{"as_of":"2026-08-22T03:58:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:2622f55c63a26f0ffe521220ad56ce07f8294af09d14dfc3efaac4367c640093","coverage":[{"denominator":7,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":7,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":9,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":9,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T10:48:03.679246Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":1,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[{"count":0,"observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","source":"pith"}],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2605.30568","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-03T10:48:03.617339Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.29252","last_updated":"2026-07-31T10:21:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T14:43:37.559363Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-31T10:21:56Z","title":"CalibratedRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubric Banks for Open-Ended LLM Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T10:48:03.617339Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.30568","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.29252"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff02fc59f90bfc10ed62fb6831278421fc8dbd83f116c3cbdc61c82029cfbde1","observation_id":"469f513a-bdb0-44da-be48-9582f28cb620","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T10:48:03.617339Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.30568","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2605.30568","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:49:54.815029Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"1ca11cf3-c5b2-4671-85d5-270c7de64385","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.29252","last_updated":"2026-07-31T10:21:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T14:43:37.559363Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-31T10:21:56Z","title":"CalibratedRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubric Banks for Open-Ended LLM Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-03T10:48:03.679246Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.30568","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.29252"},"observation_digest":"sha256:023de014d0416e79ae161e8623fcb2d6f6993e25877bf61f581f36528767fd43","observation_id":"9789c53b-4201-4ec3-8781-69c1b4eda3a9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-03T10:48:30.420992Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2605.30568/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2605.30568/integrity","json":"/paper/2605.30568/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2605.30568"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2601.08430","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-03T10:07:56.260300Z","title":"Rubrichub: A comprehensive and highly discriminative rubric dataset via automated coarse-to-fine generation","venue":null,"work_id":"40a19e50-6fa8-4437-8d3d-bfd461b26a1e","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30568"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bc25c6a7313ed26e511dd3c05fa50ebf91da151bfff266e0056a688560bec7ff","observation_id":"c276beaf-5d51-49d5-bba3-67b1e7119a16","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:23:12.615670Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.15651","last_updated":"2025-06-18T17:29:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:52:21.675888Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-18T17:29:19Z","title":"AutoRule: Reasoning Chain-of-thought Extracted Rule-based Rewards Improve Preference Learning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2506.15651","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2506.15651","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-04T08:09:40.705912Z","title":"Autorule: Reasoning chain-of-thought extracted rule-based rewards improve preference learning","venue":null,"work_id":"b8f39669-586f-4bf6-b41c-7e80bfca8595","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.15651","citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30568"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4b8b8094d52b2a6a081cd5edc8df06c9abd09b10f8df948f497eaafff579a2a5","observation_id":"e2dc734c-b2b6-479d-9a4c-e9bd28f1bad1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:23:12.618105Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30568"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8382fa5a000c31f2be24c8c9193095102da28b19eafb5de91cfe1f2605976984","observation_id":"cb1643cd-5daf-4b8e-ab1e-1e8890f755a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30568"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f55b0f1ab35dff368f5c5e9a6442a0263ccf0225e6e4ab09769ae4ba79cf851c","observation_id":"d0a2b1cd-9b2f-4849-8f32-7af0ce446749","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30568"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e07107f987cbd2fd4ac045d6dd68968362bd095ab9a891742c049801b129c201","observation_id":"7ce3178f-5e96-4663-ad11-9d9a61eab17e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","title":"winner\":","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30568"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b38e85731b6427d77ac35481a210cf95401b61a146a479399a8c10bb07d6fbc3","observation_id":"f86c5c1e-20c9-48d9-9916-95ea061f2666","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","title":"The response clearly ex- plains","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2048},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2605.30568"},"observation_digest":"sha256:485b5a1d813e2e33d31db94207b325d8bff95a81ee1e339e692bc9fa1eaadc36","observation_id":"4f2de621-cdaf-4489-861b-8b6cea3f6270","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-29T07:21:37.937934Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30568","last_updated":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T02:12:14.030428Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T20:59:45Z","title":"Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judge"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":7,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":2,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":5,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":7},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-21T06:32:16.066871+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 7 of 7 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2605.30568."}