{"as_of":"2026-08-14T15:10:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:329658ef26ae3203f1036443bb94994fafa4e27f010bf54afca95063ccb0bc20","coverage":[{"denominator":27,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":27,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.294547Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":27,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":27,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2608.00566/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2608.00566/integrity","json":"/paper/2608.00566/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.993220Z","title":"ACM Computing Surveys , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"bafc1962-371e-4f6e-9c6c-2ab17b233f7e","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:47.864572Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5db85b11924bf1380e15a5a282d5a2f9c3606aa5537d14db5a42bc363b9a0277","observation_id":"82e79446-add6-4a3a-b9c6-62a07bdf8115","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:54.115740Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.847626Z","title":"IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"667d0d2c-575d-42c0-a57a-622c8e721988","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:47.931249Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7e197fd5eae42b1f190601d4e78dcefc6317410bdeaa4496ce250eefc1594ba7","observation_id":"5fedec81-4b1c-4453-a5e8-cea86b855be2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.917213Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.654228Z","title":"2024 IEEE 21st Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":"356f2a40-8bde-4652-b6ad-347e548fbfd9","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.038481Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4a40a2cf6fc3a528dc9cdfd65ad649de8bc9ab237010abdfa62722a5c9ebc334","observation_id":"96eac8b0-a341-400b-88d8-c8f953bcb401","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.722085Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2408.06509","last_updated":"2024-08-12T21:57:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T23:04:39.523294Z","submitted_at":"2024-08-12T21:57:18Z","title":"Fooling SHAP with Output Shuffling Attacks","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2408.06509","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.122138Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06509 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.122138Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2408.06509","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e5fcba5cc83725264fdef692cb351a9d15cac68ae40661f00fd17d82fc0cda36","observation_id":"085f5ca4-7c6e-4ed7-875b-57f4d5dfd99d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.122138Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2510.03623","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.590332Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.03623 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":"87a41bb7-6ab3-4b89-a459-a5add8390acb","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.190716Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:143aec0b6bedfeec2c9895cd23ccc8516d16749db3c2bd8b0d5f1104ce2fa5e9","observation_id":"5fc10bb3-ed0c-4f98-9734-9282b71a3dbb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.687846Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1712.05526","last_updated":"2017-12-15T04:26:26Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T06:14:30.795326Z","submitted_at":"2017-12-15T04:26:26Z","title":"Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1712.05526","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.273120Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05526 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.273120Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1712.05526","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f05cc498525b70ed5583a89b57f4fe22b7c46858691d06b4577be35218efa716","observation_id":"ad328853-1003-449c-b97a-7d5c609056a1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.273120Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.492880Z","title":"International workshop on extending explainable AI beyond deep models and classifiers , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":"65d0f709-b75d-4681-8dcc-cb513b7314d3","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.333065Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c62201af969dcb2ad14dcc0449bf710ec03ad8370f9c493f60003003220af1b8","observation_id":"c86f4c37-adf1-472d-bb28-31d819d1abb3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.570714Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.332956Z","title":"CCF international conference on natural language processing and Chinese computing , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":"18484ef5-f2a2-455d-a708-d821a9423be0","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.467173Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:88551ee118de97f8191e11f58b123e4ed1b37941cebede94509eee36ee3cc398","observation_id":"a6eab697-cc0b-45e7-b179-6f6d7f1c18cd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.408904Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.152812Z","title":"ACM computing surveys , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"6d025586-d146-4ba1-8c87-48353069a680","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.679732Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:41d8073cfa669030c5c0ce532642bdf6a948522a1f3e26b9f6360b03a27d24bd","observation_id":"a223e966-eac3-412a-8d5d-3881069f4960","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.250863Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.953345Z","title":"Black Box","venue":null,"work_id":"5c4ac067-8c1a-4217-bb58-06bda8f44b68","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.700276Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5ba49c93f75f5fe80f3125fb1bcda7fbe6831b786f1a2372ec543e6ff38f561","observation_id":"0993459e-1629-49e6-9e68-128f9d684be0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:53.034544Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.796855Z","title":", author=","venue":null,"work_id":"6bc8c644-7964-4f84-8e7a-aa4113e27c0d","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.709696Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff21fd418b0255f1b0bd657d874df4b0c65b16ca932fd6b9b02f8e07cbe7d178","observation_id":"abce3493-a0ae-47a7-95bf-b73e965ffa72","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.874922Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.614536Z","title":"ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"4b1ddb4b-6110-401b-8403-023737b835e6","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.776743Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:88dd3b0f1ab724f67a942aedd8ca812f209d9c947d16035ae38e819f322cdb27","observation_id":"ed88bdce-7af7-4adf-8ee2-44e3ff509928","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.717382Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.449051Z","title":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"2af701eb-51cb-4a00-81bf-80abbe668483","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.851403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d29ec180d13372a588364833f8b17172edcb62c6a10cb955f733f30c4e8c6c1c","observation_id":"16d9ab1e-6d10-403b-9358-7d5af05d9927","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.556722Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.240967Z","title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"e3b64952-89a4-421f-898b-022aba0d7ba4","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.905277Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bb1d77733cb101e26bc45589a9191c48d73e6cb80b4ed56d4ca1b6916dc4fdfc","observation_id":"595e274f-1350-4073-a27c-79147a6a1d97","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.318933Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.053197Z","title":"Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS) , year=","venue":null,"work_id":"0014a5e6-1486-499f-86c6-618522631f1b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:48.972360Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b90935edf63a6df3b549d928cc39280d7c2a434ab05867bf0648a90a0664c9a3","observation_id":"69fb8295-b777-4f21-b5cf-6344fbb25f77","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:52.121751Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.882291Z","title":"International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":"c40b9ba1-33e2-49b8-9965-23deac783d9f","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.010381Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:502773f3649a58e107185b14343cad9cc141ea9d2f9376e7a0e8a95e2ccfa636","observation_id":"d426028a-05a2-472b-a619-066faa9d3bc1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.991330Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.662249Z","title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"6a1460e9-0fda-45d0-b30c-448e48e20507","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.063038Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1fa07ad28aa75ed8e0f942f3e1afb1a0101123f9c2c8beb79159833e86387488","observation_id":"a9a876e6-05fb-4eb7-8052-dcb5b2c549fa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.802219Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1708.06733","last_updated":"2019-03-11T20:45:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T15:43:59.037380Z","submitted_at":"2017-08-22T17:31:54Z","title":"BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chain","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1708.06733","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.158563Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06733 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.158563Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1708.06733","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:17eec263ddb11b816e00ce5592fab8983a08848c592b31a3fd261448dc3fbc0c","observation_id":"7fa489f9-9e16-4f8d-b40d-9882b4b03706","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.158563Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.431847Z","title":"Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR) , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":"944156a0-19a1-4e9d-a050-4312e2ba53eb","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.298366Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2a597921ccd7eac0f4cd3c1bc84cb720d9191b9a8e5e94e57fc09c8ad7897ba2","observation_id":"99bb3e3c-7071-4e9b-aff8-bb5d5da1e200","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.537806Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.427058Z","title":"2009 , institution=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.427058Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d0789e8460d814cb8a0fc54e3ba3b521ae7ffb1f294713267b35da0ff1bf9939","observation_id":"0d083ff8-2cb9-4cc7-a7eb-e90242ae626a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.427058Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.269864Z","title":"Why should I trust you?","venue":null,"work_id":"823149a7-5c82-48d1-8b4b-18d177740a95","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.577440Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5a3a8ae443eb0fd47a390e00a58e6231d4eb0c3c1fdbcfdb9d25825e1abc3eed","observation_id":"b163e776-ebea-4d30-ae71-24a875ffade0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.377426Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.691578Z","title":"2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.691578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0a3db6cc6eb7c78999d96a0fbeec93b6807f17746441969f738b5cdba618564f","observation_id":"899a3f5b-bf6f-4fee-97b4-8c23dc620d97","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.691578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.035816Z","title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":"8c0e631e-00f6-49bd-beb7-bb71bd0030a5","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.816591Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:718f62978d9fdf8fabcb0a2ca75d80c76a80f051926caf35603f9076f58f505a","observation_id":"5df1647f-2f89-4904-a6b8-66df21574ad8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:51.135751Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2009.07896","last_updated":"2020-09-16T18:57:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T09:56:16.122954Z","submitted_at":"2020-09-16T18:57:57Z","title":"Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorch","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2009.07896","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.966363Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.07896 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.966363Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2009.07896","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8fc0801c791cf7d28175e8619fe689fb36e33163645dde899fee1ecac3a78b2d","observation_id":"0d7a3759-df69-4c02-b1cb-eeb58f423233","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:49.966363Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.803876Z","title":"2019 , publisher=","venue":null,"work_id":"72e91c35-0d13-4d6f-a0fb-a3cb985a4321","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.075375Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3eb3574e700212ca4c94aae854f9d97c9299cd5f436e64df916600507c82a5e5","observation_id":"a5dd6a8f-6ac3-4a9e-bce7-bfea60bb81cd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.898321Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1412.6980","last_updated":"2017-01-30T01:27:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2014-12-22T13:54:29Z","title":"Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization","version":9},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1412.6980","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.177748Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.177748Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1412.6980","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c7f570a87be7b537551b63db79cddff481c0e7bc57d743bb153e5f6eddfbb243","observation_id":"06c44dad-bedd-4d72-a710-ed037dbb5bf8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.177748Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.294547Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.294547Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.00566"},"observation_digest":"sha256:61f311e8f9574c376222523f38b3a23e555a066e5713acbfaba7965b38897310","observation_id":"fca6e264-c533-4bf9-a403-863dc1902e15","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-05T00:44:50.294547Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00566","last_updated":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T15:08:19.319111Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-01T10:03:14Z","title":"Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":27,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":8,"verified_exact":1,"verified_fuzzy":18},"total_outbound_references":27},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:32:18.44784+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 27 of 27 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.00566."}