{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF","short_pith_number":"pith:3XDBUAMZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ddc61a0199f1366c4ab7d79f58bf42995edd166dc68966bd8b27d16ff6dd62ae","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2403.06294","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ArgMed-Agents: Explainable Clinical Decision Reasoning with LLM Disscusion via Argumentation Schemes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.MA","cs.SC"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Jianxia Chen, Liang Xiao, Shengxin Hong, Xin Zhang","submitted_at":"2024-03-10T19:47:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"There are two main barriers to using large language models (LLMs) in clinical reasoning. Firstly, while LLMs exhibit significant promise in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, their performance in complex reasoning and planning falls short of expectations. Secondly, LLMs use uninterpretable methods to make clinical decisions that are fundamentally different from the clinician's cognitive processes. This leads to user distrust. In this paper, we present a multi-agent framework called ArgMed-Agents, which aims to enable LLM-based agents to make explainable clinical decision reasoning throug"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2403.06294","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-03-10T19:47:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.MA","cs.SC"],"title_canon_sha256":"9613192fdaaf41f4ef838aff6bb45049739bafe13ca698d814d0c61e2e681d60","abstract_canon_sha256":"4cb934e9b76cf34942cca918f72374b13903ec69019f79adda2de8c4286357fb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.226030Z","signature_b64":"MwgtgN7Y1oH4ylnPgr2RZxATe/BCjN0zXmNjFJ+YMcw328eQ7VVX761PTxQkAPiEZtMhBR5Ux9/Qs5o+DbUsDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ddc61a0199f1366c4ab7d79f58bf42995edd166dc68966bd8b27d16ff6dd62ae","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225132Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225132Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ArgMed-Agents: Explainable Clinical Decision Reasoning with LLM Disscusion via Argumentation Schemes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.MA","cs.SC"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Jianxia Chen, Liang Xiao, Shengxin Hong, Xin Zhang","submitted_at":"2024-03-10T19:47:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"There are two main barriers to using large language models (LLMs) in clinical reasoning. Firstly, while LLMs exhibit significant promise in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, their performance in complex reasoning and planning falls short of expectations. Secondly, LLMs use uninterpretable methods to make clinical decisions that are fundamentally different from the clinician's cognitive processes. This leads to user distrust. In this paper, we present a multi-agent framework called ArgMed-Agents, which aims to enable LLM-based agents to make explainable clinical decision reasoning throug"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2403.06294","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2403.06294/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2403.06294","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225510+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2403.06294v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225510+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2403.06294","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225510+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"3XDBUAMZ6E3G","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225510+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225510+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"3XDBUAMZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225510+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.15748","citing_title":"Critique of Impure Reason: Unveiling the reasoning behaviour of medical Large Language Models","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3XDBUAMZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/3XDBUAMZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2403.06294&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/3XDBUAMZ6E3GYSVX26PVRP2CTF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225510+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:54:44.225510+00:00"}