pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20431 · v1 · pith:EQ7N7QMSnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.RO

Multi-Week, In-Class Deployments of Telepresence Robots With Four Homebound K-12 Students: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations

Matthew Rueben , Rhianna Lee , Thomas R. Groechel , Hengzhi Chen , Haemi Lee , Gisele Ragusa , Maja J. Matari\'c This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 07:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.RO
keywords telepresence robotshomebound studentsK-12 classroomremote presencemobile robotsembodimentcase studiesclassroom deployment
0
0 comments X

The pith

Telepresence robots let homebound K-12 students join classes with mobility and embodiment that video calls lack.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies four multi-week deployments of telepresence robots allowing homebound K-12 students to attend regular classrooms. These systems gave remote students the ability to move around and feel physically present, delivering some benefits to every participant while each student also gained distinct advantages tied to their situation. Challenges in hearing, seeing, and guiding the robot through the room led to calls for hardware fixes and classroom rules that keep the remote student included, accountable to the teacher, and respected by peers. The authors draw from 15 interviews treated as case studies to outline practical steps for setting up similar robot use in other K-12 settings. This approach addresses the known risks to cognitive and social growth when students miss large amounts of in-person school time.

Core claim

Mobile remote presence systems, or telepresence robots, provide embodiment and mobility in addition to real-time participation for homebound K-12 students. While all participants enjoyed some benefits, each also experienced unique ones. Challenges with hearing, seeing, and moving the robot around the classroom warrant improvements to the design of the telepresence system and specific priorities for managing a classroom deployment, such as ensuring that the remote student is included in classroom activities, accountable to the teacher, and treated with respect by classmates.

What carries the argument

Telepresence robots deployed for multi-week classroom use that add physical mobility and embodiment to remote attendance.

If this is right

  • Remote students gain the ability to move independently around the classroom and join activities that fixed video cannot support.
  • Classroom management must prioritize inclusion so the remote student is called on, grouped with peers, and held to the same expectations as others.
  • Audio and video quality plus navigation controls require targeted design changes to reduce the reported hearing, seeing, and movement problems.
  • Deployment procedures should include pre-class setup checks and teacher training to handle technical issues without disrupting the lesson.
  • Respect from classmates must be actively supported to prevent the remote student from feeling excluded or treated differently.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mobility features could be tested for homebound students in high school labs or group projects where physical presence matters more than lectures.
  • Longer studies tracking academic grades and peer relationships over a full semester would show whether the short-term benefits persist.
  • Combining the robot with simple add-on tools like better microphones or tablet sharing might address some sensory challenges without full hardware redesign.
  • School districts could explore shared robot fleets to lower costs for multiple homebound students across different grades.

Load-bearing premise

The four diverse case studies from 15 interviews give enough evidence to create workable recommendations for other similar K-12 robot deployments.

What would settle it

A follow-up deployment in a comparable K-12 setting where the remote student shows no measurable gains in social interaction or learning access compared to video-only methods would undermine the claimed benefits and recommendations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20431 by Gisele Ragusa, Haemi Lee, Hengzhi Chen, Maja J. Matari\'c, Matthew Rueben, Rhianna Lee, Thomas R. Groechel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Ohmni robot uses a 10.1-inch touchscreen to display a video of a remote [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Missing significant amounts of school during K-12 education is known to put students' cognitive and social development at risk. Alternatives such as home instruction and online learning are common, but lack sufficient interaction with peers and teachers in the classroom. Mobile remote presence systems, or telepresence robots, are promising for homebound students because they provide embodiment and mobility in addition to the real-time participation offered by video conferencing technologies. Research is needed, however, for telepresence robots to meet the complex needs of homebound students participating remotely in the K-12 classroom context. We present findings from four multi-week deployments with homebound K-12 students attending classes via telepresence robots. The homebound students' experiences were documented in a total of 15 interviews and analyzed qualitatively as case studies. The homebound student participants and their deployment contexts differed from one another along multiple dimensions, and while some benefits of mobile remote attendance were enjoyed by all participants, each participant also experienced unique benefits. Some challenges with hearing, seeing, and moving the robot around the classroom warranted improvements to the design of the telepresence system. Other challenges suggested priorities for managing a classroom deployment, such as ensuring that the remote student is included in classroom activities, accountable to the teacher, and treated with respect by classmates. Based on insights from the study, we make recommendations for real-world deployment procedures in similar contexts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports findings from four multi-week in-class deployments of telepresence robots with homebound K-12 students. Qualitative analysis of 15 interviews presented as case studies identifies benefits (embodiment, mobility, and real-time participation) enjoyed by all participants along with unique per-student benefits, challenges in hearing/seeing/moving the robot, and recommendations for design improvements plus classroom management priorities (inclusion, accountability, respect) to support real-world deployment procedures in similar contexts.

Significance. If the results hold, the work contributes practical, context-rich insights into telepresence robot use for maintaining educational and social access for homebound students, an area with clear societal need. The multi-week duration and in-class focus distinguish it from shorter lab or video-only studies and could guide both system design and deployment protocols.

major comments (2)
  1. [Recommendations / Discussion] The section deriving recommendations for real-world deployment procedures bases actionable priorities (inclusion, accountability, respect) on challenges observed across the four cases; however, with high inter-school and inter-student variability noted in the abstract, the manuscript does not provide saturation checks, cross-case validation, or explicit limits on transferability, making robustness of these recommendations load-bearing for the central practical claim.
  2. [Methods] The qualitative analysis supporting benefits, unique experiences, and challenges rests on 15 interviews from four deployments, yet the methods description (interview protocol, coding process, theme derivation) is not detailed enough to evaluate how the case-study findings were rigorously obtained or to rule out researcher bias in theme extraction.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the total of 15 interviews but could briefly note the qualitative case-study approach and diversity of the four contexts to better set reader expectations.
  2. [Results / Case Descriptions] Ensure any tables or appendices listing the four students include concise context dimensions (grade level, duration, classroom setup) so readers can directly assess the claimed diversity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight important considerations for qualitative case study research. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate to improve transparency and robustness without misrepresenting the study's scope.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Recommendations / Discussion] The section deriving recommendations for real-world deployment procedures bases actionable priorities (inclusion, accountability, respect) on challenges observed across the four cases; however, with high inter-school and inter-student variability noted in the abstract, the manuscript does not provide saturation checks, cross-case validation, or explicit limits on transferability, making robustness of these recommendations load-bearing for the central practical claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit discussion of transferability is essential given the noted variability across the four cases. Our analysis did include cross-case comparison to distinguish shared benefits and challenges from unique experiences, but we did not frame the work as seeking theoretical saturation, which is more typical of grounded theory approaches than multiple case studies. In revision, we will add a new subsection in the Discussion explicitly describing our cross-case validation process, acknowledging the small sample and inter-case differences as limits on generalizability, and framing the recommendations as context-sensitive insights to guide similar deployments rather than universal prescriptions. This addresses the load-bearing nature of the practical claims. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] The qualitative analysis supporting benefits, unique experiences, and challenges rests on 15 interviews from four deployments, yet the methods description (interview protocol, coding process, theme derivation) is not detailed enough to evaluate how the case-study findings were rigorously obtained or to rule out researcher bias in theme extraction.

    Authors: We concur that greater methodological transparency is needed for readers to assess rigor and potential bias. The original submission summarized the process at a high level, but we will expand the Methods section in revision to detail the semi-structured interview protocol (including example questions), the inductive and deductive coding procedures, the iterative theme derivation through team consensus meetings, and steps taken to mitigate researcher bias such as reflexive discussion and cross-verification of themes against raw transcripts. This will allow evaluation of the case-study findings without altering the underlying data or analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in empirical qualitative analysis

full rationale

The paper derives its claims about benefits, challenges, and deployment recommendations directly from qualitative analysis of 15 new interviews across four distinct multi-week case studies with homebound K-12 students. No mathematical derivations, parameter fittings, self-definitional constructs, or load-bearing self-citations reduce the central findings to prior inputs by construction. The chain is self-contained empirical observation leading to context-specific insights, with the small-N limitation representing an evidence-strength concern rather than circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a qualitative empirical study; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5814 in / 1133 out tokens · 40609 ms · 2026-05-21T07:06:35.516358+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Department of Health and Human Services

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The 2019 N ational S urvey of C hildren’s H ealth

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    , author=

    Absence from school related to cancer and other chronic conditions. , author=. Archives of disease in childhood , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    , author=

    Asthma, wheezing, and school absence in primary schools. , author=. Archives of disease in childhood , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine , volume=

    Illness among schoolchildren during influenza season: effect on school absenteeism, parental absenteeism from work, and secondary illness in families , author=. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , volume=

    School refusal and psychiatric disorders: A community study , author=. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry , volume=

    Characteristics of adolescents with school refusal , author=. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    2000 , publisher=

    How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition , author=. 2000 , publisher=

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    2003 , publisher=

    Learning and instruction , author=. 2003 , publisher=

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    A review of mobile robotic telepresence , journal =

    Kristoffersson, Annica and Coradeschi, Silvia and Loutfi, Amy , year =. A review of mobile robotic telepresence , journal =

    work page

  10. [10]

    Fels and Judith K

    Deborah I. Fels and Judith K. Waalen and Shumin Zhai and Patrice L. Weiss , editor =. Telepresence under. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT) , pages =. 2001 , timestamp =

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    2001 , publisher =

    Personal and Ubiquitous Computing , author =. 2001 , publisher =

    work page 2001

  12. [12]

    Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning and 51st International Conference on Engineering Pedagogy (ICL 2022) , year=

    Limits and benefits of using telepresence robots for educational purposes , author=. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning and 51st International Conference on Engineering Pedagogy (ICL 2022) , year=

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    International Journal of Social Robotics , volume=

    Telepresence robot use for children with chronic illness in Australian schools: a scoping review and thematic analysis , author=. International Journal of Social Robotics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics , volume=

    Design challenges and guidelines for social interaction using mobile telepresence robots , author=. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    The International Journal of Technologies in Learning , author =

    Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom:. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning , author =. 2016 , pages =

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Proceedings of the

    My student is a robot: How schools manage telepresence experiences for students , author=. Proceedings of the

    work page

  17. [17]

    Long-term, in-the-wild study of feedback about speech intelligibility for

    Rueben, Matthew and Syed, Mohammad and London, Emily and Camarena, Mark and Shin, Eunsook and Zhang, Yulun and Wang, Timothy S and Groechel, Thomas R and Lee, Rhianna and Matari. Long-term, in-the-wild study of feedback about speech intelligibility for. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interaction , pages=

    work page

  18. [18]

    , year =

    Cha, Elizabeth and Chen, Samantha and Matarić, Maja J. , year =. Designing telepresence robots for. 26th

    work page

  19. [19]

    International Journal of Designs for Learning , author =

    From. International Journal of Designs for Learning , author =. 2016 , publisher =

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    American Journal of Education , volume=

    The detrimental effects of missing school: Evidence from urban siblings , author=. American Journal of Education , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts

    Bridgeland, John M and DiIulio Jr, John J and Morison, Karen Burke. The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts

    work page

  22. [22]

    Science and children , volume=

    Cooperative learning in the science classroom , author=. Science and children , volume=

    work page

  23. [23]

    Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis , author=

    work page

  24. [24]

    Half of world’s student population not attending school: UNESCO launches global coalition to accelerate deployment of remote learning solutions

    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Half of world’s student population not attending school: UNESCO launches global coalition to accelerate deployment of remote learning solutions

    work page

  25. [25]

    Handbook of Educational Psychology , edition =

    Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy , author=. Handbook of Educational Psychology , edition =. 2005 , address =

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , author =

    Are we there yet?. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , author =. 2020 , publisher =

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Lee, Min Kyung and Takayama, Leila , year =. `. Proceedings of the

    work page

  28. [28]

    Enabling access to

    Cha, Elizabeth and Sajid, Qandeel and Mataric, Maja , booktitle=. Enabling access to

    work page

  29. [29]

    and Kontak, Daniel , year =

    Tsui, Kate and Norton, Adam and Brooks, David and Yanco, H. and Kontak, Daniel , year =. Designing telepresence robot systems for use by people with special needs , booktitle =

    work page

  30. [30]

    Information & management , volume=

    Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study , author=. Information & management , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting , volume=

    Interface development for a child's video conferencing robot , author=. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting , volume=. 2000 , organization=

    work page 2000

  32. [32]

    Perspectives in health information management , volume=

    Mobile robotic telepresence solutions for the education of hospitalized children , author=. Perspectives in health information management , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Nursing open , volume=

    Back to school with telepresence robot technology: A qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment , author=. Nursing open , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Frontiers in psychology , volume=

    Keeping connected with school: Implementing telepresence robots to improve the wellbeing of adolescent cancer patients , author=. Frontiers in psychology , volume=. 2021 , pages=

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Oxford Review of Education , volume=

    Student at a distance: exploring the potential and prerequisites of using telepresence robots in schools , author=. Oxford Review of Education , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    , year =

    Cha, Elizabeth and Greczek, Jillian and Song, Ao and Matarić, Maja J. , year =. My classroom robot:. 26th

    work page

  37. [37]

    ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) , volume =

    Going to school on a robot: Robot and user interface design features that matter , author =. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) , volume =. 2019 , publisher =

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    and Chowdhury, Yasmin and Cha, Elizabeth and Takayama, Leila and Matarić, Maja J

    Fitter, Naomi T. and Chowdhury, Yasmin and Cha, Elizabeth and Takayama, Leila and Matarić, Maja J. , year =. Evaluating the effects of personalized appearance on telepresence robots for education , booktitle =

    work page

  39. [39]

    Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction , pages=

    Closeness is key over long distances: Effects of interpersonal closeness on telepresence experience , author=. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction , pages=

    work page

  40. [40]

    Journal of the Korea Convergence Society , volume=

    Qualitative exploration on children's interactions in telepresence robot assisted language learning , author=. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Online Learning Journal , author =

    Hybrid education:. Online Learning Journal , author =. 2017 , pages =

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Computers in Human Behavior , volume=

    Robomorphism: Examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation , author=. Computers in Human Behavior , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Classroom Discourse , volume=

    Mediated learning materials: visibility checks in telepresence robot mediated classroom interaction , author=. Classroom Discourse , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    The use of

    Han, Jeonghye and Conti, Daniela , journal=. The use of. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    International Journal of Inclusive Education , volume =

    Jennifer Charteris and Jeanette Berman and Angela Page , title =. International Journal of Inclusive Education , volume =. 2024 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/13603116.2022.2112769 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1080/13603116.2022.2112769 2024

  46. [46]

    International Journal of School & Educational Psychology , volume=

    Increasing student compliance with teacher instructions using telepresence robot problem-solving teleconsultation , author=. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Byiers and Joe Reichle and Frank J

    Breanne J. Byiers and Joe Reichle and Frank J. Symons , title =. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Effects of the

    Huck, Carla and Zhang, Jingshun , journal=. Effects of the. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021