Ask-to-Clarify: Resolving Instruction Ambiguity through Multi-turn Dialogue
read the original abstract
The ultimate goal of embodied agents is to create collaborators that can interact with humans, not mere executors that passively follow instructions. This requires agents to communicate, coordinate, and adapt their actions based on human feedback. Recently, advances in VLAs have offered a path toward this goal. However, most current VLA-based embodied agents operate in a one-way mode: they receive an instruction and execute it without feedback. This approach fails in real-world scenarios where instructions are often ambiguous. In this paper, we address this problem with the Ask-to-Clarify framework. Our framework first resolves ambiguous instructions by asking questions in a multi-turn dialogue. Then it generates low-level actions end-to-end. Specifically, the Ask-to-Clarify framework consists of two components, one VLM for collaboration and one diffusion for action. We also introduce a connection module that generates conditions for the diffusion based on the output of the VLM. This module adjusts the observation by instructions to create reliable conditions. We train our framework with a two-stage knowledge-insulation strategy. First, we fine-tune the collaboration component using ambiguity-solving dialogue data to handle ambiguity. Then, we integrate the action component while freezing the collaboration one. This preserves the interaction abilities while fine-tuning the diffusion to generate actions. The training strategy guarantees our framework can first ask questions, then generate actions. During inference, a signal detector functions as a router that helps our framework switch between asking questions and taking actions. We evaluate the Ask-to-Clarify framework in 8 real-world tasks, where it outperforms existing state-of-the-art VLAs. The results suggest that our proposed framework, along with the training strategy, provides a path toward collaborative embodied agents.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
ProCompNav: Proactive Instance Navigation with Comparative Judgment for Ambiguous User Queries
ProCompNav disambiguates ambiguous instance navigation queries via candidate-pool construction followed by attribute-based comparative binary questions that prune distractors, yielding higher success rates and shorter...
-
ProCompNav: Proactive Instance Navigation with Comparative Judgment for Ambiguous User Queries
ProCompNav improves success rate and shortens user responses in ambiguous instance navigation by using comparative binary questions that prune a candidate pool rather than requesting detailed descriptions.
-
ProCompNav: Proactive Instance Navigation with Comparative Judgment for Ambiguous User Queries
ProCompNav builds a candidate pool from ambiguous queries then uses pool-splitting binary questions for disambiguation, improving success rate and shortening responses on CoIN-Bench and TextNav.
-
Seeing Isn't Believing: Mitigating Belief Inertia via Active Intervention in Embodied Agents
The Estimate-Verify-Update (EVU) mechanism reduces belief inertia in embodied agents and raises task success rates on three benchmarks.
-
A Multimodal Data Collection Framework for Dialogue-Driven Assistive Robotics to Clarify Ambiguities: A Wizard-of-Oz Pilot Study
A two-room Wizard-of-Oz pilot collected 53 multimodal trials from five users to capture dialogue ambiguities for training ambiguity-aware assistive robot controllers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.