{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA","short_pith_number":"pith:2DEOH5TL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d0c8e3f66b03a0ad3fd3961563520a0837f80b08cfc411c987fca37700956718","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.07481","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The end of multiple choice tests: using AI to enhance assessment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Melanie M. Cooper, Michael Klymkowsky","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T17:24:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Effective teaching relies on knowing what students know-or think they know. Revealing student thinking is challenging. Often used because of their ease of grading, even the best multiple choice (MC) tests, those using research based distractors (wrong answers) are intrinsically limited in the insights they provide due to two factors. When distractors do not reflect student beliefs they can be ignored, increasing the likelihood that the correct answer will be chosen by chance. Moreover, making the correct choice does not guarantee that the student understands why it is correct. To address these"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.07481","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T17:24:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"775d5a50fc472763177d0a67311ecc9f0865db13d251ffa1c477f2661d0434af","abstract_canon_sha256":"0ab101ff57c4758a7a307f1569ad766dafd29eeedcddd8acd0c27357cfb06851"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.864198Z","signature_b64":"gufVHSII/wnkf0a4f8zsbAr5QZ2N3redEU+eldCsK7qe5prPJTisX97Z7B7/R95cJWCLTOWuHIDQcGBO1FfoBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d0c8e3f66b03a0ad3fd3961563520a0837f80b08cfc411c987fca37700956718","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863675Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863675Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The end of multiple choice tests: using AI to enhance assessment","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Melanie M. Cooper, Michael Klymkowsky","submitted_at":"2024-06-11T17:24:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Effective teaching relies on knowing what students know-or think they know. Revealing student thinking is challenging. Often used because of their ease of grading, even the best multiple choice (MC) tests, those using research based distractors (wrong answers) are intrinsically limited in the insights they provide due to two factors. When distractors do not reflect student beliefs they can be ignored, increasing the likelihood that the correct answer will be chosen by chance. Moreover, making the correct choice does not guarantee that the student understands why it is correct. To address these"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.07481","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.07481/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.07481","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863739+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.07481v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863739+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.07481","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863739+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2DEOH5TLAOQK","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863739+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6T","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863739+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2DEOH5TL","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863739+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.13381","citing_title":"How Adding Metacognitive Requirements in Support of AI Feedback in Practice Exams Transforms Student Learning Behaviors","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2DEOH5TL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2DEOH5TL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.07481&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2DEOH5TLAOQK2P6TSYKWGUQKBA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863739+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:30:25.863739+00:00"}