{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT","short_pith_number":"pith:2DI6WSTC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"d0d1eb4a6225f60cf35bca13e3c40104d8bfcc28e0839ee1e1b8b91022d68a65","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1708.07487","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The prior can generally only be understood in the context of the likelihood","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Andrew Gelman, Daniel Simpson, Michael Betancourt","submitted_at":"2017-08-24T16:47:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"A key sticking point of Bayesian analysis is the choice of prior distribution, and there is a vast literature on potential defaults including uniform priors, Jeffreys' priors, reference priors, maximum entropy priors, and weakly informative priors. These methods, however, often manifest a key conceptual tension in prior modeling: a model encoding true prior information should be chosen without reference to the model of the measurement process, but almost all common prior modeling techniques are implicitly motivated by a reference likelihood. In this paper we resolve this apparent paradox by pl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1708.07487","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2017-08-24T16:47:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"6f400c6284fa5f39d415de87bf687b4728eac1fa93144088faf5bee8baa00e42","abstract_canon_sha256":"55d5a69e8c85ce0fe5adfa2d33ae953faa1ac6cb900d5a36fd06a9b563f5b42d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:30:00.398941Z","signature_b64":"QdFUi7H1itS0PNj296w+J/6+eNtfckUlwa/XBiPdWPhwYQM9XaQD5a+COYDOTULvilnkKYWj9PrAqe+aC56aDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"d0d1eb4a6225f60cf35bca13e3c40104d8bfcc28e0839ee1e1b8b91022d68a65","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:30:00.398245Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:30:00.398245Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The prior can generally only be understood in the context of the likelihood","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Andrew Gelman, Daniel Simpson, Michael Betancourt","submitted_at":"2017-08-24T16:47:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"A key sticking point of Bayesian analysis is the choice of prior distribution, and there is a vast literature on potential defaults including uniform priors, Jeffreys' priors, reference priors, maximum entropy priors, and weakly informative priors. These methods, however, often manifest a key conceptual tension in prior modeling: a model encoding true prior information should be chosen without reference to the model of the measurement process, but almost all common prior modeling techniques are implicitly motivated by a reference likelihood. In this paper we resolve this apparent paradox by pl"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1708.07487","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1708.07487","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:30:00.398369+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1708.07487v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:30:00.398369+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1708.07487","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:30:00.398369+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"2DI6WSTCEX3A","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:55.937587+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:55.937587+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"2DI6WSTC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:55.937587+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2DI6WSTC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/2DI6WSTC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1708.07487&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/2DI6WSTCEX3AZ423ZIJ6HRABAT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:30:00.398369+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:30:00.398369+00:00"}