{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY","short_pith_number":"pith:4VBTI6HE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"e5433478e4f4a1ebc1422257a06fdc2e00d71cdb92b07da72e524487568a8483","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1811.09820","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Wild sets in global function fields","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.NT","authors_text":"Alfred Czoga{\\l}a, Beata Rothkegel, Przemys{\\l}aw Koprowski","submitted_at":"2018-11-24T12:00:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Given a self-equivalence of a global function field, its wild set is the set of points where the self-equivalence fails to preserve parity of valuation. In this paper we describe structure of finite wild sets."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1811.09820","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.NT","submitted_at":"2018-11-24T12:00:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a3d4345fdd762b017ba57bf21aec7fa5710e11dee29cdc8e8566164b8c7275a8","abstract_canon_sha256":"c8de2bb859a08af95739268b4cc25ffcc55d7c5124a8e3cce957fd0c1a28a466"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:59.391822Z","signature_b64":"Lx2IWr7DfApU8CArD9SvpgPWXwxm0loYQ1jvH23iQy/RmYpreGzRGck3yD8jox+uZdSW1FSRBe07f1koQb6OBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"e5433478e4f4a1ebc1422257a06fdc2e00d71cdb92b07da72e524487568a8483","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:59.391457Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:59.391457Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Wild sets in global function fields","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.NT","authors_text":"Alfred Czoga{\\l}a, Beata Rothkegel, Przemys{\\l}aw Koprowski","submitted_at":"2018-11-24T12:00:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Given a self-equivalence of a global function field, its wild set is the set of points where the self-equivalence fails to preserve parity of valuation. In this paper we describe structure of finite wild sets."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1811.09820","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1811.09820","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:59.391509+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1811.09820v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:59.391509+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1811.09820","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:59.391509+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"4VBTI6HE6SQ6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:05.422762+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:05.422762+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"4VBTI6HE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:05.422762+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4VBTI6HE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/4VBTI6HE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1811.09820&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/4VBTI6HE6SQ6XQKCEJL2A364FY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:59.391509+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:59:59.391509+00:00"}