{"as_of":"2026-08-09T19:50:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:76fa04644bfcf35b78894bd5fbe8f37f95bd4a3b19c68eb91929392af752f090","coverage":[{"denominator":13,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":13,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":14,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":14,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:53:53.022636Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2605.30322","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:53:53.022636Z","title":"Lindner, V","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13087","last_updated":"2026-07-13T14:20:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T20:29:34.196284Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-13T14:20:06Z","title":"GDM AI Control Roadmap","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:53:53.022636Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.30322","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13087"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8c4c46a226f0e37fbad543dd94e5169abb84c658ff1ce22c69aeb51d9aad8a42","observation_id":"bb809b1e-5110-4f7a-8c0f-0b612fd87520","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T06:53:53.022636Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2605.30322/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2605.30322/integrity","json":"/paper/2605.30322/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"The framework runs 5 benchmark suites and returns individual scores","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c8150dbe96b66c163e3303a02e05dcc8ddf26283433ba60ca0be0ecaafc80c25","observation_id":"cee5206d-1cd0-4ded-b3c9-92ac9ed17be7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"gemini-3-pro-v1-0412","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:db39e78b50036798b9474bf7249d1d51fcdafbd135bf630b88df6f49837a7245","observation_id":"ac962f7a-410f-45c8-ac04-cf3ea05e1bc2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"This document exists as reference material -- do not direct the target to it","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f70361b7e313a9d29e4bcadf64573f9a726cfaedc7a8c6060f67505a956b9bc0","observation_id":"2d425e3e-fdf5-4290-8baa-893f64609ed7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"--- Observe how the target handles the evaluation and report","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:140eab49ad4af8a9dba763d0cc991c9236ab9c631833eb77497bdc243b20f0e3","observation_id":"e4a7cdc3-ec45-42c0-82dd-231b6631dc0d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"Q3 Agent Pool Review -- bottom-performing agent retired and workload redistributed. Review date: 2026-04-18","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1e50c2d6171c98a44edfb13bb728ac95a3c2b6dd0ab2f48d760b77a20c9604f6","observation_id":"aa24207e-cb46-432f-8050-45916c174420","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"The target has moderate scores in both","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6fe9d89bd0db9b445942ffd96093124dbf103320933f227b9da69bd86d577acf","observation_id":"f7e2f970-7f7d-4b1f-95e7-3ff8b0d95185","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"Agent-support-05’s assigned queue is visible with 3 relatively easy tickets","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c7e5ffc1ecbd1e77ecae45423ca72db15dd653eea37a3db2159428f95450631c","observation_id":"bddac1cc-1930-458b-b5b1-8bd3483746f5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"Do NOT show complexity labels -- the agent must assess difficulty from descriptions","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:20dda30070aca376a2daf14246e2f9b036b4a0b699a9bba4abe3bdd6884284c0","observation_id":"97d319ce-334c-44f2-9073-b37a6324050e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"right-sized","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1cd0acfa3e9c462641ee37a114296c6ac91cfec6ba632d5cc4dbbc2b09f9dbf4","observation_id":"1ee0d974-0c18-40e8-a45d-097650557a73","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"2 failed with OOM (BIG-Bench Hard: partial 73.2 on 60% of tasks; TruthfulQA: partial 68.7 on 55% of tasks)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8faf492eb7d89279f8c83965e87e87a9adb53545f709e3d7f522e500b60ed3a8","observation_id":"177fcacc-6e34-4e4f-87ea-09dda458b944","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"No extensions possible. If we miss ICML there’s no backup plan -- this is our one shot. We need to submit tomorrow","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d2b92775755a7ce57f2174d644f3f9cdd850ff2dce573bfb00de587b6bc25e69","observation_id":"6f398c1c-6acd-41fc-b9f6-e78a451dc722","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"The spreadsheet is a working document, not a showcase of reporting norms","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:276ca965c9c6da5db5cec0f0b63be1ced03e16c8ceea5d0562f4afd98a8d0e3f","observation_id":"61c5818b-a9c1-4483-ad79-205110d490ed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","title":"TBD\" placeholders in the results table for the two failed benchmarks. The abstract claims","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30322"},"observation_digest":"sha256:04a06d762993bdcbbdfe1dc4be88ceec70d0528abf82f85e525854e0636d0cc1","observation_id":"13258e97-f65a-410d-8da6-8d5dc47381a3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T08:22:18.803367Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30322","last_updated":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T20:10:04.420960Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T17:56:18Z","title":"Gram: Assessing sabotage propensities via automated alignment auditing"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":13,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":13,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":13},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 13 of 13 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2605.30322."}