pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.25184 · v2 · pith:SK2RJZGVnew · submitted 2026-03-26 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Train at Moving Edge: Online-Verified Prompt Selection for Efficient RL Training of Large Reasoning Model

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords hivepromptlargelearningreasoningselectiontrainingutility
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become essential for post-training large language models (LLMs) in reasoning tasks. While scaling rollouts can stabilize training and enhance performance, the computational overhead is a critical issue. In algorithms like GRPO, multiple rollouts per prompt incur prohibitive costs, as a large portion of prompts provide negligible gradients and are thus of low utility. To address this problem, we investigate how to select high-utility prompts before the rollout phase. Our experimental analysis reveals that sample utility is non-uniform and evolving: the strongest learning signals concentrate at the ``learning edge", the intersection of intermediate difficulty and high uncertainty, which shifts as training proceeds. Motivated by this, we propose HIVE (History-Informed and online-VErified prompt selection), a dual-stage framework for data-efficient RL. HIVE utilizes historical reward trajectories for coarse selection and employs prompt entropy as a real-time proxy to prune instances with stale utility. By evaluating HIVE across multiple math reasoning benchmarks and models, we show that HIVE yields significant rollout efficiency without compromising performance.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AHD Agent: Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Automatic Heuristic Design

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AHD Agent trains a 4B-parameter LLM via agentic RL to actively use tools for automatic heuristic design, matching or exceeding larger baselines across eight domains with fewer evaluations.