cnik, A. Mezzacapo, U. Las Heras, L. Lamata, E. Solano, S. Filipp, and A. Wallraff, Digital quantum simulation of spin models with circuit quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. X5, 021027 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Vanderstraeten, J

    B.-X. Lao and S. Rychkov, 3d ising cft and exact di- agonalization on icosahedron: The power of conformal perturbation theory, SciPost Physics15, 10.21468/sci- postphys.15.6.243 (2023)

    work page doi:10.21468/sci- 2023

  23. [23]

    Arguello Cruz, I

    E. Arguello Cruz, I. R. Klebanov, G. Tarnopolsky, and Y. Xin, Yang-lee quantum criticality in various dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. X16, 011022 (2026)

    work page 2026

  24. [24]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling, J. Phys. A17, L385 (1984)

    work page 1984

  25. [25]

    J. L. Cardy, Universal amplitudes in finite-size scaling: generalisation to arbitrary dimensionality, J. Phys. A18, L757 (1985)

    work page 1985

  26. [26]

    J. L. Cardy, Operator content of two-dimensional con- formally invariant theories, Nuclear Physics B270, 186 (1986)

    work page 1986

  27. [27]

    N. V. Cohan, The spherical harmonics with the symme- try of the icosahedral group, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society54, 286 (1958)

    work page 1958

  28. [28]

    Brower, G

    R. Brower, G. Fleming, and H. Neuberger, Lattice radial quantization: 3d ising, Physics Letters B721, 299–305 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Schuler, S

    M. Schuler, S. Whitsitt, L.-P. Henry, S. Sachdev, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Universal signatures of quantum critical points from finite-size torus spectra: A window into the operator content of higher-dimensional conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 210401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    M. Suzuki, Relationship between d-Dimensional Quan- tal Spin Systems and (d+1)-Dimensional Ising Systems: Equivalence, Critical Exponents and Systematic Approx- imants of the Partition Function and Spin Correlations, Prog. Theor. Phys.56, 1454 (1976)

    work page 1976

  31. [31]

    Sachdev,Quantum phase transitions, second ed

    S. Sachdev,Quantum phase transitions, second ed. ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Alcaraz and H

    F. Alcaraz and H. Herrmann, Numerical difficulties in ob- taining 3d critical exponents from platonic solids, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General20, 5735 (1987)

    work page 1987

  33. [33]

    Weigel and W

    M. Weigel and W. Janke, Universal amplitude-exponent relation for the ising model on sphere-like lattices, Euro- physics Letters (EPL)51, 578–583 (2000)

    work page 2000

  34. [34]

    J.-M. Dong, Y. Zhang, K.-W. Huang, H.-H. Tu, and Y.- H. Wu, Numerical extraction of crosscap coefficients in microscopic models for (2 + 1)D conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. D112, L121701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Zhou and Y.-C

    Z. Zhou and Y.-C. He, 3d conformal field theories with Sp(n) global symmetry on a fuzzy sphere, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 026504 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Zhou, Fuzzified : Julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2503.00100 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Z. Zhou, Fuzzified : Julia package for numerics on the fuzzy sphere (2025), arXiv:2503.00100 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical optimization (Springer, 2006)

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    P. R. Cromwell,Polyhedra(Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    work page 1997

  39. [39]

    R. C. Brower and E. K. Owen, The ising model on∼ 2 (2024), arXiv:2407.00459 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Synthetic three-dimensional atomic structures assembled atom by atom, Nature561, 79–82 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Lin, H.-S

    R. Lin, H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, Z.-R. Zhao, L.-T. Zheng, T.-R. Hu, H.-M. Wu, Z. Wu, W.-J. Ma, Y. Gao, Y.-K. Zhu, Z.-F. Su, W.-L. Ouyang, Y.-C. Zhang, J. Rui, M.- C. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Ai-enabled parallel assembly of thousands of defect-free neutral atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 060602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    A. Byun, M. Kim, and J. Ahn, Finding the maximum independent sets of platonic graphs using rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum3, 030305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Gr¨ unbaum, V

    B. Gr¨ unbaum, V. Klee, M. A. Perles, and G. C. Shep- hard,Convex polytopes, Vol. 16 (Springer, 1967)

    work page 1967

  44. [44]

    Periwal, E

    A. Periwal, E. S. Cooper, P. Kunkel, J. F. Wienand, E. J. Davis, and M. Schleier-Smith, Programmable in- teractions and emergent geometry in an array of atom clouds, Nature600, 630–635 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Valentini, M

    M. Valentini, M. W. van Mourik, F. Butt, J. Wahl, M. Di- etl, M. Pfeifer, F. Anmasser, Y. Colombe, C. R¨ ossler, P. C. Holz, R. Blatt, A. Bermudez, M. M¨ uller, T. Monz, and P. Schindler, Demonstration of two-dimensional con- nectivity for a scalable error-corrected ion-trap quantum processor architecture, Phys. Rev. X15, 041023 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Science Advances 6(25), 4935 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1126/sciadv.aba4935

    K. Xu, Z.-H. Sun, W. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, H. Li, H. Dong, W. Ren, P. Zhang, F. Nori, D. Zheng, H. Fan, and H. Wang, Probing dynamical phase transitions with a superconducting quantum sim- ulator, Science Advances6, eaba4935 (2020), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aba4935

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba4935 2020

  47. [47]

    M. Will, T. A. Cochran, E. Rosenberg, B. Jobst, N. M. Eassa, P. Roushan, M. Knap, A. Gammon-Smith, and F. Pollmann, Probing non-equilibrium topological order 9 on a quantum processor, Nature645, 348–353 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    T. I. Andersen, N. Astrakhantsev, A. H. Karamlou, J. Berndtsson, J. Motruk, A. Szasz, J. A. Gross, A. Schuckert, T. Westerhout, Y. Zhang, E. Forati, D. Rossi, B. Kobrin, A. D. Paolo, A. R. Klots, I. Droz- dov, V. D. Kurilovich, A. Petukhov, L. B. Ioffe, A. Elben, A. Rath, V. Vitale, B. Vermersch, R. Acharya, L. A. Beni, K. Anderson, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, ...

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    S. J. Evered, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, T. Manovitz, D. Bluvstein, S. H. Li, N. Maskara, H. Zhou, S. Ebadi, M. Xu, J. Campo, M. Cain, S. Ostermann, S. F. Yelin, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing the kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature645, 341–347 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    L. M. K. Vandersypen and I. L. Chuang, Nmr techniques for quantum control and computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1037 (2005)

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    Tilly, H

    J. Tilly, H. Chen, S. Cao, D. Picozzi, K. Setia, Y. Li, E. Grant, L. Wossnig, I. Rungger, G. H. Booth, and J. Tennyson, The variational quantum eigensolver: A re- view of methods and best practices, Physics Reports986, 1–128 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    M. L. Baez, M. Goihl, J. Haferkamp, J. Bermejo-Vega, M. Gluza, and J. Eisert, Dynamical structure factors of dynamical quantum simulators, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences117, 26123–26134 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Senko, J

    C. Senko, J. Smith, P. Richerme, A. Lee, W. C. Camp- bell, and C. Monroe, Coherent imaging spectroscopy of a quantum many-body spin system, Science345, 430–433 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Roushan, C

    P. Roushan, C. Neill, J. Tangpanitanon, V. M. Bastidas, A. Megrant, R. Barends, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, M. Giustina, E. Jef- frey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Quin- tana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, H. Neven, D. G. Angelakis, and J. Martinis, Spectro- scopic signatures of localizat...

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Martin, M

    R. Martin, M. Qiao, I. Morera, L. Homeier, B. G´ ely, L. Klein, Y. T. Chew, D. Barredo, T. Lahaye, E. Dem- ler, and A. Browaeys, Measuring spectral functions of doped magnets with rydberg tweezer arrays (2026), arXiv:2602.17600 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    X. Sun, Y. Le, S. Naus, R. B.-S. Tsai, L. R. B. Picard, S. Murciano, M. Knap, J. Alicea, and M. Endres, Ex- perimental observation of conformal field theory spectra (2026), arXiv:2601.16275 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Chandrasekharan and U.-J

    S. Chandrasekharan and U.-J. Wiese, Quantum link models: A discrete approach to gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B492, 455–471 (1997)

    work page 1997

  58. [58]

    Defect production in nonlinear quench across a quantum critical point,

    A. L¨ auchli, L. Herviou, P. Wilhelm, and S. Rychkov, Exact diagonalization, matrix product states and con- formal perturbation theory study of a 3d ising fuzzy sphere model, SciPost Physics19, 10.21468/scipost- phys.19.3.076 (2025)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipost- 2025

  59. [59]

    Tinkham,Group theory and quantum mechanics (Courier Corporation, 2003)

    M. Tinkham,Group theory and quantum mechanics (Courier Corporation, 2003)

    work page 2003

  60. [60]

    S. G. Tabrizi, Symmetry-induced universal momentum- transfer dependencies for inelastic neutron scattering on anisotropic spin clusters, Phys. Rev. B104, 014416 (2021)

    work page 2021