{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB","short_pith_number":"pith:3OJGX3KO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"db926bed4e496f526c2da75490b3a8485140fdaae91dcf31c0cd3e264f5500a8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1711.06693","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Theoretical and observational constraints on Tachyon Inflation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Gabriel German, Josue De-Santiago, Juan Carlos Hidalgo, Nandinii Barbosa-Cendejas, Refugio Rigel Mora-Luna","submitted_at":"2017-11-17T19:02:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"We constrain several models in Tachyonic Inflation derived from the large-$N$ formalism by considering theoretical aspects as well as the latest observational data. On the theoretical side, we assess the field range of our models by means of the excursion of the equivalent canonical field. On the observational side, we employ BK14+PLANCK+BAO data to perform a parameter estimation analysis as well as a Bayesian model selection to distinguish the most favoured models among all four classes here presented. We observe that the original potential $V \\propto \\textrm{sech}(T)$ is strongly disfavoured"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1711.06693","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2017-11-17T19:02:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c74fd3f0fdd56a2470af8fcca998f3241160deb63dc1fbe5aefba49f473e56bf","abstract_canon_sha256":"4af90380e9a4ce88b400f26b81c9ff208bb503ac1e798f46bde4df5968c2571e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:20:29.988787Z","signature_b64":"wK/Eq93ADlFWmmEk5oQEvwsGh3zKbf1DN8prnZcVBBq7YzwQaZDz2hHw3AhS2LPlsOKg7OukpgLhVyV8C1SYCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"db926bed4e496f526c2da75490b3a8485140fdaae91dcf31c0cd3e264f5500a8","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:20:29.988404Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:20:29.988404Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Theoretical and observational constraints on Tachyon Inflation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Gabriel German, Josue De-Santiago, Juan Carlos Hidalgo, Nandinii Barbosa-Cendejas, Refugio Rigel Mora-Luna","submitted_at":"2017-11-17T19:02:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"We constrain several models in Tachyonic Inflation derived from the large-$N$ formalism by considering theoretical aspects as well as the latest observational data. On the theoretical side, we assess the field range of our models by means of the excursion of the equivalent canonical field. On the observational side, we employ BK14+PLANCK+BAO data to perform a parameter estimation analysis as well as a Bayesian model selection to distinguish the most favoured models among all four classes here presented. We observe that the original potential $V \\propto \\textrm{sech}(T)$ is strongly disfavoured"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1711.06693","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1711.06693","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:20:29.988470+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1711.06693v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:20:29.988470+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1711.06693","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:20:29.988470+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3OJGX3KOJFXV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3OJGX3KO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:58.224056+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00195","citing_title":"Analytical calculation of the observational parameters for tachyon inflation","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3OJGX3KO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3OJGX3KO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1711.06693&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3OJGX3KOJFXVE3BNU5KJBM5IJB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:20:29.988470+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:20:29.988470+00:00"}